| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
What's this? |
Population Biology |
University of Massachusetts Boston, Department of Biology, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 USA
Received for publication September 22, 2006. Accepted for publication April 17, 2007.
ABSTRACT
Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed, Polygonaceae) is a well-known East Asian perennial that is established throughout the U.S. and Europe. Another congener, F. sachalinensis, and their hybrid, F. xbohemica, also persist on both continents. Their invasive success is primarily attributed to their ability to spread via clonal growth. However, mounting evidence suggests invasion history and dynamics differ between continents and that sexual reproduction is more common than previously assumed. We used published morphological traits designed to distinguish the three taxa to characterize their distribution in 24 New England towns. We found continuous variation of all five traits, with 84% of our 81 individuals having at least one trait outside parental limits. Hierarchical cluster analysis, along with two chloroplast and one nuclear species-specific markers, suggests the presence of intercrossing, segregating hybrids, and likely introgression between F1 hybrids and F. japonica. Our markers also show the first evidence of bidirectional hybridization between parental taxa in the U.S., emphasizing the complex structure of populations in our region. This study is a first step toward unraveling the evolutionary forces that have made these taxa such aggressive invaders in the U.S. The data may also affect management strategies originally designed for largely monomorphic, clonal populations.
Key Words: introgression • invasive species • Japanese knotweed • Polygonaceae • SNP • SSR • United States
For researchers interested in witnessing "evolution in action," the dynamic nature of invasive species makes them ideal targets for experimental studies, but understanding invasive species dynamics and managing these species are major challenges (Mooney and Hobbs, 2000
). Many correlates and mechanisms of plant invasions have been proposed, debated, and reviewed (Sher and Hyatt, 1999
; Davis et al., 2000
; Ellstrand and Schierenbeck, 2000
; Mack, et al., 2000
; Rejmánek, 2000
; Keane and Crawley, 2002
; Lee, 2002
; Shea and Chesson, 2002
; Levine et al., 2003
; Colautti, 2004
), yet the search for universal principles for predicting invasions has been complicated and at times contradictory (Scott and Panetta, 1993; Reichard and Hamilton, 1997
; Londsdale, 1999
; Kolar and Lodge, 2001
; Muth, 2006
). Hybridization, however, may be a key factor involved in the evolution of many invasive species. By introducing new genetic diversity, hybridization can rescue populations from bottleneck or drift-related problems. Hybridization and subsequent segregation can generate new recombinants that can be tested by natural selection (Ellstrand and Schierenbeck, 2000
). Hybrid differences in growth rates, phenology, herbivory, or pathogen defense, for example, could contribute to establishment (Vila et al., 2000
). Also, for perennial taxa, particularly those with extensive asexual reproduction, hybrids can be retained and vigorous genotypes can spread to fixation in populations. Finally, hybridization can conceivably produce very different invasion dynamics depending on the founding taxa and genotypes.
Although the perennial Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Dcne. (Polygonum cuspidatum, Reynoutria japonica, Japanese knotweed) and F. sachalinensis (F. Schmidt & Maxim) Dcne. (P. sachalinese, R. sachalinensis, giant knotweed) are not new to invasion biology, their invasion dynamics are complex and not well understood. Both East Asian taxa were introduced into Europe and New England by the 19th century. The herbaceous F. japonica is a prolific invader of riparian and disturbed habitats throughout Canada, the U.S., and Europe, where it forms dense stands of bamboo-like ramets that crowd out native species (Wade and Child, 2001
). Fallopia sachalinensis is found in similar habitats in Europe and the U.S. but is assumed to be less of a threat because of its lower frequency (Hollingsworth et al., 1998
; Dukopp and Starfinger, 1995
; Mandak et al., 2004
). In New England, for example, only 31 F. sachalinensis herbarium specimens have been recorded in the Invasive Plant Atlas of New England database (Mehrhoff et al., 2003
), with only 13 of these in Massachusetts. The two species, F. japonica and F. sachalinensis, are known to hybridize, producing Fallopia xbohemica (Chrtek & Chrtkova) J. Bailey (Polygonum xbohemicum, Reynoutria xbohemica). While it has been argued that the F. japonica in Europe is one massive clone (Hollingsworth et al., 1998
), genetic diversity has been detected in both F. sachalinensis and F. xbohemica populations (Hollingsworth et al., 1998
; Mandak et al., 2003
; Pysek et al., 2003
). This diversity may contribute to the rapidly expanding distribution of F. xbohemica in some regions of Europe (Mandak et al., 2004
). While no comparable study has been done in the U.S., the PLANTS database (USDA, 2007
) shows that the parent species are sympatric in 28 states.
The composition, structure, and invasion dynamics of knotweed populations in the U.S. and Europe appear to differ. Remarkably, no male fertile F. japonica plants have been found in Europe, suggesting that sexual reproduction occurs only between congeneric taxa (Bailey and Stace, 1992
; Hollingsworth and Bailey, 2000
). The low genetic diversity, low viability of hybrid seeds, rarity of seedlings, and impressive rhizomatous growth point to asexual reproduction as the primary mechanism of dispersal in Europe (Bailey, 1994
; Hollingsworth et al., 1998
; Pysek et al., 2003
). However, there is no evidence that F. japonica in the U.S. is solely clonal; in fact recent work has detected genetic diversity (Grimsby et al., 2007
). The taxa are subdioecious, and populations are almost always composed of both male and female individuals. Some males set small amounts of viable seed while others do not (Forman and Kesseli, 2003
; personal observations). Recent work has found high rates of field and greenhouse germination in both parental and various hybrid crosses (Forman and Kesseli, 2003
; Bram and McNair, 2004
). Finally, morphological criteria that distinguish F. xbohemica from F. japonica in Europe are not as robust in the U.S. (Forman, 2003
). Fallopia xbohemica has been reported to have several morphological characteristics that are intermediate to either parent species and distinguish these taxa in Europe (Bailey et al., 1995
). In 2003, some of these criteria were modified for North America using herbarium and field specimens (Zika and Jacobson, 2003
).
Here we examine and quantify the extent of introgression in the U.S. through morphology-based cluster analysis and molecular markers. We argue that existing differences between continents may reflect greater genetic diversity and extensive sexual reproduction within U.S. populations. The potential genetic diversity within these complex swarms should be considered in any management strategy.
With the heightened interest in biological control for these species in the U.S. (Shaw and Sieger, 2002
), knowledge of the role of inter- and intraspecific sexual reproduction and hybridization may be critical, and the effectiveness of such control efforts may depend upon genotype-specific interactions (Nissen et al., 1995
).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphological markers
Bailey et al. (1995)
noted that hybrids can be distinguished from parentals based on their intermediate leaf and stand size; a slightly cordate leaf base; slightly acuminate apex or tip; intermediate subaxial trichome length, shape, and density; and in most cases, intermediate ploidy values. Zika and Jacobson (2003)
considered leaf and trichome size to be reliable indicators in North America, but rejected leaf base shape and tip morphology. They also described a new diagnostic trait; panicle lengths in F. xbohemica and F. sachalinensis are shorter than subtending leaves. We used these guidelines to examine New England populations.
In 2003 and 2004 we surveyed vegetative and reproductive morphological traits for 81 individuals in 24 towns in CT, MA, ME, RI, and VT. Populations were chosen to include the diversity present in New England with some patches resembling F. sachalinensis or F. japonica and others that would likely be defined as hybrids. To control for developmental effects on morphology, only plants that were greater than 1.5-m tall were included. Three fully mature, mid-branch leaves and floral branches were collected from each plant. We scored leaf length and width as overall indicators of size on the collected leaves. Trichome morphology was scored with 20x magnification and was grouped into five classes representing trichome height (Fig. 1A). Bailey et al. (1995)
and Zika and Jacobson's (2003) descriptions of parental morphology were used to help rank these classes. The glabrous to tuburculate surfaces of F. japonica were considered equivalent to one another and were given the same value of one for the cluster analysis. A subset of samples was used to measure trichome cell number to define categories. The number of cells per trichome ranged from one to five in category 4, and eight or greater in category 5. We measured panicle and subtending leaf lengths during or after peak flowering. Sex was scored when possible. Tip morphology was also ranked from F. japonica to F. sachalinensis typical morphology, representing estimates of parental expression for this trait (Fig. 1B). Seven leaf base shapes were found in our populations and were given ordinal values based on published observations of parental morphology (Bailey et al., 1995
). The angle where the leaf base joins the petiole, as in Kim and Park (2000)
, was used as a measure of parental expression (Fig. 1C). Described F. japonica bases all attach at an angle 
0, and were treated as equivalent in the cluster analysis. The remaining morphologies were ranked in order of the decreasing angle of attachment and were assigned values accordingly. Leaf tip morphology and leaf base shape were examined for all mature leaves for each plant. After observations were completed, we gave each sample a tentative species identifier, F. sachalinensis, F. xbohemica, or F. japonica, based on published criteria (Table 1). When possible, North American limits were used. Individuals that did not satisfy all traits for either parental were labeled as F. xbohemica. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on z-score transformed morphological traits using SPSS 14.0.1 (Chicago, Illinois, USA), with the Euclidean distance measure and UPGMA (between-groups linkage) clustering method selected. Leaf width was excluded because it was correlated to length and was as diagnostic as length. Elongated leaves in hybrids and F. sachalinensis are commonly cited anecdotally, and length : width values have been reported in Europe (Bailey et al., 1995
). We examined this ratio in our populations to test for elongated leaves and possible differences in values between continents.
|
|
, primers a and b, AT = 50, 
600 bp) had four species-specific polymorphisms. One SNP is located within the 5' GGCC3' recognition sequence of several restriction enzymes that are unique cutters for this sequence. All F. japonica samples had 5' GACC3' at this site and were not cut by the chosen enzyme, HaeIII The second locus, rbcL-1_atpB-1 (Chiang et al., 1998
, AT = 49, 900 bp), contained four base-substitution SNPs, one single-base pair indel, and one eight-base pair indel. The SNP targeted for restriction digest was cut by the enzyme HpyCH4III in all F. japonica individuals (5' ACTGT3' vs. 5' ACTGG3' in F. sachalinensis). For both loci, 10 µL of PCR product was digested with 2.5 units of enzyme for 1 h at 37°C. Results were visualized on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Once the protocol was established, PCR was performed on 70 of 81 individuals. Fallopia japonica and F. sachalinensis GenBank accession numbers are EF017663 and EF017664 for the TrnL(UGU)_TrnT(UAA) locus, and EF017665 and EF017666 for the rbcL-1_atpB-1 locus.
The nuclear, simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker, KW6, was discovered in a concurrent study (Grimsby et al., 2007
). KW6 is a potentially diagnostic F. sachalinensis-specific marker. Upon PCR amplification of a subset of samples, this marker only amplified DNA from plants that were previously identified morphologically as F. xbohemica or F. sachalinensis. Fallopia japonica individuals produced no visible amplification product. It was suspected that a sequence variation that distinguished F. japonica from either hybrid or F. sachalinensis is located on the reverse primer site because a test PCR using the same forward primer and a new reverse primer resulted in amplification of all samples, not just F. xbohemica and F. sachalinensis. The cloned fragment did not contain any additional downstream sequence for primer design that would allow for an examination of this variation. Accessions of each taxon were screened for amplification of this locus under the same PCR conditions as in Grimsby et al. (2007)
. All PCRs were carried out at least twice for verification. The presence of F. sachalinensis chloroplast and nuclear markers were superimposed on the cluster analysis.
RESULTS
All of our traits had continuous variation, and diverse combinations could be found in different individuals (Figs. 1 and 2). Multiple morphologies were detected within individuals for the trichome and leaf base traits, though these had limited ranges within individuals and still appeared to be useful traits. In general, the range in variation for each trait was greater than has been reported in European accessions. For example, Bailey et al. (1995)
reported leaf length : width ratios of 1.0–1.5 for F. japonica, 1.1–1.8 for F. xbohemica, and 1.5 for F. sachalinensis. The values for this trait among our collections ranged from 0.78 to 2.43 and, when assigned to taxonomic categories based on the characters used in our cluster analysis, taxa had a greater overlap in range; values of 0.84–1.46 for F. japonica, 0.78–2.43 for F. xbohemica, and 1.20–1.44 for F. sachalinensis.
|
; Bailey, 1997
). The deepest branch distinguishes a predominant F. sachalinensis cluster (Group II) from all other individuals. Most individuals (10 of 11) that fit all criteria for F. japonica were all embedded within Group IA-1. A failure to meet the criterion for the panicle trait is largely responsible for the clustering of F. xbohemica into Group IA-1 and II. For example, if the panicle trait was excluded from the criteria for taxonomic identification, Group IA-1 would then contain three more F. japonica individuals, with only two individuals of the cluster (nos. 96 and 97) still violating established F. japonica criteria because of trichome morphology. Similarly, no. 172 in Group II would be reclassified as F. sachalinensis, creating a F. sachalinensis specific cluster. This individual was part of a young and small (1.7 m tall) stand, suggesting that age or habitat in addition to taxon may influence relative panicle size.
|
|
|
|
DISCUSSION
Post-invasion adaptation has been suggested and demonstrated in several plant species (Siemann and Rogers, 2001; Lee, 2002
; Maron et al., 2004
). Interspecific hybridization may often be responsible for this adaptation (Ellstrand and Schierenbeck, 2000
; Bleeker, 2003
). Our study shows that the range in variation for traits thought to be diagnostic for species identification in Fallopia is high in U.S. populations and that individuals often possess combinations of traits that preclude their characterization as either F. sachalinensis or F. japonica. Multiple introductions from Asia could contribute to this high level of morphological and genetic variation in the U.S., which has not been found in European studies (Bailey et al., 1995
; Hollingsworth and Bailey, 2000
; Mandak, et al., 2005
). The analyses here, however, suggest that repeated hybridization and introgression are also likely and may be responsible for taxonomic ambiguities in the genus. For example, our F. sachalinensis-specific SSR marker is not always concordant with morphology-based taxon assignment, suggesting backcrossing or intermating among hybrids and segregation. This is not surprising, because both male and female individuals of F. japonica (Group IA-1), F. xbohemica (Groups IB-1 and IB-2), and F. sachalinensis (Group II) are present in local populations, and such diversity would generate many more sexual combinations than may be possible in European populations. We have seen that both males and females of F. xbohemica are fertile in the wild (M. Gammon, data not shown). There are indications from several studies that European populations may also have accessions that are backcrosses or later generation hybrids. Specifically, Hollingsworth et al. (1998)
found five different hybrid genotypes yet only two of F. sachalinensis and one of F. japonica. Similarly, Pysek et al. (2003)
identified nine hybrid genotypes but only five for F. sachalinensis and one for F. japonica. Both groups note that these novel hybrid genotypes could be caused by backcrossing to parents or by intercrossing among hybrids and subsequent segregation.
The F. sachalinensis-specific chloroplast haplotypes were detected in only one individual outside of the distinct Group II cluster, indicating that most hybridization events have involved F. japonica as the maternal parent. However, one likely hybrid individual (no. 174) had F. sachalinensis chloroplast and nuclear genotypes. Because chloroplasts are maternally inherited in these taxa (Hollingsworth et al., 1998
), this is evidence of past F. sachalinensis maternity in this individual. While this kind of cross has not previously been documented in the U.S., four morphologically hybrid individuals collected for a different study and currently growing in our greenhouse also show this genetic pattern. One of these individuals, a Canadian female, has a ploidy estimate of 2n = 66, typical of F. xbohemica and suggesting the product of a F. sachalinensis x F. japonica var. japonica cross and further supporting its hybrid nature (data not shown). At collection, the no. 174 hybrid female was 3 m tall, and all its leaves were mildly to deeply cordate with acute or obtuse tips. It was found at a site on Nantucket, Massachusetts, USA, in a population with F. sachalinensis, F. japonica, and F. xbohemica individuals.
Because New England has a more extensive history with the Old World than any other region of the U.S., it is a logical place to explore differences in species introductions and subsequent adaptations. We have shown morphological and molecular evidence that Japanese and giant knotweed have hybridized and produced complex swarms that appear to include backcrossed and later-generation hybrids. Continuous variation and character segregation patterns appear to make morphological criteria that distinguish F. xbohemica and F. japonica in Europe and possibly other parts of North America unreliable in New England. Even the cluster most representative of a parental F. japonica group (Group IA-1) has individuals that appear to carry some F. sachalinensis traits; three of 15 appear to be outside the appropriate range for the panicle trait (nos. 74, 89, 217), two of 15 appear outside the range for both panicle and trichome traits (nos. 96, 97), and two of the 10 scored carry a copy of the F. sachalinensis nuclear marker (nos. 17, 169). In total, 25 of 70 individuals have taxonomic labels that do not concur with genetic markers. The degree to which these ambiguities indicate a broader range of trait variation in F. japonica than originally believed, or extensive introgression of F. sachalinensis into the F. japonica gene pool, remains uncertain. However, the range and segregation of morphologies within sites, along with the recent detection of genetic diversity in New England (Grimsby et al., 2007
) do not support the hypothesis that plasticity is responsible for the range of traits shown here.
Hybridization and extensive introgression into F. japonica seem evident and are likely potent forces generating the diversity and invasiveness seen in New England. While the perennial habit and capability for clonal growth are unquestionably major factors promoting the spread of these taxa, previous data showed that seeds are viable and seedlings establish in nature (Forman and Kesseli, 2003
; Bram and McNair, 2004) and that stands are composed of multiple genotypes (Grimsby et al., 2007
). The current study shows that interspecific hybridization and introgression are likely common occurrences. Together these studies demonstrate that sexual reproduction is important in these taxa, both for dispersal and for generating diversity. This reality highlights the need for a local as well as global approach when studying the spread and evolution of invasive species. For example, control of the often overlooked F. sachalinensis may aid in the prevention of further hybridization. In addition, as complete removal of vast stands is often impossible for management, the prevention of flowering or removal of seeds should be considered. Finally, biological control programs that may be successful in Europe may not yield equivalent control of U.S. swarms.
FOOTNOTES
1 The authors thank J. Forman Orth for her continued work and support on this project; C. Comeau Beaton, K. Lombard, and T. Zona for help with accessions; and J. Allen, L. Gammon, and C. Kalkwarf for greenhouse and field assistance. 
2 Author for correspondence (e-mail: melinda.gammon{at}umb.edu
)
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey J. P.. 1994. Reproductive biology and fertility of Fallopia japonica (Japanese Knotweed) and its hybrids on the British Isles. In L. C. de Waal, L. E. Child, P. M. Wade [eds.] Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants, 141-158. Wiley, New York, New York, USA..
Bailey J. P.. 1997. The Japanese knotweed invasion in Europe; the potential for further evolution in non-native regions. In E. Yano, K. Matsuo, M. Shiyomi, D. A. Andow [eds.] Biological invasions of ecosystems by pests and beneficial organisms, series 3, 27-37. NIAES, Tsukuba, Japan..
Bailey J. P. Child L. E. Conolly A. P.. 1996. A survey of the distribution of Fallopia xbohemica (Chrtek & Chrtkova) J. Bailey (Polygonaceae) in the British Isles. Watsonia 21: 187-198..
Bailey J. P. Child L. E. Wade M.. 1995. Assessment of the genetic variation and spread of British populations of Fallopia japonica and its hybrid Fallopia xbohemica. In P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, M. Wade [eds.] Plant invasions—general aspects and special problems, 141-150. SPB, Amsterdam, Netherlands..
Bailey J. P. Conolly A. P.. 2000. Prize-winners to pariahs—a history of Japanese knotweed s.l. (Polygonaceae) in the British Isles. Watsonia 23: 93-110..
Bailey J. P. Stace C. A.. 1992. Chromosome number, morphology, pairing, and DNA values of species and hybrids in the genus Fallopia (Polygonaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 180: 29-52..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Bleeker W.. 2003. Hybridization and Rorippa austriaca (Brassiaceae) invasion in Germany. Molecular Ecology 12: 1831-1841..[CrossRef][Medline]
Bram M. R. Mcnair J. N.. 2004. Seed germinability and its seasonal onset of Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum). Weed Science 52: 759-767..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Chiang T. Y. Schaal B. A. Peng C. I.. 1998. Universal primers for amplification and sequencing a noncoding spacer between the atpB and rbcL genes of chloroplast DNA. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 39: 245-250..[Web of Science]
Colautti R. I. Ricciardi A. Grigorovich I. A. Macisaac H. J.. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis?. Ecology Letters 7: 721-733..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Davis M. A. Grime J. P. Thompson K.. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528-534..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Dukopp H. Starfinger U.. 1995. Reynoutria sachalinensis in Europe and in the Far East: a comparison of the species ecology in its native and adventive distribution range. In P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, M. Wade [eds.] Plant invasions, 151-159. SPB, Amsterdam, Netherlands..
Ellstrand N. C. Schierenbeck K. A.. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 7043-7050..
Forman J.. 2003. Of knotweeds and other weeds: invasive plants at home and abroad. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA..
Forman J. Kesseli R. V.. 2003. Sexual reproduction in the invasive species Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 586-592..
Grimsby J. Tsirelson D. Gammon M. Kesseli R.. 2007. Genetic diversity and clonal versus sexual reproduction in Fallopia spp. (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 957-964..
Hollingsworth M. L. Bailey J. P.. 2000. Evidence for massive clonal growth in the invasive weed Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 463-472..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hollingsworth M. L. Hollingsworth P. M. Jenkins G. I. Bailey J. P. Ferris C.. 1998. The use of molecular markers to study patterns of genotypic diversity in some invasive alien Fallopia spp. (Polygonaceae). Molecular Ecology 7: 1681-1691..[CrossRef]
Inamura A. Ohashi Y. Sato E. Yoda Y. Masuzawa T. Ito M. Yoshinaga K.. 2000. Intraspecific sequence variation of chloroplast DNA reflecting variety and geographical distribution of Polygonum cuspidatum (Polygonaceae) in Japan. Journal of Plant Research 113: 419-426..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Keane R. M. Crawley M. J.. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 164-169..[CrossRef]
Kim J. Y. Park C. W.. 2000. Morphological and chromosomal variation in Fallopia section Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) in Korea. Brittonia 52: 34-48..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kolar C. S. Lodge D. M.. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 199-204..[CrossRef]
Lee C. E.. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 386-391..[CrossRef]
Levine J. M. Vilá M. D'antonio C. M. Dukes J. S. Grigulis K. Lavorel S.. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 270: 775-781..
Londsdale W. M.. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522-1536..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Mack R. N. Simberloff D. Lonsdale W. M. Evans H. Clout M. Bazzaz F. A.. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689-710..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Mandak B. Bimova K. Pysek P. Stepanek J. Plackova I.. 2005. Isozyme diversity in Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) taxa: escape from sterility by hybridization. Plant Systematics and Evolution 253: 219-230..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Mandak B. Pysek P. Bimova K.. 2004. History of the invasion and distribution of Reynoutria taxa in the Czech Republic: a hybrid spreading faster than its parents. Preslia 76: 15-64..[Web of Science]
Mandak B. Pysek P. Lysak M. Suda J. Krahulcova A. Bimova K.. 2003. Variation in DNA-ploidy levels of Reynoutria taxa in the Czech Republic. Annals of Botany 92: 265-272..
Maron J. L. Vila M. Bommarco R. Elmendorf S. Beardsley P.. 2004. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecological Monographs 74: 261-280..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Mehrhoff L. J. Silander J. A. Jr. Leicht S. A. Mosher E. S. Tabak N. M.. 2003. IPANE: invasive plant atlas of New England. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Website http://nbii-nin.ciesin.columbia.edu/ipane/index.htm [accessed 22 September 2006]..
Mooney H. A. Hobbs R. J. [eds.]. 2000. Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA..
Muth N. Z. Pigliucci M.. 2006. Traits of invasives reconsidered: phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasive and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related clades. American Journal of Botany 93: 188-196..
Nissen S. J. Masters R. A. Lee D. J. Rowe M.. 1995. DNA-based marker systems to determine genetic diversity of weedy species and their application to biocontrol. Weed Science 43: 504-513..[Web of Science]
Pysek P. Brock J. H. Bímová K. Mandák B. Jarosík V. Koukolíková I. Pergl J. Stepánek J.. 2003. Vegetative regeneration in invasive Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) taxa: the determinant of invasibility at the genotype level. American Journal of Botany 90: 1487-1495..
Reichard S. H. Hamilton C. W.. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11: 193-203..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Rejmánek M.. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25: 497-506..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Shaw R. H. Seiger L. A.. 2002. Japanese knotweed. In R. Van Driesche, S. Lyon, B. Blossey, M. Hoddle, R. Reardon [eds.] Biological control of invasive plants in the eastern United States, 413-418. USDA Forest Service, Publication FHTET-. 2002–04. Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.invasive.org/eastern/biocontrol/..
Shea K. Chesson P.. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 170-176..[CrossRef]
Sher A. A. Hyatt L. A.. 1999. The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biological Invasions 1: 107-114..[CrossRef]
Siemann E. Rogers W. E.. 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecology Letters 4: 514-518..[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Taberlet P. Gielly L. Patou G. Bouvet J.. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109..[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Toonen R.. 1997. Microsatellites for ecologists: non-radioactive isolation and amplification protocols for microsatellite markers. Website http://biogeek.ucdavis.edu/Mstats/ [accessed May 2004]..
USDA, NRCS.. 2007. The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. Website http://http:/plants.usda.gov [accessed 3 January 2007]..
Vila M. Weber E. D'Antonio C. M.. 2000. Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biological Invasions 2: 207-217..[CrossRef]
Wade M. Child L. E.. 2001. Getting to grips with Japanese knotweed. ENACT 9: 4-7..
Zika P. F. Jacobson A. L.. 2003. An overlooked hybrid Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum x sachalinese; Polygonaceae) in North America. Rhodora 105: 143-152..[Web of Science]
CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. L. Richards, R. L. Walls, J. P. Bailey, R. Parameswaran, T. George, and M. Pigliucci Plasticity in salt tolerance traits allows for invasion of novel habitat by Japanese knotweed s. l. (Fallopia japonica and F.xbohemica, Polygonaceae) Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 931 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Grimsby, D. Tsirelson, M. A. Gammon, and R. Kesseli Genetic diversity and clonal vs. sexual reproduction in Fallopia spp. (Polygonaceae) Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2007; 94(6): 957 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
