|
|
||||||||
Ecology |
2Centro de Investigación Forestal (CIFOR), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Apartado 8111, 28080 Madrid, Spain; 3Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication April 19, 2005. Accepted for publication March 8, 2006.
ABSTRACT
A heteroblastic (or vegetative phase) change is an abrupt manifestation in the general heteroblastic development during the ontogeny of plants. The Canary Island pine undergoes an especially marked and delayed heteroblastic change, including both the formation of secondary needles on dwarf shoots and the onset of preformed growth. To assess genetic and environmental effects on the heteroblastic change in this species, we followed plants from 19 populations at a dry site and a wetter site. Comparing juvenile and adult needles from the same individuals, the adult had a significantly lower rate of water loss and higher leaf mass per area. Pooling data from all seed sources, the heteroblastic change took place when plants reached a critical height, on average, at 4 years of age at the dry site and 1 year earlier at the wet site. Within a subsample of individuals of equal size, mortality was significantly higher in juvenile plants than in mature plants. However, the juvenile phase was longer in plants from dry regions when compared to plants from highly productive, wet regions. This apparent contradiction might be explained through differential resource allocation and the cost of sclerophylly and resprouting ability. Considering the life strategy of the Canary Island pine, we interpret the prolonged juvenile phase as an unavoidable trade-off for the high tolerance of adults to harsh environments.
Key Words: Canary Islands ontogeny phase change Pinaceae provenance trial survival
Ontogeny is a key aspect in understanding the evolutionary role of phenotypic differences between organisms (McKinney and McNamara, 1991
; Pigliucci, 1997
). In plants, the ontogenetic sequence is often associated with morphological differences in leaf characteristics, internode dimensions, and the fate of axillary buds. While the ontogenetic transition is usually gradual, in some plant species the transition is abrupt and distinct, frequently referred to as heteroblastic change or "vegetative phase change," to distinguish it from a "reproductive phase change" (Greenwood, 1995
; Jones, 1999
). Heteroblasty, that is, the sequence of changes in vegetative metamers along the shoot during ontogeny, has been extensively studied in a few model plants, such as maize and Arabidopsis (Pigliucci, 1997
; Winn, 1999
; Poethig, 2002a
, b
), but information on the adaptive and evolutionary role of heteroblasty in woody plants is still scarce. Moreover, while ontogeny has been recognized as an important source of variation for functional studies of plants (Thomas and Winner, 2002
; Wright and Mcconnaughay, 2002
), few works have dealt with ontogenetic differences linked to distinct, heteroblastic morphotypes (Miller et al., 1995
; King, 1999
; Schreuder et al., 2001
). Studies on different Eucalyptus species have highlighted the complexity of interpreting the adaptive role of heteroblasty (Jordan et al., 2000
) and have shown high heritability for the timing of heteroblastic change and its independence from the timing of the reproductive phase change in this genus (Wiltshire et al., 1998
; Jordan et al., 1999
).
Although little studied in this respect, Pinus provides a good model to broaden our knowledge on the adaptive role of heteroblasty. After the cotyledonary stage, seedlings have only euphylls (solitary needles such as those in the adult shoots of Pseudotsuga, Picea, or Abies). Later, axillary shoots start developing; first, fascicles of juvenile needles (resembling those of Cedrus or Larix) appear in many species, followed by the distinctive dwarf shoots with clustered secondary needles (Doak, 1935
; Lester, 1968
). In most pine species, secondary needles are produced from the second vegetative period onward or even during the first growing season. Juvenile needles are bluish, short, and elliptical in shape, while adult secondary needles are dark green and significantly longer and thicker. In addition to the heterophylly (i.e., differences between leaf structures), the heteroblastic change in pines includes an abrupt change from free growth to fixed growth (Lanner, 1976
). In the juvenile phase, stem units elongate shortly after their formation without forming terminal buds. By contrast, the adult, fixed growth pattern implies increasing the lapse between the formation of needle primordia and the elongation of stem units (Cannell et al., 1976
; Lanner, 1976
). This expansion of the period for production of initials in a bud protected with scales and resinous materials has been interpreted as an adaptation to temperate or cold climates occurring in the Tertiary (Klaus, 1989
) and as a way to concentrate the entire shoot elongation in a single flush in spring for competing more favorably with herbaceous plants (Cannell et al., 1976
). Growth-accelerating conditions, including watering, fertilizing, high temperatures, and long photoperiods have been found to hasten the transition from juvenile to adult foliage and reduce the time to formation of the first terminal bud in pines (Lester, 1968
; Lascoux et al., 1993
), putatively, when the plant achieves a critical size for undergoing heteroblastic change (Greenwood, 1995
).
In a few species within the subgenus Pinus, particularly in the Mediterranean P. pinea, P. canariensis, P. halepensis, P. brutia, and, to a lesser extent, also in P. pinaster, the juvenile growth habit can persist for several years (Klaus, 1989
). Particularly, the stone pine (Pinus pinea) and the Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis Chr. Sm.) have long-lasting juvenile stages (Lester, 1968
) and a marked heterophylly between primary and secondary needles.
The Canary Island pine is a drought-tolerant, fire-resistant endemism of the Canary Archipelago. This pine displays a conspicuous and delayed heteroblastic change (Fig. 1) combined with high environmental variation between natural populations, which may have contributed to ecotypic or clinal intraspecific genetic variation (Climent et al., 2004
). Secondary needles have an extensive lignified hypodermis and deeply sunken stomata with a complex spatial structure, which makes them extremely well adapted to avoid water loss when compared to juvenile needles (Jimenez et al., 2000
; Zellnig et al., 2001
). Therefore, we expected plants before the heteroblastic change to perform differently than plants after heteroblastic change in the field. To test this expectation and to describe intraspecific variation for this characteristic, we conducted a common garden experiment with several natural populations covering the whole geographical and ecological range of the species, planted at two contrasting sites.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant material
All 19 P. canariensis sampled populations (Table 1 and Fig. 2) are well documented to be of natural origin and naturally regenerated through historical records dating from the 16th century. In each population, cones were collected from 25 trees spaced at least 100 m apart. Cones were oven-dried to extract seeds, and within each population, seeds were pooled across parent trees. Sampled populations ranged from semi-arid pine stands, receiving 300 mm of rain per year to wet mixed pine forests with evergreen broadleaves, receiving >1500 mm per year.
|
|
Experimental design and field measurement
To check for maternal effects related to seed size, 20 sound seeds per mother tree were scanned to obtain the mean projected area per population. The seedlings used in the common garden experiment were raised over 12 mo in a nursery in plastic containers with a peat-based fertilized mixture. One-year-old seedlings were planted in December 1999 in hand-opened holes following removal of scrubby vegetation. The two trial sites were located in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) within the range of potential pine forests (Fig. 2). These sites were selected for this study because their soils (andosols) and annual mean temperatures (~13°C) are very similar, but they differed markedly in water availability. The north site (NS, 28°21' N, 16°36' W) is located at 1575 m on the windward slope of Teide Mountain (3718 m) and benefits from the mist from October to June. By contrast, the south site (SS, 28°16' N, 16°29' W) is located on the leeward slope of Teide Mountain, lacking the mist effect. The regional site index Gs is 26.6 m2/ha for NS and 15.9 m2/ha for SS. At each site, plants were arranged in seven randomized complete blocks in four-plant-squared experimental plots, totalling 28 plants per population, plus a borderline. The effect of differential competition within and between experimental plots was checked using standard indices (Tomé and Burkhart, 1989
), and judged as inconsequential; competition throughout the experiment was negligible even at the best site (NS) due to the wide spacing (2 x 3 m) in relation to plant size.
Measurements were taken after planting in the winter of 1999/2000 (age 1 yr) and every autumn until 2004 (age 6 yr). This period covered the entire juvenile period for virtually all plants in the trials. Each year, the height, survival, and ontogenetic score (OS) of every plant were recorded. The ontogenetic score followed a categorical three-level scale (OS0, juvenile; OS1, intermediate; and OS2, adult; Fig. 3). Further analyses were based on height at age 1 (H1 ) and height at age 6 (H6).
|
Data analysis
Differences between juvenile and adult foliage were assessed by comparing the linear regression models of relative needle mass vs. time and those of needle dry mass vs. needle area. The influence of plant age and height on heteroblastic change (HC) was analyzed at the site level (pooling for populations and replicates) using logistic probability models. For this analysis, every observation for a given plant (i.e., every combination of age, height, and ontogenetic score at each measurement) was used as an independent data point, thus considerably enlarging the sample size. We used the following logistic function:
|
| (1) |
The relationship between heteroblasty and survival was analyzed through a demographic analysis. For this purpose, each plant at each measuring date was classified into one of three categories: juvenile (J, corresponding to OS0), adult (A, pooling OS1 and OS2 because of their identical behavior facing survival), or dead (D). Between consecutive observations, the possible transitions between categories were either heteroblastic change (abbreviated JA) or death either at the juvenile (JD) or adult stage (AD). Plants conserving their juvenile or adult status were identified as JJ and AA, respectively. Rejuvenation (AJ) and the recovery of apparently dead plants (DJ) occurred at a negligible frequency; hence we preferred to consider those cases as observation errors and excluded them from the analyses. The frequencies obtained were cross-tabulated to build a transition matrix, showing the probabilities of a plant at a given year remaining in the same state, changing it, or dying over the following year (Markov chain). Plant height was compared between demographic groups to determine the relationship among plant size, heteroblasty, and survival each measuring year.
To separate the effects of plant size and heteroblasty on survival, we searched for series of plants with the same height (disregarding plant age) but different ontogenetic stage within each population. A series was considered only if any mortality was observed over the following year. This subsample consisted of 26 series totalling 188 plants and including all ecological regions. Survival between juveniles and adults was compared using Student's t test of angular-transformed frequencies per series. All analyses were performed with statistical package Statgraphics Plus, version 5.1 (StatPoint, Inc., Herndon, Virginia, USA).
To separate environmental and genetic influences on heteroblasty, two variables, height (Hh) and time (Th) until heteroblastic change, were defined, respectively, as the height and age the year before the heteroblastic change for each plant. A GLM approach to ANOVA with type III sum of squares was conducted for Hh, Th, and the height at age 6, H6, using the following model:
|
| (2) |
the residual term, thus comprising individual variation and experimental error. Initial height (H1) was included as a covariate in the analysis of Th and H6 to avoid biases caused by nursery effects. Site, region and population were considered fixed effects while block was considered a random factor. Comparisons among regions were done through multiple range tests with Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) intervals. The differential site effect on heteroblasty for each region was checked graphically through environmentenvironment biplots (Pigliucci and Schlichting, 1996
RESULTS
Comparison between juvenile and adult needles
The rate of water loss was significantly lower for secondary needles than for primary needles (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, leaf mass per area was significantly higher in secondary needles than in primary needles (0.13 and 0.07 g/cm2, respectively, Fig. 4b), and this difference was consistent for all eight ecological regions analyzed. The observed needle life span was similar between juvenile and adult foliage (23 yr, data not shown).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heteroblasty in Pinus canariensis: relationship to plant age, size, and survival
Under the conditions of this experiment, we observed that plants of the Canary Island pine took from 2 to as much as 6 years or more (three plants still remained juvenile at the end of the experiment) before undergoing a heteroblastic change in the main shoot. We have not found previous references to such a prolonged juvenile stage in pines, apart from the "grass-stage" characteristic of some subtropical Diploxylon species (Kossuth, 1981
; Keeley and Zedler, 1998
; Koskela, 2000
). However, it is important to note that the grass stage is characterized by the lack of elongation of otherwise adult metamers, while juvenile Canary Island pine bears exclusively primary needles. In addition to the variation in the timing of the vegetative phase change, which could be interpreted as deriving merely from an accelerated or delayed development, we can respond affirmatively to the existence of genetic variability in the heteroblastic process of P. canariensis, in parallel with findings in Eucalyptus globulus (Jordan et al., 2000
).
Juvenile and adult leaves of P. canariensis diverge in numerous morphological features whose functional relevance merits further research. As formerly postulated from anatomical attributes (Jimenez et al., 2000
; Zellnig et al., 2001
), our results confirmed the higher leaf mass per area and resistance to water loss of secondary needles. In fact, this increase in leaf sclerophylly along the ontogenetic sequence in the Canary Island pine seems an abrupt manifestation of a well-established general trend in trees (Greenwood, 1995
; Miller et al., 1995
; Steinbauer, 2001
; Thomas and Winner, 2002
).
The results of the demographic analysis together with the analysis of a series of plants of the same size suggest a direct effect of heteroblasty on survival, independent of plant size in P. canariensis, with significantly higher survival in adult plants under dry conditions. Even when it is clear, both from the logistic analysis and from size comparisons, that most plants undergo a phase change when they reach a critical size (~43 cm), our results point out that in this species the ontogenetic status might be a better indicator of plant vigor than plant size per se (V. Luis, unpublished manuscript).
Environmental and genetic effects on heteroblasty in P. canariensis
The time needed to reach vegetative maturity was significantly affected by the environment such that at the dry site the juvenile stage lasted, on average, about 1 year more than at the wet site. This is congruent with the idea that limitations to carbon gain elicit the maintenance of the juvenile condition, while treatments favoring growth tend to hasten maturation (Lascoux et al., 1993
; Poethig, 2002b
; Williams et al., 2004
). However, the environmental effect on heteroblasty was far less marked when this process was observed on a plant height basis. We found significant genetic divergence among ecological regions, such that plants from less productive regions underwent heteroblastic change later and at a taller size compared to plants from more productive, wetter areas. On the other hand, seeds from highly productive regions (1, 3 and 4) yielded significantly lower survival at the dry site compared to the intermediate and less productive regions. The existence of genetic differences for heteroblasty among seed sources of Pinus canariensis is coherent with the low gene flux among populations detected within the bigger Islands (Gomez et al., 2003
).
The interpretation of the significant genotype x environment interaction for the height to heteroblastic change deserves special attention. One possible explanation is that different levels of phenotypic plasticity for heteroblasty have been selected in resource-rich regions and resource-poor regions (Fig. 9). This is congruent with the idea that plasticity is selected when the environment experienced by individuals during their lifetime or from one generation to the next is heterogeneous (Van Tienderen, 1991
). In fact, individuals from favorable regions of the Canary Island pine must adapt to drastic environmental changes during their long life span, ranging from strong competition with understory species in early years to the dominant position of adult trees. The steep slopes prevalent in northern regions may also contribute to the sharp microenvironmental differences to which closely related genotypes would be exposed from one generation to the next. In this scenario, plasticity may help individuals to benefit from enhanced local conditions. On the contrary, the lack of plasticity of the unfavorable, less productive regions is coherent with the high evolutionary costs of stress tolerance (Lortie and Aarssen, 1996
). However, if, as the results at the regional level suggest, traits conferring drought resistance are genetically correlated with a delayed phase change, the high mortality of seed sources from wetter regions at the drier site might have caused a directional selection favoring drought-tolerant, less precocious genotypes from those regions. If this is the case, the observed genotype x environment interaction may simply reflect the difference in the genotypes being evaluated at both sites.
Nongenetic differences associated with environmental conditions faced during seed development (carryover effects, after-effects) have been found in some forest species to inflate estimates of genetic variation (Lopez et al., 2003
). However, we found no relationship between seed size and heteroblasty or survival per population or ecological region, which allows us to discard at least this source of maternal effects in our experiment.
Is heteroblasty in the Canary Island pine adaptive?
In the light of our results, the adaptive interpretation of heteroblasty in the Canary Island pine is nontrivial and somewhat counterintuitive. While, at the individual level, plants with adult foliage were found to be better adapted to drought, drought-adapted populations had a longer delay until the heteroblastic change.
So, if the adult phenotype is better, why don't plants from dry environments undergo heteroblastic change earlier? Is there any advantage in maintaining the juvenile condition in stressful environments? The response to the first question may be simply because they can't. The construction of evergreen sclerophyllous foliage involves high energetic costs (Poorter and Villar, 1997
; Villar and Merino, 2001
); hence an early formation of adult, drought-resistant leaves may be unaffordable under environmental restrictions, as postulated for the heteroblastic, drought-tolerant conifer Juniperus occidentalis (Miller et al., 1995
). Furthermore, the maintenance of a longer juvenile phase may be the only way to construct adult individuals with high survivability through differential resource allocation, and throughout the entire life cycle of the species, is probably adaptive. The Canary Island pine life history is characterized by a long life span, postfire resprouting ability, delayed sexual maturity, and low fecundity (Climent et al., 2004
). All these features indicate a tendency to the K reproductive strategy and imply a need to allocate a large quantity of resources to maintenance and survival (Wilson, 1983
), for example, producing a deep taproot and thick bark and accumulating great amounts of starch in the xylem (Climent et al., 1998
, 2004
). We can see similarities between the Canary Island pine's life strategy and that of lignotuberous species, including grass-stage pines, that may indicate parallel adaptations to a combination of predictable fires with low site productivity (Keeley and Zedler, 1998
). The energetic cost of storing and protecting stored materials (water and carbohydrates) leads to a loss of juvenile competitiveness, i.e., growth and survival potential, as seen when comparing resprouting and non-resprouting species in Mediterranean-type fire-prone ecosystems (Bell, 2001
; Pausas et al., 2004
).
In addition, shoot preformation occurring in the adult shoot implies the uncoupling of metamers formation within the winter bud and their elongation in the following spring (Cannell et al., 1976
; Jones and Watson, 2001
). Preformation severely limits morphological responses to environmental restrictions during the growing season, with the exception of abortion of preformed organs (Diggle, 1997
). This can be too risky for young plants until they are able to develop a deep root system and to store enough water and carbohydrates.
We interpret the long juvenile phase observed in P. canariensis as the unavoidable trade-off of constructing adult trees highly tolerant to stress and capable to resprout and hence attaining high reproductive success under the severe environmental constraints (drought, fire, or both) prevailing in most of its natural habitat. Further experiments will be necessary to unveil the precise role of heteroblasty in the ontogenetic shifts of biomass allocation and functional traits and the relevance of ontogenetic plasticity to the early performance of the Canary Island pine and other related taxa.
FOOTNOTES
1 The authors thank the numerous people involved in establishing and measuring the Canary Island pine provenance trial, as well as P. Smouse, M. Verdú, S. Mariette, and C. Burgarella for their helpful comments. This research was funded by the Canary Islands Government and Island Administrations (Cabildos) of Tenerife and Gran Canaria. L. Woodin helped with the English. ![]()
4 Author for correspondence (climent{at}inia.es
) ![]()
LITERATURE CITED
Aboal J. R. Jimenez M. S. Morales D. Gil P.. 2000. Effects of thinning on throughfall in Canary Islands pine forest: the role of fog. Journal of Hydrology 238: 218-230.[CrossRef][ISI]
Alberch P. Gould S. Oster G. Wake D.. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.[Abstract]
Bell D. T.. 2001. Ecological response syndromes in the flora of southwestern Western Australia: fire resprouters versus reseeders. Botanical Review 67: 417-440.
Cannell M. G. R. Thompson S. Lines R.. 1976. An analysis of inherent differences in shoot growth within some north temperate conifers. In M. G. R. Cannell and F. T. Last [eds.] Tree physiology and yield improvement 173-205 Academic Press, London, UK.
Clarke J. McCaig T.. 1982. Excised-leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of Triticum genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62: 571-578.[ISI]
Clarke J. Richards R.. 1988. The effect of glaucousness, epicuticular wax, leaf age, plant height and growth environment on water rates of the excised leaves. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68: 975-982.[ISI]
Climent J. Gil L. Pardos J. A.. 1998. Xylem anatomical traits related to resinous heartwood formation in Pinus canariensis Sm. Trees: Structure and Function 12: 139-145.[ISI]
Climent J. Tapias R. Pardos J. A. Gil L.. 2004. Fire adaptations in the Canary Islands pine (Pinus canariensis). Plant Ecology 171: 185-196.[CrossRef][ISI]
Diggle P. K.. 1997. Extreme preformation in alpine Polygonum viviparum: an architectural and developmental analysis. American Journal of Botany 84: 154-169.[Abstract]
Doak C. C.. 1935. Evolution of foliar types, dwarf shoots, and cone scales of Pinus. Illinois Biological Monographs 13: 1-106.
Gomez A. Gonzalez-Martinez S. C. Collada C. Climent J. Gil L.. 2003. Complex population genetic structure in the endemic Canary Island pine revealed using chloroplast microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 1123-1131.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Greenwood M. S.. 1995. Juvenility and maturation in conifers: current concepts. Tree Physiology 15: 433-438.[ISI][Medline]
Jimenez S. Zellnig G. Stabentheiner E. Peters J. Morales D. Grill D.. 2000. Structure and ultrastructure of Pinus canariensis needles. Flora 195: 228-235.[ISI]
Jones C. S.. 1999. An essay on juvenility, phase change, and heteroblasty in seed plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: S105-S111.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jones C. S. Watson M. A.. 2001. Heteroblasty and preformation in mayapple, Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae): developmental flexibility and morphological constraint. American Journal of Botany 88: 1340-1358.
Jordan G. J. Potts B. M. Chalmers P. Wiltshire R. J. E.. 2000. Quantitative genetic evidence that the timing of vegetative phase change in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus is an adaptive trait. Australian Journal of Botany 48: 561-567.[CrossRef]
Jordan G. J. Potts B. M. Wiltshire R. J. E.. 1999. Strong, independent, quantitative genetic control of the timing of vegetative phase change and first flowering in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Heredity 83: 179-187.
Keeley J. Zedler P.. 1998. Life history evolution in pines. In D. M. Richardson [ed.] Biogeography of Pinus, 219-242 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
King D. A.. 1999. Juvenile foliage and the scaling of tree proportions, with emphasis on Eucalyptus. Ecology 80: 1944-1954.[ISI]
Klaus W.. 1989. Mediterranean pines and their history. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 133-163.[CrossRef][ISI]
Koskela J.. 2000. A process-based growth model for the grass stage pine seedlings. Silva Fennica 1: 3-20.
Kossuth S. V.. 1981. Shortening the grass stage of longleaf pine with plant-growth regulators. Forest Science 27: 400-404.[ISI]
Lanner R. M.. 1976. Patterns of shoot development in Pinus and their relationship to growth potential. In M. G. R. Cannell and F. T. Last [eds.] Tree physiology and yield improvement 223-243 Academic Press, London, UK.
Lascoux D. Paino E. Sierra de Grado R. Kremer A. Dormling I.. 1993. Maturation of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) seedlings after exposure to a period of continuous light. Tree Physiology 12: 363-378.[ISI][Medline]
Lester D.. 1968. Developmental patterns of axillary meristematic activity in seedlings of Pinus. Botanical Gazette 129: 206-210.
Lopez G. Potts B. Vaillancourt R. Apiolaza A.. 2003. Maternal and carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 2108-2115.[CrossRef]
Lortie C. J. Aarssen L. W.. 1996. The specialization hypothesis for phenotypic plasticity in plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 157: 484-487.[CrossRef]
McCaig T. Romagosa I.. 1991. Water status measurements of excised leaves: position and age effects. Crop Science 31: 1583-1588.
McKinney M. McNamara K.. 1991. Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny Plenum Press, New York, New York, USA.
Miller P. M. Eddleman L. E. Miller J. M.. 1995. Juniperus occidentalis juvenile foliage: advantages and disadvantages for a stress-tolerant, invasive conifer. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25: 470-479.
Pausas J. Bradstock R. Keith D. Keeley J.. 2004. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85: 1085-1100.[CrossRef][ISI]
Pigliucci M.. 1997. Ontogenetic phenotypic plasticity during the reproductive phase in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 887-895.[Abstract]
Pigliucci M. Schlichting C. D.. 1996. Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. IV. Relationships between plasticity and fitness. Heredity 76: 427-436.
Poethig S.. 2002a. Genetic regulation of vegetative phase change in plants. Developmental Biology 247: 521.
Poethig S.. 2002b. Temporal and genetic regulation of vegetative phase change. Plant and Cell Physiology 43: S8.
Poorter H. Villar R.. 1997. The fate of acquired carbon in plants: chemical composition and construction costs. In F. Bazzaz and J. Grace [eds.] Plant resource allocation 39-72 Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
Schreuder M. van Hove L. Brewer C.. 2001. Ozone exposure affects leaf wettability and tree water balance. New Phytologist 152: 443-454.[CrossRef][ISI]
Steinbauer M.. 2001. Specific leaf weight as an indicator of juvenile leaf toughness in Tasmanian bluegum (Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus): implications for insect defoliation. Australian Forestry 64: 32-37.
Thomas S. C. Winner W. E.. 2002. Photosynthetic differences between saplings and adult trees: an integration of field results by meta-analysis. Tree Physiology 22: 117-127.[ISI][Medline]
Tomé M. Burkhart H. E.. 1989. Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. Forest Science 35: 816-831.[ISI]
Van Tienderen P. H.. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45: 1317-1331.[CrossRef][ISI]
Villar R. Merino J.. 2001. Comparison of leaf construction costs in woody species with differing leaf life-spans in constrasting ecosystems. New Phytologist 151: 213-226.[CrossRef][ISI]
Waring R. H. Gholz H. L. Grier C. C. Plummer M. L.. 1977. Evaluating stem conducting tissue as an estimator of leaf area in four woody angiosperms. Canadian Journal of Botany 55: 1474-1477.[ISI]
Williams D. R. Potts B. M. Smethurst P. J.. 2004. Phosphorus fertiliser can induce earlier vegetative phase change in Eucalyptus nitens. Australian Journal of Botany 52: 281-284.
Wilson M. F.. 1983. Plant reproductive ecology John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
Wiltshire R. J. E. Potts B. M. Reid J. B.. 1998. Genetic control of reproductive and vegetative phase change in the Eucalyptus risdoniiE. tenuiramis complex. Australian Journal of Botany 46: 45-63.[CrossRef][ISI]
Winn A. A.. 1999. The functional significance and fitness consequences of heterophylly. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: S113-S121.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wright S. D. McConnaughay D. M.. 2002. Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17: 119-131.
Zellnig G. J P. Jimenez M. Morales D. Grill D. Perktold A.. 2001. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the stomatal complex in Pinus canariensis needles using serial sections. Plant Biology 4: 70-76.[CrossRef][ISI]
Zimmermann M. H.. 1964. The relation of transport to growth in dicotyledonous trees. In M. H. Zimmermann [ed.] The formation of wood in forest trees 289-303 Academic Press, London, UK.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Verdu and J. Climent Evolutionary correlations of polycyclic shoot growth in Acer (Sapindaceae) Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1316 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |