Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caicedo, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caicedo, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caicedo, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
(American Journal of Botany. 2008;95:393-398.)
© 2008 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Brief Communication

Geographic diversity cline of R gene homologs in wild populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium (Solanaceae)1

Ana L. Caicedo2

Biology Dept., 221 Morrill Science Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003 USA

Received for publication 2 May 2007. Accepted for publication 31 January 2008.

ABSTRACT

Plant resistance (R) genes tend to be highly variable within plant species and are thought to be under natural selection; however, little is known about the geographic distribution of R gene diversity within and among plant populations. To determine the possible roles of demography and selection on R gene evolution, patterns of diversity at the multigenic Cf-2 R gene family were studied in Solanum pimpinellifolium populations along the northern coast of Peru. Population diversity levels of Cf-2 homologs follow a latitudinal cline, consistent with the species's history of gradual colonization of the Peruvian coast and population variation in outcrossing levels. Although previous evidence suggests that selection has shaped the DNA sequence content of the Cf-2 genes, current results imply that the geographic distribution of Cf-2 homolog diversity has been shaped primarily by demographic factors or by selective pressures with a clinal distribution.

Key Words: Cf- 2 • diversity cline • Hcr2-pLycopersicon pimpinellifolium • Peru • R gene • Solanaceae

In plants, resistance (R) genes are responsible for the recognition of invading pathogens, leading to a defense response (reviewed in Ellis et al., 2000Go; Michelmore, 2000Go; Hulbert et al., 2001Go; Meyers et al., 2005Go). In the past decade, studies of R gene sequence variation have shown that R genes tend to be highly polymorphic within species (e.g., Caicedo et al., 1999Go; Stahl et al., 1999Go; Bergelson et al., 2001Go; Mauricio et al., 2003Go; Rose et al., 2004Go). Studies have also shown that alleles of some R genes are long-lived, suggesting that R gene variation may often be maintained by balancing selection (Bergelson et al., 2001Go); other studies have shown that frequency-dependent or transient selection may also play a role in maintaining R gene diversity (Bakker et al., 2006Go). Further evidence that R gene evolution is adaptive is given by observations of high amino acid substitution rates in leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) domains of R gene protein products (e.g., Rose et al., 2004Go); these regions are believed to be directly involved in pathogen recognition (Jones and Jones, 1997Go).

Molecular population genetic studies of R genes to date have characterized species-wide levels of R gene variation. However, little is known about geographic patterns of diversity within and among populations, primarily because within-population sampling of R genes has not often been carried out. Attempts to understand R gene evolutionary dynamics can benefit from within- and between-population sampling for several reasons. Species-wide samples can occasionally obscure the type of selection responsible for patterns of variation; for example, balancing selection detected at the species level may be due to local adaptation (Nordborg and Innan, 2003Go; Wright and Gaut, 2005). Additionally, many evolutionary models of plant–pathogen interactions, such as frequency-dependent selection and the Red-queen's hypothesis, were developed within a population-level framework (Haldane, 1949Go; Hamilton, 1980Go). It is also likely that local population processes, such as gene flow, drift, and mating system, have an impact on R gene evolution, and detecting these processes requires characterizing diversity within and between populations.

To characterize geographic patterns of R gene variation among plant populations, I studied the distribution of Cf-2 homologs in natural populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium L. [formerly Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (L.) Mill.], a wild relative of cultivated tomato. The Cf-2 locus was originally identified as comprising two paralogous genes, Cf-2.1 and Cf-2.2, both conferring resistance to strains of Cladosporium fulvum (causal agent of leaf mold) carrying an Avr2 avirulence gene (Dixon et al., 1996Go). A subsequent survey of Cf-2 variation across the species detected 26 closely related homologs (maximum of 6.42% nucleotide divergence), establishing that Cf-2.1 and Cf-2.2 are part of a multigene family (hereafter referred to as the Hcr2-p family) (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo). The occurrence of R genes in families is common and can have an impact on their evolutionary dynamics (Hulbert et al., 2001Go). The 26 Hcr2-p homologs display length variation due primarily to variation in the number of LRR-coding units within each gene and can be classified into nine different size classes according to length (Fig. 1); within size-classes, homologs differ from each other by one or a few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo) (Appendices S1, S2; see Supplemental Data with the online version of this article). Solanum pimpinellifolium individuals vary extensively in the number of Hcr2-p homologs they carry, with Southern blots results suggesting 1–5 genes per individual (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo). Although the function of Hcr2-p genes other than Cf-2.1 and Cf-2.2 is currently undemonstrated, sequence similarities suggest that most are functional R genes. Four size classes, however, contain frame-shift mutations, three of which cause loss of a membrane spanning domain (Fig. 1) (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo); given the substantial length of putative protein products of these size classes, it is possible that the truncated genes are still functional R genes or have some other functional role.


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Schematic alignment of the open reading frame (ORF) of the nine characterized Hcr2-p size classes in Solanum pimpinellifolium. Numbers in parenthesis refer to the number of different homologs found within each size class. In all Hcr2-p homologs, a single intron occurs downstream of the ORF and was not sequenced in its entirety.

 
Species-wide analyses of Hcr2-p sequence diversity suggest that selection has played a role in the evolution of the gene family. Patterns of amino acid substitution are consistent with purifying selection in the 5' LRR-coding portion of the genes and positive selection on some amino acid residues in the 3' region (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo). Evolutionary relationships among homologs also suggest that balancing selection has shaped species-wide patterns of diversity (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo). In this paper, I describe the geographic distribution of Hcr2-p diversity across a portion of S. pimpinellifolium's native range, and use patterns of population variation to gain further understanding of the evolutionary processes affecting the evolution of this R gene family in the wild.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 16 S. pimpinellifolium populations were sampled along the northern coast of Peru as described in Caicedo and Schaal (2004b)Go (Fig. 2). From 120 collected plants, 185 Hcr2-p sequences were successfully isolated and sequenced using conditions described in Caicedo and Schaal (2004a)Go. Due to PCR bias against efficient amplification of very large bands, the obtained products are a large, but likely not exhaustive, sample of Hcr2-p homolog diversity. These Hcr2-p homologs are known to be a part of a cohesive gene family because levels of divergence among them (0–6.4%) are lower than those compared the closest known paralog, Hcr2–2A (~11.5%) (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo; Dixon et al., 1996Go). Sequences were classified as corresponding to one of 26 possible homologs and one of nine possible size classes. Across individuals, homolog combinations gave rise to 40 different genotypes (Appendix S3; see Supplemental Data with the online version of this article).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Solanum pimpinellifolium sampling localities along the Peruvian coast.

