|
|
||||||||
Population Biology |
2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary biology, University of California Los Angeles, P.O. Box 951605, Los Angeles, California 90095-1605 USA; 3Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8551 USA;and 4Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA
Received for publication February 27, 2004. Accepted for publication October 12, 2004.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: bearing correlogram California oak genetic autocorrelation analysis microsatellite pollen and seed dispersal tree species wind direction
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we are concerned with Quercus lobata Neé (henceforth Valley oak), one of California's signature species. Valley oak is a canopy tree species, generally found on deep loamy soils, below 600 m of elevation (Pavlik et al., 1991
). Along with Q. agrifolia and Q. douglasii, it is one of the more common tree species of the savanna oak community from the noncoastal lowlands, between Shasta Lake and the Santa Monica Mountains. It is also the most threatened of California's oak species, with a distribution that has been impacted seriously by continuing agricultural development, and with local populations becoming progressively sparser, due to ongoing demographic attrition (Griffin, 1971
; Brown and Davis, 1991
). This savanna oak occurs naturally in low densities (210 trees/ ha), but a further consequence of progressive demographic thinning is that individuals may become reproductively isolated into small, sparse populations, among which pollen movement may become limited. From two seasons of study, using the TwoGener pollen pool structure analysis of Smouse et al. (2001)
, we estimate that the standard deviation of pollination distance can vary from 50 to 88 m, the average distance can vary between 64 and 110 m, and the effective number of pollen donors per maternal adult ranges from 4 to 18 individuals (Sork et al., 2002a
; Austerlitz et al., 2004
). The emerging story for Valley oak is that the contemporary pollination neighborhood ranges in size from 3 to 10 ha.
An understanding of contemporary pollen movement would be enhanced by comparison with a historically relevant reference value, which latter should be reflected in the genetic structure of the extant adults themselves. If Valley oak has historically exhibited restricted pollen movement, and if a larger proportion of seeds are dispersed by rodents with restricted seed dispersal, as presumed for other oak species (Ducousso et al., 1993
), we might anticipate that Valley oak should exhibit a strong and significant spatial genetic structure. Neighboring individuals would be more likely than distant individuals to share alleles (i.e., "isolation by distance" pattern (IBD); Wright, 1943
; Malécot, 1950
; Rousset, 2000
). Such a pattern can be detected in plant populations by genetic autocorrelation analysis, describing the relationship between pairwise genetic affinity of individuals and pairwise interindividual distance (Heywood, 1991
; Hardy and Vekemans, 1999
). This method can be used to estimate the scale of gene movement (Hardy and Vekemans, 1999
; Rousset, 2000
). Assuming that genetic markers used in the analysis are not affected by natural selection, regression analysis yields an estimate of effective population size, Ne = 4
De
2, where De is the effective reproductive population density and
2 is the second moment of the dispersal distance, measured from parent to offspring, because spatial genetic structure is assumed to reflect the net balance between gene flow and genetic drift. Given an extraneous estimate of De, we can extract an estimate of
, the standard deviation of successful propagule dispersal (with seed and pollen flow combined). An analysis of fine-scale genetic structure should reflect the cumulative historical scale of propagule flow, which can be compared with our independently acquired estimate of contemporary pollen movement, to determine whether contemporary and historical processes have been operating on similar scales.
Because Valley oak is wind-pollinated, we might expect wind patterns that have been consistent over many generations could have shaped spatial genetic structure among surviving adults. Our particular study population, on the Sedgwick Reserve in Santa Barbara County, is located in a region that exhibits a predominant westnorthwest wind direction (Dorman and Winant, 2000
). Preferential pollen movement along the major wind axis could create differing degrees of relationship between pairs of individuals, depending on whether they are separated along the major axis of pollen flow or across it. Such directional asymmetry in genetic affinity (usually called "anisotropy") could affect the analysis of spatial genetic structure, because most autocorrelation analyses of propagule flow have assumed "isotropy" or radial symmetry (Tufto et al., 1997
). At Sedgwick Reserve, the prevailing winds are strong enough that we might expect them to have favored genetic relatedness among individuals along the predominant wind axis, which should produce a slow (but steady) decline of relatedness with distance. Perpendicular to the wind axis, genetic autocorrelation might be significant among close neighbors, as a consequence of localized seed movement, but genetic relatedness should decrease strongly beyond a relatively short distance, because of a low pollen flow in that direction. We can therefore expect that the slope of the genetic correlogram should be steeper across (perpendicular to) the wind axis than along it. The question is whether wind-induced anisotropy of pollen flow has imposed a lasting signature of directional asymmetry on the adult structure in our population.
Here, we will assess whether the genetic signature of the adult population reveals a historical scale of gene movement that is comparable with contemporary pollen movement, assuming that seed dispersal is much more restricted than pollen dispersal (as is common in many tree species; Ennos, 1994
). Our objective is to examine the pattern of genetic affinities among N = 191 adults at Sedgwick Reserve, using a collection of eight microsatellite loci. This analysis allows us to address three specific questions: (1) Is there significant autocorrelation in the Valley oak population at Sedgwick Reserve? (2) What is the scale of gene flow inferred by Rousset's method (2000)
? (3) Does our population exhibit anisotropic autocorrelation in a manner consistent with predictions based on the predominant wind direction at the study site?
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In the spring and summer of 2002, we sampled leaves from the majority of adult individuals (N = 191) along Figueroa Creek, including the slopes on both sides of the canyon (Fig. 1). A spatial buffer of 200 m around all sampled trees encompasses a 230-ha region that includes an additional (but ungenotyped) 123 adults. Assuming low gene flow in Q. lobata (see INTRODUCTION), genetic clustering (spatial genetic structure) was expected among neighboring individuals. Our sampling goal was to include individuals separated by small, intermediate and longer distances, rather than to exhaustively sample all individuals within the study area. Tree density in the buffered area is 1.36 trees/ha. After collection, leaves were stored at 80°C in the laboratory, pending genetic analysis.
DNA analysis
We extracted total DNA from 3040 mg of frozen leaves from each individual, using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) buffer and liquid nitrogen, following the method described in Sork et al. (2002a)
. We utilized a battery of eight unlinked microsatellite loci, QrZAG11, QrZAG20, QpZAG1/5, QpZAG9, QpZAG36, and QpZAG110, developed by Steinkellner et al. (1997)
for Q. robur and Q. petreae, MSQ4, developed by Dow et al. (1995)
for Q. macrocarpa, and Qm50, developed by Isagi and Suhandono (1997)
for Q. myrsinifolia. We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and visualization methods described by Sork et al. (2002a)
.
Wind regime
Due to latitude, regional topography and coastal location, prevailing winds in the Santa Ynez Valley are from the westnorthwest (Dorman and Winant, 2000
). The Sedgwick Reserve has maintained a weather station 900 m from the center of our study population since 1997. We analyzed hourly average wind speed and direction for the main flowering period of 1 March to 30 April (Fairley and Batchelder, 1986
) for the years 1997 2003. Conditions for pollen dispersal are best during the late morning through early evening hours (11001900 hours), when air temperature increases, relatively humidity decreases, and wind velocity increases 24 fold at the study site (F. W. Davis, unpublished data). Because these conditions certainly favor pollination and should have the strongest impact on pollen dispersal, estimates of average wind speed and the distribution of hourly average wind directions (the wind rose) were estimated for the period between 1100 and 1900 hours.
Genetic data analysis
Hardy-Weinberg
As background for our results, we estimated observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He, following Nei, 1987
), number of alleles (Nall), and inbreeding coefficient (FIS, following Weir and Cockerham, 1984
) for each of the eight microsatellite loci. We performed exact tests for Hardy-Weinberg proportions for the complete battery of eight loci and for each of the eight microsatellite loci, separately. Similarly, we performed exact tests for gametic disequilibrium between each pair of loci. We used Genepop version 3.1d (Raymond and Rousset, 1995
) for all of these tests.
Kinship
We estimated the relatedness between pairs of individuals, based on Nason's kinship coefficient (r), as described in Loiselle et al. (1995)
, and defined as a ratio of probabilities of identity by descent (for details see Hardy, 2003
). Assuming migration-drift equilibrium, the impact of mutation at small spatial scales is negligible, relative to that of gene flow, and the ratio of probabilities of identity in state is similar to that of probabilities of identity by descent (Rousset, 1996
). Using the formula from the SPAGeDi software (Hardy and Vekemans, 2002
), we estimated the kinship coefficient for the ith and jth individuals, formally defined over all alleles and loci, as

·k the mean frequency of the kth allele in the sampled population, and pik and pjk are the frequencies of the kth allele in the ith and jth individuals (taking the values 0, 0.5 and 1, respectively, for homozygotes lacking the kth allele, heterozygotes having one copy of the kth allele, and homozygotes for the kth allele), and where n is the sample size. The second term of the equation corrects for finite sampling. Average kinship coefficients were estimated for each distance interval, considering all pairs of individuals separated by a spatial distance included in that interval. For the hth distance interval, this is formally accomplished by computing 
Isotropic autocorrelation
A linear decrease of kinship coefficient with the logarithm of spatial distance is expected if gene flow follows a process of isolation by distance in two dimensions (Rousset, 1997
, 2000
). We thus computed average kinship coefficients for individuals separated by various degrees of spatial isolation. The natural logarithm of the maximum distance of the first distance class is 3.5 (i.e., all individuals are separated by from 0 to 33 m), and the logarithmic increment between successive classes is 0.50. Each estimate of r[h] was plotted against its intertree distance interval to produce a correlogram, from which we can visualize the decay of kinship with distance. We estimated the probability that the average kinship coefficient of a particular distance class was significantly different from that obtained from a genetically randomized population (no spatial structure) with 1000 permutational shuffles of the spatial coordinates of the individuals themselves. The difference over all the distance classes between the spatial genetic structure of Valley oak at Sedgwick Reserve and a genetically randomized population was also tested by a t test, defined as:
![]()
2[h] is the estimated variance of the estimated correlation, r[h], determined by permuting the sampled individuals (1000 permutations) among locations. The observed t value is compared with an empirically generated null distribution, obtained by permuting the spatial coordinates of the N individuals, and the "tail probability" is assessed as the number of random trial values of T that equal or exceed that observed value.
Regression analysis
Rousset (2000)
introduced an approach that allows extraction of information on the scale of gene movement that creates fine spatial genetic signature, by extending his model of genetic relationships among populations (Rousset, 1997
) to the relatedness between individuals within single populations. Within populations, Rousset (2000)
showed that, for an isolation-by-distance model in two-dimensional habitat with neutral loci, we should expect a linear regression of the relatedness coefficient between a pair of individuals, on the natural logarithm of geographic distance. The slope of the regression provides an estimate of 1/4
De
2, where De is the effective reproductive population density and
2 is the second moment of the dispersal distance, measured from parent to offspring. Thus, 4
De
2 can be related to neighborhood size (Ne), as defined by Wright (1951)
, but in Rousset's method, this product is essentially independent of the dispersal function and only estimates the spatial scale of gene flow. Vekemans and Hardy (2004)
have extended this approach and proposed a slightly different way of estimating dispersal parameters for spatial genetic structure. Under certain conditions, their "Sp" statistic can be used to estimate 1/4
De
2. This statistic provides a means of comparing estimates of dispersal parameters from fine-scale genetic structure with those derived from direct measures. Furthermore, Sp has proven to be a convenient parameter for assessing the degree of spatial genetic structure and for comparing such structure across species, independent of the sampling scheme (see Vekemans and Hardy, 2004
).
We estimated the Sp statistic as bk/(r[1] 1), where bk is defined as the estimated regression slope of the Loiselle et al. (1995)
kinship coefficient on the logarithm of spatial distance and r[1] is the average kinship coefficient between pairs of individuals within the first distance class, respectively (Hardy and Vekemans, 1999
; Vekemans and Hardy, 2004
). The significance of the kinship regression on the natural logarithm of spatial distance (i.e., the test for isolation by distance) was obtained by permuting individual locations and comparing the observed bk value with the frequency distributions obtained by permutation (Rousset, 1997
; Hardy and Vekemans, 2002
) for each locus and for the multilocus estimate. The standard error of bk was obtained by jackknifing genetic loci (Hardy and Vekemans, 2002
). Thus, the extent of gene flow (as measured by the
parameter) can be estimated under the assumption of an effective population density De.
Inclusion of both the very proximal and very distal pairs can bias the
estimate (Rousset, 1997
, 2000
). In order to remove the possible effect of these pairs on the
estimate, we used an iterative method developed by Fenster et al. (2003)
. A first
estimate (
) is obtained by including all pairs of individuals. Based on this first estimate, all pairs outside the interval (
< dij < 20
) are discarded from the new regression, yielding a revised estimate,
. This procedure is repeated until
converges, along with the range of distances between pairs of individuals used for the regression (i.e.,
to 20
). Using the standard error of bk (SEb), obtained by jackknifing among loci (Hardy and Vekemans, 2002
), we constructed a 95% confidence interval (CI) of Ne as (r[1] 1)/(bk ± 2 SEb). Because
=
, the 95% CI of
was estimated from the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI of Ne. We extracted all of the estimates and conducted all of the isotropic hypothesis tests with the autocorrelation program SPAGeDi, Version 1.1 (Hardy and Vekemans, 2002
; http: //www.ulb.ac.be/sciences/lagev).
Anisotropic autocorrelation
If wind direction has an important effect on pollination and on spatial genetic structure, we would predict that the correlogram should decrease more slowly with distance along the main wind azimuth, and the correlogram with the sharpest slope for the shorter distance classes should be at right angles to that first axis (across the prevailing wind vector). To assess the effect of wind on spatial structure, we conducted a directional autocorrelation analysis, for which we used minor modifications of a technique developed by Rosenberg (2000)
. Building on earlier work by Oden and Sokal (1986)
, Rosenberg (2000)
introduced a novel directional autocorrelation analysis for univariate data. Smouse and Peakall (1999)
have pointed out that single-allele (univariate) autocorrelation results have large statistical variance, but that analogous multi-allele/multilocus (multivariate) analysis reduces stochastic noise, so we have developed such an approach here.
Rosenberg's (2000)
method provides an analysis for any direction, adjusting the weights for the difference between the directional angle between two individuals, denoted
ij, and the azimuth along which we assess spatial pattern, denoted
. Specifically, we define
![]()
) remains 0 if the ij pair does not fall within the hth distance interval, but w[h]ij(
) varies continuously between 0 and 1 if the ij pair falls within the hth distance interval, the exact value depending on the angular displacement (
ij) between the two individuals, as well as the azimuth (
) being considered. If
=
ij (the angular displacement of the two individuals is the same as the azimuth being considered), w[h]ij(
) = 1, but if
=
ij ± 90° (the two individuals have an angular displacement that is perpendicular to the azimuth being considered), w[h]ij(
) = 0. The method "weights" the distance between the two individuals by the difference between their angular displacement and the azimuth being considered.
For any given distance class, we can describe the changing pattern of r[h](
) as we navigate around the circle, with
measured as the clockwise angular displacement from 0° (true North). We computed a correlogram for each of 180 trial azimuths (every 1°), portraying the relationships for successive distance classes. We should expect the autocorrelation coefficients to decrease most rapidly with increasing distance class along the angle of greatest pattern (
max) and to decrease more slowly with increasing distance class across the angle of greatest pattern (
min =
max ± 
), by virtue of the geometric construction of the angular weights. Evaluation of the difference in the correlograms along (and across) the primary wind direction should also tell us how well (or poorly) the direction of the wind accounts for the pattern of any anisotropy we encounter.
In addition to the usual test of the hypothesis that the isotropic correlogram represents a significant departure from the null hypothesis of no autocorrelation (r[h] = 0 for all distance intervals, [h]; see Smouse and Peakall, 1999
), we have added a statistically independent test of the difference between the correlogram along any particular azimuth (
) and that at right angles (
± 
), a measure of anisotropy. The null hypothesis for this second test is that r[h](
) = r[h](isotropic) = r[h](
± 
). In other words, we evaluate anisotropy as a deviation from isotropic pattern, whatever that might be. The test itself takes the form:

2
h is now the estimated variance of r[h](
), under random permutation of the angular orientations of the paired genotypic observations in the [h]th distance class. Individual pairs are not permuted among intervals with this procedure, so isotropic "structure" is preserved. With random sampling alone, we should anticipate that there would always be some angle (
), such that r[h](
) would be maximized. We need to determine whether the observed pattern of anisotropy is more pronounced than a randomly generated pattern of anisotropy, i.e., to determine whether the "directional signal is greater than the sampling noise." In addition to finding (and testing) the angle (
max) that optimized Z(
max), we have evaluated Z(
wind) to determine whether prevailing wind direction accounts for any anisotropy encountered. If wind direction has an homogenizing effect on spatial structure, we should expect that
wind
max ± 
. | RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
assume independent loci, so we removed QrZAG11 and QpZAG1/5 for trial analyses, but the genetic signature for isolation by distance and multi-allelic dispersal estimates were not significantly affected (analyses not shown). On the premise that these loci are (probably) not physically linked and that the disequilibrium is probably due to the spatial pattern of IBD itself, we have chosen to retain all loci assayed.
Decrease of kinship coefficient with spatial distance
The average kinship coefficient decreased steadily with the natural logarithm of the distance separating individuals (Fig. 3). The largest correlation occurred in the first distance class (r[1] = 0.042 ± 0.016), and r[h] became negative for the first time in the seventh distance class (i.e., for individuals separated by a distance ranging from 403 to 664 m) and remained negative in all the larger distance classes (Fig. 3). The first three r values (i.e., individuals separated by less than 90 m) were significantly more positive than expected in a random population (P
0.05), in spite of the fact that larger confidence intervals were observed for the first three distance classes than for the others. The large confidence intervals were a predictable consequence of the fact that the numbers of pairs in these initial distance classes (nh = 108266) were smaller than those for the later distance classes (nh = 4855086). The multilocus correlogram (Fig. 3) shows strong divergence (t = 5.8; P < 0.001) from the null hypothesis of no autocorrelation.
|
De
2) = 215.9 individuals. Setting De = 0.000136 individuals/m2; (the census density of the sampling area), we obtained
= 355 m. The iterative procedure to estimate
failed to converge when we set De = 0.000136 individuals/m2, but when we used a value somewhat closer to the presumed historical reproductive density (De = 0.0003: F.W. Davis, unpublished data), the iterative procedure yielded an estimate of
= 353 m. Using only pairs included between 353 m and the maximum spatial distance (i.e., 2628 m), the regression slope was 0.0020 (±0.0008) and was significantly different from that obtained in a random population (P = 0.048). The standard error of the slope yielded a 95% CI of
that ranged between 263 and 853 m.
|
wind = 292.5°/112.5°) and across it (
wind ± 
= 202.5°/22.5°), are shown in Fig. 4a, where they are contrasted with the isotropic result and with the 95% confidence band for the isotropic reference case. Departure from the null hypothesis of isotropy [r[h](
) = r[h](isotropic) = r[h](
± 
)] is not significant for any one distance class, nor is the multiclass test criterion Z(
wind) = 4.57, with P
0.53. The angle of maximum anisotropy, as judged by the Z test, is actually (
max = 286°/106°), running 6.5° "off the wind." The correlograms along the
max azimuth and across it (
min = 196°/ 16°) are shown as Fig. 4b, again contrasted with the isotropic result and with the 95% isotropic confidence band. Clearly though, Z(
max) = 4.63 (P
0.50) is still not significant. No great meaning should be attached to the directional nuances of these results, since the cumulative evidence for anisotropy is itself subtle, but it is interesting to note that what little directional pattern there is lies roughly along the wind, rather than across it. The autocorrelogram itself decreases convincingly with distance (P
0.001), but our analysis does not detect anisotropy. On balance, the isotropic treatment would seem to be an adequate description for these data.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
for pollination distance ranges between 50 and 88 m, substantially smaller than the historical estimate of
350 m (for seed and pollen together).
Seed dispersal distance in Q. lobata is still not well known, but it is often assumed that seed movement is more restricted than pollen movement in oaks (Ducousso et al., 1993
). What we do know is that acorns are removed by birds and rodents with different potential impact on dispersal distances. After maturation, many acorns are removed from the canopy by acorn woodpeckers (Melanerpes formicivorus) and scrub jays (Aphoelocoma coerulescens) (Pavlik et al., 1991
). Acorn woodpeckers can certainly fly for great distances (Koenig et al., 2000
), but any dispersal they contribute is incidental loss en route to storing acorns in their granaries, located in their own territories (Pavlik et al., 1991
). Acorns destined for the granary do not contribute to recruitment of Valley oak, and when they do, dispersal distances are not likely to be great (D. Grivet and V. Sork, unpublished data). Scrub jays, on the other hand, disperse acorns by planting them singly, and those that are not recovered may enter the population. Thus, scrub jays are capable of dispersing acorns, but their activities seem to be mostly local (V. Sork, personal observation) and little is known about frequency of long distance transport (Pavlik et al., 1991
).
Remaining acorns fall to the ground, where active transport by small rodents, such as California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), also comes into play. It is generally assumed that rodents are the principal dispersal agents but that seed dispersal is highly localized (Ducousso et al., 1993
). When rodent-dispersed acorns become established seedlings, those individuals should create a pattern of local clustering of close relatives. Fine-scale genetic structure should be determined more by small-scale rodent-mediated seed dispersal than by occasional long-distance events, such as transport by jays. For this reason, Sork et al. (1993)
ascribed the significant autocorrelation at short spatial scales in a United States Midwestern temperate oak species, Quercus rubra, to be the result of localized dispersal by rodents.
Our correlogram indicates low gene dispersal. It suggests that pollen and/or seed dispersal are restricted in Q. lobata, which is in agreement with our contemporary pollen estimate. Seed dispersal could contribute to produce this strong IBD pattern if jays and woodpeckers, although capable of long-distance dispersal, play a limited role on settlement of most seedlings. On the other hand, if most established seedlings are derived from rodent- or gravity-dispersed seed, we would expect clusters of relatives and a resulting pattern of IBD that is consistent with the autocorrelated spatial structure we observe.
The decay of kinship with increasing log (distance) was nonlinear, with the curve becoming less steep beyond 100 m (Fig. 3). Values of kinship in the shortest spatial intervals are sensitive to the precise parametric form of the dispersal function, which can explain the nonlinearity of the regression over the entire range of distances (Rousset, 1997
; Hardy and Vekemans, 1999
). Strong kurtosis of the dispersal function, unequal dispersal distributions for seed and pollen, small values of (De
2), and/or low migration rates among populations all produce a high kinship coefficient between proximal pairs of individuals, followed by a rapid decrease in kinship for more distant individuals (Hardy and Vekemans, 1999
; Heuertz et al., 2003
; Vekemans and Hardy, 2004
).
In this oak savanna setting, densities of less than 3 individuals/ha since the 19th century could have promoted small values of De
2, if gene flow was spatially restricted. If seed dispersal is substantially more limited than wind-mediated pollen dispersal, then the difference should also produce a highly nonlinear kinship correlogram (Heuertz et al., 2003
). Furthermore, contemporary pollen-dispersal curves were estimated leptokurtic in Q. lobata (Austerlitz et al., 2004
), which should reinforce this shape of the correlogram if historical dispersal has not been strongly modified by demographic change.
Spatial genetic structure has been reported in other oak species from North America (Quercus rubra, Sork et al., 1993
; Q. laevis, Berg and Hamrick, 1995
), Europe (Q. petrea and Q. robur, Streiff et al., 1998
), and Asia (Q. acutissima, Chung et al., 2002
). For these species, however, significant genetic structures were observed over shorter distances (<30 m), and kinship coefficients were either nonsignificant or smaller than we see here for Q. lobata. Direct comparisons of relationship coefficients across studies should be made with some caution, of course, because they are sensitive to the spatial scales investigated (Dutech et al., 2002
; Fenster et al., 2003
), to the methods used (Smouse and Peakall, 1999
), and to the genetic markers analyzed (Streiff et al., 1998
). That is why we have used the Sp statistic of Vekemans and Hardy (2004)
, which is equivalent to 1/4
De
2, as a convenient parametric representation for comparison of spatial genetic structure among species.
The Sp value we found for Q. lobata (Sp = 0.0046) is intermediate between those found for Q. robur (Sp = 0.003) and Q. petraea (Sp = 0.008) by Vekemans and Hardy (2004)
, who also indicate a negative correlation between Sp and the effective population density. Valley oak, with an adult density of 13 individuals/ha, should exhibit a stronger genetic structure than other European and North American oaks, for which adult densities are generally greater than 50 adults/ha. As pointed out by Vekemans and Hardy (2004)
, however, low-density species may exhibit increased distances of gene movement, due to the greater pollination distances between reproductive individuals. For example, our savanna population of Valley oak yields an estimate of
= 50 m (Sork et al., 2002a
), greater than that observed for a high-density forest population of Q. alba (
= 9 m; Smouse et al., 2001
). This inter-tree distance effect and the openness of canopy in the savanna could explain why Valley oak, in spite of its lower adult density, has less spatial genetic structure than Q. petraea.
Gene flow estimates
We can assess the hypothesis of low gene flow with an estimate of neighborhood size (4
D
2) from the regression slope. If we consider the census density of 3 individuals/ha (the historical tree density at the approximate time that this cohort was established),
can be estimated as 353 m, using the iterative procedure of Fenster et al. (2003)
. This estimate, which combines pollen and seed-mediated gene flow, was definitely larger than the indirect
estimate of contemporary pollen dispersal provided by TwoGener analysis (i.e., between 50 m and 90 m: Sork et al., 2002a
; Austerlitz et al., 2004
).
It is difficult to be certain whether the discrepancy is due to the assumptions and statistical nuances of the two approaches or whether the scale of gene flow has actually changed. Our contemporary and historical estimates should be taken with caution because they both have large variances and assumptions that affect the estimates. On one hand, the contemporary estimate assumes a specific dispersal curve (see Austerlitz et al., 2004
) and an estimate of current adult density that may be higher than the effective reproductive adult density. Either or both of these assumptions could lead to an underestimate of neighborhood area (Austerlitz et al., 2004
). On the other hand, the estimate of historical gene flow assumes migration/genetic drift equilibrium (e.g., Hardy and Vekemans, 1999
) but climatic change in California during the last few centuries may have created demographic disequilibrium. Thus, historical gene flow could be overestimated if demographic disturbances have eroded spatial genetic structure (see for example Knowles et al., 1992
).
To the extent that the perceived difference is real, two nonexclusive hypotheses can be invoked to explain the difference: (1) Seed flow is much less spatially restricted then previously assumed, and if contemporary estimates of seed-mediated
were included in an overall
, the difference in the two estimates would disappear or be reduced. While our current observations on acorn movements by rodents, acorn woodpeckers, and jays are still limited (D. Grivet and V. L. Sork, unpublished data), it seems unlikely that seed dispersal is more than twice as extensive as pollen dispersal. (2) Contemporary pollen flow has been reduced by the decrease in reproductive density in Q. lobata in post-colonial times, due to continuous demographic attrition. Although decreasing density can promote pollen dispersal (see INTRODUCTION), demographic attrition should also promote a proportionately greater degree of mating among proximal individuals, reducing the value of
for pollen dispersion as suggested for Q. lobata (Sork et al., 2002a
). We have studies of both seed and pollen dispersal, currently in progress at Sedgwick Reserve, that should shed some additional light on these issues.
Impact of wind direction on genetic structure and dispersal estimates
For this study site (and the region in general), the predominant wind direction is from the westnorthwest during the pollination period of Valley oak. Our analysis of anisotropy yields a maximum Z value along the 286°/106° azimuth, close to the predominant wind direction of 295.5°/ 112.5°. Even our best anisotropic model was far from significant, however, and we expect the correlogram to be steeper across the wind axis than along it, the reverse of what pattern we do see. Perhaps it is not surprising that we do not see the signature of the wind in our adult spatial genetic structure. First, seed dispersal, which probably has no wind component, could dilute any such effect. Moreover, by the time the established individuals were assayed as adults, 100300 years after germination, micro-local selection pressures and random demographic losses could have overwhelmed any initial wind signature. Studies of the pattern of wind-mediated pollen movement are still under way, but it will be interesting to see whether contemporary pollen movement itself is detectably anistotropic.
In summary, we show significant autocorrelation in the Valley oak population at Sedgwick Reserve, with a strong signal of shared genetic affinity, particularly for pairs of individuals separated by short distances (less than 100 m). Using regression methods, we estimate that the historical standard deviation of the propagule dispersal distribution is on the order of 350 m (for pollen and seed combined). Contrary to expectation, however, the Sedgwick Reserve population of Valley oak yields no more than a hint of historically anisotropic gene flow, in spite of strong prevailing winds from the westnorthwest during the pollination period. This latter finding indicates either that the wind has had limited effect on pollen flow or that seed flow and subsequent demographic factors, playing out over several decades, have overwhelmed any initial "wind-signature."
This study is unique in its comparison of historical and contemporary gene flow for the same population. The spatial signature of past gene flow provides a useful reference against which to gauge the future consequences of contemporary processes. Additional studies of contemporary pollen and seed flow that will shed light on these issues are currently in process, but the results reported here suggest that contemporary gene flow could be more restricted than has been true in the past and that further demographic attrition and fragmentation of the extant Valley oak population, a probable consequence of ongoing anthropogenic disturbance, can further decrease the level and extent of gene flow across California's savanna oak landscape.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
5 Present address: Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueBodeaux,Unité Mixte de Recherche BIOGECO, Laboratoire de Pathologie Forestière Domaine de la Grande Ferrade-BP81 33883 Villenave d'Ornon, France (e-mail address: cdutech{at}bordeaux.inra.fr
) ![]()
6 Present address: Department of Biology, College of Staten IslandCUNY, Staten Island, New York 10314 USA ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Barreneche T. C. Bodenes C. Lexer J. F. Trontin S. Fluch R. Streiff C. Plomion G. Roussel H. Steinkellner K. Burg J. M. Favre J. Glössl A. Kremer 1998 A genetic linkage map of Quercus robur L. (pedunculate oak) based on RAPD, SCAR, microsatellite, minisatellite, isozyme and 5S rDNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 1090-1103[CrossRef][ISI]
Barreneche T. M. Casasoli K. Russell A. Akkak H. Meddour C. Plomion F. Villani A. Kremer 2004 Comparative mapping between Quercus and Castanea using simple-sequence repeats (SSRs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 558-566[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Berg E. E. J. L. Hamrick 1995 Fine-scale genetic structure of a turkey oak forest. Evolution 49: 110-120[CrossRef][ISI]
Brown R. W. F. W. Davis 1991 Historic mortality of valley oak in the Santa Ynez Valley, Santa Barbara County, CA. In R. Standiford [ed.], Proceedings of the Symposium on Oak Woodlands and Hardwood Rangeland Management, 31 October2 November 1990, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-126, 202207. Albany, California, USA
Chung M. Y. J. Nason M. G. Chung K.-J. Kim C.-W. Park B.-Y. Sun J.-H. Pak 2002 Landscape-level spatial genetic structure in Quercus acutissima (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1229-1236
Dick C. W. G. Etchelecu F. Austerlitz 2003 Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Molecular Ecology 12: 753-764[CrossRef][Medline]
Dorman C. E. C. D. Winant 2000 The structure and variability of the marine atmosphere around the Santa Barbara Channel. Monthly Weather Review 128: 261-282[CrossRef][ISI]
Dow B. D. M. V. Ashley H. F. Howe 1995 Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 137-141[ISI]
Ducousso A. H. Michaud R. Lumaret 1993 Reproduction and gene flow in the genus Quercus L. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: (Suppl.) 91s-106s[CrossRef]
Dutech C. J. Seiter P. Petronelli H. I. Joly P. Jarne 2002 Evidence of low gene flow in a neotropical tree species in two forest stands of French Guiana. Molecular Ecology 11: 725-738[CrossRef][Medline]
Ellstrand N. C. D. R. Elam 1993 Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242[CrossRef][ISI]
Ennos R. A. 1994 Estimating the relatives rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity 72: 250-259[ISI]
Epperson B. K. 1995 Fine-scale spatial structure: correlations for individual genotypes differ from those for local gene frequencies. Evolution 49: 1022-1026[CrossRef][ISI]
Fairley D. G. L. Batchelder 1986 A study of oak-pollen production and phenology in northern California: prediction of annual variation in pollen counts based on geographic and meterologic factors. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 78: 300-307[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fenster C. B. X. Vekemans O. J. Hardy 2003 Quantifying gene flow from spatial genetic structure data in a metapopulation of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). Evolution 57: 995-1007[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Griffin J. R. 1971 Oak regeneration in the upper Carmel Valley, California. Ecology 52: 862-868[CrossRef][ISI]
Hardy O. J. 2003 Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Molecular Ecology 12: 1577-1588[CrossRef][Medline]
Hardy O. J. X. Vekemans 1999 Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Heredity 83: 145-154
Hardy O. J. X. Vekemans 2002 SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 618-620[CrossRef][ISI]
Heuertz M. X. Vekemans J. F. Hausman M. Palada O. J. Hardy 2003 Estimating seed vs. pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash. Molecular Ecology 12: 2483-2495[CrossRef][Medline]
Heywood J. S. 1991 Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 335-355[CrossRef][ISI]
Isagi Y. S. Suhandono 1997 PCR primers amplifying microsatellite loci of Quercus myrsinifolia Blume and their conservation between oak species. Molecular Ecology 6: 897-899[CrossRef][Medline]
Knowles P. D. Perry H. A. Foster 1992 Spatial genetic structure in two tamarack (Larix laricinia (du roi) K. Koch) populations with differing establishment histories. Evolution 46: 572-576[CrossRef][ISI]
Koenig W. D. P. N. Hooge M. T. Stanback J. Haydock 2000 Natal dispersal in the cooperatively breeding Acorn Woodpecker. Condor 102: 492-502[CrossRef][ISI]
Ledig F. T. 1988 The conservation of diversity in forest trees. BioScience 38: 471-479[CrossRef][ISI]
Ledig F. T. 1992 Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63: 87-108[CrossRef][ISI]
Loiselle B. A. V. L. Sork J. Nason C. Graham 1995 Spatial genetic structure of tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1420-1425[CrossRef][ISI]
Malécot G. 1950 Quelques schémas probabilistes sur la variabilité des populations naturelles. Annales de l'Université de Lyon A 13: 37-60
Nason J. D. J. L. Hamrick 1997 Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of Neotropical canopy trees. Journal of Heredity 88: 264-276
Nei M. 1987 Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA
Oden N. L. R. R. Sokal 1986 Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Systematic Zoology 35: 608-617[CrossRef][ISI]
Ogden G. L. 1975 Differential response of two oak species to far inland advection of sea-salt spray aerosol. Ph.D. dissertation, University