| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
What's this? |
Systematics and Phytogeography |
2Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 14, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; 3Department of Botany, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Praha 2, Czech Republic; 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe-University, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; 5Heidelberg Institute of Plant Science, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 345, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Received for publication November 8, 2005. Accepted for publication May 21, 2006.
ABSTRACT
Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography, and taxonomy of a group of taxa putatively related to the tetraploid Cardamine flexuosa were explored using sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region of nrDNA (ITS) and the trnL-trnF region of cpDNA. Taxon sampling focused on eastern Asia, North America, and Europe, and included 19 taxa represented by 177 and 182 accessions for each data set, respectively. Our analyses provided unequivocal evidence that Asian weedy populations traditionally assigned to C. flexuosa form an independent evolutionary lineage and represent a distinct taxon from European C. flexuosa. The allopolyploid origin of this common weed in paddy fields, its origin, and/or spread associated with the establishment of suitable man-made habitats are suggested. It is also found as an introduced weed in Australia and North America. Phylogenetic relationships and the associated taxonomic implications are presented and discussed for the group as a whole. Contrasting patterns of genetic variation (particularly in cpDNA) among different species were revealed. While very little haplotype diversity was found in widespread C. hirsuta and C. flexuosa, greater variation, showing phylogeographic structure, was observed in the tetraploid C. scutata within a relatively small area of Japan.
Key Words: Brassicaceae • cpDNA • Cruciferae • DNA sequencing • nrDNA ITS • phylogeography • polyploidy
Species number is not evenly distributed across genera within plant families, and some genera contain several hundred species often reflecting complex evolutionary processes. Cardamine L. is one of the largest genera of the Brassicaceae, comprising at least 200 species distributed worldwide. This number of species is far beyond the average number of species per genus within this family that consists of more than 3700 species in 338 currently recognized genera (Al-Shehbaz and Beilstein, 2006
). The genus shows great morphological and karyological diversity and complex evolutionary history strongly affected by both historical and more recent reticulation events (reviewed by Lihová and Marhold, 2006
), providing an opportunity to study mechanisms of plant diversification. Major centers of diversity, assessed by species richness and endemism, occur in the Far East and the Himalayas, with about 70 Cardamine taxa reported (Al-Shehbaz, 1988
). Several species have been reported to have spread as weeds beyond their natural ranges following introduction to distant areas and even different continents. Apart from the European species, most of which have been thoroughly investigated taxonomically (Lihová and Marhold, 2006
), the taxonomy of species from other continents, e.g., South America (Sjöstedt, 1975
), Australia, and New Zealand (Hewson, 1982
; Webb et al., 1988
) or eastern Asia (Ohwi, 1984
; Zhou et al., 2001
), is very complex and remains in many cases controversial and unresolved.
Several molecular phylogenetic studies of Cardamine species have been published in recent years (Franzke et al., 1998
; Sweeney and Price, 2000
; Bleeker et al., 2002a
; Lihová et al., 2004
). The traditional sectional classification proposed by Schulz (1903)
apparently does not reflect phylogenetic relationships within the genus. Most sections analyzed so far in molecular studies have been shown to be polyphyletic. The evolutionary history of Cardamine is complicated by widespread reticulation and polyploidization, making the reconstruction of an overall phylogeny challenging. Disentangling reticulate from divergent relationships requires use of multiple independent markers with different modes of inheritance (Doyle, 1992
; Linder and Rieseberg, 2004
; Vriesendorp and Bakker, 2005
). Investigation of the additivity of molecular markers, their (in)congruence, and additional data such as morphology, chromosome numbers, and geographic distribution are often crucial (Vriesendorp and Bakker, 2005
). Exclusion of putative hybrids or allopolyploids from phylogenetic analyses to construct an initial diploid phylogeny can provide a useful starting point for subsequent analysis of polyploid origins (Bachmann, 2000
; Marhold et al., 2004
), but in genera with a large number of polyploids this approach has limited application (Vriesendorp and Bakker, 2005
).
This study focuses on a cosmopolitan group of taxa that are putatively related to two Eurasian taxa, tetraploid C. flexuosa With. and diploid C. hirsuta L. (see Table 1). Much controversy surrounds the taxonomy of these species, and little is known about their phylogenetic relationships. The group is characterized by overall morphological similarity (e.g., pinnate or pinnatisect leaves; small, white flowers) and includes annual or perennial herbs, most of which are predominantly autogamous, but outcrossing occurs as well. Diploids to high polyploids are represented (Table 1).
|
), and there are no doubts about its circumscription within Europe, except for occasional misidentifications as C. hirsuta. Cardamine flexuosa is a tetraploid species and is widely distributed in Europe west of Belorussia and Ukraine, with a few localities in the western part of Russia (Jalas and Suominen, 1994
). It has also been reported as native to northern Africa (Ouyahya, 1999
) and southeastern Asia (Ohwi, 1984
; Zhou et al., 2001
; Pak, 2005
) as well as introduced to other continents (Hewson, 1982
; Webb et al., 1988
; Rollins, 1993
), although doubts remain about the identity and relationships of populations outside Europe (Marhold, 1995
; Kudoh et al., 2006
). The polyploid origin of C. flexuosa has been a challenging problem for several decades. Initially, an autotetraploid origin from diploid C. hirsuta was suggested (Banach, 1950
), but later an allopolyploid origin with C. hirsuta and C. impatiens L. as parents has been favored, based essentially on morphology and geography (Ellis and Jones, 1969
).
Cardamine scutata Thunb. was described from Japan (Thunberg, 1794
), without a precise locality. This, together with difficulties in the interpretation of the type specimen (deposited at UPS), probably led some Japanese authors to adopt the later name C. regeliana Miq. (Hara, 1952
; Kitagawa, 1982
) for this taxon. This latter name has also been widely used in Russia (e.g., Busch, 1915
; Berkutenko, 1988
). The illustration referred to in the protologue of C. regeliana (Regel, 1862
: Table 5, Figs. 1, 2) leaves no doubt that notwithstanding the problems of nomenclature, C. regeliana represents the same taxon as C. scutata. Several other taxa, apparently related to C. scutata, were described from Japan and still are considered to be endemic to that country, namely C. niigatensis H. Hara, C. dentipetala Matsum., and C. longifructus Ohwi (Hara, 1983
; Ohwi, 1984
; Fukuoka and Kurosaki, 1992
).
Cardamine hirsuta is a nearly cosmopolitan diploid species. However, the precise native range remains a mystery because it occurs as a weed throughout the world including Europe (its most likely area of origin). Cardamine parviflora L. occurs in Eurasia (Jalas and Suominen, 1994
; Zhou et al., 2001
) and northern Africa (Almeida, 1973
). It is diploid and grows in moist open habitats of various kinds. Similar populations from sandy, open moist soils along the Atlantic coast of North America were described as a separate species, C. arenicola Britton (Britton, 1892
). Rollins (1993)
recently treated all North American populations as C. parviflora var. arenicola (Britton) O. E. Schulz as different than var. parviflora in other parts of the distribution area of this species. Cardamine impatiens, one of the putative parental species of C. flexuosa, is a widespread Eurasian diploid (Khatri, 1989
; Jalas and Suominen, 1994
). A morphologically similar species with a more restricted distribution, C. pectinata Pall. ex DC., has been sometimes treated as conspecific with the former, but our investigations confirmed that it is distinct (Ku
era et al., 2006
). Finally, several highly variable and taxonomically confusing taxa, namely C. debilis DC., C. corymbosa Hook. f., C. paucijuga Turcz., which seem to be related to the C. flexuosa group, have been reported from Australia and New Zealand (Hewson, 1982
; Webb et al., 1988
). Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses of southern hemisphere Cardamine species have shed some light on the relationships of these species as closely related to South American C. glacialis (G. Forst.) DC. (Bleeker et al., 2002a
).
Here we aim to resolve phylogenetic relationships and address both biogeographic and taxonomic questions within the C. flexuosa group using sequence data from the 5.8S subunit and flanking internal transcribed spacers ITS1 and ITS2 of nrDNA, and the trnL-trnF region of cpDNA. Specifically we focus on the morphologically variable populations assigned to C. flexuosa from different areas and continents, which often behave as serious and invasive weeds, as well as assess genetic diversity patterns among the studied taxa across geographic areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Taxon sampling
Altogether 19 Cardamine taxa were sampled (Table 1), with a focus on C. flexuosa, C. hirsuta, and other taxa, which have been associated with either of these two species, or considered to be closely related based on morphology or previous DNA sequence data (Franzke et al., 1998
; Bleeker et al., 2002a
). Our preliminary screening of phylogenetic relationships in the genus (J. Lihová, K. Marhold, and K. K. Shimizu [University of Zürich, Switzerland], unpublished data) suggested that the Eurasian diploid C. amara is also closely related to C. flexuosa justifying its inclusion despite its distinct morphology. Most taxa were represented by multiple accessions with 177 ITS sequences and 182 trnL-trnF sequences in total, representing accessions from all continents, but with the main focus on Europe, North America, and eastern Asia. Material was either field-collected or obtained from herbarium specimens at MO, UBC, PERTH, and HEID (acronyms follow Holmgren et al., 1990
). Voucher specimens and GenBank accession numbers are listed in the Appendix. In addition to the new sequences, a few previously published sequences of selected southern hemisphere species, C. corymbosa, C. debilis, C. paucijuga, and C. glacialis (Bleeker et al., 2002a
), were included in the analyses (Appendix). Representatives of most closely related genera Barbarea R. Br. and Rorippa Scop. (Franzke et al., 1998
) were used as outgroups.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing
Total genomic DNA was isolated from silica-gel-dried or herbarium material using a modified CTAB extraction method with either isopropanol or ethanol with sodium acetate used for nucleic acids precipitation (Doyle and Doyle, 1987
). PCR amplification of the target regions, ITS of nrDNA, chloroplast trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer, was performed using the universal primers P1A, P4 by Francisco-Ortega et al. (1999)
and the primers e, f, c, d by Taberlet et al. (1991)
. The PCR conditions were as described in Lihová et al. (2004)
. For problematic herbarium material, a "touch-down" PCR approach was applied with annealing temperature starting at 65°C and each cycle decreasing by 0.5°C. Amplification products were purified using the GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocols. Sequencing was performed using the original PCR primers at Heidelberg Institute of Plant Science, Germany and the Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, Germany. At the former, sequencing reactions and post-reaction cleanups were performed using the DYEnamic ET Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Amersham Biosciences), and the sequences were resolved on a MegaBACE 500 DNA Analysis System (Amersham Biosciences). In the latter, cycle sequencing was performed using the TaqDyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (ABI Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany), and products were analyzed on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyser automated sequencer.
ITS electropherograms were carefully inspected for the occurrence of double or overlapping peaks in the same position that might suggest presence of different ITS copy types within individuals (see e.g., Rauscher et al., 2002
; Nieto Feliner et al., 2004
).
Phylogenetic analyses
Sequences were aligned manually using BioEdit (version 5.0.9; Hall, 1999
). The trnL intron and trnL-trnF spacer sequences were first aligned separately and then combined for phylogenetic analyses. In both these alignments, indels of 4 bp or longer were scored as additional gap characters (three indels in the trnL alignment and six in the trnL-trnF). One complex indel of variable length across accessions was coded as a four-state character. Otherwise gaps were coded as binary characters (see e.g., Simmons and Ochoterena, 2000
). Due to multiple trnF gene duplications and subsequent pseudogene formation (Koch et al., 2005
), the trnL-trnF sequences varied considerably in length. Multiple overlapping gaps at the 3' end of the spacer were identified after alignment. These ambiguous regions were eliminated from the alignment, and only 335 aligned positions from the 5' end downstream were used in the phylogenetic analysis.
Both data sets (ITS, trnL+trnL-trnF; Appendices S1, S2, see Supplemental Data accompanying online version of this article) were subjected to a heuristic maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis (ML), as well as a Bayesian inference based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm (MCMC; Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001
). Prior to the ML analyses, accessions with identical sequences were detected and merged using MacClade 4.0 PPC (Maddison and Maddison, 2000
) to reduce computation time. Models of nucleotide substitutions and the gamma distribution shape parameter were selected using MODELTEST 3.6 (Posada and Crandall, 1998
) in conjuction with PAUP*, version 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2001
). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to determine the model that best fits the data. The ML analyses were run in PAUP* using the resulting model settings and a neighbor-joining tree based on the logdet distance as a starting tree. Heuristic searches were performed with 10 random addition replicates, TBR (tree-bisection-reconnection) branch swapping, and a reduced scope of tree rearrangements using the ReconLimit option set to 10.
In the Bayesian analysis (MrBayes, version 3.0beta4) four chains were run for four to ten millions generations, adjusting the temperature difference between the cold and heated chains to achieve efficient swaps between the chains. Six substitution rates (nst = 6) and a gamma distribution (rates = gamma) with (for cpDNA data) or without (for ITS data) invariable sites were assumed. The trees were sampled every 100 generations, and finally, a majority-rule consensus tree was computed excluding the trees found in the burn-in phase (i.e., those generated before the likelihood values reached a plateau and fluctuated within a stable range, this was assessed individually for each run). The node's posterior probability indicated on the consensus tree is estimated by examining the proportion of trees containing each node. At least three independent Bayesian analyses were run for each data set, and the topologies of the consensus trees were compared. Except for minor differences in posterior probability values for some nodes, the topology was stabilized, indicating that the results are robust. Posterior probabilities shown here are values averaged across independent analyses.
For the cpDNA sequences also, a haplotype network was constructed using the parsimony method of Templeton et al. (1992)
, implemented in TCS 1.13 program (Clement et al., 2000
). The 95% probability limit of parsimonious connections was applied to produce the network. The analysis was run with gaps coded as missing data, but with an additional nine characters reflecting indel structure.
RESULTS
ITS region
Sequence characteristics
Sequencing of the ITS region was in most taxa, including European tetraploid C. flexuosa, straightforward, resulting in completely homogenized sequences or with only a few intra-individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Conversely, in numerous accessions of Asian C. flexuosa, C. dentipetala, and C. longifructus high numbers (up to 16 per accession) of polymorphic sites were observed, suggesting presence of divergent ITS copies. Comparison of the individual ITS sequences retrieved from Asian C. flexuosa revealed a complex pattern (Table 2). Altogether 25 positions where at least one accession displayed an intra-individual polymorphism were identified. In such positions, either both nucleotides were observed simultaneously (i.e., intra-individual polymorphism) or only one of them, depending on the accession. This may imply differential partial homogenization of originally divergent ITS copies within this taxon, although bias caused by preferential amplification or quantitative masking of minority ITS variant(s) cannot be excluded (Rauscher et al., 2002
). Similar sequence variation has been found in introduced plants in Australia and North America. Most of the intra-individual polymorphisms in Asian C. flexuosa displayed an additive pattern, with alternative nucleotides found in Asian taxa C. fallax and C. scutata (Table 2). This suggests an allopolyploid origin of Asian C. flexuosa, although future studies are needed to address this issue in more details.
|
Phylogenetic analyses
The optimal likelihood model for the ITS data set was SYM + G. To reduce computing load of the maximum likelihood analysis, this was run only on the reduced ITS data set, where, in addition, identical sequences were merged. The load was still too high to complete the search. We present here only the consensus tree produced by the Bayesian inference (Fig. 1).
|
trnL-trnF region
The combined trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer alignment of 182 accessions comprised 853 characters plus nine indel characters, of which 89 were variable (79 informative, 10 autapomorphic). Of 182 accessions, 87 different sequences were identified by MacClade. For the maximum likelihood analysis only the reduced data matrix (of 87 sequences) was used.
Based on the Akaike information criterion, the model K81uf + I + G was selected for this data set. The maximum likelihood analysis produced an ML tree with –ln likelihood of 1951.26 (not shown). Its topology fully corresponded to that of the Bayesian consensus tree (Fig. 2), with the only exception of the placement of two accessions of C. pensylvanica as indicated on the tree. Nevertheless, in the Bayesian tree they were placed in a clade that received only a low posterior probability value. Four main groups of haplotypes can be delimited on the tree, corresponding to four isolated (disconnected) haplotype networks produced by the parsimony method of Templeton et al. (1992)
with the 95% probability connection limit (not shown). The groups comprised clade I, Eurasian diploids C. impatiens and C. pectinata; clade II, diploids C. hirsuta and C. oligosperma; clade III, European tetraploid C. flexuosa and diploid C. amara; and clade IV, remaining taxa, including the Asian C. flexuosa. Highly divergent levels of haplotype diversity were observed among the analyzed taxa. Very low diversity was found in the weedy cosmopolitan C. hirsuta with only two haplotypes identified among 42 different accessions; in C. oligosperma with two haplotypes differentiated from C. hirsuta by four or five mutations, respectively; and in 17 accessions of C. flexuosa with only three haplotypes found in Europe and two of them in populations apparently introduced to North America. Among the remaining taxa forming clade IV, a number of closely related haplotypes were resolved (Fig. 3). A few mutations differentiated a group of related haplotypes found in taxa from New Zealand; C. corymbosa and C. debilis, C. glacialis from South America; and amphi-Beringian C. umbellata. This is congruent with the ITS data, for which these taxa were also placed in a single clade. All 29 accessions of the Asian C. flexuosa (including accessions representing introduced weedy populations in Australia and North America), Asian C. fallax, and Australian C. paucijuga shared a single haplotype. In contrast, greater haplotype variability was observed in C. parviflora, North American C. pensylvanica, and Asian C. scutata and its related species. In the latter two, geographic pattern was also apparent. Four different haplotypes were identified in seven accessions of C. pensylvanica, two western haplotypes (haplotype a: British Columbia; b: Washington, Oregon), one eastern (d: New York), and one southern haplotype (c: Arkansas). In C. scutata and its related Japanese endemics C. niigatensis, C. dentipetala, and C. longifructus, altogether 12 haplotypes were observed, in which two groups of northern (A–E) and southern (F–J) haplotypes can be delimited, respectively, with the overlap in central Honshu where the main haplotype diversity is found (Fig. 3). One widespread haplotype (K), present across the whole area of Japan, was identified.
|
|
Phylogeny reconstruction in the studied Cardamine taxa
Our phylogenetic study comprising several putatively closely related diploid and polyploid Cardamine species incorporated both maternally inherited cpDNA markers being essential for teasing apart maternal vs paternal contributions to polyploid species, as well as biparentally inherited nuclear DNA data. The nrDNA region has been widely employed in similar studies, although its multicopy constitution and molecular evolutionary processes that may impact ITS sequence variation should be considered (Baldwin et al., 1995
; Álvarez and Wendel, 2003
). In the present study, different patterns of nrDNA sequence evolution in polyploids have been suggested. While C. scutata, C. niigatensis, C. fallax, C. pensylvanica, and European C. flexuosa displayed largely uniform ITS sequences, significant ITS sequence heterogeneity was found in Asian C. flexuosa, C. longifructus, and C. dentipetala (Table 2). This may indicate different modes of polyploid evolution (auto- or allopolyploidization) or different ages of polyploid origins, but molecular genetic processes that impact on nrDNA evolution often proceed in an unpredictable way, and, in addition, this was based only on examination of direct ITS sequences. The ability to detect multiple ITS types is strongly dependent on their copy number in the genome, and thus rare repeat types can remain undetected (Rauscher et al., 2002
).
Several approaches have been adopted to reconstruct patterns of reticulate evolution, which are apparently present in the studied genus, and they are currently thoroughly reviewed and discussed (see e.g., Linder and Rieseberg, 2004
; Hegarty and Hiscock, 2005
; Vriesendorp and Bakker, 2005
). The importance of the use of multiple independent markers and additional data (e.g., morphology, geography, cytogenetics) for reconstructing relationships among potentially reticulating species has been stressed, as well as the need of comparative sequencing of single-copy nuclear genes. The present study provides a phylogenetic framework for taxa poorly explored so far, and as such it serves as a basis for future detailed studies, which should address proposed reticulations and focus on individual polyploids and their origins. Recently, the allopolyploid origin of European hexaploid C. asarifolia has been resolved, first based on and invoked from strong incongruence between cpDNA and ITS gene trees of European taxa (Lihová et al., 2004
). Employment of a single-copy nuclear gene has proven useful to address this issue (Lihová et al., 2006
) and should be followed in other polyploids of the genus as well.
Comparison of ITS and cpDNA phylogenies in the present study identified areas of both congruence and incongruence. Generally, diploid taxa were well resolved and supported, while low genetic differentiation was apparent among several polyploids (although in ITS this may be due to different patterns of ITS sequence evolution and homogenization). The most striking conflict between the two data sets is the placement of diploid C. parviflora (including var. parviflora and var. arenicola). Although in the ITS tree, it was placed among other diploids, its cpDNA haplotypes were close to Asian and North American polyploids (Figs. 1, 3). We sequenced several accessions of both the Eurasian and American varieties from different parts of their distributions, so a single hybridization event or an artefact due to sparse sampling can be excluded. Even when considering that the effective population size of maternally inherited cpDNA markers is smaller than that of nuclear markers, the trnL-trnF region of cpDNA has been reported to evolve more slowly than ITS and may retain traces of ancestral polymorphisms. To a certain extent, this may explain the ambiguities (loops) in the haplotype relationships, with several taxa bearing non-monophyletic haplotypes (C. scutata, C. pensylvanica). However, the incongruence might also be connected with the polyploid origins of Asian and North American species, which possess related haplotypes. Cardamine parviflora (including both varieties) is widely distributed, covering the whole of Eurasia and North America. Considering this, its ecology (weedy behavior, invading open habitats free of competition), and common reticulate evolution in the genus, this species might have contributed to the origin of several geographically disjunct polyploids. Such a scenario would explain the close relationship of C. parviflora cpDNA haplotypes to Asian and American polyploids. A somewhat less striking, but still an apparent discrepancy concerns European C. flexuosa, probably reflecting its allopolyploid evolution (see the next subsection).
Cardamine flexuosa
Populations from Europe and Asia represent two distinct lineages of different polyploid origins
Cardamine flexuosa in Europe is a morphologically well-defined tetraploid, growing usually in mesic natural to seminatural habitats (e.g., along forest roads). Its distribution area in Europe does not extend far into Asia (Jalas and Suominen, 1994
). Populations assigned to this species have, however, also been reported from southeastern Asia (see introduction). There has been no consensus as to whether these Asian populations can be considered native or introduced, but their weedy behavior has been often mentioned alongside their great morphological variability and phenotypic plasticity (Ishiguri et al., 1994
; Kudoh et al. 1995
, 1996
). Populations in Japan typically occur in cultivated areas, such as paddy fields, moist gardens, and orchards but not in natural habitats (Kimata, 1983
; Kudoh et al., 1993
; Yatsu et al., 2003
). In fact, they represent a serious and dominant weed there. Maekawa (1944)
pointed to the possibility of its historic (archaeophytic) introduction together with the rice cultivation.
Our analyses provided unequivocal evidence that Asian populations traditionally treated as C. flexuosa represent an independent lineage that should be treated as a distinct taxon. We sequenced accessions from Japan, mainland China, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam, and all of them displayed a single cpDNA haplotype that was strongly divergent from the haplotypes found in C. flexuosa from Europe. Apart from apparently different ecology of C. flexuosa in Europe, Asian populations also seem to be high polyploids. Preliminary investigations have suggested an octoploid level, in contrast to the tetraploid one in Europe (Table 1). However, morphological differentiation of Asian C. flexuosa is complicated by the enormous variability present in Asian populations. European C. flexuosa has a tendency toward having smaller flowers and fewer basal branches compared with Asian plants, which often do not retain basal leaf rosettes and differ in stem hairness, but the variation overlaps between both groups of plants. More detailed morphometric investigations are needed.
Molecular data shed some light on the possible polyploid origin of Asian C. flexuosa. In most of the Asian accessions that were analyzed, multiple ITS copy types were inferred from intra-individual polymorphisms that aligned to alternative nucleotides across the taxa sampled (Table 2). This revealed an additive pattern for most polymorphic nucleotide sites, indicating that the Asian polyploids, hexaploid C. fallax, and tetraploid C. scutata, or their diploid progenitors may have been involved in the polyploid origin of Asian C. flexuosa. The cpDNA gene tree also supports C. fallax as the putative maternal parent, because it shares its haplotype with the Asian C. flexuosa. Preliminary results from single-copy gene investigations (K. K. Shimizu, University of Zürich, unpublished data) are in congruence with this proposed pattern. Although both C. fallax and C. scutata are polyploids, there is no evidence to date as to their diploid progenitors. Cardamine parviflora and C. amara are two closely related widespread species meriting consideration, but we have no data on other potential diploids from Asia. Asia harbors an enormous diversity of Cardamine species, which are very poorly known. In Japan, most of them are polyploids, but we are not aware of any chromosome count for Cardamine from mainland China (Kuera et al., 2005
). It is difficult to ascertain the exact place of its origin, whether in Japan, China (rice was introduced from China to Japan), or other Asian countries, but it is probable that its polyploid evolution, establishment, and spread are associated with the establishment of suitable man-made habitats. Examples of other polyploid taxa that are successful colonizers of man-made habitats are already known both from Cardamine (C. schulzii, Urbanska-Worytkiewicz, 1977
) and the related Rorippa (R. palustris and R. sylvestris, Bleeker et al., 2002b
). Indeed, hybridization and polyploidy have been proposed as important mechanisms prompting the evolution of invasiveness more generally (Ellstrand and Schierenbeck, 2000
).
Given that C. flexuosa was described from Europe and that the illustrations cited in the protologue (in the absence of the extant original herbarium material) are based on and correspond to C. flexuosa in the European sense, this name is applicable only to the European populations. Throughout this paper, we have referred to the Asian populations informally as Asian C. flexuosa, but a search for the correct name for these Asian plants will be required.
Cardamine flexuosa has also been sporadically reported from other continents as an introduced alien species (e.g., from America: Al-Shehbaz, 1988
; Australia: Hewson, 1982
; southern Africa: Dreyer and Jordaan, 2000
) usually as a weed in flowerbeds, flowerpots, gardens, greenhouses, and lawns. Here we have shown that these weedy populations include both European and Asian C. flexuosa. Several accessions of both taxa have been discovered and sequenced across North America (Appendix, Table 2). The name C. debilis Don (later homonym of here studied C. debilis DC.) has been applied in North America to an introduced weed (Rollins, 1993
) and apparently refers to Asian C. flexuosa. These populations have been often identified as C. flexuosa or misidentified and confused with C. parviflora. In Australia, another taxon of unknown origin and taxonomic position has been referred to as C. aff. flexuosa (Thompson, 1996
). Material of this was sequenced by Franzke et al. (1998)
, and this sequence clearly matches those of Asian C. flexuosa. Alongside the Australian accession by Franzke et al. (1998)
, we analyzed two other Australian samples from herbarium specimens, one determined as C. flexuosa and another misidentified as C. paucijuga. Both corresponded to the Asian C. flexuosa (Appendix).
Several previous attempts have been made to explain the polyploid origin of C. flexuosa in Europe (Banach, 1950
; Ellis and Jones, 1969
). Molecular phylogenetic analyses by Franzke et al. (1998)
did not show high support for C. impatiens and C. hirsuta as parental species, proposed by Ellis and Jones (1969)
. Nevertheless, the hypothesized increased sequence evolution in C. hirsuta (see the next subsection) might have led to the current distant position of this species, and under this hypothesis this pattern does not exclude it from further considerations as a putative parental species. The origin of C. flexuosa, however, remains intriguing. Our cpDNA gene tree indicates close affinities to the Eurasian diploid C. amara, while in the ITS gene tree it is placed among other polyploids. Cardamine amara is thus the most likely maternal parent, but the paternal parent remains unknown.
Taxonomic and phylogenetic positions of other Cardamine taxa, introductions to non-native areas
Cardamine hirsuta is an annual or rarely biennial weed occurring in ruderal habitats across all continents except Antarctica. Its origin and native range are assumed to be in Europe, but the eastern limit in western parts of Asia is not clear. From central Asia, it is reported as an adventive weed in fields (Khatri, 1989
), and there are no records at all from Siberia (Doron'kin, 1994
), Russian Far East (Berkutenko, 1988
), or Korea (Pak, 2005
). In Japan, it has been recorded only in the last few decades. This species was probably not introduced to Japan before the 1950s (Kudoh et al., 1992
), but now it is spreading rapidly across Honshu and Hokkaido (Kudoh et al., 2006
; Yatsu et al., 2003
). Just as in Japan, C. hirsuta has spread and naturalized in other parts of the world. It has been reported as an introduced weed in America, Africa, Australia, and New Zealand (Hewson, 1982
; Jonsell, 1982
; Webb et al., 1988
; Rollins, 1993
), growing on disturbed sites such as lawns, pavement cracks, roadsides, or ditches. In Australia, it has been sometimes confused with the native C. paucijuga; several accessions from Australian herbarium material sequenced have been originally determined as C. paucijuga (Appendix). Although C. hirsuta has also been reported from China (Zhou et al., 2001
), we have not seen any Chinese herbarium material that corresponds to this species. Specimens determined as C. hirsuta from this country, as well as the illustration of C. hirsuta in Flora of China (Cheo et al., 1987
; Zhou et al., 2003
) are different from European C. hirsuta, and some at least can be referred to as Asian C. flexuosa. Very low genetic variation was found in C. hirsuta in both ITS and cpDNA data. Despite our extensive sampling, lack of variation precluded identification of the areas of its original occurrence or detailed tracking of its spread and introduction to other continents. More variable markers such as AFLPs (amplified fragment length polymorphism) will be needed to address these questions.
Cardamine oligosperma and C. umbellata were considered to be very close to or even conspecific with C. hirsuta. Cardamine hirsuta and C. oligosperma are both diploid annuals or biennials, and based on our survey of herbarium material from MO, they have been often confused and misidentified. Cardamine oligosperma was described from Oregon (Torrey and Gray, 1838
) and seems to be confined to western North America. We consulted the type specimen at NY to interpret this name correctly and conclude that C. oligosperma is indeed closely related to, but clearly distinct and genetically differentiated from C. hirsuta. The long branch supporting C. hirsuta and C. oligosperma (Figs. 1, 2) reflects the high number of synapomorphic substitutions shared between them. This pattern has been observed (for C. hirsuta) previously by Franzke et al. (1998)
, who suggested a faster rate of molecular evolution in this species. The disjunct distributions of these two species (setting aside current contact following introduction of C. hirsuta to North America) are consistent with allopatric speciation following fragmentation of a previously widespread ancestor. Alternatively, migration to North America from Eurasia via Beringia could also explain this distribution. As for the amphi-Beringian species C. umbellata, in both the cpDNA and ITS gene trees it was placed in a distinct lineage more closely related to taxa from New Zealand than to C. oligosperma or C. hirsuta. Although C. hirsuta or C. oligosperma might have been involved in its polyploid origin, current genetic differentiation of the polyploid is apparent. Analyses of other nuclear markers may provide more insights into the polyploid origin and evolution of that group including C. umbellata, C. debilis, and C. corymbosa.
Cardamine pensylvanica is a morphologically variable tetraploid species native to North America and probably one of the most widespread Cardamine species on that continent (Al-Shehbaz, 1988
). Nuclear and cpDNA data indicated different phylogenetic patterns, but did not elucidate its polyploid origin. Two groups of cpDNA haplotypes separated by several mutations are inferred for this species perhaps reflecting variation of its progenitor(s) and/or multiple independent origins. Two haplotypes were very close to the haplotypes of diploid C. parviflora and Asian polyploids, while the remaining ones were differentiated from any other species. In the ITS gene tree, on the other hand, we did not find differentiation between C. pensylvanica and European C. flexuosa.
In recent literature, populations of C. parviflora from North America have been treated as distinct from Eurasian ones and classified either as a separate species C. arenicola or as C. parviflora var. arenicola (Al-Shehbaz, 1988
). In the absence of detailed morphometric studies, the morphological distinction between Eurasian and North American populations seems to be problematic and limited to differences in the leaf shape and some quantitative characters (Al-Shehbaz, 1988
; Rollins, 1993
). Our analyses showed them to be closely related with overlap in cpDNA haplotypes favoring infraspecific treatment in line with the almost continuous northern hemisphere distribution of C. parviflora (s.l.) apart from minor gaps in Yukon, Alaska (Warwick et al., 2005
) and northeast Asia (Berkutenko, 1988
).
Tetraploid C. scutata and the Japanese endemics C. niigatensis, C. longifructus, and C. dentipetala are clearly closely related based on morphology. So far, knowledge of these taxa is very limited; C. scutata and C. niigatensis are tetraploids, but there are no data on the ploidy of the other two taxa. The distinction of C. niigatensis, with its conspicuous leaf morphology, has not been questioned, but field observations on the locality where both C. scutata and C. niigatensis co-occur, suggest almost continuous morphological variation between these two species. Recognition of C. dentipetala and C. longifructus as separate taxa, on the other hand, has not been accepted in the recent Flora of China (Zhou et al., 2001
), nor in the forthcoming Flora of Japan (I. A. Al-Shehbaz, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, USA, personal communication) with both names placed in synonymy under C. scutata. Final decisions about the taxonomic status of these endemics must await more detailed analyses, including thorough morphological and karyological investigation, as well as molecular studies using more variable markers.
Populations corresponding to C. fallax, which occur in Japan, Korea, and sporadically also in China (in spite of the fact that this taxon is not recognized in the most recent Flora of China by Zhou et al., 2001
; K. Marhold, J. Lihová, H. Kudoh, and I. A. Al-Shehbaz [Missouri Botanical Garden], unpublished data) show similarities to Asian C. flexuosa in morphology and adaptation to moist habitats, but differs in leaf morphology, growth form, and habitat preferences to more natural sites (Kimata, 1983
; Kudoh et al., 1993
). We assume that morphological delimitation of C. fallax is complicated by variation and plasticity present in Asian C. flexuosa, which blurs morphological distinction of the former. Here we hypothesize that C. fallax may represent one of parental taxa of Asian C. flexuosa: it is of lower ploidy level (Table 1), shares the cpDNA haplotype with Asian C. flexuosa, and posesses a single and distinct ITS sequence variant, in contrast to the additive pattern in Asian C. flexuosa.
cpDNA haplotype diversity and biogeographic patterns
Contrasting patterns of genetic variation (particularly in cpDNA) among different species and lineages have been revealed in our study. Very little haplotype diversity was found in C. hirsuta and European C. flexuosa. Despite the large number of accessions analyzed, only two and three haplotypes were detected, respectively. We postulate that low diversity in Europe, their assumed area of origin, reflects pronounced bottleneck effects following migration and population extinction during the Pleistocene. Moreover, even among the few distinct haplotypes that are resolved, there is no obvious geographic pattern that could shed some light on their glacial survival and colonization routes. In weedy species as C. hirsuta and C. flexuosa, we might expect that historical migration patterns could be lost. There are, however, examples of weedy species in which clear phylogegraphic structure has been detected (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana, Sharbel et al., 2000
; Microthlaspi perfoliatum, Koch and Bernhardt, 2004
). We assume that more variable DNA markers may provide more resolution of the species studied here. Both species, especially C. hirsuta, are characterized by high dispersal and colonization ability, and weedy behavior. Apparently, they have been introduced by man to areas where they are now spreading rapidly in ruderal habitats (as documented for C. hirsuta in Japan). Multiple introductions of C. flexuosa to North America were expected, judging only from its occurrence there, reported from both Atlantic and Pacific coast areas (Rollins, 1993
; USDA, NRCS, 2005
) and this is apparent also from our data.
Completely different patterns were found in the Asian tetraploid C. scutata and related Japanese endemics. Within just a relatively small area of Japan, enormous diversity showing clear phylogeographic structure was found. Two groups of northern and southern haplotypes were identified, respectively, with the main diversity concentrated in central Honshu. The Japanese archipelago is characterized by a wide range of climatic zones along its northeast to southwest axis and a complex topography with several mountain chains running parallel to the coasts. In addition, the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan sides of the islands show differences in climate conditions over short distances, resulting in different floristic compositions (Miyawaki et al., 1994
). This is reflected also in a few phylogeographic studies centered on the area of Japan that have been published in recent years (e.g., Fujii et al., 2002
; Ohi et al., 2003
; Tsuda and Ide, 2005
; Fujii and Senni, 2006
). Cardamine scutata shows wide ecological amplitude with respect to climatic conditions and cold tolerance. Genetic diversity patterns in this species strongly suggest that central Honshu as well as part of southern Japan acted as refugia during colder periods, with subsequent northward migrations. Most genetic variation is now found in the putative refugial region of central Honshu, which might also have been enriched from populations that expanded postglacially from southern refugia. Postglacial expansion from the proposed refugial areas was apparently associated with the loss of genetic variation, as the populations north of central Honshu display only a subset of total genetic variation present in central regions of Honshu.
Conclusions
Our study based on cpDNA and ITS sequence data aimed to elucidate phylogenetic relationships within a group of taxa taxonomically related to C. flexuosa sampled throughout the world. The results provided unequivocal evidence that Asian weedy populations traditionally assigned to C. flexuosa form an independent evolutionary lineage and represent a distinct taxon from European C. flexuosa. Inevitable nomenclatural changes, however, remain to be done. Two taxa usually considered to be very close or even conspecific with C. hirsuta, C. oligosperma, and C. umbellata (= C. oligosperma var. kamtschatica) showed distinct phylogenetic positions. While the former is sister to C. hirsuta, the latter seems to be more closely related to New Zealand C. debilis and C. corymbosa. Cardamine parviflora var. parviflora and C. parviflora var. arenicola from Eurasia and North America, respectively, indeed represent genetically well-defined sister taxa. Contrasting patterns of genetic variation (particularly in cpDNA) between widespread C. hirsuta and C. flexuosa on one side, and eastern Asian C. scutata on the other, were found. While very little variation was detected in C. hirsuta and C. flexuosa, which has been suggested to reflect pronounced bottleneck effects following migration and population extinction, C. scutata had a distinct phylogeographic structure.
A) Sequences acquired in the present study.
Taxon—Accession code; Source, Voucher; GenBank accessions: ITS, trnL, trnL-trnF.
Cardamine amara(subsp.amara)—IT (AM-S5); Italy, prov. Piemont, S of Frabosa Soprana, JL et al. (SAV); —, DQ278898, —. IT (AM-S4); Italy, prov. Piemont, Garessio, Cla. di Casotto, JL (SAV); —, DQ278900, —. IT (AM-S6); Italy, prov. Piemont, Gias del Roccassone, JL et al. (SAV); —, DQ278899, —. IT (AM-E2); Switzerland, Graubünden, NE of Brusio, JL et al. (SAV); —, DQ278897, —. Cardaminecf.corymbosa—CAN6; Canada, British Columbia, Vancouver, UBC Botanical Garden, F. Lomer (UBC); DQ268393, DQ268060, DQ268227. Cardamine debilis—NZ; New Zealand, Wellington, Otari-Wiltons Bush Forest Reserve, M. Tsiantos (SAV); DQ268392, DQ268059, DQ268226. Cardamine dentipetala—JP18; Japan, Shiga Pref., Katsuragawa, Mt. Minako, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268499-DQ268501, DQ268149-DQ268151, DQ268316-DQ268318. Cardamine fallax—JP19; Japan, Shiga Pref., Takashima-gun, Shin-ashahi-cho, Harie, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268456-DQ268458, DQ268117-DQ268119, DQ268284-DQ268286. JP137; Japan, Fukushima Pref., Sohma-gun, Fukuda Pass, K. Yonekura & T. Fukuda 95503 (MO 0508811); DQ268462, DQ268120, DQ268287. JP138; Japan, Mie Pref., Matsusaka-shi, Kushida River, HK (SAV); DQ268459-DQ268461, DQ268121-DQ268122, DQ268288- DQ268289. JP139; Japan, Kanagawa Pref., Aikawa-cho, Hanbara, HK (SAV); DQ268463, DQ268123, DQ268290. CHI14 (as C. flexuosa); China, Xiuning Xian, Anhui prov., Liu Qixin (MO 04509180); DQ268464, DQ268103, DQ268270 [morphological identification of this specimen is not unequivocal]. Cardamine flexuosa(European)—DE3; Germany, Heidelberg, Heiligenberg, JL (SAV); DQ268411, DQ268082, DQ268249. SK4; Slovakia, E Carpathians, Miro
a, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268415, DQ268083, DQ268250. ES3; Spain, prov. Palencia, Embalse de Camporredondo, JL (SAV); DQ268420, DQ268072, DQ268239. ES4; Spain, prov. León, Pto. de Pajares, JL (SAV); DQ268410, DQ268075, DQ268242. ES5; Spain, Sierra Nevada Mts., Capilleira, JL (SAV); DQ268408, DQ268078, DQ268245. ES6; Spain, prov. Lérida, Val d' Aran, Refugi Eth Santet, JL (SAV); DQ268419, DQ268080, DQ268247. IT3; Italy, prov. Piemont, Garessio, Cla. di Casotto, JL & KM (SAV); DQ268418, DQ268081, DQ268248. UC; Ukraine, Ivano-Frankivska obl., Nadvirianskyi raion, Hoverla, MK (SAV); DQ268421, DQ268084, DQ268251. BG1; Bulgaria, Vasiliovska planina-Tetevenski Balkan, Ribaritsa, JK (SAV); DQ268424, DQ268076, DQ268243. BG2; Bulgaria, Rila Mts., Ch. Iskar stream, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268422, DQ268073, DQ268240. RO1; Romania, Timi
u de Sus, Mt. Postâvarul, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268414, DQ268077, DQ268244. RO2; Romania, Mt. Rodna, Bora, Pietroul Mt., MK & JK (SAV); DQ268416, DQ268085, DQ268252. RO3; Romania, Mt. Bucegi, Zanoaga, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268417, DQ268086, DQ268253. NO2; Norway, Furuneset, Fjaler, Sogn & Fjordane, K. Hansen (SAV); —, DQ268074, DQ268241. Tu4; Turkey, Istanbul, M. Slovák (SAV), DQ268423, DQ268087, DQ268254. US31; USA, Washington, Snohomish Co., Bryant, PZ 18441, F. & A. Weinmann (SAV); DQ268413, DQ268079, DQ268246. US32; USA, Washington, King Co., Shoreline Center Park, Richmond Heights, PZ 18347 (SAV); DQ268409 and DQ268412, DQ268071, DQ268238. ‘AsianCardamine flexuosa'—JP1; Japan, Yamanashi Pref., Nirasaki-shi, Miyakubo, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268429, DQ268088, DQ268255. JP5; Japan, Nagano Pref., Minamiazumi-gun, Minamiazumi-mura, Ariake, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268428, DQ268095, DQ268262. JP11; Japan, Toyama Pref. Shimoniikawa-gun, Nyusen-machi, Yoshiwara, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268430, DQ268093, DQ268260. JP13; Japan, Toyama Pref., Tonami-shi, Yagi, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268425, DQ268090, DQ268257. JP18; Japan, Shiga Pref., Ohtsu-shi, Katsuragawa, Mt. Minako, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268431, DQ268089, DQ268256. JP27; Japan, Gumma Pref., Tone-gun, Shirasawa-mura, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268426, DQ268092, DQ268259. JP28; Japan, Gumma Pref., Tone-gun, Katashina-mura, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268427, DQ268094, DQ268261. JP54; Japan, Hokkaido, Ishikari-gun, Tohbetsu-cho, Aoyamaokunibangawa, JL et al. (SAV); —. DQ268091, DQ268258. CHI1 (as C. hirsuta); China, Yunnan, Nujiang Lisu Aut. Pref., Lushui Co., from Pain Ma to Liuku, Li Heng 10015 (MO 5151560); DQ268438, DQ268097, DQ268264. CHI2 (as C. hirsuta); China, Yunnan, Nujiang Lisu Aut. Pref., Gongshan Co., Gongshan suburbs, Li Heng 8680 (MO 5306051); DQ268437, DQ268098, DQ268265. CHI3 (as C. hirsuta); China, Liuyang, Hunan Prov., Chen Dehuan (MO 04745232); —, DQ268099, DQ268266. CHI4 (as C. hirsuta); China, Ziyuan Xian, Guangxi Prov., Li Ming (MO 04723770); DQ268432, DQ268100, DQ268267. CHI5 (as C. flexuosa); China, Hubei Prov., Hefeng, Zhang 419 (MO 04515568); —, DQ268105, DQ268272. CHI6 (as C. flexuosa); China, Sichuan, Emei Shan, Mugua, Xu Honggui 0112 (MO 04545485); DQ268435, —, —. CHI7 (as C. flexuosa); China, Jiangxi, Wuynan Xian, Lai & Shan 4512 (MO 04564479); DQ268451, —, — [morphological identification of this specimen is not unequivocal]. CHI9 (as C. flexuosa); China, Shaanxi Prov., Yang xian, Li 8 (MO 04521808); —, DQ268104, DQ268271. CHI10 (as C. flexuosa); China, Si-chuan, Datsian lu city, G. N. Potanin (MO 04969045); DQ268440, —, —. CHI11 (as C. flexuosa); China, Wu-lao-feng, Lushan, Jiangxi Prov., S. S. Lai & H. R. Shan113 (MO 04558088); —, DQ268124, DQ268291. CHI13 (as C. flexuosa); Hong Kong, Hu & But 20161 (MO 0463702); DQ268436, DQ268106, DQ268273. TAI2 (as C. flexuosa); Taiwan, Nantou Hsien, Jenai Hsiang, Meifeng, C. M. Wang 02615 (MO 0495782); DQ268439, DQ268101, DQ268268. TAI3 (as C. flexuosa); Taiwan, Taoyuan Hsien, Kuanyin Hsiang, Hsinpo, 8 Dec 1999, Ching-I Peng 17875 (MO5312726); DQ268441, DQ268102, DQ268269. THA1; Thailand, National ark Doi Inthanon, M. Koch (HEID); DQ268434, DQ268096, DQ268263. THA2 (as C. flexuosa); Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao, Huay Nam Ru, Doi Sahm Meun, J. F. Maxwell 90–149 (MO 4041946); DQ268433, —, —. VIE (as C. flexuosa); Vietnam, Ninh Binh Province, Sanh village, N. M. Cuong, D. T. Kien & M. V. Sinh NMC1311 (MO 5599888); DQ268450, —, —. AUS5 (as C. flexuosa); Australia, Western Australian Herbarium grounds, Kensington, Perth WA, B. J. Lepschi (PERTH 04232569); DQ268452, DQ268113, DQ268280. AUS9 (as C. paucijuga); Narrogin Townsite WA, G. J. Keighery & N. Gibson 7093 (PERTH 06760732); DQ268454, DQ268128, DQ268295. CAN3; Canada, Meadow Avenue, Burnaby, B.C., E of Vancouver, F. Lomer (UBC); DQ268442, DQ268114, DQ268281. CAN4; Canada, Surrey, B.C., F. Lomer (UBC); DQ268443, DQ268115, DQ268282. CAN5; Canada, Cariboo Hill Salvation Army Temple, Burnaby, F. Lomer (UBC); DQ268444, DQ268116, DQ268283. US33 (as C. parviflora); USA, California, San Bernardino Valley, Yucaipa, A. C. Sanders (MO 04890589); DQ268445, DQ268107, DQ268274. US34 (as C. flexuosa); USA, California, Riverside, UCR campus, B. Pitzer 2935 (MO 04890590); DQ268446, DQ268108, DQ268275. US35 (as C. parviflora); USA, California, Riverside, UCR campus, A. Sanders 15915 (MO 04924769); DQ268447, DQ268109, DQ268276. US8 (as C. flexuosa); USA, North Carolina, Guilford Co., Browns Summit, Dan Tenaglia (MO 5737873); DQ268449, DQ268110, DQ268277. US36 (as C. flexuosa); USA, Rhode Island, Washington Co., Perryville, G. C. Tucker 13473 (MO 5709457); —, DQ268111, DQ268278. MEX (as C. hirsuta); Mexico, Rancho El Jabali, Volcán de Colima, A. S. Sanders 10245, w/B. L. Phillips & B. M. Rothschild (MO 09464960); DQ268448, DQ268112, DQ268279. Cardamine hirsuta—DE1; Germany, Freiburg, JL (SAV); DQ268377, DQ268035, DQ268202. DE2; Germany, Heidelberg, Schlierbach, JL (SAV); —, DQ268030, —. AU; Austria, E of Gleisdorf, Arnwiesen Raststätte, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268369, DQ268037, DQ268204. CH; Switzerland, Lake Geneva, Nyon, M. Tsiantis (SAV); DQ268373, DQ268043, DQ268210. IT1; Italy, prov. Trentino, Val di Breguzzo, JL et al. (SAV); —, DQ268032, —. IT2; Italy, prov. Piemont, Botanical Garden of Torino, JL & KM (SAV); DQ268376, DQ268036, DQ268203. ES1; Spain, prov. Lérida, Val d' Aran, Val de Valarties, JL (SAV); DQ268370, DQ268038, DQ268205. ES2; Spain, prov. Zamora, Vigo de Sanabria, JL & MP (SAV); DQ268368, DQ268046, DQ268213. NO1; Norway, Jeløya, Moss, Østfold, S. Kjølner & T. Carlsen (SAV); DQ268371, DQ268045, DQ268212. SK1; Slovakia, Botanical Garden of Blatnica (origin on Mt. Bori
ov, Veká Fatra Mts.), J. Kochjarová (SAV); DQ268372, DQ268039, DQ268206. CR1; Croatia, Zagreb, Zool. Garden, JK (SAV); DQ268380, DQ268040, DQ268207. CR3; Croatia, Plitvicka jezera lakes, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268381, DQ268044, DQ268211. MN1; Monte Negro, 
evo, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268378, DQ268034, DQ268201. MN2; Monte Negro, Maglic Mts., Plu
ine, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268379, DQ268042, DQ268209. Tu1; Turkey, Giresum Da
lari Mts., Kümbet, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268375, DQ268041, DQ268208. Tu2, Turkey, Ilgaz Mts., MK & JK (SAV); —, DQ268033, DQ268200. Tu3; Turkey, Rize, Do Karageniz Mts., Çamlik, MK & JK (SAV); DQ268374, DQ268031, DQ268199. GE1; Georgia, Majacowsky distr., S-E from Majacowsky, L. Krupkina et al. (MO 04674069); DQ268361, —, —. JP10; Japan, Niigata Pref., Nishikubiki-gun, Oumi-cho, Hashidate, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268363, DQ268028, DQ268197. JP29; Japan, Gumma Pref., Tone-gun, Katashina-mura, Higashiogawa, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268362, DQ268026, DQ268195. JP4; Japan, Nagano Pref., Minamiazumi-gun, Azumi-mura, Shimashima-dani, JL et al. (SAV); —, DQ268029, DQ268198. JP17; Japan, Gifu Pref., Fuwa-gun, Sekigahara-cho, Odaka, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268364, DQ268027, DQ268196. JP13; Japan, Toyama Pref., Tonami-shi, Yagi, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268365, —, —. JP19; Japan, Shiga Pref., Takashima-gun, Shinashahi-cho, Harie, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268366, —, —. JP12; Japan, Toyama Pref., Toyama-shi, Hamakurosaki Kourai, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268367, —, —. US1; USA, Washington, San Juan Co., Friday Harbor, PZ 18344 (SAV); DQ268348, DQ268013, DQ268182. US43 (as C. oligosperma); USA, Washington, Grays Harbor Co., Grayland, G. C. Tucker 12636 (MO 5688347); DQ268356, DQ268018, DQ268187. US2; USA, California, Alameda county, Berkeley, PZ 16765 (SAV); DQ268349, DQ268012, DQ268181. US3, USA, Washington, Clark Co., Kevanna Park, Burnt Bridge Creek, PZ 18393 (SAV); DQ268350, DQ268015, DQ268184. US4; USA, Oregon, Clatsop Co., Clatsop Spit, PZ 18408 (SAV); DQ268351, DQ268014, DQ268183. US5 (as C. oligosperma); USA, Washington, Grays Harbor Co., Highland Golf Course, PZ 18241 (SAV); DQ268346, DQ268016, DQ268185. US6 (as C. oligosperma); Oregon, Columbia Co., St. Helens, PZ 18224 (SAV); DQ268347, DQ268017, DQ268186. US7; USA, Maryland, Kent Island, Crab Alley Road, C. F. Reed (MO 5428171); DQ268358, —, —. US8; USA, North Carolina, Guilford Co., Browns Summit, D. Tenaglia (MO 5737872); DQ268352, DQ268019, DQ268188. US9; USA, Florida, Leon Co., W of Tallahassee, R. K. Godfrey 56250 (MO 5582753); DQ268353, DQ268020, DQ268189. US10; USA, Illinois, Lawrence Co., Indiana Robeson Hills Nature Preserve, B. Edgin 2033 (MO 5171397); DQ268354, DQ268021, DQ268190. US11, USA, Connecticut, New London Co., Groton, G. C. Tucker 10486 (MO 04998220); DQ268355, DQ268022, DQ268191. US12; USA, California, Los Angeles Co., Claremont, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, A. C. Sanders 17956 (MO 5706308); DQ268357, DQ268023, DQ268192. VEN; Venezuela, Estado Aragua, Maya, J. A. Steyermark & R. Liesner (MO 2795440); DQ268359, DQ268024, DQ268193. EQ; Ecuador, Pichincha, Quito Cantón, Bosque Seco Montano Bajo, C. Cerón & M. Montesdeoca 12116 (MO 04990843); DQ268360, DQ268025, DQ268194. AUS1, Australia, WA, Manjimup, V. L. Tunsell 223 (PERTH 06147070); DQ268341, DQ268009, DQ268178. AUS2; Australia, Lowlands, Serpentine River, G. J. Keighery 3474 (PERTH 04181700); DQ268343, DQ268010, DQ268179. AUS3; Australia, Woodvale Nature Reserve, G. J. Keighery 14390 (PERTH 04832086); DQ268344, —, —. AUS4; Australia, Mt. Chudalup, WA, A. R. Annels, R. W. Hearn ARA 4399 (PERTH 04440773); DQ268345, DQ268007, DQ268176. AUS10 (as C. paucijuga); Australia, Lake Muir Nature Reserve, WA, G. J. Keighery 15413 (PERTH 05275113); —, DQ268011, DQ268180. AUS11; Australia, Lovett Street, Scarborough, WA, K. F. Kenneally (PERTH 06147070); DQ268342, DQ268008, DQ268177. AUS12 (as C. paucijuga); Australia, Rockingham Lakes Regional Park, WA, G. J. Keighery 16265 (PERTH 06330339); DQ268340, —, —. ETH1; Ethiopia, Simea Mt. National Park, E. Ermias (SAV); DQ268382 and DQ268385; DQ268047-DQ268048, DQ268214-DQ268215. ETH2; Ethiopia, Choke Mt., E. Ermias (SAV); DQ268383, —, —. ETH3; Ethiopia, Addis Ababa Univ., E. Ermias (SAV); DQ268384, —, —.Cardamine impatiens—GE2; Georgia, Borjomis Raioni, Bakuriani, KM (SAV); —, DQ268169, DQ268335. JP4; Japan, Nagano Pref., Minamiazumi-gun, Azumi-mura, Shimashima-dani, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268503, DQ268168, DQ268334. SK5; Slovakia, V
chod. níina lowland, Bo
any, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268504, DQ268170, DQ268336. DE4; Germany, Heidelberg, Schlierbach, JL (SAV), —, DQ268167, —. CR2; Croatia, Velebit, Otarje, JK (SAV); DQ268505, DQ268171, DQ268337. Cardamine longifructus—JP24; Japan, Hyogo Pref., Ibo-gun, Shingu-cho, Okugoya, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268496-DQ268498, DQ268152-DQ268153, DQ268319-DQ268320. JP82; Tokushima Pref., Mima-gun, Koyadaira-mura, Mt. Tsurugisan, Gyójyó, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268495, DQ268154, DQ268321. JP83; Tokushima Pref., Miyoshi-gun, Higashiiyayama-mura, Mt. Miune, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268494, DQ268155, DQ268322. Cardamine niigatensis—JP97; Japan, Niigata Pref., Kitauonuma-gun, Yunotani-mura, Tochiomata, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268490-DQ268493, DQ268159 and DQ268161-DQ268163, DQ268326 and DQ268328-DQ268330. JP98; Japan, Niigata Pref., Kitauonuma-gun, Yunotani-mura, Ginzandaira, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268479-DQ268482, DQ268164-DQ268165, DQ268331-DQ268332. Cardamine oligosperma—US13; USA, Oregon, Washington Co., Tualatin Hills Nature Park, Beaverton, PZ 18232 (SAV); DQ268386, DQ268053, DQ268220. US14 (as C. flexuosa); USA, Oregon, Washington Co., Tualatin Hills Nature Park, Beaverton, PZ 18234 (SAV); DQ268388, DQ268051, DQ268218. US15; USA, Washington, San Juan Co., Lopez Island, Point Colville, PZ 18343 (SAV); —, DQ268052, DQ268219. US16; USA, Oregon, Capses, East Side Hill, L. F. Henderson 399/1924 (MO 911084); DQ268389, DQ268049, DQ268216. US17; USA, California, Butte Co., Oroville, M. S. Taylor 3498 (MO 3207800); —, DQ268054, DQ268221. CAN1; Canada, 1 km W of Bridal Falls, F. Lomer (UBC); DQ268387, DQ268050, DQ268217. Cardamine parvifloravar.parviflora—SK2; Slovakia, Vchod. níina lowland, Stráne, KM (SAV); DQ268407, DQ268068-DQ268069, DQ268235-DQ268236. SK3; Slovakia, Vchod. níina lowland, Leles, KM (SAV); DQ268405, —, —. Ru, Russia, prov. Rjasan, district Spassk, Brykin Bor, V. Tichomirov et al. (MO 2402212); DQ268067, DQ268234. CZ; Czech Republic, Dolnomoravsk úval, Zbrod, KM (SAV); DQ268406, DQ268070, DQ268237. Cardamine parvifloravar.arenicola—US22; USA, Oklahoma, Mayes Co., E of Locust Grove, R. C. & K. W. Rollins 8753 (MO 3665047); DQ268403, DQ268061, DQ268228. US23; Missouri, St. Genevieve Co., Terre Blue Creek, NW of Sprott, J. A. Steyermark 806 (MO1027030); DQ268404, DQ268064, DQ268231. US24; USA, Florida, Leon Co., Tallahassee, R. K. Godfrey 62647 (MO 5168086); DQ268400, DQ268066, DQ268233. US25; USA, New York, Suffolk Co., Fisher's Island, Southold, G. C. Tucker & E. H. Horning 5989 (MO 3898808); DQ268395, DQ268063, DQ268230. US26; USA, New York, Suffolk Co., Fisher's Island, Southold, G. C. Tucker & E. H. Horning 5977 (MO 3898807); DQ268398, DQ268062, DQ268229. US27; USA, Illinois, Sullivan Co., First Old Field North, W. McClain (MO 5414442); DQ268399, DQ268065, DQ268232. US28; USA, Ohio, Butler Co., Hamilton city, Gilmore Ponds Preserve, A. W. Cusick 32,936 & D. C. Dister (MO 05017273); DQ268396, —, —. US29; USA, Missouri, Pulaski Co., Falls Hollow Sandstone Glade, Ft. Leonard Wood, J. Hays 352 (MO 04614587); DQ268397, —, —. US30; USA, Howell Co., N of Brandsville, B. Summers 4123 (MO 4235073); DQ268402, —, —. US44; USA, North Carolina, Madison Co., Co. road 1304, D. Boufford 12946 (MO2401083); DQ268394, —, —. CAN2; Canada, Essex Co., Pelee Island, W of Stone Rd, S of East West Rd, A. W. Cusick #33,770 & M. J. Oldham (MO 04898922); DQ268401, —, —. Cardamine paucijuga—AUS6; Australia, Layman Block, Tuart Forest WA, G. J. Keighery 14120 (PERTH 04475410); DQ268453, DQ268125, DQ268292. AUS7; Australia, Layman Block, Tuart Forest, E of Busselton, G. J. Keighery 14851 (PERTH 05017653); DQ268455, DQ268126, DQ268293. AUS8; Australia, Simmonds Block, Tuart Forest, G. J. Keighery 13,633 (PERTH 04533208); —, DQ268127, DQ268294. Cardamine pectinata—BG3; Bulgaria, Tsarichina natural reserve, St. Planina, Vezhen, JK (SAV); DQ268502, DQ268174, DQ268338. BG4; Bulgaria, Pirin Mts., Banderitsa, JK (SAV); —, DQ268172, —. BG5; Bulgaria, Tetevensky Balkan, Zavodna River valley, JK (SAV); —, DQ268173, —. GE2; Georgia, Borjomis Raioni, Bakuriani, KM (SAV); —, DQ268175, DQ268339. Cardamine pensylvanica—US37; USA, Arkansas, Pope Co., Atkins, R. C. & K. W. Rollins 8755 (MO 3665046);—, DQ268132, DQ268299. US38; USA, Washington, Pierce Co., SE of Frederickson, R. R. Halse 4130 (MO 05037131); —, DQ268133, DQ268300. US39; USA, New York, Hamilton Co., Whitaker Lake, G. C. Tucker 6044 (MO 04998197); DQ268466, —. US40; USA, Washington, Clark Co., Vancouver, Columbia River, PZ 18321 (SAV); DQ268468-DQ268469, DQ268134-DQ268135, DQ268301-DQ268302. US41; USA, Oregon, Yamhill Co., Cozine Creek, PZ 18183 (SAV); DQ268467, DQ268136, DQ268303. US42; USA, New York, Orange Co., Harriman State Park, Summer Hill, G. C. Tucker & J. G. Barbour 8663 (MO 04998214); —, DQ268137, DQ268304. US43; USA, South Carolina, Richland Co., Congaree Swamp National Monument, J. N. Nelson 20407 (MO 5706300); —, DQ268130, DQ268297. CAN1; Canada, British Columbia, Bridal Falls, F. Lomer (UBC); DQ268465, DQ268131, DQ268298. Cardamine scutata—TAI1 (as C. flexuosa); Taiwan, Miaoli Hsien, Nanchuang Hsiang, Fengmeihsi, Tsui-Ya Liu 375 et al. (MO 04594130); —, DQ268129, DQ268296. JP7; Japan, Nagano Pref., Oomachi-shi, Kurosawa, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268483, DQ268166, DQ268333. JP10; Japan, Niigata Pref., Nishikubiki-gun, Oumi-cho, Hashidate, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268470, DQ268142, DQ268309. JP17; Japan, Gifu Pref., Fuwa-gun, Sekigahara-cho, Odaka, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268488, DQ268143, DQ268310. JP18; Japan, Shiga Pref., Ohtsu-shi, Katsuragawa, Mt. Minako, Ado river, JL et al. (SAV); —, DQ268144, DQ268311. JP29; Japan, Gumma Pref., Tone-gun, Katashina-mura, Higashiogawa, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268471, DQ268145, DQ268312. JP41; Japan, Hokkaido, Otaru-shi, S of Otaru, Tenjin, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268486, DQ268138, DQ268305. JP46; Japan, Hokkaido, Isoya-gun, Rankoshi-cho, Isotani-gun, Tachikawa, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268472, DQ268146, DQ268313. JP50; Japan, Hokkaido, Setana-gun, Setana-cho, Kariba-keikoku, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268484, DQ268141, DQ268308. JP52; Japan, Hokkaido, Ishikari-gun, Tohbetu-cho, Aoyamaokunibangawa, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268473, DQ268147, DQ268314. JP66; Japan, Hokkaido, Nakagawa-gun, Bifuka-cho, Panke, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268485, DQ268148, DQ268315. JP68; Japan, Hokkaido, Teshio-gun, Horonobe-cho, Kamitoikan, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268474, DQ268140, DQ268307. JP81; Japan, Tochigi Pref., Nikko-shi, Chyuzenji lake, JL et al. (SAV); DQ268477, DQ268139, DQ268306. JP84; Japan, Ehime Pref., Matsuyama-shi, Minamitakai-cho, Tsuenofuchi-kohen Park (in cultivation), KM & HK (SAV); DQ268489, DQ268156, DQ268323. JP88; Japan, Miyazaki Pref., Higasiusuki-gun, Kitakata-cho, Nakasuiryu, Kiunadani valley, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268487, DQ268157, DQ268324. JP97; Japan, Niigata Pref., Kitauonuma-gun, Yunotani-mura, Tochiomata, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268478, DQ268160, DQ268327. JP103; Japan, Iwate Pref., Shimohei-gun, Iwaizumi-cho, Hitsutori-shitsugen, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268475, —, —. JP107; Japan, Aomori Pref., Kitatsugaru-gun, Kanagi-cho, Takahashi-zawa river, KM & HK (SAV); DQ268476, DQ268158, DQ268325. Cardamine umbellata—US18; USA, Alaska, Mt. McKinley National Park, A. Nelson & R. A. Nelson (MO 1200653); —, DQ268055, DQ268222. US19; USA, Alaska, Rainy Creek, Hyder, K. Whited (MO 925629); DQ268391, DQ268056, DQ268223. US20; USA, Aleutian Islands, Attu Island, Massacre Bay area, G. W. Soule (MO 1705457); DQ268390, DQ268058, DQ268225. US21; USA, Aleutian Islands, Atka, Lt.Cl.York (MO 1294537); —, DQ268057, DQ268224.
B) Sequences used in our previous studies or downloaded from GenBank.
Taxon—Accession code (if specified); GenBank accessions: ITS, trnL, trnL-trnF.
Cardamine amara(subsp.amara)—IT(AM-S5); DQ209070, —, DQ209184. IT(AM-S4); DQ209069, —, DQ209183. IT(AM-S6); DQ209067, —, DQ209181. IT(AM-E2); DQ209066, —, DQ209180. Cardamine debilis—; —, AY047643, AY047660. Cardamine corymbosa—; AF100678, AY047633, AY047646. Cardamine glacialis—; —, AY047634- AY047635, AY047648-AY047649. Cardamine hirsuta—DE2; DQ209131, —, DQ209142. IT1; DQ209132, —, DQ209143. Cardamine impatiens—RO4; DQ209127, —, —. DE4; DQ209128, —, DQ209201. Cardamine parviflora(var.parviflora) —SK2; DQ209133, —, DQ209134. Cardamine paucijuga—; —, AY047640, AY047656. Cardamine pectinata—BG4; DQ209129, —, DQ209200. BG5; DQ209130, —, DQ209199.
FOOTNOTES
1 This research was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany (research fellowship to J. L.), the exchange programme of the Japan Society of Promotion of Science and Slovak Academy of Sciences, the German Academic Exchange Service DAAD (project 323-PPP to M. A. K.), the Grant Agency VEGA, Slovak Republic (project no. 3042 to K. M.), and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (grant no. 0021620828 to K. M.). The authors thank the curators of MO, PERTH, and UBC for sending herbarium material and allowing the extraction of DNA from leaf samples; collectors of the plant material in the Appendix, especially P. Zika (Seattle, Washington, USA) who provided numerous specimens from his own collection; I. A. Al-Shehbaz (Missouri Botanical Garden) for providing information on his unpublished account of Cardamine for the Flora of Japan, as well as numerous samples of Asian specimens; F. Lomer (Vancouver, Canada) for providing specimens from Canada; H. Kato (Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan) for help in the field; Hong Song (Missouri Botanical Garden) for translation of Chinese herbarium labels; and C. Hughes (University of Oxford, UK) for many useful comments on and English improvements to the manuscript. J. L. also thanks the staff at the Department of Biodiversity and Plant Systematics at the University of Heidelberg, Germany (particularly I. Hase and Ch. Dobe), for their support during her research fellowship. 
6 Author for correspondence (judita.lihova{at}savba.sk
), phone: +421 2 5942 6148, fax: +421 2 5477 1948
LITERATURE CITED
Almeida M. T. de.. 1973. Uma Crucífera nova para a flora de Portugal. Anuário de Sociedade Broteriana 39: 19-23.
Álvarez I. Wendel J. F.. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417-434.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Al-Shehbaz I. A.. 1988. The genera of Arabidae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 69: 85-166.[Web of Science]
Al-Shehbaz I. A. Beilstein M. A.. 2006. Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview. Plant Systematics and Evolution: in press.
Bachmann K.. 2000. Molecules, morphology and maps: new directions in evolutionary genetics. Plant Species Biology 15: 197-210.[CrossRef]
Baldwin C. D. Sanderson M. J. Porter J. M. Wojciechowski M. F. Campbell C. S. Donoghue M. J.. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Banach E.. 1950. Cardamine. In M. Skali
ska [ed.], Studies in chromosome numbers. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 20: 53-55.
Berkutenko A. N.. 1988. Cardamine L. In S. S. Kharkevich [ed.] Sosudistye rasteniya sovetskogo Dal'nego Vostoka, vol. 3 65-77 Nauka, Leningrad, USSR.
Bleeker W. Franzke A. Pollmann K. Brown A. H. D. Hurka H.. 2002a. Phylogeny and biogeography of southern hemisphere high-mountain Cardamine species. Australian Systematic Botany 15: 575-581.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Bleeker W. Weber-Sparenberg C. Hurka H.. 2002b. Chloroplast DNA variation and biogeography in the genus Rorippa Scop. (Brassicaceae). Plant Biology 4: 104-111.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Britton N. L.. 1892. New or noteworthy North American phanerogams VI. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 19: 219-226.[CrossRef]
Busch N.. 1915. Flora Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka, part 2 Gosudarstvennaya Tipografiya, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Cheo T. Y. Guo R. L. Lan Y. Z. Lou L. L. Kuan K. C. An Z. X.. 1987. Cruciferae. In T. Y. Cheo [ed.] Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 33 1-483 Science Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Clement M. Posada D. Crandall K. A.. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9: 1657-1660.[CrossRef][Medline]
Doron'kin V. M.. 1994. Cardamine L. In L. I. Malyshev and G. A. Peshkova [eds.] Flora Sibiri, vol. 7, Berberidaceae–Grossulariaceae 78-84 VO Nauka, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Doyle J. J.. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Doyle J. J. Doyle J. L.. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
Dreyer L. L. Jordaan M.. 2000. Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). In O. A. Leistner [ed.] Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 184-191.
Ellis R. P. Jones B. M. G.. 1969. The origin of Cardamine flexuosa with evidence from morphology and geographical distribution. Watsonia 78: 92-103.
Ellstrand N. C. Schierenbeck K. A.. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 7043-7050.
Francisco-Ortega J. Fuertes-Aguilar J. Gomez-Campo C. Santos-Guerra A. Jansen R. K.. 1999. ITS sequence phylogeny of Crambe L. (Brassicaceae): molecular data reveal two Old World disjunctions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 361-380.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Franzke A. Pollmann K. Bleeker W. Kohrt R. Hurka H.. 1998. Molecular systematics of Cardamine and allied genera (Brassicaceae): ITS and non-coding chloroplast DNA. Folia Geobotanica 33: 225-240.[Web of Science]
Fujii N. Okuyama K. Koike T. Mikami T. Ueda K.. 2002. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Fagus crenata (Fagaceae) in Japan. Plant Systematics and Evolution 232: 21-33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Fujii N. Senni K.. 2006. Phylogeography of Japanese alpine plants: biogeographic importance of alpine region of central Honshu in Japan. Taxon 55: 43-52.[Web of Science]
Fukuoka N. Kurosaki N.. 1992. Phytogeographical notes on some species of western Honshu, Japan 10. Shoei Junior College Annual Reports of Studies 24: 67-75 (in Japanese).
Hall T. A.. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
Hara H.. 1952. Contribution to the study of variation in the Japanese plants closely related to those of Europe or North America, part 1. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section III, Botany 6: 29-96.
Hara H.. 1983. Comments on the East Asiatic plants (12). Journal of Japanese Botany (Shokubutsu kenkyu zasshi) 58: 321-330.
Hegarty M. J. Hiscock S. J.. 2005. Hybrid speciation in plants: new insights from molecular studies. New Phytologist 165: 411-423.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hewson H. R.. 1982. 32. Cardamine. In A. S. George [ed.] Flora of Australia, vol. 8 311-318 Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.
Holmgren P. K. Holmgren N. H. Barnett L. C.. 1990. Index herbariorum, part I, The herbaria of the world, 8th ed. Regnum Vegetabile 120: 1-693.
Huelsenbeck J. P. Ronquist F.. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
Ishiguri Y. Kudoh H. Kawano S.. 1994. Effects of different photoperiods and chilling treatments on growth and reproduction of Cardamine flexuosa With. and its ecological implications. Plant Species Biology 9: 75-84.[CrossRef]
Jalas J. Suominen J.. 1994. Atlas florae europaeae, vol. 10 Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki, Finland.
Jonsell B.. 1982. Cardamine. In R. M. Polhill [ed.] Flora of the tropical East Africa, Cruciferae 38-43 A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Khatri K. S.. 1989. Cardamine L. sect. Cardamine (Cruciferae) in the Asian territory of Soviet Union. Feddes Repertorium 100: 81-96.
Kimata M.. 1983. Comparative studies on the reproductive systems of Cardamine flexuosa, C. impatiens, C. scutata, and C. lyrata, Cruciferae. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) (Shokubutsu-gaku zasshi) 96: 299-312.
Kitagawa M.. 1982. Cruciferae. In Y. Satake, J. Ohwi, S. Kitamura, S. Watari and T. Tominari [eds.] Wild flowers of Japan II. Herbaceous plants (including dwarf shrubs), Choripetalae 127-138 Heibonsha, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
Koch M. Bernhardt K.-G.. 2004. Comparative biogeography of different cytotypes of the European annual Microthlaspi perfoliatum (Brassicaceae): refugia, diversity centers and postglacial colonization. American Journal of Botany 91: 115-124.
Koch M. A. Dobe Ch. Matschinger M. Bleeker W. Vogel J. Kiefer M. Mitchell-Olds T.. 2005. Evolution of the trnF(GAA) gene in Arabidopsis relatives and the Brassicaceae family: monophyletic origin and subsequent diversification of a plastidic pseudogene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1032-1043.
Kuera J. Lihová J. Marhold K.. 2006. Taxonomy and phylogeography of Cardamine impatiens and C. pectinata (Brassicaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society: in press.
Kuera J. Valko I. Marhold K.. 2005. On-line database of the chromosome numbers of the genus Cardamine (Brassicaceae). Biologia (Bratislava) 60: 473-476 Website http://147.213.100.117/cardamine/index.php.
Kudoh H. Ishiguri Y. Kawano S.. 1992. Cardamine hirsuta L., a new ruderal species introduced into Japan. Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy (Shokubutsu chiri bunrui kenkyu) 40: 85-89.
Kudoh H. Ishiguri Y. Kawano S.. 1993. Phenotypic variability in life history traits and phenology of field populations of Cardamine flexuosa and C. fallax (Cruciferae) in Honshu, Japan. Plant Species Biology 8: 7-20.[CrossRef]
Kudoh H. Ishiguri Y. Kawano S.. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity in Cardamine flexuosa: variation among populations in plastic response to chilling treatments and photoperiods. Oecologia 103: 148-156.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kudoh H. Ishiguri Y. Kawano S.. 1996. Phenotypic plasticity in age and size at maturity and its effects on the integrated phenotypic expressions of life history traits of Cardamine flexuosa (Cruciferae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 541-570.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kudoh H. Marhold K. Lihová J.. 2006. Notes on Cardamine impatiens L., C. flexuosa With., C. hirsuta L. and C. parviflora L. in Japan. Bunrui 6: 41-49 (in Japanese with English summary).
Lihová J. Fuertes Aguilar J. Marhold K. Nieto Feliner G.. 2004. Origin of the disjunct tetraploid Cardamine amporitana (Brassicaceae) assessed with nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. American Journal of Botany 91: 1231-1242.
Lihová J. Marhold K.. 2006. Phylogenetic and diversity patterns in Cardamine (Brassicaceae)—a genus with conspicuous polyploid and reticulate evolution. In A. K. Sharma and A. Sharma [eds.] Plant genome: biodiversity and evolution, vol. 1C: Phanerogams (Angiosperms–Dicotyledons) 149-186 Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, USA.
Lihová J. Shimizu K. K. Marhold K.. 2006. Allopolyploid origin of Cardamine asarifolia (Brassicaceae): incongruence between plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences solved by a single-copy nuclear gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 759-786.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Linder C. R. Rieseberg L. H.. 2004. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. American Journal of Botany 91: 1700-1708.
Maddison D. R. Maddison W. P.. 2000. MacClade4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.0 Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
Maekawa F.. 1944. Prehistoric-naturalized plants to Japan proper. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica (Shokubutsu bunrui chiri) 13: 274-279 (in Japanese).
Marhold K.. 1995. Taxonomy of the genus Cardamine L. (Cruciferae) in the Carpathians and Pannonia. III. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 30: 397-434.
Marhold K. Lihová J. Pern M. Bleeker W.. 2004. Comparative ITS and AFLP analysis of diploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) taxa from closely related polyploid complexes. Annals of Botany (Oxford) 93: 507-520.[CrossRef]
Miyawaki A. Okuda S. Fujiwara M.. 1994. Hand book of Japanese vegetation, new revised ed Shibundo, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
Nieto Feliner G. Gutiérrez Larena B. Fuertes Aguilar J.. 2004. Fine-scale geographical structure, intra-individual polymorphism and recombination in nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers in Armeria (Plumbaginaceae). Annals of Botany (Oxford) 93: 189-200.[CrossRef]
Ohi T. Kajita T. Murata J.. 2003. Distinct geographic structure as evidenced by chloroplast DNA haplotypes and ploidy level in Japanese Aucuba (Aucubaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 1645-1652.
Ohwi J.. 1984. Flora of Japan Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
Ouyahya A.. 1999. Cardamine. In M. Fennane, M. Ibn Tattou, J. Mathez, A. Ouyahya and J. El Oualidi [eds.] Flore pratique du Maroc, vol. 1. Travaux de l'Institut Scientifique, Sér. Botanique 36: 418-419.
Pak J.-H.. 2005. The coloured flora for practical use in Korea, herbaceous plants Tonga Munhwasa, Taegu, Korea (in Hangul).
Posada D. Crandall K. A.. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
Rauscher J. T. Doyle J. J. Brown A. H. D.. 2002. Internal transcribed spacer repeat-specific primers and the analysis of hybridization in the Glycine tomentella (Leguminosae) polyploid complex. Molecular Ecology 11: 2691-2702.[CrossRef][Medline]
Regel E.. 1862. Aufzaehlung der von Radde in Baikalien, Dahurien und am Amur sowie der vom Herrn von Stubendorff auf seiner Reise durch Sibirien nach Kamtschatka, und der von Rieder, Kussmisscheff und anderen in Kamtschatka gesammelten Pflanzen. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 34: 1-211.
Rollins R. C.. 1993. The Cruciferae of continental North America Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.
Schulz O. E.. 1903. Monographie der Gattung Cardamine. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 32: 280-623.
Sharbel T. F. Haubold B. Mitchell-Olds T.. 2000. Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and postglacial colonization of Europe. Molecular Ecology 9: 2109-2118.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simmons M. P. Ochoterena H.. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sjöstedt B.. 1975. Revision of the genus Cardamine L. (Cruciferae) in South and Central America. Botaniska Notiser 128: 8-19.[Web of Science]
Sweeney P. W. Price R. A.. 2000. Polyphyly of the genus Dentaria (Brassicaceae): Evidence from trnL intron and ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 25: 468-478.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Swofford D. L.. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods) Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
Taberlet P. Gielly L. Pautou G. Bouvet J.. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Templeton A. R. Crandall K. A. Sing C. F.. 1992. A cladistic analysis of the phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619-633.[Abstract]
Thompson I. R.. 1996. Cardamine. In N. G. Walsh and T. J. Entwisle [eds.] Flora of Victoria, vol. 3 434-442 Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.
Thunberg Ch. P.. 1794. Botanical observations on the flora japonica. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 2: 326-342.
Torrey J. Gray A.. 1838. Flora of North America, vol. 1, part 1 Wiley & Putnam, New York, New York, USA.
Tsuda Y. Ide Y.. 2005. Wide-range analysis of genetic structure of Betula maximowicziana, a long-lived pioneer tree species and noble hardwood in the cool temperate zone of Japan. Molecular Ecology 14: 3929-3941.[CrossRef][Medline]
Urbanska-Worytkiewicz K.. 1977. An autoallohexaploid in Cardamine L., new to the Swiss flora. Berichte des Geobotanischen Instituts der ETH Stiftung Rübel 44: 86-103.
USDA, NRCS.. 2005. The PLANTS database, version 3.5. Data compiled from various sources by Mark W. Skinner. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Lousiana, USA Website http://plants.usda.gov.
Vriesendorp B. Bakker F. T.. 2005. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in angiosperms: what can we do?. Taxon 54: 593-604.[Web of Science]
Warwick S. I. Francis A. Mulligan G. A.. 2005. Brassicaceae of Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre (ECORC), Ottawa, Canada. Website http://www.cbif.gc.ca/spp_pages/brass/index_e.php.
Webb C. J. Sykes W. R. Garnock-Jones P. J.. 1988. Flora of New Zealand, vol. 4 Botany Division, D.S.I.R., Christchurch, New Zealand.
Withering W.. 1796. An arrangement of British plants, 3rd ed M. Swiney, Birmingham, England; C. G. J. & J. Robinson, London, England.
Yatsu Y. Kachi N. Kudoh H.. 2003. Ecological distribution and phenology of an invasive species, Cardamine hirsuta L., and its native counterpart, C. flexuosa With., in central Japan. Plant Species Biology 18: 35-42.[CrossRef]
Zhou T. Y. Lu L. L. Yang G. Al-Shehbaz I. A.. 2001. Brassicaceae. In Z. Y. Wu and P. H. Raven [eds.] Flora of China, vol. 8 1-193 Science Press, Beijing, China/Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Zhou T. Y. Lu L. L. Yang G. Al-Shehbaz I. A. Dorofeyev V. I.. 2003. Brassicaceae. In Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven and D. Hong [eds.] Flora of China, Illustrations, vol. 8 1-134 Science Press, Beijing, China; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. P. Der, J. A. Thomson, J. K. Stratford, and P. G. Wolf Global chloroplast phylogeny and biogeography of bracken (Pteridium; Dennstaedtiaceae) Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 1041 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
