Online Errata

Files in this Data Supplement:

• Page 1143 - Revised Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood trees showing placement of Iochrominae within the Solanoideae. Regions analyzed are listed to the upper left of each tree. All trees are shown with branch lengths proportional to the estimated average number of substitutions per site under the models indicated in Table 2. Bootstrap support (BS) values > 50% are shown above branches or before the slash, and posterior probabilities (PP) > 0.75 (shown as percentages) are below branches or after the slash. Asterisks indicate a PP of 1.0. The rightmost tree is labeled with Olmstead et al. (1999) tribal and subtribal groupings. Solid vertical lines label monophyletic groups; dashed vertical lines indicate non-monophyly. This figure differs from the print journal: the bootstrap value 90 with asterisk has been moved to the branch subtending the Salpichroa + Solanum + Capsicum + Lycianthes clade in the rightmost tree (combined ITS and waxy).
  A formal erratum will be posted in the September issue.
• Page 1148 - Revised Fig. 3. Floral diversity, biogeography, and hybridization in Iochrominae. Cladogram showing relationships from combined analysis with the well-supported (BS > 70%, PP > 0.95) branches bolded. See Fig. 2 caption for explanation of clade names (L, C, F, etc.); members of Dunalia and Saracha are not labeled as the genera are non-monophyletic. Colored boxes indicate entire geographic distribution with the exception of A. arborescens (widespread, with samples from Ecuador, Peru, and Costa Rica included in this analysis) and V. breviflora, (widespread through southern South America). The samples of A. arborescens from Peru and Ecuador are condensed to a single line because they appear to be sister taxa in the combined analysis; the A. arborescens from Costa Rica is abbreviated "A. arb." Gray, curved lines connect the putative hybrids, I. ayabacense, I. stenanthum, and I. "sagasteguii" to their putative parents. This figure differs from the print journal: the branch and associated symbols for V. breviflora and for V. dichotoma have been interchanged to align with the correct flower images.
  A formal erratum will be posted in the September issue.