|
|
||||||||
Systematics and Phytogeography |
2Department of Higher Plant Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria; 3The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK; 4Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, NMNH MRC-166, Washington DC 20013-7012, USA; 6Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétale, Université d'Antananarivo, B.P. 906, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar; 7Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK
Received for publication August 9, 2005. Accepted for publication January 12, 2006.
ABSTRACT
Phylogenetic relationships within tribe Phyllantheae, the largest tribe of the family Phyllanthaceae, were examined with special emphasis on the large genus Phyllanthus. Nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid matK DNA sequence data for 95 species of tribe Phyllantheae, including representatives of all subgenera of Phyllanthus (except Cyclanthera) and several hitherto unplaced infrageneric groups, were analyzed. Results for ITS and matK are generally concordant, although some species are placed differently in the plastid and ITS trees, indicating that hybridization/paralogy is involved. Results confirm paraphyly of Phyllanthus in its traditional circumscription with embedded Breynia, Glochidion, Reverchonia, and Sauropus. We favor the inclusion of the embedded taxa in Phyllanthus over further generic segregation. Monophyletic Phyllanthus comprises an estimated 1269 species, making it one of the "giant" genera. Phyllanthus maderaspatensis is sister to all other species of Phyllanthus, and the genus appears to be of paleotropical origin. Subgenera Isocladus, Kirganelia, and Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, whereas other subgenera appear to be monophyletic. Monotypic Reverchonia is sister to P. abnormis, arborescent section Emblica to herbaceous Urinaria, free-floating aquatic P. fluitans to the weed P. caroliniensis, and the phyllocladous section Choretropsis to the delicate leafy P. claussenii. The unique branching architecture known as "phyllanthoid branching" found in most Phyllanthus taxa has been lost (and/or has been derived) repeatedly. Taxonomic divisions within Phyllantheae based on similar pollen morphology are confirmed, and related taxa share similar distributions. We recommend recognition of six clades at generic level: Flueggea s.l. (including Richeriella), Lingelsheimia, Margaritaria, Phyllanthus s.l. (including Breynia, Glochidion, Reverchonia, and Sauropus), P. diandrus, and Savia section Heterosavia.
Key Words: ITS matK molecular phylogenetics Phyllanthaceae Phyllantheae Phyllanthus systematics
Recent advances in understanding phylogenetic patterns of the pantropical family Phyllanthaceae (a segregate from Euphorbiaceae sensu lato [s.l.]) based on congruent plastid and nuclear DNA sequence data have recovered well-resolved and strongly supported clades (Wurdack et al., 2004
; Samuel et al., 2005
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
) that correspond to subfamilies and tribes. Among the proposed tribes in the phylogenetic classification (Hoffmann et al., 2006
), tribe Phyllantheae, the focus of this paper, is the largest natural group and accounts for more than half of the ca. 2000 species in the family. The high species number (833 in Phyllanthus sensu Govaerts et al., 2000
) paired with minute unisexual flowers and an often confusingly similar habit in unrelated groups makes this a taxonomically challenging group. Generic circumscriptions in Phyllantheae have undergone substantial fluctuation in the course of their taxonomic history, and the definition of natural groups is still unclear in many parts of the tribe. These problems need to be addressed if the opportunities to study the evolution and morphological and ecological diversification in "giant genera" are to be embraced by the scientific community (Berry et al., 2005
).
As here interpreted, Phyllantheae are considerably narrower in scope than in the circumscription of Pax and Hoffmann (1922
, 1931
), Webster (1975
, 1994
), and Radcliffe-Smith (2001)
. It largely corresponds to subtribe Flueggeinae (tribe Phyllantheae; subfamily Phyllanthoideae) according to Webster (1994)
and Radcliffe-Smith (2001)
, with the addition of Lingelsheimia and Savia section Heterosavia. Previous classifications of Müller (1866)
, Pax and Hoffmann (1922
, 1931
), and Hutchinson (1969)
had placed the constituent taxa in a number of tribes and subtribes including Bridelieae, Drypeteae/-inae, Glochidieae/-inae, Hymenocardieae, Phyllantheae/-inae, Sauropodinae, Saviinae, Securineginae, and Wielandieae.
Pantropical Phyllanthus dominates tribe Phyllantheae, being the largest genus in the family. Phyllanthus has a remarkable diversity of growth forms (annual and perennial herbaceous, arborescent, climbing, floating aquatic, pachycaulous, and phyllocladous), floral morphology (Bancilhon, 1971
), and chromosome numbers (Webster and Ellis, 1962
). The diversity of pollen types (Köhler, 1965
, 1967
; Punt, 1967
, 1987
; Webster and Carpenter, 2002a
; Sagun and van der Ham, 2003
) rivals that of any genus of flowering plants. The vast majority of Phyllanthus species, however, share a distinctive vegetative specialization known as "phyllanthoid branching" (Webster, 1956
) with leaves on the main axes reduced to scales called "cataphylls" and those on lateral (plagiotropic), deciduous, floriferous axes developing normally.
In the first monograph of Euphorbiaceae s.l., Jussieu (1824) accepted 11 genera in Phyllanthinae: Agyneia, Anisonema, Cicca, Emblica, Epistylium, Glochidion, Gynoon, Kirganelia, Menarda, Phyllanthus, and Xylophylla. Baillon (1858)
closely followed Jussieu's narrow generic circumscriptions. The comprehensive body of work by Müller (1863
, 1865
, 1866
) adopted a broad generic concept, placing most of Jussieu's genera in Phyllanthus. Bentham (1878)
, Bentham and Hooker (1880)
, and Pax (1890)
followed Müller's system, but Hooker (1887)
excluded Glochidion from Phyllanthus. A detailed account of the taxonomic history of Phyllanthus can be found in Webster (1956)
. Further development of the infrageneric taxonomy of Phyllanthus was mainly based on the work of Webster (1956
, 1957
, 1958
), who concentrated on the Caribbean species and proposed the first modern classification for the genus. Subsequent publications by Webster and his collaborators mainly focused on the neotropical taxa (Webster, 1967
, 1970
, 1978
, 2001
, 2002a
, b
, 2003
, 2004
; Webster and Carpenter, 2002a
, b) but also dealt with the Phyllanthus species of New Guinea (Webster and Airy Shaw, 1971
), Melanesia (Webster, 1986
), and Sri Lanka (Webster, 1997
). Regional contributions by Leandri (1958)
, Brunel (1975
, 1987
), Airy Shaw (1971
, 1975
, 1980
), Radcliffe-Smith (1987
, 1996
), and Schmid (1991)
further advanced our knowledge of the Old World taxa. The generic circumscription of Phyllanthus by Webster (19562004), excluding only Glochidion of Jussieu's (1824) Phyllanthinae, has been widely adopted.
Webster's (1956, 1957, 1958) classification of Phyllanthus divided the genus in eight subgenera and over 30 sections based on vegetative architecture and pollen morphology in addition to floral characters. He stated in his monograph that, as in many other large angiosperm genera, the existing classification of Phyllanthus poorly reflects the true relationships among the subgeneric taxa. Holm-Nielsen (1979)
further emphasized the uncertainty of the infrageneric taxonomy and presumed that reticulate evolution played a role in the high diversity and wide distribution of Phyllanthus. During the course of our recent series of phylogenetic analyses of Phyllanthaceae (Wurdack et al., 2004
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
; Samuel et al., 2005
), internal resolution of Phyllantheae has improved with increased taxon sampling and addition of molecular markers. However, species representation in this clade of over 1250 species was insufficient to reach definite conclusions regarding generic delimitations in tribe Phyllantheae and the infrageneric classification of Phyllanthus in those studies. Sampling for this study is near-complete at the subgeneric level, and includes 29 of 64 validly published and accepted sections of Phyllanthus, and four of six subsections of section Phyllanthus recognized by Webster and other recent authors. The total of 64 sections was estimated from numerous sources spanning five decades, often with fluctuating and contradictory circumscriptions and complex synonymies. An attempt at a synopsis is provided in Table 1. Webster never synthesized his regional and sectional Phyllanthus treatments into a worldwide synopsis. In addition, we included representatives of eight infrageneric entities (one subgenus, six sections, one subsection) from Brunel's (1987) doctoral thesis; these names were never effectively published and are therefore invalid according to Article 32 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Greuter et al., 2000
).
|
For our phylogenetic investigation of tribe Phyllantheae, we used the plastid matK gene and part of its flanking trnK intron and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. The utility of matK (i.e., Samuel et al., 2005
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
) and ITS (i.e., Kawakita et al., 2004
) to resolve Phyllanthaceae relationships has been recently demonstrated. The ITS has also been used to resolve relationships in other Euphorbiaceae s.l. groups (e.g., Steinmann and Porter, 2002
). This study aims to (1) assess generic delimitations in the tribe, and (2) evaluate monophyly and relationships of infrageneric taxa of Phyllanthus. We acknowledge the limitations of our sampling at the species level in Phyllanthus, but we wish to emphasize well-resolved groups and recommend classification changes that will better reflect the phylogenetic relationships in Phyllanthus and tribe Phyllantheae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Taxon sampling and plant material
Taxon names, voucher information, and GenBank numbers for all sequences are listed in the Appendix. Ingroup sampling includes all currently recognized genera of tribe Phyllantheae as inferred from Kathriarachchi et al. (2005)
and circumscribed in Hoffmann et al. (2006)
, as well as of subtribe Flueggeinae of Webster (1994)
and Radcliffe-Smith (2001)
with similar composition. We made special efforts to obtain a good representation of subgeneric taxa defined by Webster (19562004), informal groups (Schmid, 1991
), and Brunel's (1987) ineffectively proposed infrageneric taxa of Phyllanthus. Cyclanthera with five species endemic to Cuba and Hispaniola, only recently elevated from sectional to subgeneric rank (Webster, 2002b
), was not sampled. Other unsampled taxa that could be phylogenetically significant include the Madagascan taxa described as Glochidion (see Hoffmann and McPherson, 2003
), P. fraternus, Phyllanthus subsection Pentaphylli, Phyllanthus subgenus Conami section Brazzaeani, and the remaining sections of subgenus Emblica (Microglochidion and Pityrocladus). Multiple accessions were sampled to confirm the position of those Phyllanthus species that were found in positions not predicted by their previous taxonomic placements. Outgroup sampling included representatives of each tribe of subfamily Phyllanthoideae sensu stricto (s.s.) as circumscribed by Hoffmann et al. (2006)
. Nomenclature and generic circumscription follow Govaerts et al. (2000)
and Radcliffe-Smith (2001)
for ease of reference.
The analyses shown here used matK sequences from 103 ingroup accessions (representing 97 species), 83 of which were newly generated for this study. The remaining were from our previous studies (Samuel et al., 2005
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
). The ITS data set contained 97 newly generated sequences (88 species) of tribe Phyllantheae. As far as possible, we used the same DNA samples for both markers, but in some cases different samples of the same species were used. Missing data are mainly due to the high degree of DNA degradation in some taxa (e.g., P. diandrus), and/or difficulty in amplifying the whole matK region in a few species (e.g., P. rheedii). Silica-gel-dried collections were obtained during field trips to Madagascar, Mayotte (Comoro Islands, Territorial Collectivity of France), and Sri Lanka, as well as from the DNA bank of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Most of the remaining DNA extractions are from herbarium material (Appendix).
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
DNA extractions, PCR, and sequencing generally followed Samuel et al. (2005)
. DNA from the Kew herbarium specimens was extracted at the Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK, using the method described by Doyle and Doyle (1987), but with a 2-wk (or more) precipitation with ethanol and purification on a cesium chloride/ethidium bromide gradient (1.55 g/ml).
Primers described in Samuel et al. (2005)
were used for the matK gene and its partial flanking trnK intron. In most cases, each PCR template was sequenced in both directions using the two amplification primers. For some sequences of the matK gene and the partial trnK intron regions, we used internal primers. The complete ITS region (ITS1, 5.8S rDNA gene, ITS2) was amplified and sequenced with universal primers 17SE and 26SE (Sun et al., 1994
). For the majority of taxa, the ITS1 and ITS2 regions were amplified separately using internal primers ITS2 and ITS3 (White et al., 1990
). Sequences were initially edited using Sequence Navigator (Applied Biosystems, Vienna, Austria), and complementary sequences were assembled using AutoAssembler version 1.4.0 (Applied Biosystems).
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses
Sequences were initially aligned with Clustal X (version 1.5b), then the alignment was adjusted by eye following the guidelines provided by Kelchner (2000)
. Length variation (in multiples of three) was observed in the matK gene. Secondary structure predictions in ITS1 and ITS2 were made using Mfold (Zuker, 2003
) using default parameters, and a general correspondence between structural motifs and sequence changes was observed. We also improved the ITS alignment by using the conserved angiosperm motifs described in Liu and Scardl (1994)
for ITS1 and in Hershkovitz and Zimmer (1996)
for ITS2 as benchmarks.
For the individual markers (ITS and matK + partial trnK intron) and the combined data, maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed as implemented in PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2003
). Analyses were conducted with nucleotide substitutions equally weighted (Fitch parsimony; Fitch, 1971
) and gaps treated as "missing" data. Insertions and deletions (indels) were not recorded because upon inspection none was found to mark groups with low support. Heuristic searches were performed initially using 1000 random taxon addition replicates, tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping, and "keeping multiple trees" (MulTrees) in effect but holding 10 trees per replicate to minimize swapping on large numbers of suboptimal trees. All trees thus obtained were used as starting trees for a further search with MulTrees option in effect and a limit of 15 000 trees. To assess support for each clade, bootstrap analyses (Felsenstein, 1985
) were performed with 1000 bootstrap replicates, TBR branch-swapping, and simple sequence additions. The individual bootstrap consensus tree of each marker was examined visually to determine congruence among data sets (Whitten et al., 2000
). For the combined analyses, the data set contained 87 ingroup species with both markers represented, plus 10 ingroup taxa that only had matK or ITS sequences available but were sole representatives of their morphologically defined taxonomic groups.
A few cases of species-specific incongruence between matK and ITS were observed, and after we removed either the ITS or matK sequence from the matrix, we proceeded with the combination of data sets. The incongruence length difference (ILD; Farris et al., 1995
) test was employed to detect incongruence among the data sets using partition homogeneity test in PAUP*. We used 1000 replicates on parsimony informative characters using TBR branch-swapping, with simple sequence addition and MulTrees option in effect. Siddal (1997)
pointed out that the ILD test does not truly reveal the amount of incongruence and can be insensitive to small but significant topological differences suggested by the different data sets. Failure of ILD to determine data combinability has been cited in various studies (Yoder et al., 2001
; Reeves et al., 2001
).
Bootstrap percentages (BP) are described as high (85100%), moderate (7584%), or low (5074%).
RESULTS
The data set characteristics and statistics from the maximum parsimony analyses are given in Table 2. Strongly supported incongruence between the individual analyses was observed in two instances (see Incongruent results and combined analysis of ITS and matK), and we removed the ITS or matK sequence for these taxa in the combined analysis. The results of the combined analysis (Fig. 3) are used to discuss phylogenetic relationships within Phyllantheae.
|
|
|
|
Because of the incongruent placements of New Caledonian subgenus Gomphidium and Madagascan P. betsileanus in the individual data sets, we removed the ITS data of P. betsileanus from the combined matrix. This resulted in a topology retaining high bootstrap support (BP 97) for the New Caledonian clade (subgenus Gomphidium and groups 6 and 7 of Schmid, 1991
; see Fig. 3, clade H) as seen in the matK analysis, which is biogeographically more plausible. When the analysis was conducted with both markers present for P. betsileanus, support for the New Caledonian clade was reduced but still moderate (BP 75, tree not shown). In the combined analysis with both markers included for P. kaessneri (tree not shown), this species has a poorly supported sister relationship with the majority of Old World subgenus Phyllanthus. We performed the combined analysis by removing the matK sequence of P. kaessneri from the matrix because the ITS topology is more consistent with its current geographical distribution.
The combined analysis (without matK for P. kaessneri and ITS for P. betsileanus) recovered 2980 shortest trees with 5840 steps (CI = 0.37 and RI = 0.67). The strict consensus tree with bootstrap percentages is depicted in Fig. 3. Increasing the number of characters generally increases support but not resolution (relative to only the ITS results) in the combined analysis. Monophyly of tribe Phyllantheae is confirmed (BP 100), and Margaritaria and Phyllanthus diandrus are sister to all other ingroup taxa. Flueggea (including unresolved Richeriella) + Savia section Heterosavia are consistently sister to Phyllanthus s.l., which is supported by BP 92 in the combined analysis.
Phyllanthus maderaspatensis is sister (BP 85) to all the other species of Phyllanthus s.l. It occupies this position in both single-gene analyses with less support (BP 61 and <50). Section Ceramanthus s.l., subgenus Isocladus section Macraea, subgenus Kirganelia section Anisonema, and subgenus Eriococcus form a basal grade (Fig. 3, clades A, B, and C) in which all other taxa of Phyllanthus s.l. are embedded. Subgenera Isocladus, Kirganelia, and Phyllanthus are shown to be nonmonophyletic in both the single-gene and the combined analyses. The clade comprising all taxa with phyllanthoid branching is strongly supported (BP 100), confirming the results of the matK analysis.
DISCUSSION
This study based on ITS and matK DNA sequences presents for the first time a molecular phylogenetic analysis of the large genus Phyllanthus and its relatives. It uses DNA sequence data for nearly 70 species of Phyllanthus sensu stricto, as well as species of Breynia, Glochidion, Reverchonia, and Sauropus, which have been recognized at generic rank in previous classifications.
There are several potential sources of incongruence between plastid and ITS DNA that could generate strongly supported and incongruent results for the two species that are differently placed in our trees from the separate analyses. These include spurious (sometimes termed "long branch") attraction caused by heterogeneity of evolutionary rates, and hybridization. In this study, relationships as estimated by ITS and matK data are in general agreement, but two species (i.e., P. betsileanus and P. kaessneri) are differently placed in the two (ITS and matK) trees. Thus we should look for reasons why individual species are misplaced, not for a phenomenon that affects all aspects of tree topology. In the case of ITS, potential difficulties could result from its structure and evolutionary dynamics, specifically the presence of multiple copies and variable thoroughness of concerted evolution. In the absence of complete concerted evolution, sequence variants can arise and be maintained (Mayol and Rossello, 2001
; Bailey et al., 2003
), but in this case we did not encounter multiple copies, so lack of concerted evolution can be eliminated as a cause of the differing placements for these species in the ITS and matK trees. In addition, biological causes for incongruence such as ancient hybridization and plastid capture have been reported (Boykinia, Soltis et al., 1996
; Veroniceae, Albach and Chase, 2004
).
It seems unlikely to us that heterogeneity of rates is causing misplacement of taxa, but of course this cannot be ruled out. Phyllanthus betsileanus does in fact have a long branch in the matK tree (results not shown), but its ITS sequence is not as divergent. However, we think that its position in the ITS trees is most likely spurious because it does not fit the general patterns of geographical relationships observed. Thus, we turn to the issues of hybridization and paralogy as potential causes. In the case of recent hybridization (plastid capture), there should not be large numbers of differences between the sequence of the misplaced taxon and the other taxa with which it falls, but it is difficult to see how paralogy and subsequent loss of different copy types in different species could cause this sort of misplacement. In the case of P. betsileanus, recent hybridization could seem to be ruled out as the cause of misplacement because it is Madagascan; the taxa with which it is misplaced are New Caledonian and its sequences are highly divergent from theirs. Ancient hybridization and subsequent divergence of the ITS copy of P. betsileanus could produce this pattern, but again this case would require either pollination across huge distances or long-distance dispersal of all progeny or extinction in the place where hybridization occurred.
The case of misplacement with African P. kaessneri is less easily explained. This species is morphologically aberrant with respect to its placement among African and Asian species in the ITS tree as well as in the neotropical species where it is placed in the matK tree. Our decision to remove the matK sequence in the combined analysis was motivated by geographical considerations; it seems more reasonable that it should be placed among African/Asian species because geographical groupings are so clear in our results, but this would then imply that its matK sequence is paralogous, a most unlikely scenario given that plastid genes are rarely implicated in such phenomena. Its position in the ITS has BP<50, whereas there is up to BP 72 with matK. If the matK tree is correct, then this is a case of dispersal from the New World to Africa, but this result clearly needs further investigation.
Circumscription of Phyllantheae
This study corroborates our earlier results (Wurdack et al., 2004
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
; Samuel et al., 2005
) and strongly supports the monophyly of Phyllantheae sensu Hoffmann et al. (2006)
with its adjusted generic compositions. Six taxa should be recognized at generic rank in this tribe: Flueggea s.l., Lingelsheimia, Margaritaria, Phyllanthus s.l., Phyllanthus diandrus, and Savia section Heterosavia.
Phyllanthus diandrus
DNA sequence data for Phyllanthus diandrus from western Central Africa were studied here for the first time. This species is not resolved within Phyllanthus, making Phyllanthus sensu Webster (1994)
biphyletic. It is instead strongly supported as sister to Margaritaria (Fig. 3). Phyllanthus diandrus agrees with Margaritaria in the flat, annular disc but differs from it in consistently having six instead of four sepals and two instead of four stamens. Taxa with two stamens are rare in Phyllanthaceae; they are otherwise only found in some taxa within Phyllanthus s.l., e.g., Reverchonia and subgenus Eriococcus, and in Antidesma and Aporosa in subfamily Antidesmatoideae (Hoffmann et al., 2006
). Furthermore, P. diandrus does not share the peculiar fruit structure of Margaritaria (chartaceous, brittle endocarp with fragmentary fruit dehiscence) but has a typical euphorbiaceous schizocarp. Pax and Hoffmann (1922)
created a monotypic section Diandri to accommodate P. diandrus, but in 1931 they transferred it to section Eriococcodes. Brunel (1987)
segregated P. diandrus as a putatively new genus Plagiocladus, citing its aberrant morphological features but neither effectively published the genus nor suggested a closest relative. Our results support generic status for Phyllanthus diandrus as Plagiocladus as validated by Hoffmann et al. (2006)
.
Flueggea s.l. and Richeriella
Richeriella forms a polytomy with the sampled Flueggea species (Fig. 3). Distinguishing characters used to justify generic rank for Richeriella include its elongated inflorescence axes, subsessile staminate flowers, and possession of a single seed per locule (due to abortion of the other ovule), but Webster (1984)
had already doubted its distinctiveness from Flueggea. The close affinities of this rare Southeast Asian plant with the widespread genus Flueggea were also noted by Airy Shaw (1972
; 1975, as a species of Securinega) and Radcliffe-Smith (2001)
. Foliar morphology (Levin, 1986
) and pollen studies (Punt, 1962
; Köhler, 1965
; Sagun and van der Ham, 2003
) also indicated a relationship between Flueggea and Richeriella. In our previous analyses (Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
), Richeriella was unresolved with the two sampled species of Flueggea section Flueggea, but Flueggea section Pleiostemon was not sampled then. Addition of F. tinctoria representing section Pleiostemon (Webster, 1984
) to these analyses did not affect the relationship of Flueggea and Richeriella. We therefore propose to subsume the Southeast Asian genus Richeriella into Flueggea s.l. due to its overall similarity to Flueggea.
Savia section Heterosavia
This group of five species, endemic to the Caribbean, differs morphologically from all other Phyllantheae in having petals, but pollen morphology (Punt, 1962
; Köhler, 1965
) is congruent with the results of our study. Savia was shown to be polyphyletic in recent molecular phylogenetic studies (Wurdack et al., 2004
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
; Samuel et al., 2005
), with other species belonging to tribes Bridelieae and Wielandieae (Hoffmann et al., 2006
). Section Heterosavia will be raised to generic level in a forthcoming revision (P. Hoffmann, unpublished manuscript).
Phyllanthus s.l
As circumscribed here, Phyllanthus includes the members of Phyllanthus sensu Webster (1994)
and Radcliffe-Smith (2001)
, plus Breynia, Glochidion, Sauropus, and Reverchonia, but excludes P. diandrus (see earlier in Discussion). This large clade is referred to here as Phyllanthus s.l. These changes increase the number of Phyllanthus species from 833 to 1269 according to the species counts in Govaerts et al. (2000)
. Broad nomenclatural adjustments will be necessary to obtain a phylogenetic classification for this large group, but we feel that this solution is preferable to maintaining a paraphyletic construct or recognizing more than 20 clades of Phyllanthus s.s. at the generic rank. Three of Webster's subgenera (Kirganelia, Isocladus, and Phyllanthus) were found to be nonmonophyletic, but the remaining subgenera sampled here appear to be monophyletic based on our sampling of c. 10% of the total species number. We will discuss our findings according to the sequential groupings in Fig. 3, marked clades AO in the figures.
Clade A: sections Paraphyllanthus, Ceramanthus, Macraea
Webster (1956)
placed all species with unspecialized (non-phyllanthoid) branching in subgenus Isocladus and typified this subgenus with P. maderaspatensis (section Paraphyllanthus). He assumed that phyllanthoid branching arose from isocladous (non-phyllanthoid; all branches are equal) architecture more than once. Our results indicate a greater likelihood that phyllanthoid branching arose only once but was subsequently lost in at least five separate instances (P. calycinus, P. betsileanus, P. caroliniensis + P. fluitans, P. pachystylus, and Reverchonia arenaria, indicated by solid circles in Fig. 3). Phyllanthus maderaspatensis, common throughout the Old World tropics and subtropics, is sister to all other species of Phyllanthus s.l. included in this analysis. It stands out because of its spiral phyllotaxy compared to the distichous leaf arrangement in other sections of subgenus Isocladus. The tricolporate, simply reticulate, and slightly prolate pollen found in species such as P. maderaspatensis is considered to be the most undifferentiated pollen type in Phyllanthus (Punt, 1967
, 1987
).
Phyllanthus welwitschianus from eastern tropical Africa (type of section Anisolobium of subgenus Isocladus) + P. cochinchinensis from Assam, Bangladesh, China, and Indochina (type of P. section Cluytiopsis, Müll. Arg., 1863) were placed in section Ceramanthus s.l. by Punt (1972
; Ceramanthus s.s. not sampled here). Airy Shaw (1969)
had already noted morphological similarities between P. cochinchinensis and section Anisolobium. Punt (1972)
studied the pollen of sections Anisolobium, Ceramanthus s.s., and Cluytiopsis and found their pollen and other morphological characters so similar that he united the three sections despite differences in the sepals, staminate disc, and styles. This close affinity is corroborated by our results. Sections Ceramanthus s.l. and Macraea share syncolpate to panto(col)porate pollen, in contrast to the tricolporate section Paraphyllanthus, and a similar exine reticulum (Punt, 1972
, 1987
). In contrast to section Macraea, which has pantocolporate or syncolpate pollen, a reduction of colpus length to sometimes pantoporate pollen can be observed in section Ceramanthus s.l. Punt (1987)
also pointed out that the areolate pollen of section Macraea differs from that of Botryanthus and Xylophylla (also areolate) in the position of their endoapertures. This parallelism is confirmed by the distant placement of these groups in our analyses. Brunel (1987)
suggested that sections Ceramanthus and Macraea be raised to subgeneric rank as part of his dismemberment of subgenus Isocladus sensu Webster, but he never effectively published these changes.
Clade B: sections Anisonema and Floribundi
This morphologically uniform group with plagiotropic branchlets fascicled on brachyblasts, sometimes spiny stipules, unequally connate filaments, distinct pollen grains (Bor, 1979
; Punt, 1980
; Meewis and Punt, 1983
), and baccate fruits, is sister to subgenus Eriococcus + subgenus Isocladus section Antipodanthus. Sections Anisonema and Floribundi, like section Pentandra, were classified in the paleotropical subgenus Kirganelia by Webster (1957)
. Consistent with previous matK and PHYC results (Samuel et al., 2005
), our analyses here support polyphyly of this subgenus. Most species of section Anisonema are endemic to Madagascar, although the number of described names will be substantially reduced in the forthcoming revision of Madagascan Phyllanthus (H. Ralimanana and P. Hoffmann, unpublished manuscript; note name changes in the Appendix with regards to Samuel et al., 2005
, and Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
).
Clade C: subgenus Eriococcus and subgenus Isocladus section Antipodanthus
The distinct, entirely Asiatic subgenus Eriococcus is distinguished by the presence of two or three stamens with connate filaments, sometimes lacerate, colored sepals (Webster, 1957
, 1997
), and pantoporate, coarsely reticulate pollen (Punt, 1980
, 1987
). The Australian Phyllanthus calycinus, which lacks phyllanthoid branching, belongs to subgenus Isocladus section Antipodanthus (Webster, 2002b
). Both subgenus Eriococcus and P. calycinus share macroreticulate pollen, smooth seeds, and sometimes conspicuous sepals. Differences include phyllanthoid branching vs. isocladous branching architecture, number of stamens, and androecial fusion.
Clade D: "subgenus Tenellanthus"
All species sampled in this clade were classified in subgenus Kirganelia by Webster (1957)
. Webster (1967)
later described a new section Pentandra in subgenus Kirganelia to accommodate P. nummulariifolius and P. tenellus along with the type, P. pentandrus, and further discussed the phylogenetic significance of this section as an assumed link between subgenera Kirganelia and Phyllanthus. Brunel (1975
, 1987
) separated Webster's section Pentandra from subgenus Kirganelia based on characters such as habit and androecium morphology, and placed it in a new subgenus Tenellanthus, which he never effectively published. Likewise, Meewis and Punt (1983)
found pollen of P. nummulariifolius and P. tenellus to be markedly different from other members of subgenus Kirganelia and called for a reinvestigation of the taxonomic position of these species. The results of Samuel et al. (2005)
and the findings from our expanded sampling presented here confirm the views in these last three reports.
Clade E: Reverchonia, Phyllanthus abnormis, and P. amarus
Reverchonia was described as a monotypic genus because of its central staminate disc and because of its cotyledons that are scarcely broader than the radicle (Webster and Miller, 1963
; Webster, 1994
). A central staminate disc is also found in Celianella in Phyllanthaceae and in some Picrodendraceae and Euphorbiaceae s.s. Narrow cotyledons were shown to be homoplasious in phylogenetic studies of Phyllanthaceae (Wurdack et al., 2004
; Kathriarachchi et al., 2005
; Samuel et al., 2005
) and Euphorbiaceae s.s. (Wurdack et al., 2005
). Webster (1956
, p. 247) himself described the cotyledons of some herbaceous Phyllanthus species as "narrowly oblong and only slightly broader than the radicle," citing P. amarus as an example. In our initial analyses, Reverchonia was the strongly supported sister of P. amarus, the type of Phyllanthus subsection Swartziani. Webster (1957
, p. 315) stated that "the closest relative of P. amarus, however, is undoubtedly P. abnormis Baill. of the southern United States, which is the only other species in the subsection with bisexual cymules. The two resemble one another in so many respects that they are obviously intimately related, although P. abnormis is unquestionably distinct by virtue of its larger capsule, perennial habit, and tetramerous male calyx." During the revision of the present study, suitable material of P. abnormis became available. Analysis of ITS sequences (not shown) places the species as strongly supported sister to Reverchonia arenaria, thereby confirming Webster's (1956) prediction of a close relationship between P. abnormis and P. amarus. Phyllanthus abnormis and Reverchonia share similar, localized distributions and habitat preferences, a xeromorphic habit, reddish stipules, sepals and capsules, bisexual cymules, and flowers with four sepals in staminate and five to six sepals in pistillate flowers as well as only two stamens. They differ mainly in their branching architecture (P. abnormis and P. amarus with phyllanthoid branching vs. isocladous Reverchonia) and the fusion of their filaments (fused in P. abnormis and P. amarus vs. free in Reverchonia). The discs of P. abnormis and P. amarus consist of discrete extrastaminal segments isomerous with the calyx, whereas the disc segments of Reverchonia are fused between the stamens. Despite these differences, Reverchonia and these Phyllanthus species are closely related, and Reverchonia should be included in Phyllanthus.
Clade F: African subsection Swartziani and "section Praephyllanthus"
This clade includes all sampled African and Madagascan representatives of section Phyllanthus subsection Swartziani, plus P. hutchinsonianus. Phyllanthus hutchinsonianus belongs to a group of species distinguished by Brunel (1987)
from other species in subgenus Phyllanthus mainly by their auriculate cataphylls. This group differs from the Caribbean section Phyllanthus subsection Pentaphylli (not sampled), which also has auriculate cataphylls, by their distribution, habit, apparent dioecy, and pollen morphology. Brunel (1987)
proposed to accommodate these species in a new section Praephyllanthus, which he, however, never effectively published. Punt (1987
, p. 135) listed P. hutchinsonianus as one of a group of African species with "quite spectacular" pollen grains, which should be referred to a subsection of their own. Phyllanthus hutchinsonianus occupies slightly different positions in the ITS and matK trees with regards to P. gossweileri but is associated with the African Swartziani clade in all analyses.
Clade G: subsection Odontadenii, Phyllanthus debilis, P. rheedii, P. sepialis, and P. kaessneri
This poorly supported clade unites a number of paleotropical herbs with phyllanthoid branching. Because of their similar habit and floral structure, taxa such as these are easily confused throughout the genus, and their relationships have been difficult to establish. Phyllanthus debilis is a pantropical weed that probably originated on the Indian subcontinent and was placed in Phyllanthus subsection Swartziani (Webster, 1957
). Phyllanthus rheedii is confined to the southern Asian tropics and was placed near P. amarus and P. debilis in the key of Sri Lankan section Phyllanthus (Webster, 1997
). Phyllanthus mannianus belongs to Brunel and Roux's (1981)
exclusively African subsection Odontadenii of section Phyllanthus. In the description of this new subsection, four diagnostic characters were given: (1) cataphyllary stipules basally auriculate but not indurate, (2) plagiotropic branchlets keeled or winged, (3) tricolporate pollen with a tectate exine, and (4) dorsally longitudinally striate seeds. Evaluating these characters, we found auriculate stipules also in some P. amarus (the type of subsection Swartziani); none of the observed stipules in Phyllanthus subsection Swartziani was indurate. The cross-sections of plagiotropic branchlets were found to be keeled and even slightly winged, mainly above the nodes, in both P. amarus and P. debilis. Distinctly winged plagiotropic branchlets are also present in P. nyale from Cameroon (Hoffmann and Cheek, 2003
), which is excluded from subsection Odontadenii by its pentamerous perianth (discussed later in clade G). Pollen of both subsections Pentaphylli and Swartziani are tricolporate according to Punt and Rentrop (1973)
, and we could not find any mention of intectate Phyllanthus pollen in the literature (e.g., Punt, 1987
; Webster and Carpenter, 2002a
). The longitudinally striate sculpture of the dorsal seed surface is shared between subsections Odontadenii and Swartziani.
Having thus shown the diagnostic characters for subsection Odontadenii to be at least ambiguous, merosity of the perianth may be a potential synapomorphy for clade G. Although not explicitly stated by Brunel and Roux (1981
, 1984
), all species of subsection Odontadenii have hexamerous perianths in both sexes, and the character is included in the description of the subsection by Brunel (1987)
in his definitive treatment of continental African Phyllanthus. Phyllanthus debilis and P. rheedii also have hexamerous perianths (Webster, 1957
, 1997
), as has P. sepialis (Brunel, 1987
). Phyllanthus amarus (clade E), on the other hand, has predominantly pentamerous perianths. In the third clade containing species assigned to subsection Swartziani (clade F), the number of perianth parts varies between five and six.
Brunel and Roux (1981)
first thought that P. sepialis might belong to their subsection Odontadenii but did not include it in a later publication on the subsection (Brunel and Roux, 1984
). Phyllanthus sepialis was finally (Brunel, 1987
) placed in a proposed subsection Callidisci, characterized by neatly crenulated disc margins. In the combined analysis, P. sepialis is weakly supported (BP 69) as a member of clade G (Fig. 3).
Phyllanthus kaessneri is an aberrant African species and the only species of Brunel's (1987)
ineffectively published section Tangani within the (likewise ineffective) subgenus Tenellanthus (clade D). It is a monoecious perennial shrub with an unusual pollen sculpture, and smooth or only faintly longitudinally striate seed ornamentation (Brunel, 1987
). The placement of this species differs in the ITS and matK analyses (Figs. 1 and 2; see Results: Incongruent results and combined analysis of ITS and matK).
Clade H: New Caledonian clade
This clade contains seven of eight sampled taxa from New Caledonia, which has c. 115 endemic Phyllanthus species. Recent publications reported a similar obligate pollination mutualism with the same genus of seed-consuming moths in species of New Caledonian Phyllanthus (Kawakita and Kato, 2004a
) as in Asian Glochidion (Kato et al., 2003
) and Breynia (Kawakita and Kato, 2004b
). Both Breynia and Glochidion (clade M) are notorious for being taxonomically problematic; they contain large numbers of species that are both morphologically variable and difficult to distinguish from each other. It is conceivable that the high species number in New Caledonian subgenus Gomphidium and relatives is due to a similar speciation pattern as seen in Breynia and Glochidion. The typical pollen (oblate shape, triangular polar view, marginate colpi) of subgenus Gomphidium was well documented by Punt (1980)
and Lobreau-Callen (1988)
. In the most recent treatment of Phyllanthus for New Caledonia, Schmid (1991)
distinguished subgenus Gomphidium section Gomphidium (P. chamaecerasus, P. aff. moorei, P. pancherianus sampled here) from other species of subgenus Gomphidium by their biseriate perianth (vs. uniseriate), consistently three stamens (vs. 220), disc morphology, and inflorescence structure. The species treated as group 7 within clade H (not classified in section Gomphidium; P. favieri, P. loranthoides, P. unifoliatus sampled here) belong to different pre-Websterian sections not affiliated with a subgenus. Schmid (1991)
also singled out P. kanalensis (monotypic section Pentaglochidion) for its fused filaments and placed it in a separate group 6 under subgenus Gomphidium. In our analyses, P. kanalensis is embedded in group 7, the filament fusion being autapomorphic. The subclades containing Gomphidium section Gomphidium and groups 6 + 7 are both strongly supported in our analyses. Our finding of a sister relationship of Gomphidium section Gomphidium to Madagascan P. betsileanus (clade I) with ITS sequence data is unexpected (see under Results: Incongruent results and combined analysis of ITS and matK).
Phyllanthus purpusii and P. sellowianus
These two species from Mexico and South America, respectively, are not placed in sections of Webster's classification and occupy isolated positions in our analyses. Webster (1978)
thought that the areolate pollen grains of P. sellowianus necessitated placing the species in subgenus Xylophylla. This is not supported by our results, but in our combined analysis P. sellowianus is moderately supported as sister to clades J, K, and L, all of which show a tendency to increased pollen aperture number. No inferences about the phylogenetic relationships of these species can be made until more neotropical taxa are sampled and/or more genetic markers are analyzed.
Clade I: Madagascan clade
Phyllanthus andalangiensis and P. vakinakaratrae belong to a group of eight species that was proposed by Brunel (1987)
as a new section in subgenus Kirganelia. This group has phyllanthoid branching, entire stipules, and five or rarely six stamens that are sometimes centrally fused, whereas P. betsileanus is a species with isocladous branching architecture, denticulate stipules, and three free stamens. Pollen can be trisyncolporate and perisyncolporate in the same specimen in the group containing P. betsileanus and tricolporate or trisyncolporate in the group containing P. andalangiensis and P. vakinakaratrae (Brunel, 1987
), the colpi being bordered by parallel muri in both groups. Brunel (1987)
placed P. betsileanus in a separate section ("Praemacraea") next to unrelated Macraea (clade A), which also lacks phyllanthoid branching, but in this study the absence of phyllanthoid branching in P. betsileanus is interpreted as a loss of this character. The placement of the subclades in clade I differs in the ITS and matK analyses (Figs. 1 and 2, see Results: Incongruent results and combined analysis of ITS and matK).
Clade J: section Loxopodium, "section Salviniopsis", subsection Niruri, subsection Clausseniani, section Choretropsis
This strongly supported clade unites neotropical species belonging to five infrageneric taxa with extremely divergent habits. Section Loxopodium comprises herbs or subshrubs lacking phyllanthoid branching; "section Salviniopsis" represents the only free-floating aquatic in Euphorbiaceae s.l. (also isocladous); subsection Niruri comprises annual herbs with phyllanthoid branching; subsection Clausseniani is the only group recognized by Webster (2002a)
to have both phyllanthoid and non-phyllanthoid branching; and section Choretropsis is one of the two unrelated phyllocladous sections. Each of these species is presently classified in a different section or subsection of subgenus Phyllanthus and Isocladus (Webster, 1956
, 1957
, 2002a
; Brunel, 1987
; Webster and Carpenter, 2002a
). Despite their considerable morphological divergence in many respects, all members of clade J share similar pollen morphology and verruculate seed sculpture.
Phyllanthus caroliniensis (section Loxopodium) is the most widespread and variable species of American Phyllanthus, ranging from the northern USA to Argentina and Paraguay (Webster, 1956
, 1970
). Among all isocladous taxa, its tetracolporate, reticulate, prolate pollen is most similar to that of subsections Niruri and Clausseniani and section Choretropsis. Brunel (1987)
assigned it to his pollen model Niruri. Phyllanthus fluitans has to our knowledge not been assigned to an infrageneric taxon since Müller (1866)
, although Brunel (1987)
proposed it as the type of his (ineffectively published) section Salviniopsis in subgenus Phyllanthus. Our analyses place these two species as strongly supported sisters. It is possible that the high degree of architectural plasticity in this clade was a favorable precondition for the development of the free-floating habit of Phyllanthus fluitans. A detailed study of section Loxopodium (and placement of more unsampled neotropical groups) might shed light on the morphological transformation involved in the evolution of this species. Sister to this pair with moderate support is P. niruri, the type of the genus Phyllanthus. Phyllanthus niruri was classified in section Phyllanthus subsection Niruri by Webster (1957)
. Brunel (1987)
felt that the subsection should be raised to sectional rank. The species appears to be endemic to the Americas (Webster, 1957
), despite specimens from other areas often being misidentified as P. niruri.
Subsection Clausseniani (represented by P. claussenii) was described by Webster (2002a)
based mainly on its peculiar anther morphology. The anthers are deeply emarginate with distinct to stipitate thecae. This type of anther is otherwise known in Phyllanthaceae only in Phyllanthus section Choretropsis, unrelated Dicoelia and some taxa of subfamily Antidesmatoideae (Hoffmann et al., 2006
). Both subsection Clausseniani and section Choretropsis have 4-(5-)colporate, reticulate, subspheroidal pollen (Webster, 2002a
; Webster and Carpenter, 2002a
; Santiago et al., 2004
). Webster (2002a
, p. 12) stated that in his new subsection Clausseniani "flowers and pollen are suggestively similar to those of sect. Choretropsis," but did not conclude that the two groups are closely related. Webster (2002a)
also compared the non-phyllanthoid branching species of subsection Clausseniani, P. atalaiensis and P. heteradenius (not sampled) to section Loxopodium. In our combined analyses, subsection Clausseniani is strongly supported as sister (BP 91) to section Choretropsis. Section Choretropsis is one of the two phyllocladous sections (the other being the Caribbean section Xylophylla in clade L). Webster placed these two phyllocladous sections in subgenus Phyllanthus and Xylophylla, respectively, on account of their divergent anatomy and floral and pollen morphology. This independent origin of phylloclady in Phyllanthus was supported with rbcL sequence data by Wurdack et al. (2004)
and is corroborated here with a different species of section Choretropsis and an additonal species of section Xylophylla.
Clade K: section Nothoclema
This taxonomically difficult neotropical section in subgenus Conami is notable for its use as a fish poison. It contains 10 species and was synoptically revised by Webster (2003)
. We recovered a poorly supported relationship of Nothoclema with P. niruri and allies (clade J). Pollen of subgenus Conami has distinct vermiculate to pilate exine ornamentation (illustrated in Webster and Carpenter, 2002a
). The West African section Brazzaeani (not sampled) was included in subgenus Conami by Brunel and Roux (1977)
because of its similar pilate pollen exine. Brazzaeani has five sepals and disc segments and five dimorphous stamens with longitudinal dehiscence typical of subgenus Kirganelia in which it had been placed previously. The neotropical sections of subgenus Conami (only section Nothoclema sampled here) have, on the other hand, consistently tri- or hexamerous perianths and staminate discs. The stamens are uniform with horizontal to oblique dehiscence. Considering the geographic disjunction as well as the strongly divergent floral morphology, Meewis and Punt (1983)
came to the conclusion that the similar pilate ornamentation in section Brazzaeani is due to convergence.
Clade L: subgenus Xylophylla
This morphologically diverse predominantly Caribbean clade includes c. 60 species in 10 sections (Webster, 1958
, 2001
), five of which are sampled here. Subgenus Botryanthus was originally