HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content

Online errata

P. 1143

Revised Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood trees showing placement of Iochrominae within the Solanoideae. Regions analyzed are listed to the upper left of each tree. All trees are shown with branch lengths proportional to the estimated average number of substitutions per site under the models indicated in Table 2. Bootstrap support (BS) values > 50% are shown above branches or before the slash, and posterior probabilities (PP) > 0.75 (shown as percentages) are below branches or after the slash. Asterisks indicate a PP of 1.0. The rightmost tree is labeled with Olmstead et al. (1999) tribal and subtribal groupings. Solid vertical lines label monophyletic groups; dashed vertical lines indicate non-monophyly. This figure differs from the print journal: the bootstrap value 90 with asterisk has been moved to the branch subtending theSalpichroa+Solanum+Capsicum+Lycianthesclade in the rightmost tree (combined ITS andwaxy).

A formal erratum appears in the September issue.

P. 1148

Revised Fig. 3. Floral diversity, biogeography, and hybridization in Iochrominae. Cladogram showing relationships from combined analysis with the well-supported (BS > 70%, PP > 0.95) branches bolded. See Fig. 2 caption for explanation of clade names (L, C, F, etc.); members of Dunalia and Saracha are not labeled as the genera are non-monophyletic. Colored boxes indicate entire geographic distribution with the exception of A. arborescens (widespread, with samples from Ecuador, Peru, and Costa Rica included in this analysis) and V. breviflora, (widespread through southern South America). The samples of A. arborescens from Peru and Ecuador are condensed to a single line because they appear to be sister taxa in the combined analysis; the A. arborescens from Costa Rica is abbreviated "A. arb." Gray, curved lines connect the putative hybrids, I. ayabacense, I. stenanthum, and I. "sagasteguii" to their putative parents. This figure differs from the print journal: the branch and associated symbols forV. brevifloraand forV. dichotomahave been interchanged to align with the correct flower images.

A formal erratum appears in the September issue.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content