 
The variation in Hcr2-p gene number among S. pimpinellifolium individuals obscures relationships of orthology and paralogy between these genes, and assumptions cannot be made about the zygosity value represented by each sequence. Because traditional population genetic descriptors of variation are not suitable for gene families, levels of diversity were assessed with alternative measures. First, the frequency of homologous genes (of which there are 26 types) was determined in each population, without regard to the distribution within individuals. For each population, an index of diversity was calculated as the probability that two randomly chosen homologs are different from each other (1 {sum}pi2, where pi is the frequency of the ith homolog in the population); this measure is referred to as the homology diversity index. Second, an index of size-class diversity was calculated as above, but considering pi as the frequency of the ith homolog size class (i.e., the nine size classes determined by the length of the LRR coding region) in each population. Although these measures seem similar to the traditional population genetics descriptor, haplotype diversity (Nei, 1987Go: eq. 8.4), they should not be interpreted as such, as the categories are not alleles. Geographic correlations between both diversity indexes and latitude were examined using a nonparameteric Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Differences in levels of diversity among geographic regions were assessed with nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Diversity indexes based on multihomolog Hcr2-p genotypes were also calculated for each population and examined in a geographic context. To determine how genotype variation is distributed among and between populations, individual genotypes were further assessed by scoring each Hcr2-p size class as presence–absence data; genotypes were thus made up of combinations of one of two possible states in nine separate categories. An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) (Excoffier et al., 1992Go) using pairwise differences between genotypes was carried out with the program Arlequin (Schneider et al., 2000Go), using 16 000 permutations. An AMOVA was not carried out on multihomolog genotypes, as homologs partition variation too finely to allow appreciable sharing of genotypes across populations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The geographic distribution of Hcr2-p variation
Populations of S. pimpinellifolium along the sampled range were found to contain many different combinations of Hcr2-p homologs and Hcr2-p size classes (Table 1). Levels of homolog diversity and size-class diversity vary greatly between populations, with homolog diversity values ranging from 0.31 to 0.87, and size-class diversity ranging from 0 to 0.76 (Table 2, Fig. 3). Hcr2-p diversity values are significantly different in southern and northern populations (Wilcoxon rank sum test: Phomolog = 0.040, Psize-class = 0.018), and tend to be higher in northern Peru (Table 2, Figs. 2, 3). Both homolog diversity and size class diversity were found to be positively and significantly correlated with population latitudinal position on a south-north axis ({rho}homolog = 0.7607, P < 0.001; {rho}size-class = 0.7703, P < 0.001), as determined by a nonparametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Geographic distribution and frequencies of Hcr2-p homologs in sampled Solanum pimpinellifolium populations.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Diversity statistics for Hcr2-p homologs in the populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium sampled.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Measures of (A) Hcr2-p homolog and (B) size class diversity in sampled Peruvian populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium. Populations are ordered south to north and population numbers correspond to those in Table 1 and Fig. 2. Population 5 was excluded due to low sample size. Error bars correspond to jackknife standard deviations.

 
Different Hcr2-p size classes code for protein products that differ in the number of LRRs. Within size classes, however, some homologs differ by synonymous substitutions and code for identical proteins (online Appendix S2; see Supplemental Data with the online version of this article). To determine if there is variation among populations for Hcr2-p proteins, I calculated Hcr2-p homolog diversity taking protein-coding variants in account (Table 2). Northern and southern populations differ significantly in protein variant diversity (Wilcoxon rank sum test: P = 0.043), and, as observed for Hcr2-p homolog and size-classes, protein variant diversity is strongly correlated with population latitudinal position ({rho} = 0.8061, P < 0.001). Taken together, these results all suggest that the diversity of Hcr2-p genes increases in northern Peruvian populations.

Hcr2-p genotype diversity also varies greatly among S. pimpinellifolium populations and tends toward higher values in the north ({rho}genotype = 0.7771, P < 0.001; Table 2); this indicates that individuals in northern Peruvian populations tend to be more heterogeneous for Hcr2-p gene content. The geographic distribution of Hcr2-p diversity was further examined with an AMOVA based on class-size genotypes within individuals. Genotype diversity is almost equally distributed between (46.76%) and within (53.24%, FST = 0.46, P < 0.0001) populations in the complete population sample. Given that several populations, display very little variation, especially in the southern portion of the sample (Table 1), the analysis was repeated for the northern and southern geographic area separately. In the seven southern populations, most of the genetic variation occurred between populations (71.17%, FST = 0.22, P < 0.0001), while in the eight northern populations, most of the variation occured within populations (77.79%, FST = 0.71, P < 0.0001). No geographic break exists between these sets of populations, but these results, coupled with the observed correlations between latitude and diversity, suggest that there is an Hcr2-p diversity cline among sampled Peruvian S. pimpinellifolium populations.

The impact of demography on Hcr2-p variation
Solanum pimpinellifolium is a self-compatible plant, but is known to vary in breeding system; previous allozyme (Rick et al., 1977Go) and noncoding DNA sequence based studies (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004bGo) have shown that populations in northern Peru have lower inbreeding coefficients and higher levels of genetic diversity. Northern Peruvian populations also tend to have larger flowers and a greater degree of stigma exsertion (Rick et al., 1977Go). This cline in levels of diversity and outcrossing is believed to be due to S. pimpinellifolium's sequential colonization of the Peruvian coast from a center of origin in northern Peru coupled with increased selfing favored in new populations (Rick, 1984; Caicedo and Schaal, 2004bGo). S. pimpinellifolium grows in river valleys found along the dry coastal lowlands of Peru, and the intervening desert regions likely limit gene flow between populations. It is thus possible that the observed geographic patterns of Hcr2-p diversity are a consequence of the demographic history and mating system variation in S. pimpinellifolium.

Hcr2-p population diversity values were compared to haplotype diversity measures based on the second intron of the vacuolar invertase gene, a neutral marker formerly shown to be affected by the demographic history of S. pimpinellifolium (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004bGo). The vacuolar invertase gene corresponds to T1V1 (Klann et al., 1992Go; Chetelat et al., 1993Go; Elliott et al., 1993Go; R. Chetelat, University of California-Davis, personal communication), which has been mapped to chromosome 3. The two mapped Cf-2 genes lie on chromosome 6 and are physically unlinked from T1V1. As observed for the Hcr2-p gene family, distribution of T1V1 genetic diversity varies according to geographical area: in the seven southernmost sampled populations, most genetic variation occurs between populations (82.88%; FST = 0.83, P < 0.001), while for the eight northernmost populations most of the variation occurs within populations (74.74%; FST = 0.25, P < 0.001) (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004bGo). Likewise, T1V1 haplotype diversity (h) increases in northern populations, and is positively correlated with latitudinal population position (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004bGo). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between T1V1 h values and Hcr2-p homolog and size-class diversity values were found to be positive and significant ({rho}(h;homolog div.) = 0.7455 P < 0.005; {rho}(h;size class div.) = 0.6063 P < 0.02). Hcr2-p diversity in S. pimpinellifolium thus follows the same geographical trend as that of an unlinked neutral marker, as well as previously studied allozymes (Rick et al., 1977Go).

The geographic diversity cline observed in Hcr2-p diversity is interesting for two reasons. First, it suggests that demographic history and local mating system may play a substantial role in of the amount and apportionment of variation for genes putatively involved in resistance to disease; this observation is unexpected, as natural selection is believed to play a crucial role in R gene evolution, and diversity patterns at R gene loci might not necessarily reflect population demographic processes. Second, it indicates that mating system may affect genetic diversity not only at single loci, but also at the level of gene families. While this may not be surprising, it should be noted that the mechanisms by which mating system affects diversity in each of these cases might be different. Increased inbreeding decreases effective population size through increased homozygosity, leading to a greater probability of loss of alleles through drift (Templeton, 2006Go); inbreeding should affect all loci (whether single-copy or in gene families) in the genome equally. Increased levels of outcrossing lead to increased heterozygosity, which in multigene families can promote unequal recombination, and the generation of diversity through the creation of new family members or multigenic haplotypes. This effect of outcrossing should be particular to multigene families. Current Hcr2-p diversity in sampled S. pimpinellifolium populations may thus have been shaped by both past sequential bottlenecks as the species spread south, as well as the local mating system.

The role of selection in Hcr2-p homolog evolution
Species-wide patterns of nucleotide diversity within the Hcr2-p family have suggested that there is selection against amino acid substitutions in the 5' LRR-coding region of the genes, while positive selection has possibly occurred on some amino acid residues at the 3' portion of the genes (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004aGo). Homolog nucleotide diversity is also significantly higher at the 5' end of the genes, suggesting either a high mutation rate or maintenance of species-wide diversity by selection. The DNA sequence of the Hcr2-p genes thus seems to be determined by various types of natural selection. The geographic distribution of various levels of Hcr2-p diversity, on the other hand, is correlated with latitude and with geographic patterns of diversity observed for neutral loci. In light of the molecular and geographical characterization of Hcr2-p diversity, it would be of interest to determine whether demography or selection has played a larger role in shaping Hcr2-p family evolution.

Although the evidence for a latitudinal cline in Hcr2-p diversity is strong, local factors may nevertheless have an effect, causing some populations to deviate from the geographic trend. Among the populations sampled, for example, population 6 (Pativilca) has very high levels of Hcr2-p diversity for its latitude (Table 2, Fig. 3). Even more striking is that the T1V1 inbreeding coefficient (FIS) of this population is 1 (Caicedo and Schaal, 2004bGo). Thus, in population 6 there is no correlation between diversity at a neutral locus and Hcr2-p diversity, suggesting that local factors such as selection may be playing a role.

The best candidate for a selective agent on Hcr2-p homologs in the wild is C. fulvum, the fungus involved in the resistance response mediated by the Cf-2.1 and Cf-2.2 genes. Interestingly, in the sampled populations, one of the most common and widely distributed size classes is the one containing Cf-2.1 and Cf-2.2, which was observed in eight of the populations across the sampled range (Table 1). However, two other widely distributed size classes are Hcr2-p7 (nine populations) and Hcr2-p8 (10 populations, Table 1), which code for truncated proteins and may be pseudogenes (Fig. 1). Surprisingly, two populations (Roma (1) and Cocachacra (3)) contained only Hcr2-p7 and -p8 genes. Additionally, if all genes coding for proteins lacking a transmembrane domain (Hcr2-p6, -p7, -p8) are ignored, an additional four populations, all from the northern half of the sampled range, display no homolog diversity (Tables 1, 2). Thus, the cline in diversity is only evident if putatively functional and nonfunctional genes are considered ({rho}putative functional = 0.1367 P = 0.328). It should be noted that it is possible that Hcr2-p6, -p7, -p8 may still perform some function, as their predicted protein products range from 282 to 487 amino acids in length. However, if these genes are indeed nonfunctional, their wide geographic range and maintenance at high frequency levels in some populations, could suggest that demographic factors have played an important role in the distribution of Hcr2-p geographic variation.

Regardless of the exact role of each Hcr2-p gene, C. fulvum seems to have played a role in the evolution of wild tomatoes. Members of the tomato clade are the only known hosts of C. fulvum (Bond, 1938Go). Sources of C. fulvum resistance have been identified in many wild tomato species (Kerr and Bailey, 1964Go), and various Cf-type genes with demonstrated resistance function have been cloned from at least three species (Jones et al., 1994Go; Dixon et al., 1996Go, 1998Go; Thomas et al., 1997Go). Additionally, (Van der Hoorn et al., 2001Go) have found widespread recognition of a C. fulvum avirulence protein, Avr9, in accessions from S. pimpinellifolium's geographic range. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that C. fulvum acts as a source of selective pressure on S. pimpinellifolium.

Unfortunately, little is known of the origin of C. fulvum and its behavior in natural populations. Most knowledge of the pathogen comes from observations of greenhouse tomatoes, and it has only rarely been reported in cultivated fields (Alexander, 1934Go; Esquinas-Alcazar, 1981Go; Joosten and de Wit, 1999Go). Because the tomato clade has a South American origin, C. fulvum is assumed to originate in South America (Joosten and de Wit, 1999Go). However, no studies of the pathogen have been carried out in its presumed native range. Interestingly, S. pimpinellifolium thrives in drier conditions than would be expected to favor C. fulvum infection and sporulation (Langford, 1937Go). Attempts to infect S. lycopersicum (cultivated tomato) control plants in the laboratory were only successful at humidity levels higher than those observed in collection localities (personal observation). Repeated attempted evaluation of Hcr2-p gene function in S. pimpinellifolium accessions with C. fulvum race 5, 9 (carrying the Avr 2 avirulence gene) in the laboratory have been unsuccessful, possibly due to lack of isogenic fungal strains, leading to S. pimpinellifolium recognition of uncharacterized avirulence factors in the pathogen (personal observation). Thus, many questions still remain about C. fulvum's action as a selective agent in the wild.

Based on the available data, three possibilities regarding the role of C. fulvum in the evolution and geographic distribution of Hcr2-p diversity come to mind. It is possible that molecular variation at the Hcr2-p genes has been shaped by past selection preceding speciation. In this case, the geographic distribution of Hcr2-p genes in S. pimpinellifolium would be due entirely to demographic processes and would reflect lack of current selection on these genes. Lack of current selection might also explain the high frequency of possible pseudogenes in the Hcr2-p family. A second possibility is that under periodic climatic conditions C. fulvum can sporadically attack S. pimpinellifolium, and thus maintain Cf-2 homolog variation; if selection is irregular or not very strong, demographic factors may be dominant in shaping the geographic distribution of diversity, although the DNA sequence of the genes may be shaped by selection. A last possibility is that selection pressure on Hcr2-p function (whether it is resistance against C. fulvum, resistance to other pathogens, or an unknown function) has itself a clinal distribution; under this scenario, geographic diversity patterns could in fact be due to selection, and selection could be contributing to population variation in outcrossing. The future integration of field pathogen studies with R gene population studies should help shed further light on the various forces shaping the evolution of R genes in the wild.

FOOTNOTES

1 The author thanks P. Kover, K. Mather, R. Moore, K. Olsen, and A. Porter for useful comments on this manuscript. This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant DEB-0073082. Back

2 E-mail: caicedo{at}bio.umass.edu Back

LITERATURE CITED

Alexander, L. J. 1934. Leaf mold resistance in tomato. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Wooster, Ohio, USA.

Bakker, E. G., C. Toomajian, M. Kreitman, AND J. Bergelson. 2006. A genome-wide survey of R gene polymorphisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18: 1803–1818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bergelson, J., M. Kreitman, E. A. Stahl, AND D. Tian. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of R-genes. Science 292: 2281–2285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bond, T. E. T. 1938. Infection experiments with Cladosporium fulvum Cooke and related species. Annals of Applied Biology 25: 277–307.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Caicedo, A. L., AND B. A. Schaal. 2004a. Heterogeneous evolutionary processes affect R gene diversity in natural populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 17444–17449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Caicedo, A. L., AND B. A. Schaal. 2004b. Population structure and phylogeography of Solanum pimpinellifolium inferred from a nuclear gene. Molecular Ecology 13: 1871–1882.[CrossRef][Medline]

Caicedo, A. L., B. A. Schaal, AND B. N. Kunkel. 1999. Diversity and molecular evolution of the RPS2 resistance gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 302–306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chetelat, R. T., E. Klann, J. W. DeVerna, S. Yelle, AND A. B. Bennett. 1993. Inheritance and genetic mapping of fruit sucrose accumulation in Lycopersicon chmielewskii. Plant Journal 4: 643–650.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Dixon, M. S., K. Hatzixanthis, D. A. Jones, K. Harrison, AND J. D. G. Jones. 1998. The tomato Cf-5 disease resistance gene and six homologs show pronounced allelic variation in leucine-rich repeat copy number. Plant Cell 10: 1915–1925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dixon, M. S., D. A. Jones, J. S. Keddie, C. M. Thomas, K. Harrison, AND J. D. G. Jones. 1996. The tomato Cf-2 disease resistance locus comprises two functional genes encoding leucine-rich repeat proteins. Cell 84: 451–459.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Elliott, K. J., W. O. Butler, C. D. Dickinson, Y. Konno, T. S. Vedvick, L. Fitzmaurice, AND T. E. Mirkov. 1993. Isolation and characterization of fruit vacuolar invertase genes from 2 tomato species and temporal differences in mRNA levels during fruit ripening. Plant Molecular Biology 21: 515–524.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ellis, J., P. Dodds, AND T. Pryor. 2000. Structure, function and evolution of plant disease resistance genes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 278–284.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Esquinas-Alcazar, J. T. 1981. Genetic resources of tomatoes and wild relatives. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.

Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse, AND J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haploytpes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479–491.[Abstract]

Haldane, J. B. S. 1949. Disease and evolution. La Ricerca Scientifica 19 ( Supplement): 68–79.

Hamilton, W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35: 282–290.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Hulbert, S. H., C. A. Webb, S. M. Smith, AND Q. Sun. 2001. Resistance gene complexes: Evolution and utilization. Annual Review of Phytopathology 39: 285–312.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jones, D. A., AND J. D. G. Jones. 1997. The role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in plant defences. Advances in Botanical Research 24: 89–167.[CrossRef]

Jones, D. A., C. M. Thomas, K. E. Hammond-Kosack, P. J. Balint-Kurti, AND J. D. G. Jones. 1994. Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science 266: 789–793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Joosten, M., AND P. de Wit. 1999. The tomato–Cladosporium fulvum interaction: A versatile experimental system to study plant–pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 37: 335–367.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kerr, E. A., AND D. L. Bailey. 1964. Resistance to Cladosporium fulvum Cke. obtained from wild species of tomato. Canadian Journal of Botany 42: 1541–1554.[CrossRef]

Klann, E., S. Yelle, AND A. B. Bennett. 1992. Tomato acid invertase complementary DNA. Plant Physiology 99: 351–353.[Free Full Text]

Langford, A. N. 1937. The parasitism of Cladosporium fulvum Cooke and the genetics of resistance to it. The Canadian Journal of Research 15: 108–128.

Mauricio, R., E. A. Stahl, T. Korves, D. C. Tian, M. Kreitman, AND J. Bergelson. 2003. Natural selection for polymorphism in the disease resistance gene Rps2 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 163: 735–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meyers, B. C., S. Kaushik, AND R. S. Nandety. 2005. Evolving disease resistance genes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 129–134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Michelmore, R. 2000. Genomic approaches to plant disease resistance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 125–131.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.

Nordborg, M., AND H. Innan. 2003. The genealogy of sequences containing multiple sites subject to strong selection in a subdivided population. Genetics 163: 1201–1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rick, C. M. 1983. Evolution of mating systems: Evidence from allozyme variation. In V. L. Chapra, B. C. Joshi, R. P. Sharma, and H. C. Bansal [eds.], Genetics: New frontiers (Proceedings of VX International Congress of Genetics), vol. 4, 215–221. Bowker, Epping, Essex, UK.

Rick, C. M., J. F. Fobes, AND M. Holle. 1977. Genetic variation in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems. Plant Systematics and Evolution 127: 139–170.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Rose, L. E., P. D. Bittner-Eddy, C. H. Langley, E. B. Holub, R. W. Michelmore, AND J. L. Beynon. 2004. The maintenance of extreme amino acid diversity at the disease resistance gene, RPP13, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 166: 1517–1527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schneider, S., D. Roessli, AND L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin, version 2. 000: a software for population genetic analysis, Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva.

Stahl, E. A., G. Dwyer, R. Mauricio, M. Kreitman, AND J. Bergelson. 1999. Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis. Nature 400: 667–671.[CrossRef][Medline]

Templeton, A. R. 2006. Population genetics and microevolutionary theory. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

Thomas, C. M., D. A. Jones, M. Parniske, K. Harrison, P. J. Balint-Kurti, K. Hatzixanthis, AND J. D. G. Jones. 1997. Characterization of the tomato Cf-4 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum identifies sequences that determine recognitional specificity in Cf-4 and Cf-9. Plant Cell 9: 2209–2224.[Abstract]

Van der Hoorn, R. A. L., M. Kruijt, R. Roth, B. F. Brandwagt, M. Joosten, AND P. De Wit. 2001. Intragenic recombination generated two distinct Cf genes that mediate AVR9 recognition in the natural population of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 10493–10498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wright, S. I., AND B. S. Gaut. 2004. Molecular population genetics and the search for adaptive evolution in plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 506–519.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caicedo, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caicedo, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caicedo, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS