|
|
||||||||
Ecology |
2Harvard University, Harvard Forest, P.O. Box 68, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366 USA; 3New England Wild Flower Society, 180 Hemenway Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701 USA
Received for publication November 9, 2004. Accepted for publication April 7, 2005.
ABSTRACT
Scaling relationships among photosynthetic rate, foliar nutrient concentration, and leaf mass per unit area (LMA) have been observed for a broad range of plants. Leaf traits of the carnivorous pitcher plant Darlingtonia californica, endemic to southern Oregon and northern California, USA, differ substantially from the predictions of these general scaling relationships; net photosynthetic rates of Darlingtonia are much lower than predicted by general scaling relationships given observed foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations and LMA. At five sites in the center of its range, leaf traits of Darlingtonia were strongly correlated with elevation and differed with soil calcium availability and bedrock type. The mean foliar N : P of 25.2 ± 15.4 of Darlingtonia suggested that these plants were P-limited, although N concentration in the substrate also was extremely low and prey capture was uncommon. Foliar N : P stoichiometry and the observed deviation of Darlingtonia leaf traits from predictions of general scaling relationships permit an initial assessment of the "cost of carnivory" in this species. Carnivory in plants is thought to have evolved in response to N limitation, but for Darlingtonia, carnivory is an evolutionary last resort when both N and P are severely limiting and photosynthesis is greatly reduced.
Key Words: carnivorous plants Darlingtonia californica fens leaf mass area leaf traits photosynthesis nitrogen serpentine
A central goal of plant ecology is to understand fundamental relationships among common processes required by living plants: the fixation of carbon via photosynthesis, the acquisition and use of mineral nutrients, and the use of carbon and mineral nutrients in the construction of plant organs (Givnish, 1986
; Reich et al., 1997
, 1999
; Sterner and Elser, 2002
; Wright et al., 2004
). Recent analyses of data from thousands of species have suggested that physiological and stoichiometric constraints are the primary controls on relationships between leaf traits such as photosynthetic rate, nutrient and mineral content, specific leaf area, and leaf longevity (Reich et al., 1999
; Castro-Diéz et al., 2000
; Shipley and Lechowicz, 2000
; Ellison, 2002
; Wright et al., 2004
). These interspecific relationships appear to be altered only modestly by climate or habitat characteristics (Reich and Oleksyn, 2004
; Wright et al., 2004
), life form (Craine et al., 2001
; Wright and Westoby, 2001
; Reich et al., 2003
), or by evolutionary history (Ackerly and Reich, 1999
).
Wright et al. (2004
, p. 821) called the observed scaling relationships among leaf traits among >2500 species of plants a "universal spectrum of leaf economics." This spectrum defines scaling relationships among photosynthetic rate, foliar N and P, and leaf mass area, encompasses a broad continuum of plant functional types, and includes species that range from low to high growth rates and photosynthetic efficiencies. This model is useful for identifying plants that have unique adaptations (Reich et al., 1999
). It may also be used to elucidate how intraspecific adaptations to local site conditions occur within the context of these broad constraints set by leaf-level trade-offs.
Plants in marginal habitats, such as bogs, fens, and other wetlands, often have a suite of unique characteristics that allow them to persist in strongly nutrient-limiting conditions. For example, two studies have shown that scaling relationships among leaf traits of wetland plants differ substantially from predictions based on the broad syntheses of plants from terrestrial biomes (Shipley and Lechowicz, 2000
; Ellison, 2002
). Mangroves (Ellison, 2002
) and freshwater wetland herbs (Shipley and Lechowicz, 2000
) have lower photosynthetic rates and lower diffusive conductance for given levels of leaf nitrogen than do terrestrial plants. Leaf nitrogen content, photosynthetic rate, and diffusive conductance are all lower in mangroves than are expected given the lifespan of the leaves (Ellison, 2002
). High salinities and anoxic soil conditions result in slow transpiration rates and high water use efficiencies in mangroves (Ball and Passioura, 1994
) and entail a high carbon cost of water uptake by roots (Ball and Sobrado, 1998
) that may explain their position as outliers in the general spectrum of leaf traits (Ellison, 2002
). Similarly, low redox potentials brought on by waterlogging may contribute to relatively low photosynthetic rates in freshwater wetland plants (Talbot and Etherington, 1987
; Talbot et al., 1987
; Crawford and Braendle, 1996
). The wetland herbs studied by Shipley (2000)
tend to occur in phosphorus-limited systems (Bedford et al., 1999
), whereas mangroves are known to be limited either by nitrogen, phosphorus, or both (Onuf et al., 1977
; Alongi et al., 1992
; Clough, 1992
; Feller, 1995
; Ellison and Farnsworth, 2001
).
The combination of extremely low nutrient concentrations, high light, and waterlogged soils in bogs, fens, tepuis, and inselbergs (Givnish et al., 1984
, 1989
; Barthlott et al., 1998
; Porembski and Barthlott, 2000
; Ellison and Gotelli, 2001
) is hypothesized to favor the evolution of carnivory in plants (Givnish et al., 1984
; Benzing, 1987
, 2000
). The 600 or so species of carnivorous plants share a convergent capacity to derive mineral nutrients directly from capture and digestion of animal prey (Benzing, 1987
; Givnish, 1989
; Ellison and Gotelli, 2001
; Ellison et al., 2003
) that supplements nutrient uptake from soil (Chapin and Pastor, 1995
; Schulze et al., 1997
; Ellison and Gotelli, 2001
). The relationship between low nutrient concentrations and potentially high photosynthetic rates in these habitats is the foundation for the cost-benefit model for the evolution of carnivory in plants (Givnish et al., 1984
). This model asserts that carnivory should be favored if the marginal "costs" associated with constructing carnivorous organs are less than the marginal photosynthetic "benefits" derived from the additional nutrients obtained from carnivory. The cost-benefit model has been supported with data showing that carnivorous plants can reduce their production of carnivorous organs when nutrients are more abundant in the peat, ponds, or streams in which these plants grow (Knight and Frost, 1991
; Knight, 1992
; Zamora et al., 1998
; Guisande et al., 2000
; Ellison and Gotelli, 2002
; Thorén et al., 2003
), as well as in shady conditions (Zamora et al., 1998
; Brewer, 2003
; Thorén et al., 2003
). This flexibility in carnivorous investment also suggests that leaf traits of these plants, notably nutrient content and photosynthetic rates, could be quite variable among habitats, especially if either soil nutrients or prey availability vary widely. Based on findings in other wetland systems (Shipley and Lechowicz, 2000
; Ellison, 2002
), we hypothesized that the spectrum of leaf traits in a carnivorous plant might be an outlier with respect to the universal spectrum, indicating trade-offs between deployment of leaf mass, leaf area, and nutrients towards prey capture and away from photosynthesis.
In all carnivorous taxa, the carnivorous organs are modified leaves, leaf parts such as tendrils, or glands occurring on leaves (Juniper et al., 1989
), but few data on leaf traits of carnivorous plants are available. The data set of 2548 species at 175 sites compiled by Wright et al. (2004)
includes three carnivorous plant species: two records of Sarracenia purpurea L. (Sarraceniaceae) from Wisconsin, USA (Reich et al., 1999
), and Ottawa, Canada (Small, 1972
); one record of Drosera rotundifolia L. (Droseraceae) from Abisko, Sweden (Kudo et al., 2001
); and unpublished data for an unidentified Drosera species from Western Australia.
The original publications of these data also provide no information on intraspecific variability in leaf traits. Darlingtonia is a geographically narrow endemic, and hence we further expect low variability within and among populations in leaf-trait relationships. A recent comparative study of leaf traits in endemics and congeneric widespread species showed that endemics did not differ in leaf traits from their widespread congeners (Lavergne et al., 2004
), but neither wetland plants nor carnivorous plants were included in their study.
In this study, we examined leaf traits of the carnivorous plant Darlingtonia californica Torrey (Sarraceniaceae). We addressed four questions: (1) What is the intraspecific variation in photosynthetic rates, specific leaf area, and leaf nutrient and mineral content? (2) Is the observed variation associated with habitat characteristics such as ambient nutrient availability or elevation? (3) Where does Darlingtonia fit in the universal spectrum of leaf traits defined by Wright et al. (2004)
? (4) What does the placement of Darlingtonia in this universal spectrum tell us about the ecological costs of carnivory?
Study species
Darlingtonia californica is a long-lived, rhizomatous, perennial, carnivorous pitcher plant endemic to southern and coastal Oregon and northern California, USA (Torrey, 1853
; Schnell, 2002
). It is the only species in the genus and the only pitcher plant native to North America west of the Rocky Mountains. Darlingtonia grows in fens and along seeps and streams generally associated with ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils (Whittaker, 1960
; Becking, 1997
; Coleman and Kruckeberg, 1999
), although it appears more to tolerate rather than require soils with high metal content, and it does not hyperaccumulate metals in its tissues (Reeves et al., 1983
). The 50100 cm tall pitchers of Darlingtonia are modified (epiascidiate) leaves (Arber, 1941
; Franck, 1974
, 1976
) that are produced every 24 wk throughout the growing season (April/MaySeptember/October at our sites) and senesce over the winter; their lifespan is generally 6 mo or less. The pitchers have a prominent, nearly spherical "hood" with a "mouth" at the base of the hood that faces downward (Fig. 1). From the far edge of the mouth hangs a "fishtail appendage." Allometry of the tube, hood, and fishtail appendage differs between seedling (nonfeeding) and adult (feeding) pitchers but is generally consistent within life stages (Franck, 1976
). Wasps and other prey are attracted to nectar secreted by extrafloral nectaries along the hood, mouth, and fishtail appendage; only approximately 2% of the potential prey visiting the nectaries is caught by the pitchers (Dixon et al., 2005
). Darlingtonia does not possess digestive enzymes (Hepburn et al., 1927
); captured prey is broken down by a food web of bacteria, protozoa, mites, and fly larvae (Naeem, 1988
; Nielsen, 1990
). The plant absorbs the mineral nutrients excreted by this food web.
|
Study sites
We studied Darlingtonia at five sites in the Siskiyou Mountains along the CaliforniaOregon border (Table 1). These sites are all within the Klamath Ranges (KR) subregion of the northwestern (NW) region of the California floristic province (Hickman, 1993
). The bedrock is peridotite or granodiorite (Kruckeberg, 1984
), and all five sites are characterized by serpentine soils (Kruckeberg, 1984
; Becking, 1997
) and circumneutral pH (6.97.3; see Materials and Methods) in the seeps and flowing streams along which Darlingtonia grows. The sites span an elevational range from 411 m above sea level (a.s.l.) at T. J. Howell's fen to 1241 m a.s.l. at Hobson Horn. At three of the sites (Days Gulch, Hawk Creek, and L. E. Horton), Darlingtonia grows on rocky terrain alongside continuously flowing streams, whereas at the other two sites (T. J. Howell, Hobson Horn), the plants grow in vegetated fens underlain by 1030 cm of peat. Common co-occurring herbaceous plant species (nomenclature follows Hickman, 1993
) include Rudbeckia californica A. Gray (Asteraceae), Lotus oblongifolius (Benth.) E. Greene (Fabaceae), and Narthecium californicum Baker (Liliaceae). At the higher elevation sites, the ericaceous shrubs Rhododendron occidentale (Torrey & A. Gray) A. Gray and Ledum glandulosum Nutt. and the trees Pinus monticola Douglas (Pinaceae) and Chamaecyparis lawsoniana A. Murray (Cupressaceae) form a patchy canopy over the Darlingtonia populations.
|
Site characterization
All fieldwork was conducted from 3 to 13 August 2001. Elevation and location of each site was determined using a handheld Trimble GPS (Trimble Navigation, Sunnyvale, California, USA). Bedrock type was determined from field forms provided by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service, published sources (Kruckeberg, 1984
), and field observations. At each site, five 50-mL surface water samples were collected in sterile plastic tubes, frozen, and shipped frozen to our laboratory in Massachusetts for chemical analysis. There, water pH and calcium concentration were measured with an Orion model 290A portable pH/ISE meter and Orion pH and calcium electrodes (Thermo Electron, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Nitrogen (both NO3-N and NH4-N) and phosphorus (PO4-P) concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically using standard methods (Bledzki and Ellison, 1998
; Clesceri et al., 1998
).
Field and laboratory measurements of plants
At each site, we measured size and shape of the largest mature, fully expanded pitcher on 1012 distinct plants (genets) haphazardly chosen from among a stand of 50010 000 plants growing in full sun. The sample size was limited by federal collecting permits, and we were permitted to collect only leaves (pitchers), not whole plants (i.e., we could not excavate roots and rhizomes). For each leaf, we used a flexible fabric tape to measure the height (±1 mm) of the pitcher's tube from ground level to the base of the hood; the circumference (±1 mm) of the hood from its base, around the top, and down to the mouth; and the length and height (±1 mm) of each half of the fishtail appendage (Fig. 1). Dial calipers were used to measure the two diameters (±0.1 mm) of the mouth and the diameter of the tube at its base, halfway up its length, and just below the hood. After measuring the leaf, we determined maximum photosynthetic rate (Aarea in micromoles of CO2 per square meter per second) using a LI-COR 6200 infrared gas analysis system (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) with a custom-built 4-L chamber that enclosed the hood, fishtail appendage, and upper 20 cm of the pitcher tube. The chamber was constructed of Lexan (General Electric Plastics, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, USA) and included two fans (LI-COR) to ensure adequate mixing of air. All measurements of Aarea were taken between 0930 and 1430 hours and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) always exceeded 1000 µmol · m2 · s1.
Chlorophyll contents of the pitcher tube, hood, and fishtail appendage were then assayed in the field using a CCM-200 chlorophyll content meter (Opti-Sciences, Tyngsboro, Massachusetts, USA). The CCM-200 reports relative units (0100), which we converted to actual units (µg chlorophyll [a + b]/ m2) after calibrating the device with direct measures of chlorophyll content using the acetone extraction procedure of Porra et al. (1989)
(the conversion equation was µg chlorophyll/m2 = 391.8 + 16.78 x CCM units; r2 = 0.89). The pitchers were then cut at the base, pressed in the field to prevent drying and loss of area (Shipley and Lechowicz, 2000
), and returned within 24 h to our laboratory in Massachusetts where we used a LI-COR 3000 leaf area meter to determine the total area (±1 mm2) of the pitcher and the area of the portion of the pitcher that had been enclosed in the photosynthesis measurement chamber. The tube and hood were cut lengthwise and laid flat to get accurate measures of their area, and the area of the flat fishtail appendage was measured separately. We then dried the pitchers at 70°C to constant mass, and weighed (±0.001 g) the hood, fishtail appendage, and tube (sections inside and outside the photosynthesis chamber separately). The areas and masses were used to calculate leaf mass area (LMA, in grams per square meter) and mass-based photosynthetic rates (in nanomoles of CO2 per gram per second). Each portion of the pitcherhood, fishtail appendage, and tubewas ground in a Wiley mill prior to sending the samples to the University of Vermont Agricultural and Environmental Testing Laboratory where the C, N, and mineral content (P, Ca, Mg, K, Na, Al, Mn, Cu, Zn, Cr, Co, and Ni) of the leaves was determined. Carbon and N content of the finely ground, dried samples were determined using a Leeman Lab model 440 CHN elemental analyzer (Teledyne Technologies, Los Angeles, California, USA). Mineral content was determined on microwave-digested samples using a Perkin-Elmer Optima 3000 DV inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA).
Statistical analyses
All data analyses were performed using S-Plus version 6.1 (Insightful, Seattle, Washington, USA). We used linear regression to examine relationships between plant size and shape characteristics, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine differences among sites. Composite measures of morphology and tissue mineral content were constructed using principal components analysis (PCA). Because these data were measured on different scales and varied across orders of magnitude (from millimeter-diameter mouths to nearly meter-tall pitchers), before conducting the PCAs, we standardized all the morphological data to Z scores, Zi = (Yi
/s), where Yi is the value of the measurement,
is the mean of all values of that measurement, and s is the estimated standard deviation (Gotelli and Ellison, 2004
). The Z scores are expressed in standard deviation units; for example a Z-score = +4 means that the value measured is four standard deviations larger than the observed mean.
We examined relationships between key leaf traits using reduced major axis regression on logarithmically transformed data (Reich et al., 1997
, 1999
; Wright et al., 2004
). These relationships were compared with the leaf trait data used to construct the universal spectrum of leaf economics (Wright et al., 2004
). Finally, we compared our measured values of mass-based photosynthesis (Amass) with those predicted by the universal equation given in supplement 4 of Wright et al. (2004)
: log10(Amass) = 0.74 x log10(Nmass) 0.57 x log10(LMA) + 2.96.
RESULTS
Sites
Surface water at the sites did not differ in concentration of NO3-N (P = 0.9, ANOVA), but did differ in pH (P = 1.2 x 106), NH4-N concentration (P = 0.01), PO4-P concentration (P = 0.001), and Ca concentration (P = 6.3 x 106). The two highest elevation sites, characterized by granodiorite bedrock, had significantly higher Ca concentration in the surface water, significantly lower PO4-P in the surface water, and significantly lower pH than the other three sites underlain by peridotite bedrock (Table 1). NH4-N concentrations varied significantly among the sites, but were not related to bedrock type, either of the two physiognomic characteristics, or elevation.
Plant morphology
Pitcher size measurements (tube height, diameter, hood circumference, and mouth diameter) were highly correlated with each other (all covariances >0.4). The first two principal components of pitcher size and shape accounted for 75% of the variance in the data and primarily reflected characteristics of the hood and of the height of the pitcher. Plants with large scores on the first principal component were larger in all characteristics than plants with small scores (Fig. 2A), and we used PC-1 scores in our subsequent analyses of plant size. The size of the whole plant (Fig. 2A) and the area of the fishtail appendage, a measure of the display used to attract prey (Fig. 2B), increased from low-elevation sites to the second highest one, but then declined at the highest site to a size equal to that found at the lower elevation sites. However, the allometric relationship between plant size and area of the fishtail appendage was similar across the five sites (r2 = 0.31, P < 1 x 106). Leaf mass area increased steadily from low elevations to high elevations (Fig. 2C).
|
Foliar nutrient and mineral content
Leaf nitrogen was quite low (overall average of 11.1 (=1.11%) ± 3.2 [SD] mg/ g), but in parallel with chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rates, N content increased markedly with elevation (Fig. 2F). Leaf carbon content was consistently high among sites (488 ± 11 mg/g), and the combination of low N and high C yielded high C : N ratios (overall, 48.7 ± 10.9) in these plants. As N content increased with elevation, C : N ratios declined significantly (F4,51 = 49.2, P = 1 x 1016). The three low-elevation sites had similar (P > 0.05) C : N ratios (T. J. Howell, 51.9 ± 3.12; Days Gulch, 56.8 ± 5.85; L. E. Horton, 56.0 ± 4.76), much higher than the C : N ratios at the two high-elevation sites (Hawk Creek, 41.0 ± 4.62; Hobson Horn, 32.1 ± 6.66), which also differed significantly from one another (P < 0.05).
Neither foliar P (0.6 ± 0.4 mg/g) nor foliar K (6.5 ± 3.9 mg/g) differed among the sites (P = 0.07 and P = 0.10, respectively). Key stoichiometric relationships, N : P ratios (25.2 ± 15.4) and N : K ratios (2.5 ± 1.6), did not differ among sites (P = 0.97 and P = 0.36, respectively).
Although all sites had serpentine soils, there were significant differences among sites in the metal content of pitchers. Principal components analysis revealed correlated groups of metals. Most notably, magnesium content was highest at low-elevation sites (low scores for PC-1; Fig. 2G), whereas calcium (low scores for PC-3; Fig. 2H), aluminum, and manganese (high scores for PC-1; Table 3 and Fig. 2G) content were highest at the high-elevation sites.
Scaling relationships among leaf traits
Mass-based maximal net photosynthetic rate (Amass), leaf nitrogen (Nmass), leaf phosphorus (Pmass), and LMA of Darlingtonia were all significantly correlated with each other (Fig. 3). There was pronounced variability in all these traits among Darlingtonia individuals, and the average Amass, Nmass, and LMA of Darlingtonia were similar to those of the Wisconsin Sarracenia purpurea, but much lower than those of the Ottawa S. purpurea or the two Drosera spp. in the Glopnet data set (Wright et al., 2004
). The average Pmass of Darlingtonia was similar to that of the Ottawa S. purpurea, the only carnivorous plant in the Glopnet data set with reported P concentrations. The general scaling equations of Wright et al. (2004)
overestimated Amass in Darlingtonia by over twofold (Fig. 4); the multiple regression equation for the Darlingtonia data was: log10(Amass) = 0.91 x log10(Nmass) 0.77 x log10(LMA) + 2.88 (r2 = 0.60, N = 56). Among Darlingtonia plants, Amass increased half as quickly per unit increase in P and decreased
50% more rapidly per unit increase in LMA than did the plants in the Wright et al. (2004)
data set.
|
|
Our intent in this study was to explore scaling relationships between leaf mass, photosynthetic rate, morphology, and foliar chemistry for a little-studied and highly unusual endemic carnivorous plant species and to compare these scaling relationships to the "universal spectrum of leaf traits" (Wright et al., 2004
, p. 821) developed using data from noncarnivorous plants. In addition, to our knowledge, this is the first combined study of the physiology and morphometrics of Darlingtonia californica, and we documented substantial intraspecific variation in these traits within and among populations.
In terms of environmental conditions, the two high-elevation sites (Hawk Creek and Hobson Horn) differed most markedly from the other sites in surface water pH and phosphorus and calcium concentrations (Table 1). This may in part reflect the chemistry of the granodiorite bedrock at these two sites, which contrasts with the peridotite bedrock at the lower elevation sites. Ultramafic peridotite bedrock tends to be high in magnesium and relatively low in calcium, whereas igneous granodiorite tends to be somewhat enriched in calcium relative to magnesium (Strahler and Strahler, 1992
). Although absolute nitrate and ammonium concentrations in the substrate did not differ significantly among sites, increased soil calcium concentration is associated with enhanced mobilization of N by plants and could contribute to the higher foliar N observed in plants at Hawk Creek and Hobson Horn.
We investigated whether plants growing in these contrasting habitats differed in their relative allocation to photosynthetic vs. carnivorous structures (Gotelli and Ellison, 2002
). However, we did not find significant differences in the allometric relationships between pitcher size and fishtail appendage size among the five sites, despite the fact that overall plant size varied widely among the populations. This result accords with data presented by Franck (1976)
, who found pronounced allometric differences between juveniles and adult Darlingtonia pitchers, but relatively constant allometric relationships among adult pitchers. Our observations and Franck's data suggest that Darlingtonia has little morphological flexibility in balancing photosynthesis and prey capture, even when soil N is more readily available to the plant. These data differ from results of other studies on carnivorous species that have demonstrated flexibility in relative allocation of carnivorous structures in response to N availability (Knight and Frost, 1991
; Knight, 1992
; Zamora et al., 1998
; Guisande et al., 2000
; Ellison and Gotelli, 2002
; Thorén et al., 2003
).
We observed high variability among plants in leaf traits, both within and among populations of Darlingtonia. As predicted by the universal spectrum of leaf traits, Nmass, Amass, and LMA were all tightly correlated. Darlingtonia has similar scaling relationships of Nmass, LMA, and Pmass to those reported for noncarnivorous taxa (Reich et al., 1999
; Wright et al., 2004
). However, on average Darlingtonia had a much lower Amass for its Nmass, Pmass, and LMA relative to the species studied by Wright et al. (2004)
(Figs. 3, 4). Likewise, Amass also was lower as a function of LMA than that of the two Drosera and one of the Sarracenia species reported in that study, and low relative to its N content compared with three species of Pinguicula and one species of Drosera not included in the Glopnet data set (Mendéz and Karlsson, 1999
). Indeed, photosynthetic rates were very low relative to most plant species (see also Mendéz and Karlsson, 1999
), although they did vary significantly among sites, with the plants at the high-elevation sites showing the highest rates of the five populations. This implies that Amass is highly constrained as a function of LMA in this species, even though both traits are quite variable among sites. It is possible that the observed low Amass is a consequence of low amounts of C stored in (or translocated to) belowground tissues. Although carnivorous plants are normally described as having small root systems, Darlingtonia develops extensive rhizomes (A. M. Ellison, personal observation). Because we were not permitted to excavate plants, we could not quantify root : shoot ratios of Darlingtonia, but we suspect that the low Amass in this species is not a by-product of small allocation to root and rhizome production.
The concentrations of N, P, and K in foliar tissue were quite low, in the lower decile of ranges reported in broad reviews of vascular plants (Aerts and Chapin, 2000
). The values of foliar N concentration we found in Darlingtonia are similar to those found for a range of other carnivorous plant species, including sundews (Drosera), flytraps (Dionaea), and pitcher plants (Nepenthes, Cephalotus, Darlingtonia, and Sarracenia) (Karlsson and Carlsson, 1984
; Schulze and Schulze, 1990
; Schulze et al., 1991
, 1997
; Chapin and Pastor, 1995
; Mendéz and Karlsson, 1999
; Ellison and Gotelli, 2002
; Thorén et al., 2003
; Wakefield et al., 2005
). In particular, Nmass values reported by Schulze et al. (1997)
for greenhouse-grown Darlingtonia are almost identical to the values we found for field-grown plants, and Nmass for carnivorous plans in the Glopnet data set (Wright et al., 2004
) were similarly low (Fig. 3).
Because N has been assumed to be the limiting nutrient for carnivorous plants (but see Karlsson and Carlsson, 1984
), P and K have not been measured routinely in studies of carnivorous plant stoichiometry, but P values in Sarracenia pitchers (Chapin and Pastor, 1995
; Wakefield et al., 2005
) and Pinguicula leaves (Karlsson and Carlsson, 1984
) are as low or lower than those we observed in Darlingtonia. The N : P and N : K ratios we observed suggest that Darlingtonia is P-limited or P + K co-limited, based on comparisons with other wetland plants for which nutrient limitation has been derived based on stoichiometric relationships (Olde Venterink et al., 2003
).
Preliminary evidence from other carnivorous plants (Karlsson and Carlsson, 1984
; Wakefield et al., 2005
) suggests that they may preferentially absorb P from prey. Our data on N : P ratios of common prey for Darlingtonia (N : P = 14; A. M. Ellison, unpublished data), and the very low rate of prey capture at all our study sites (Dixon et al., 2005
) suggest that prey are not a significant source of P for these plants. Thus, the high and variable N : P ratios of pitchers at the different sites most likely reflects differences among sites in soil and water nutrient availability. Photosynthesis, leaf N, and plant size of Darlingtonia are highly sensitive to N availabilities, and photosynthetic rates in carnivorous plants are more responsive to additions of inorganic N (Ellison and Gotelli, 2002
) than to additions of prey (Mendéz and Karlsson, 1999
; Wakefield et al., 2005
). All these studies suggest that in the field, the majority of foliar N is derived from substrate sources rather than carnivory, but absolute concentrations in soil and surface water are extremely low (Table 1). However, the relationship between observed nutrient concentrations and actual nutrient availability is unknown; we do not yet know the mechanisms by which carnivorous plants take up nutrients from prey or soil. The considerable investment in carnivorous traps may reflect as much a need for P as for N. Taken together, these observations suggest that carnivory in plants is Hobson's choicean evolutionary "last resort"when concentrations of both N and P are extremely low in the soil.
Detailed investigation of this unusual species has allowed us to detect the morphometric and physiological axes along which it deviates from the universal spectrum of leaf traits. This deviation may allow us to more accurately assess the costs of carnivory in Darlingtonia. Construction costs associated with the elaborate pitcher, including the hood and fishtail appendage with their extrafloral nectaries and relatively low chlorophyll content, appear to be reflected in the relatively high LMA values and C : N ratios we observed. With a moderate leaf lifespan of less than 6 mo and a low photosynthetic rate, Darlingtonia exemplifies a species that Wright et al. (2004)
would characterize as giving a "slow return" on investments of nutrients and dry mass in leaves and could perhaps be considered as an extreme along this continuum.
FOOTNOTES
1 We thank Steve Brewer, Nick Gotelli, Erik Jules, John Pastor, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on early versions of the manuscript. This research was funded by a grant from the Packard Foundation and by NSF grants DEB 98-05722 and DEB 02-35128 to A. M. E. and DGE 01-23490 to E. J. F. Field work and sample collections were permitted by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (permit issued 1 March 2000), the US Forest Service (permits issued 28 June 2000; 30 June 2001; 30 July 2002), and the Bureau of Land Management (permit issued 15 March 2000). We thank John MacRae (Six Rivers National Forest), Maria Ulloa-Cruz (Siskiyou National Forest), and Linda Mazzu (BLM-Medford, Oregon) for assistance in obtaining permits and locating plant populations, Rebecca Emerson for assistance in the field, and Ian Wright and Peter Reich (for the Glopnet collaborative) for publishing their raw data on leaf-trait relationships. ![]()
4 Author for correspondence (e-mail: aellison{at}fas.harvard.edu
) ![]()
LITERATURE CITED
Ackerly D. D. P. B. Reich 1999 Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. American Journal of Botany 86: 1272-1281
Aerts R. F. S. Chapin III 2000 The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30: 1-67
Alongi D. M. K. G. Boto A. I. Robertson 1992 Nitrogen and phosphorous cycles. In A. I. Robertson and D. M. Alongi [eds.], Tropical mangrove ecosystems, 251292. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USA
Arber A. 1941 On the morphology of the pitcher-leaves in Heliamphora, Sarracenia, Darlingtonia, Cephalotus, and Nephenthes. Annals of Botany 5: 563-578
Ball M. C. J. B. Passioura 1994 Carbon gain in relation to water use: photosynthesis in mangroves. In E.-D. Schulze and M. M. Caldwell [eds.], Ecophysiology of photosynthesis, 247259. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Ball M. C. M. A. Sobrado 1998 Ecophysiology of mangroves: challenges in linking physiological processes with patterns in forest structure. In M. C. Press, J. D. Scholes, and M. G. Barker [eds.], Physiological plant ecology, 331346. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK
Barthlott W. S. Porembski E. Fischer B. Gemmel 1998 First protozoa-trapping plant found. Nature 392: 447[Medline]
Becking R. W. 1997 The Darlingtonia bog communities of the Klamath Mountains, NW CaliforniaSW Oregon. In J. K. Beigel, E. S. Jules, and B. Snitkin [eds.], Proceedings of the first conference on Siskiyou ecology, 17. Siskiyou Regional Education Project, Kerby, Oregon, USA
Bedford B. L. M. R. Walbridge A. Aldous 1999 Patterns of nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80: 2151-2169[CrossRef][ISI]
Benzing D. H. 1987 The origin and rarity of botanical carnivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2: 364-369
Benzing D. H. 2000 Bromeliaceae: profile of an adaptive radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Bledzki L. A. A. M. Ellison 1998 Population growth and production of Habrotrocha rosa Donner (Rotifera: Bdelloidea) and its contribution to the nutrient supply of its host, the northern pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L. (Sarraceniaceae). Hydrobiologia 385: 193-200[CrossRef][ISI]
Brewer J. S. 2003 Why don't carnivorous pitcher plants compete with non-carnivorous plants for nutrients?. Ecology 84: 451-462[CrossRef][ISI]
Castro-Diéz P. J. P. Puyravaud J. H. C. Cornelissen 2000 Leaf structure and anatomy as related to leaf mass per area variation in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types. Oecologia 124: 476-486[CrossRef][ISI]
Chapin C. T. J. Pastor 1995 Nutrient limitation in the northern pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 728-734[ISI]
Clesceri L. S. A. E. Greenberg A. D. Eaton 1998 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., USA
Clough B. F. 1992 Primary productivity and growth of mangrove forests. In A. I. Robertson and D. M. Alongi [eds.], Tropical mangrove ecosystems, 225250. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USA
Coleman R. G. A. R. Kruckeberg 1999 Geology and plant life of the Klamath-Siskiyou Mountain region. Natural Areas Journal 19: 320-340
Craine J. M. J. Froehle D. G. Tilman D. A. Wedin F. S. Chapin III 2001 The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93: 274-285[CrossRef][ISI]
Crawford R. M. M. R. Braendle 1996 Oxygen deprivation stress in a changing environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 145-159
Dixon P. M. A. M. Ellison N. J. Gotelli 2005 Improving the precision of estimates of the frequency of rare events. Ecology 86: 1114-1123[CrossRef][ISI]
Ellison A. M. 2002 Macroecology of mangroves: large-scale patterns and processes in tropical coastal forests. Trees 16: 181-194[CrossRef]
Ellison A. M. E. J. Farnsworth 2001 Mangrove communities. In M. D. Bertness, S. D. Gaines, and M. E. Hay [eds.], Marine community ecology, 423442. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA
Ellison A. M. N. J. Gotelli 2001 Evolutionary ecology of carnivorous plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 623-629[CrossRef]
Ellison A. M. N. J. Gotelli 2002 Nitrogen availability alters the expression of carnivory in the northern pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 4409-4412
Ellison A. M. N. J. Gotelli J. S. Brewer D. L. Cochran-Stafira J. Kneitel T. E. Miller A. C. Worley R. Zamora 2003 The evolutionary ecology of carnivorous plants. Advances in Ecological Research 33: 1-74
Feller I. C. 1995 Effects of nutrient enrichment on growth and herbivory of dwarf red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle). Ecological Monographs 65: 477-506[CrossRef]
Franck D. H. 1974 Early histogenesis of the adult leaves of Darlingtonia californica (Sarraceniaceae) and its bearing on the nature of epiascidiate foliar appendages. American Journal of Botany 62: 116-132[CrossRef][ISI]
Franck D. H. 1976 Comparative morphology and early leaf histogenesis of adult and juvenile leaves of Darlingtonia californica and their bearing on the concept of heterophylly. Botanical Gazette 137: 20-34[CrossRef]
Givnish T. J. 1986 On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Givnish T. J. 1989 Ecology and evolution of carnivorous plants. In W. G. Abramson [ed.], Plantanimal interactions, 243290. McGraw-Hill, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Givnish T. J. E. L. Burkhardt R. E. Happel J. D. Weintraub 1984 Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist nutrient-poor habitats. American Naturalist 124: 479-497[CrossRef][ISI]
Gotelli N. J. A. M. Ellison 2002 Nitrogen deposition and extinction risk in the northern pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea. Ecology 83: 2758-2765[ISI]
Gotelli N. J. A. M. Ellison 2004 A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA
Guisande C. C. Andrade C. Granado-Lorencio S. R. Duque M. Núñez-Avellaneda 2000 Effects of zooplankton and conductivity on tropical Utricularia foliosa investment in carnivory. Aquatic Ecology 34: 137-142
Hepburn J. S. E. Q. Saint John F. M. Jones 1927 The biochemistry of the American pitcher plants. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science of Philadelphia 11: 1-95
Hickman J. C. 1993 The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA
Juniper B. E. R. J. Robins D. M. Joel 1989 The carnivorous plants. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA
Karlsson P. S. B. Carlsson 1984 Why does Pinguicula vulgaris L. trap insects?. New Phytologist 97: 25-30[CrossRef][ISI]
Knight S. E. 1992 Costs of carnivory in the common bladderwort, Utricularia macrorhiza. Oecologia 89: 348-355[ISI]
Knight S. E. T. M. Frost 1991 Bladder control in Utricularia macrorhiza: lake-specific variation in plant investment in carnivory. Ecology 72: 728-734[CrossRef][ISI]
Kruckeberg A. R. 1984 California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils, and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA
Kudo G. U. Molau N. Wada 2001 Leaf-trait variation of tundra plants along a climatic gradient: an integration of responses in evergreen and deciduous species. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 33: 181-190[CrossRef][ISI]
Lavergne S. J. D. Thompson E. Garnier M. Debussche 2004 The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: a comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs. Oikos 107: 505-518[CrossRef][ISI]
Mendéz M. P. S. Karlsson 1999 Costs and benefits of carnivory in plants: insights from the photosynthetic performance of four carnivorous plants in a subarctic environment. Oikos 86: 105-112[CrossRef][ISI]
Naeem S. 1988 Resource heterogeneity fosters coexistence of a mite and a midge in pitcher plants. Ecological Monographs 58: 215-227[CrossRef]
Nielsen D. W. 1990 Arthropod communities associated with Darlingtonia californica. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83: 189-200
Olde Venterink H. M. J. Wassen A. W. M. Verkroost P. C. De Ruiter 2003 Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands. Ecology 84: 2191-2199[CrossRef][ISI]
Onuf C. P. J. M. Teal I. Valiela 1977 Interactions of nutrients, plant growth, and herbivory in a mangrove ecosystem. Ecology 58: 514-526[CrossRef][ISI]
Porembski S. W. Barthlott 2000 Inselbergs: biotic diversity of isolated rock outcrops in tropical and temperate regions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Porra R. J. W. A. Thompson P. E. Kriedemann 1989 Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 975: 384-394[CrossRef]
Reeves R. D. R. M. MacFarlane R. R. Brooks 1983 Accumulation of nickel and zinc by western North American genera containing serpentine-tolerant species. American Journal of Botany 70: 1297-1303[CrossRef][ISI]
Reich P. B. C. Buschena M. G. Tjoelker K. Wrage J. Knops D. Tilman J. L. Machado 2003 Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. New Phytologist 157: 617-631[CrossRef][ISI]
Reich P. B. D. S. Ellsworth M. B. Walters J. M. Vose C. Gresham J. C. Volin W. D. Bowman 1999 Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80: 1955-1969[CrossRef][ISI]
Reich P. B. J. Oleksyn 2004 Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 11001-11006
Reich P. B. M. B. Walters D. S. Ellsworth 1997 From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 13730-13734
Schnell D. E. 2002 Carnivorous plants of the United States and Canada. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA
Schulze E.-D. G. Gebauer W. Schulze J. S. Pate 1991 The utilization of nitrogen from insect capture by different growth forms of Drosera from southwest Australia. Oecologia 87: 240-246[CrossRef][ISI]
Schulze W. E.-D. Schulze 1990 Insect capture and growth of the insectivorous Drosera rotundifolia L. Oecologia 82: 427-429[CrossRef][ISI]
Schulze W. E.-D. Schulze J. S. Pate A. N. Gillison 1997 The nitrogen supply from soils and insects during growth of the pitcher plants Nepenthes mirabilis, Cephalotus follicularis and Darlingtonia californica. Oecologia 112: 464-471
Shipley B. M. J. Lechowicz 2000 The functional co-ordination of leaf morphology, nitrogen concentration, and gas exchange in 40 wetland species. Écoscience 7: 183-194
Small E. 1972 Photosynthetic rates in relation to nitrogen recycling as an adaptation to nutrient deficiency in peat bog plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 50: 2227-2233
Sterner R. W. J. J. Elser 2002 Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Strahler A. H. A. N. Strahler 1992 Modern physical geography. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA
Talbot R. J. J. R. Etherington 1987 Comparative studies of plant growth and distribution in relation to waterlogging. XIII. The effect of Fe2+ on photosynthesis and respiration of Salix caprea and S. cinerea ssp. oleifolia. New Phytologist 105: 575-583[CrossRef][ISI]
Talbot R. J. J. R. Etherington J. A. Bryant 1987 Comparative studies of plant growth and distribution in relation to waterlogging. XII. Growth, photosynthetic capacity and metal ion uptake in Salis caprea and S. cinerea ssp. oleifolia. New Phytologist 105: 563-574[CrossRef][ISI]
Thorén L. M. J. Tuomi T. Kämäräinen K. Laine 2003 Resource availability affects investment in carnivory in Drosera rotundifolia. New Phytologist 159: 507-511[CrossRef][ISI]
Torrey J. 1853 On the Darlingtonia californica, a new pitcher-plant, from northern California. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge 6: 3-7
Wakefield A. E. N. J. Gotelli S. E. Wittman A. M. Ellison 2005 The effect of prey addition on nutrient stoichiometry, nutrient limitation, and morphology of the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae). Ecology 86: 1737-1743[CrossRef][ISI]
Whittaker R. H. 1960 Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30: 279-338[CrossRef]
Wright I. J. M. Westoby 2001 Understanding seedling growth relationships through specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration: generalisations across growth forms and growth irradiance. Oecologia 127: 21-29[CrossRef][ISI]
Wright I. J. P. B. Reich M. Westoby D. D. Ackerly Z. Baruch F. Bongers J. Cavender-Bares T. Chapin J. H. C. Cornelissen M. Diemer J. Flexas E. Garnier P. K. Groom J. Gulias K. Hikosaka B. B. Lamont T. Lee W. Lee C. Lusk J. J. Midgley M.-L. Navas U. Niinemets J. Oleksyn N. Osada H. Poorter P. Poot L. Prior V. Pyankov C. Roumet S. C. Thomas M. G. Tjoelker E. J. Veneklaas R. Villar 2004 The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821-827[CrossRef][Medline]
Zamora R. J. M. Gomez J. A. Hodar 1998 Fitness responses of a carnivorous plant in contrasting ecological scenarios. Ecology 79: 1630-1644[ISI]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Pavlovic, E. Masarovicova, and J. Hudak Carnivorous Syndrome in Asian Pitcher Plants of the Genus Nepenthes Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. O. Osunkoya, S. D. Daud, B. Di-Giusto, F. L. Wimmer, and T. M. Holige Construction Costs and Physico-chemical Properties of the Assimilatory Organs of Nepenthes Species in Northern Borneo Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 895 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||