|
|
||||||||
Ecology |
Centre d'études nordiques and Département de biologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada, G1K 7P4
Received for publication June 5, 2003. Accepted for publication October 30, 2003.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: aerial photos caribou disturbance Cladina George River caribou herd grazing lichen succession plant remains trampling
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The George River caribou herd (GRCH) experienced a rapid demographic growth between the early 1960s and the mid-1980s (Messier et al., 1988
), when it reached a relative stability at approximately 700 000 individuals (Couturier et al., 1996
) before declining during the 1990s (Boudreau et al., 2003
). With the increasing number of caribou in the summer habitat of the GRCH, lichen woodlands faced sustained herbivore pressure. Extensive surveys of the summer habitat of the GRCH indicated that all lichen woodlands showed signs of caribou disturbance as revealed by dense trail networks and degradation of the lichen carpet (Fig. 1a, b, c).
|
Several studies on the impact of caribou on vegetation have compared sites with different herbivory histories: ungrazed vs. grazed sites (Moser et al., 1979
; Klein, 1987
; Henry and Gunn, 1991
; Manseau et al., 1996
) and exclosure sites vs. grazed sites (Ouellet et al., 1993
; Väre et al., 1995
, 1996
). Such studies provide useful information on plantcaribou relationships but some limitations are apparent. Comparisons between ungrazed and grazed sites are based on the assumption that vegetation composition of the sites being compared was initially the same, an assumption generally difficult to assess. Such comparisons can be misleading when trying to identify vegetation change through time.
Exclosure studies are the best way to evaluate change in vegetation composition (or recovery patterns) associated with herbivore removal (Watkinson et al., 2001
). However, processes involved in vegetation degradation caused by herbivores cannot be studied directly using this approach. Furthermore, exclosure studies may not be ideal when working with slow-growing species like lichens. A more straightforward approach to identify changes in species dominance is to use vegetation composition of the same site at two different periods, before and after herbivore disturbance.
In this study, we analyzed plant remains to identify the relative abundance of ground species prior to caribou disturbance. Conventional plant macrofossil analysis is conducted generally on lake sediment or peatland samples where the decomposition process is slow (Warner, 1990
). Although plant remains are rarely preserved in terrestrial soils (Andersen, 1986
), conditions at our study sites slowed down the decomposition process (e.g., cold temperatures and short frost-free growing seasons, excessively drained soils and short time lag [about 25 yr] between the onset of caribou disturbance and sampling). As a result, most of the vegetation destroyed by caribou was still present and identifiable in the superficial organic layers.
The main objective of this study was to identify potential shifts in species dominance of ground vegetation of lichen woodlands in the summer habitat of the GRCH in response to caribou grazing and trampling. To do so, we reconstructed the vegetation composition of 14 sites prior to caribou disturbance and evaluated the severity of disturbance based on the amplitude of compositional changes between past and present vegetation.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Linear surveys of present vegetation were performed in each trail along the five transects. Plants were tallied along each 2-m transect using 20 10-cm long sections. The linear cover (cover classes: <1%, 1.110.0%, 10.120.0%, etc.) of living plants (lichens, mosses, low shrubs, etc), litter, and mineral soil crossing the transect was determined for each 10-cm section. Thus, the survey in each trail was based on 100 measurements used for the calculation of species relative cover. Based on each of the 20 sections/transect, the mean cover of living plants, litter, and mineral soil along each transect was calculated, using the central value of the cover class rather than the cover class itself (e.g., cover class 10.120.0% replaced by 15%).
Plant remains were recovered in each trail for transects #1, #3, and #5 thought to be representative of the plant macrofossil assemblage at each site. Plant remains correspond to dead plant parts directly attached to living plants (as in the case of the decaying basal part of Cladina podetia) or buried in the uppermost 1 cm of the organic horizon (F horizon). The position and good preservation of plant remains in the uppermost part of the organic horizon indicate their young age and recent burial relative to the long-term development of the vegetation cover at each site. Along each transect, contiguous slices (10-cm long, 5-cm wide) of living plants and the underlying organic horizons were extracted. The samples were then carefully packed to preserve the original stratigraphy. In the laboratory, samples were dried at room temperature and plant remains were exposed by removing the living plants.
Plant remains were then surveyed along the 20 10-cm lines of the 2-m transect. Each 10-cm line was divided in 1-cm sections, and plant cover was determined for each millimeter of 1-cm section under a dissecting microscope (40x, Fig. 3). Plant remains were identified at the genus level. Special attention was given to lichen and moss species because ground vegetation of lichen woodlands is largely dominated by different lichen and moss assemblages rather than by vascular plants. However, shrubs and herbs were also identified and surveyed when present. Plant cover prior to caribou disturbance was then reconstructed using plant remains from the six surveyed 2-m transects.
|
Data analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) on plant remains and present vegetation data was conducted to evaluate changes in the relative abundance of the different plants as a result of caribou disturbance over the last 25 yr (mixed effects of grazing and trampling). Relative abundance of species in the present ground vegetation was calculated using living plant cover only. Litter and exposed mineral soil were excluded from the current ground cover data in order to homogenize past and present vegetation data sets. Because we used standardized data, the PCA was performed on the covariance matrix. Scores were then calculated using the centered variables instead of the standardized ones (SAS 6.12, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
PCA analysis
Principal component analysis was used to ordinate the study sites according to composition of ground vegetation before and after caribou disturbance (Fig. 4). The first two axes of PCA explained 91.4% of the variance. Axis 1 (79.4% of the variance) was positively correlated with Cladina (score of 0.92) and negatively correlated with Cladonia (0.29) cover. Axis 2 explained an additional 12% of the variance and was positively correlated with Cladonia (0.57) and negatively correlated with Stereocaulon (0.79) covers.
|
Position of the sites in the PCA analysis, based on present vegetation, was directly linked to the relative abundance of the different lichens, in relation to the severity and type (trampling or grazing) of caribou disturbance. Four major vegetation types were identified: Cladina-dominated ground vegetation; reduced Cladina and increased Cladonia cover; reduced Cladina cover with no increase of Cladonia; and finally, reduced Cladina and Stereocaulon cover combined with an increase of Cladonia.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Past and present vegetation data
Prior to caribou disturbance, the ground vegetation of most lichen woodlands was largely dominated by lichens. Most of the sites (10/14) were dominated by Cladina species typical of late-successional stages (Hustich, 1951
; Ahti, 1959
; Bergerud, 1971
; Auclair, 1983
; Morneau and Payette, 1989
). Based on the Cladina dominance, sustained growth conditions in absence of ground disturbance was likely during the decades preceding growth of the GRCH. However, Stereocaulon-dominated sites were probably associated with light caribou disturbance. Stereocaulon typically increases to the detriment of Cladina in response to light disturbance (Ritchie, 1960
; Scotter, 1964
; Ahti and Hepburn, 1967
; Haapasaari, 1988
). Some of the factors likely to explain Stereocaulon abundance on disturbed sites are better trampling resistance (Haapasaari, 1988
), thalli less thoroughly eaten by caribou (Haapasaari, 1988
), and faster growth rate (Hustich, 1951
). More recent quantitative work in northern Finland (Kärenlampi, 1971
; Crittenden et al., 1994
; Kytöviita and Crittenden, 2002
), however, indicates that several Cladina species are growing faster than Stereocaulon.
Aerial photo interpretation of the sites prior to 1975 corroborates our plant-remain data, which suggested the dominance of a continuous lichen (Cladina) carpet before the period of caribou disturbance. Although the identification of the dominant species from aerial photos cannot be validated directly, continuous lichen carpets in northeastern Canada have always been reported to be Cladina-dominated in field surveys (Hustich, 1951
; Bergerud, 1971
; Morneau and Payette, 1989
; Riverin and Gagnon, 1996
). Also, according to aerial photos, no caribou trails were present in the studied sites prior to 1975. Although seldom-used trails could have been overlooked, only a few well-developed trails, particularly in fen peatlands, were present at the time the aerial photos were taken. Obviously, trail networks at that time were ill-developed in comparison to now, which strongly suggests the absence of significant caribou disturbance at that time.
Degradation process
Ground vegetation faced severe trampling and grazing pressures as caribou density increased in the summer habitat following the rapid growth of the GRCH. The most striking impact of caribou disturbance was the destruction of the lichen carpet, as reported elsewhere (Manseau et al., 1996
; Morneau and Payette, 1998
), resulting in a directional shift in species dominance, from Cladina-dominated vegetation to more complex and diverse lichen assemblages accompanied by mosses, shrubs, and herbs.
The dominant ground species in stands with light or moderate disturbances had no major change, because destruction of the lichen cover was restricted to caribou trails. Although light and moderate trampling can favor short-distance lichen dissemination (Heinken, 1999
), severe trampling can have deleterious effects on lichens. At the landscape scale, degradation of ground vegetation in lichen woodlands of the summer habitat is closely associated with severe trampling. For lichen species other than those in the genera Cladina and Stereocaulon, the impact of caribou disturbance on ground vegetation can be compared to that of forest fire. By destroying the lichen cover, caribou trampling causes mineral soil to be exposed, thereby creating favorable conditions for the establishment of crustose lichens and several early successional Cladonia species. The relative abundance of mosses and dwarf shrubs generally increases with the destruction of the lichen carpet, although to a lesser extent.
With the destruction of the Cladina stellaris carpet, the respective influences of trampling and grazing can be evaluated by looking at the sequence of lichen recovery. Present vegetation with small Cladina stellaris podetia (originating from sprouting of surviving lichen thalli) is possibly the result of the combined effects of heavy grazing (most living thalli removed) and light/moderate trampling (dead residual lichen carpet still present). However, the sequence of vegetation recovery with Cladonia and crustose lichens is likely initiated when heavy trampling that exposes the mineral soil ceases. Grazing severity is difficult to evaluate in this particular case because heavy trampling destroyed any former grazing evidence.
Lichen succession
All sampled sites were old-growth lichen woodlands (>200 yr old; Morneau, 1999
), in an area with a long fire-return interval and rare recently burned stands. In absence of disturbance (fire and caribou), old-growth lichen woodlands are self-maintained during several centuries in northern Québec (Payette and Morneau, 1993
).
Successional processes are still at an early stage at the caribou-disturbed sites as the activity of the GRCH only decreased in the early 1990s (Boudreau et al., 2003
). Although comparisons can be made, successional trajectories for this type of disturbance are, for many reasons, more complex than those associated with fire disturbance: late successional lichen species are still present at every site, mineral soils are not always exposed and, more importantly, caribou can come back to a site and change the successional pathways anytime. Furthermore, plant composition in disturbed stands includes early (crustose lichens and Cladonia) and late (Cladina stellaris thalli and fragments dispersed in the stands) successional species. Such plant assemblages produce successional stands with high lichen diversity. In the absence of caribou activity, lichen succession will progress, with Cladina species becoming progressively dominant over the next 100 years until a thick Cladina stellaris carpet covers most of the ground surface (Morneau and Payette, 1989
).
In conclusion, our results show that caribou disturbance plays an important role determining lichen abundance and diversity. Destruction of the Cladina-species-dominated lichen carpet allows other lichens, particularly species of early successional stages, to increase in abundance. However, the impact of caribou disturbance on mosses, shrubs, and herbs are less apparent, although small increases in relative cover were observed. Further research should emphasize the need to partition the respective influence of grazing and trampling in the degradation process.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 serge.payette{at}bio.ulaval.ca
. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ahti T. T. L. Hepburn 1967 Preliminary studies on woodland caribou range, especially on lichen stands, in Ontario. Research Report (wildlife), no. 74. Technical Series, Department of Lands and Forests, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Andersen S. T. 1986 Palaeoecological studies of terrestrial soils. In B. E. Berglund and M. Ralska-Jasiewiczowa [eds.], Handbook of Holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology, 165177. John Wiley & Sons, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Auclair A. N. D. 1983 The role of fire in lichen-dominated tundra and forest-tundra. In R. W. Wein and D. A. MacLean [eds.], The role of fire in northern circumpolar ecosystems, 235256. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA
Augustine D. J. S. J. McNaughton 1998 Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 1165-1183[CrossRef][ISI]
Bayfield N. G. U. H. Urquhart S. M. Cooper 1981 Susceptibility of four species of Cladonia to disturbance by trampling in the Cairngorm mountains, Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 18: 303-310[CrossRef][ISI]
Bayley R. H. 1976 Ecological aspects of dispersal and establishment in lichens. In D. H. Brown, D. L. Hawksworth, and R. H. Bayley [eds.], Lichenology: progress and problems, 215247. Academic Press, London, UK
Bergerud A. T. 1971 Abundance of forage on the winter range of Newfoundland caribou. Canadian Field-Naturalist 85: 39-52
Biermann R. F. J. A. Daniels 1997 Changes in a lichen rich dry sand grassland vegetation with special reference to lichen-synusiae and Campylopus introflexus. Phytocoenologica 27: 257-273
Boudreau S. S. Payette C. Morneau S. Couturier 2003 Recent decline of the George River caribou herd as revealed by tree-ring analysis. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 35: 187-195[CrossRef][ISI]
Couturier S. R. Courtois H. Crépeau L.-P. Rivest S. N. Luttich 1996 The June 1993 photocensus of the Rivière George caribou herd and comparison with an independent census. Rangifer Special Issue 9: 283-296
Crête M. L.-P. Rivest D. Le Henaff S. N. Luttich 1991 Adapting sampling plans to caribou distribution on calving grounds. Rangifer Special Issue 7: 137-150
Crittenden P. D. I. Kalucka E. Oliver 1994 Does nitrogen supply limit the growth of lichens?. Cryptogamic Botany 4: 143-155
Haapasaari M. 1988 The oligotrophic heath vegetation of northern Fennoscandia and its zonation. Acta Botanica Fennica 135: 1-219
Heinken T. 1999 Dispersal patterns of terricolous lichens by thallus fragments. Lichenologist 31: 603-612[ISI]
Henry G. H. R. A. Gunn 1991 Recovery of tundra vegetation after overgrazing by caribou in arctic Canada. Arctic 44: 38-42
Hustich I. 1951 The lichen woodlands in Labrador and their importance as winter pastures for domesticated reindeer. Acta Geographica 12: 1-48
Kärenlampi L. 1971 Studies on the relative growth rate of some fruticose lichens. Reports from the Kevo Subarctic Research Station 7: 33-39
Kershaw K. A. 1978 The role of lichens in boreal tundra transition areas. Bryologist 81: 294-306[CrossRef][ISI]
Klein D. R. 1987 Vegetation recovery patterns following overgrazing by reindeer on St. Matthew Island. Journal of Range Management 40: 336-338[CrossRef][ISI]
Kytöviita M.-M. P. D. Crittenden 2002 Seasonal variation in growth rate in Stereocaulon paschale. Lichenologist 34: 533-537[CrossRef][ISI]
Manseau M. J. Huot M. Crête 1996 Effects of summer grazing by caribou on composition and productivity of vegetation: community and landscape level. Journal of Ecology 84: 503-513
McNaughton S. J. 1983 Serengeti grassland ecology: the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecological Monographs 53: 291-320[CrossRef]
McNaughton S. J. 1984 Grazing lawns, animal in herds, plant form, and coevolution. American Naturalist 124: 863-886[CrossRef][ISI]
Messier F. J. Huot D. Le Henaff S. Luttich 1988 Demography of the George River caribou herd: evidence of population regulation by forage exploitation and range expansion. Arctic 41: 279-287[ISI]
Morneau C. 1999 Analyse dendroécologique de l'activité du caribou et perturbation de la végétation dans le nord-est du Québec-Labrador. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
Morneau C. S. Payette 1989 Postfire lichen-spruce woodland recovery at the limit of the boreal forest in northern Québec. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 2770-2782[ISI]
Morneau C. S. Payette 1998 A dendroecological method to evaluate past caribou (Rangifer tarandus L.) activity. Ecoscience 5: 64-76
Moser J. M. T. H. Nash III J. W. Thomson 1979 Lichens of Anaktuvuk Pass, Alaska, with emphasis on the impact of caribou grazing. Bryologist 82: 393-408[CrossRef][ISI]
Mueller-Dombois D. H. Ellenberg 1974 Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York, New York, USA
Oksanen L. 1978 Lichen grounds of Finnmarksvidda, northern Norway, in relation to summer and winter grazing by reindeer. Report of the Kevo Subarctic Research Station 14: 64-71
Oksanen L. J. Moen T. Helle 1995 Timberline patterns in northernmost Fennoscandia. Relative importance of climate and grazing. Acta Botanica Fennica 153: 93-105
Oksanen L. T. Oksanen 1989 Natural grazing as a factor shaping out barren landscapes. Journal of Arid Environments 17: 219-233[ISI]
Oksanen L. R. Virtanen 1995 Topographic, altitudinal and regional patterns in continental and suboceanic heath vegetation of northern Fennoscandia. Acta Botanica Fennica 153: 1-61
Ouellet J. P. D. C. Heard S. Boutin 1993 Range impacts following the introduction of caribou on Southampton Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic and Alpine Research 25: 136-141[CrossRef][ISI]
Ouzilleau J. S. Payette 1975 Croissance de quelques lichens à caribou du genre Cladonia (sous-genre Cladina) en milieu subarctique, Nouveau-Québec. Naturaliste canadien 102: 597-602
Payette S. C. Morneau 1993 Holocene relict woodlands at the eastern Canadian treeline. Quaternary Research 39: 84-89[CrossRef][ISI]
Pegau R. E. 1968 Growth rates of important reindeer forage lichens on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Arctic 21: 255-259[ISI]
Pegau R. E. 1970 Effect of reindeer trampling and grazing on lichens. Journal of Range Management 23: 95-97[CrossRef][ISI]
Ritchie J. C. 1960 The vegetation of northern Manitoba. V. Establishing the major zonation. Arctic 13: 211-229
Riverin S. R. Gagnon 1996 Dynamique de la régénération d'une pessière à lichen dans la zone de la pessière noire à mousses, nord du Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1504-1509[CrossRef]
Russell J. S. Couturier L. G. Sopuck K. Ovaska 1996 Post-calving photo census of the Rivière George caribou herd in July 1993. Rangifer Special Issue 9: 319-330.
Scotter G. W. 1963 Growth rates of Cladonia alpestris, C. mitis, and C. rangiferina in the Talston River region, N.W.T. Canadian Journal of Botany 41: 1199-1202
Scotter G. W. 1964 Effects of forest fires on the winter range of barren ground caribou in northern Saskatchewan. Wildlife Management Bulletin, series 1, no. 18. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Suominen O. J. Olofsson 2000 Impacts of semi-domesticated reindeer on structure of tundra and forest communities in Fennoscandia: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 37: 233-249[ISI]
Ukkola R. 1995 Trampling tolerance of plants and ground cover in Finnish Lapland, with an example from the Pyhätunturi National Park. In H. Heikkinen, B. Obrebska-Starkel and S. Tuhkanen [eds.], Environmental aspects of the timberline in Finland and in the Polish Carpathians, 91110. Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Krakow, Poland
Väre H. R. Ohtonen K. Mikkola 1996 The effect and extent of heavy grazing by reindeer in oligotrophic pine heaths in northeastern Fennoscandia. Ecography 19: 245-253
Väre H. R. Ohtonen J. Oksanen 1995 Effects of reindeer grazing on understory vegetation in dry Pinus sylvestris forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 23-30
Warner B. G. 1990 Plant macrofossils. In B. G. Warner [ed.], Methods in Quaternary ecology, 5364. Geoscience Canada Reprint Series 5. Geological Association of Canada, Stittsville, Ontario, Canada
Watkinson A. R. A. E. Riding N. R. Cowie 2001 A community and population perspective of the possible role of grazing in determining the ground flora of ancient woodland. Forestry 74: 231-239
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |