|
|
||||||||
Tropical Biology |
2School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110760, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0760 USA; 3Department of Botany, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118526, Gainesville, Florida 34002-8526 USA; 4Laboratório de Ecofitologia e Propagação de Plantas, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-Amazônia Oriental, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro S/N-Marco, CX.POSTAL 48, Belém, Pará CEP-66095-100, Brazil
Received for publication November 1, 2002. Accepted for publication February 13, 2003.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Amazon compensatory (reproductive) photosynthesis dry-season irrigation leaf water potential Melastomataceae Miconia ciliata phenology secondary forest tropical forests
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drought affects leaf, flower, and fruit phenology (Wright, 1991
; Mulkey and Wright, 1996
) primarily by reducing leaf gas exchange and, consequently, carbon gain (Mulkey and Wright, 1996
). The few studies that examine the effects of drought limitation on leaf gas exchange in Amazonian pioneer species focus only on canopy trees (e.g., Dias-Filho and Dawson, 1995
). Understory plants in early regrowth forests are more susceptible to drought than larger trees due to their smaller root systems (Wright, 1992
). Their susceptibility to drought stress is further enhanced by the generally tenuous carbon balance that exists under low-light conditions characteristic of the understory (Gentry and Emmons, 1987
; Mulkey et al., 1991
). Understory composition of regrowth forests is also influenced by water availability (Gentry and Emmons, 1987
; Wright, 1992
) and the selective environment created by highly degraded soils arising from repeated cycles of burning and cultivation (McGrath et al., 2001
). Here we report on the effects of reducing moisture stress on dry season leaf gas exchange by Miconia ciliata, a common understory species in eastern Amazonian regrowth forests.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study species
Melastomataceae is an abundant family occurring primarily in the Neotropics, generally as understory shrubs (Ellison et al., 1993
), and is especially prevalent in regrowth forest stands. The genus Miconia includes over 1000 species (most as shrubs and small trees), comprising one of the most abundant Neotropical plant genera (Gentry, 1993
). Miconia ciliata is a woody understory shrub with most individuals below 2 m tall, and very few have branches that reach heights greater than 34 m. Miconia ciliata is the third most abundant understory species at our study site, comprising 8% of all understory individuals (J. M. Tucker, University of Florida, personal communication).
Study design
The study was conducted in eight 20 x 20 m treatment plots separated by 10-m buffer strips. Four plots were randomly selected to receive dry-season irrigation; the other four served as untreated controls. Nested 10 x 10 m measurement plots were located in the center of each 20 x 20 m plot. An irrigation tape system provided the equivalent of 5 mm of daily precipitation during rainless dry-season days, corresponding to regional estimates of daily evapotranspiration (Shuttleworth et al., 1984
; Lean et al., 1996
; Jipp et al., 1998
). Irrigation was initiated at the beginning of the 2001 dry season in July. Measurements of gravimetric soil moisture content indicate that during the dry season irrigated plots had about twice as much moisture as control plots (22% vs. 10%). Wet-season gravimetric soil moisture content was 27% for both treatments (Vasconcelos, 2002
).
Gas exchange
Data were collected from October 2001 to May 2002. We picked three M. ciliata individuals in each measurement plot for leaf gas exchange measurements (N = 24). A portable gas exchange system (LI-6400, LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.) supplied with ambient air was used to measure the photosynthetic capacity at light saturation (Amax) and construct light response curves of fully expanded leaves. Photosynthetic capacity at light saturation was reached by exposing leaves to a predetermined 8001000 µmol · m2 · s1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PFD), ambient CO2 and H2O concentrations, a flow rate of 400 µmol/s and chamber temperatures kept under 32°C until the photosynthetic rate stabilized. Replicate Amax measurements on each plant were done monthly with some additional measurements during exceptionally dry periods and early wet season (total N = 346). For light response curves, leaves were subjected to decreasing levels of light from saturation through darkness. Variables derived from these data include Amax, dark respiration, apparent quantum yield, light compensation point, light saturation point, and convexity (Photosyn Assistant, Dundee Scientific, Dundee, Scotland, UK). Replicate light response curve measurements were made three times per season on all study plants. All leaf gas exchange measurements were done between 0900 and 1500. To avoid time-of-day bias, measurements alternated between control and irrigated plots.
Leaf water potentials
We selected three M. ciliata individuals per plot for leaf water potential. Two sets of measurements were made on a monthly basis (November through April) using a PMS pressure bomb (Corvalis, Oregon, USA), one set in the mid-afternoon (14001500) and one set at pre-dawn (03000400). Because individuals were small and leaves were removed monthly for leaf water potential sampling, we did not do these measurements on the individuals used for leaf gas exchange.
For both leaf gas exchange and water potential one leaf per individual per measurement was used since individuals were small and leaf-to-leaf variation for same individuals was low.
Phenology
Plants used for leaf gas exchange measurements were observed for variation in phenology. At the beginning of the wet season, each time leaf gas exchange was measured, we recorded the presence and absence of flowers and fruits for the whole plant. Additionally, one branch from each leaf gas exchange plant was used to monitor leaf phenology.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed with JMP version 3.2.6 software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). A repeated measures MANOVA model was fitted to the Amax and water potential data with treatment as the only effect, each monthly measurement set as dependent variables and time as the effect between dependent variables. We use the Wilks' lambda test statistic to evaluate the MANOVA results. Preliminary statistical analysis showed that plot as a random nested variable was not a significant factor (P > 0.25) in the univariate model and was therefore excluded from subsequent analysis. The Geisser and Greenhouse (G-G) adjustment, which allows for univariate repeated measures ANOVA on data that fail the univariate sphericity assumption (SAS Institute, 1998
), was performed along with the multivariate analysis. Light curve variables such as apparent quantum yield, dark respiration, and convexity were derived using a nonrectangular hyperbola fit with Photosyn Assistant software (Dundee Scientific, Dundee, UK). Derived variables were analyzed using the same MANOVA model described above.
Because treatment response for most variables varied greatly among measurement dates and more broadly between seasons, we assessed the significance of treatment differences as the interaction between treatment and time factors in our ANOVA and MANOVA models. Some measurement dates and plants were excluded from the multivariate analysis to conform to the requirement of no missing values.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
During very dry periods, M. ciliata individuals in control plots and the surrounding forest lost turgor, while irrigated plants maintained full turgor and horizontal leaf angles. The severity of drought stress was reflected in leaf water potential values as low as 3.0 MPa for some control plants during the dry season in comparison to a maximum wet-season leaf water potential of 0.2 (Fig. 3 and Table 1). One of our 12 control plants wilted and died after several days without rain during a critical drought period in December 2001.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stomatal limitation and limited acclimation
The combination of low Amax, gs, Ci, and leaf water potential in control plants during the dry season relative to both control plants in the wet season and irrigated plants during the dry season suggests that Amax is constrained by CO2 diffusion due to stomatal response to drought (Osmond et al., 1980
) and is consistent with studies that show stomatal closure as the initial defense against turgor loss (Tenhuen et al., 1987
; Schulze, 1993
; Flexas et al., 1998
). Stomatal response to drought is driven by reduction in both soil moisture and relative humidity (Ball and Farquhar, 1984
; Reseman and Raschke, 1984
; Reekie and Wayne, 1992
), consistent with the results we have reported.
Control plants partially acclimated to drought by increasing Amax/g (indicative of water use efficiency [WUE]) as drought stress intensified, but not enough to prevent steep drops in carbon assimilation during dry periods. As gs decreases, transpiration decreases linearly, but Ci also drops since CO2 demand is unchanged. This decrease in Ci is compensated by a steeper internal/external CO2 concentration gradient that counteracts the drop in gs and increases CO2 diffusion. Not surprisingly, drought-stricken control plants with the lowest Amax generally had higher Amax/gs ratios (cf. Jones, 1993
). These results are also consistent with other studies that link plant variation in WUE to ecological variation in atmospheric and soil drought conditions (Tenhuen et al., 1987
; Mulkey et al., 1991
, 1992
).
Wet-season recovery of leaf gas exchange
The abrupt start of the wet season in January provided a clear response of study plants to the change of water availability that occurs between the dry and wet season. There are very few data on the recovery of leaf gas exchange from drought stress as the wet season progresses (Montagu and Woo, 1999
). Similar to our results, Montagu and Woo (1999)
found fast recovery from stomatal limitation within the first 8 d of the wet season in Acacia auriculiformis in Australia, but full recovery was delayed for several weeks as foliar chlorophyll slowly rebounded from dry-season reductions. In contrast, the absence of dry-season treatment differences in apparent quantum yield and the quick recovery of leaf gas exchange in our study suggest that M. ciliata did not suffer from any sustained biochemical changes in its photosynthetic apparatus in response to drought. The dry-/wet-season transition signified a rapid and drastic change from drought-induced stomatal limits on carbon assimilation to a scenario in which water no longer limited leaf gas exchange. This is reflected in a drop in Amax/gs for both treatments and increases in Ci that signal the end of stomatal limitation to Amax.
Phenology and the impact of drought in the wet season
Water stress is closely linked to leaf, flower, and fruit phenology for a wide array of tropical species in seasonally dry forests (Opler et al., 1976
; Alvim and Alvim, 1978
; Augspurger, 1979
; Reich and Borchert, 1984
; Bullock and Solis-Magallanes, 1990
; Wright et al., 1992
; Wright, 1996
). A similar study in Panama has shown irrigation to strongly influence understory phenology without affecting canopy phenology, presumably due to differential access to deeper sources of soil moisture (Wright, 1996
). Irrigation disrupted the timing of leaf production in seven understory species (Wright, 1991
) while advancing the flowering and fruiting phenology of three other species in Panama (Tissue and Wright, 1995
). Although rainfall has been shown to function mainly as a cue to initiate growth and phenological changes (Opler et al., 1976
; Reich and Borchert, 1984
), dry-season drought likely regulated M. ciliata phenology by limiting carbon assimilation in control plants during the dry season and restricting their potential for flowering and fruiting. Our data suggest that the high potential assimilation rates of irrigated plants in the dry season advanced flowering and fruiting phenology, as observed in Panama (Tissue and Wright, 1995
), creating the difference in flowering and fruiting phenology observed during the wet season between control and irrigated treatments.
The combination of phenology and leaf gas exchange treatment differences in the wet season is consistent with reproductive compensatory photosynthesis by control plants during this period. The increased demand for carbon in developing flowers and fruits can increase photosynthesis in source leaves (Watson and Casper, 1984
; Bazzaz and Reekie, 1985
; Reekie and Bazzaz, 1987
). Although this may mean an increase in whole plant photosynthesis, this compensatory response is often observed on leaves near strong carbon sinks (Evans and Rawson, 1970
; Hansen, 1970
; Flinn, 1974
; Chapin and Wardlaw, 1988
). Because M. ciliata flowering and fruiting occurs at branch tips near fully developed mature leaves used for leaf gas exchange measurements, our findings may have captured this effect. In contrast, the broadened period of flowering and fruiting for irrigated plants likely limited compensatory photosynthesis in irrigated plants by spreading the demand for reproductive carbon over a longer time span.
An alternative or complementary explanation to the elevated wet-season leaf gas exchange of control plants relative to previously irrigated plants may be an early wet-season nutrient pulse in control plots (Lodge et al., 1994
). A pulse of nutrients derived from leaf litter and the onset of microbial activity may supply control plants with nutrients necessary to markedly increase photosynthetic capacity. In contrast, irrigated plants would have consistent access to nutrients, but in smaller amount than experienced by control plants during a pulse following the onset of rains. Although previous studies have found limited evidence of effects of irrigation on nutrient pulses during early wet season in Panama (Yavitt et al., 1993
; Yavitt and Wright, 1996
), the seasonal variation in soil water content in those studies may not have been large enough to create sufficient water stress to induce microbial mortality in early wet season (Yavitt et al., 1993
). Decreased microbial biomass and increased microbial respiration during the wet season at our site (Vasconcelos, 2002
), along with increasing evidence that nutrient pulses occur more frequently on sites of increased drought seasonality (Lodge et al., 1994
), support this explanation.
Conclusions
Leaf gas exchange of M. ciliata plants was influenced both directly and indirectly by dry-season irrigation. During the dry season, stomatal limitation in response to drought constrained gas exchange in control plants primarily through CO2 diffusion limitation. Irrigated plants exhibited advanced fruiting and flowering and, as a likely consequence, did not exhibit the compensatory photosynthetic response that appeared to have characterized wet-season leaf gas exchange for the control plants. Dry-season irrigation may have also prevented elevated leaf gas exchange rates in the wet season by suppressing an early wet-season nutrient pulse.
To the extent that Amax is a master integrator of stress, resource availability, and growth potential (Field, 1991
), our study shows how Amax reflected plant water status, water stress, and whole plant carbon demand. The large drops in control Amax associated with critical dry periods during the dry season may be largely responsible for treatment differences in plant carbon status expressed through changes in phenology. These results illustrate the importance of the periodicity of dry-season rains in the carbon budget of this understory species. Miconia ciliata's sensitivity to water availability suggests that drought stress may be an important selective pressure in the understory during the successional development of this eastern Amazonian regrowth forest stand. Future studies will assess the impact of drought water stress on this and other species as the stand ages.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
5 Author for reprint requests (zarin{at}ufl.edu
) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Augspurger C. K. 1979 Irregular rain cues and the germination and seedling survival of a Panamanian shrub (Hybanthus prunifolius). Oecologia 44: 53-59[CrossRef][ISI]
Ball M. C. G. D. Farquhar 1984 Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of 2 mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to long-term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiology 74: 1-6
Bazzaz F. A. E. G. Reekie 1985 The meaning and measurement of reproductive effort in plants. In J. White [ed.], Studies on plant demography. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, USA
Becker P. M. Wong 1994 Drought induced mortality in tropical heath forest. Journal of Tropical Sciences 5: 416-417
Bullock S. H. J. A. Solis-Magallanes 1990 Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22: 22-35[CrossRef][ISI]
Cao K. F. 2000 Water relations and gas exchange of tropical saplings during a prolonged drought in a Bornean heath forest, with reference to root architecture. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16: 101-116
Chapin F. S. I. F. Wardlaw 1988 Effect of phosphorus deficiency on source sink interactions between the flag leaf and developing grain in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 39: 165-177
Chiariello N. R. C. B. Field H. A. Mooney 1987 Midday wilting in a tropical pioneer tree. Functional Ecology 1: 3-11
Condit R. S. P. Hubbell R. B. Foster 1995 Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecological Monographs 65: 419-439
Dias-Filho M. B. T. E. Dawson 1995 Physiological responses to soil moisture stress in two Amazonian gap invader species. Functional Ecology 9: 213-221
Ellison A. M. J. S. Denslow B. A. Loiselle M. D. Brenes 1993 Seed and seedling ecology of neotropical Melastomataceae. Ecology 74: 1733-1749[CrossRef][ISI]
Ellsworth D. S. P. B. Reich 1996 Photosynthesis and leaf nitrogen in five Amazonian tree species during early secondary succession. Ecology 77: 581-594[CrossRef][ISI]
Evans L. T. H. M. Rawson 1970 Photosynthesis and respiration by flag leaf and components of ear during grain development in wheat. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23: 245-254[ISI]
Fearnside P. M. 1996 Amazonian deforestation and global warming: carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil's Amazon Forest. Forest Ecology and Management 80: 21-34
Field C. B. 1991 Ecological scaling of carbon gain to stress and resource availability. In H. A. Mooney, W. E. Winner, and E. J. Pell [eds.], Response of plants to multiple stresses, 3565. Academic Press, San Francisco, California, USA
Flexas J. J. M. Escalona H. Medrano 1998 Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 893-900[ISI]
Flinn A. M. 1974 Regulation of leaflet photosynthesis by developing fruit in pea. Physiologia Plantarum 31: 275-278[CrossRef]
Gentry A. H. 1993 A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru). Conservation International, Washington, D.C., USA
Gentry A. H. L. H. Emmons 1987 Geographical variation in fertility, phenology, and composition of the understory of neotropical forests. Biotropica 19: 216-227[CrossRef][ISI]
Hansen P. 1970 C-14 studies on apple trees. VI. Influence of fruit on photosynthesis of leaves, and relative photosynthetic yields of fruits and leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 23: 805.[CrossRef]
Houghton R. A. D. L. Skole C. A. Nobre J. L. Hackler K. T. Lawrence W. H. Chomentowski 2000 Annual fluxes or carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature 403: 301-304[CrossRef][Medline]
Jipp P. H. D. C. Nepstad D. K. Cassel C. R. de Carvalho 1998 Deep soil moisture storage and transpiration in forests and pastures of seasonally-dry Amazonia. Climatic Change 39: 395-412[CrossRef][ISI]
Jones H. G. 1993 Drought tolerance and water-use efficiency. In J. A. C. Smith and H. Griffiths [eds.], Water deficits: plant responses from the cell to the community, 193204. BIOS Scientific, Oxford, UK
Lawlor D. W. G. Cornic 2002 Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 275-294[CrossRef][Medline]
Lean J. C. B. Bunton C. A. Nobre P. R. Rowntree 1996 The simulated impact of Amazonian deforestation on climate using measured ABRACOS vegetation characteristics. In J. H. C. Gash, C. A. Nobre, J. M. Roberts, and R. L. Victoria [eds.], Amazonian deforestation and climate, 549576. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA
Liang J. J. Zhang M. H. Wong 1997 Can stomatal closure caused by xylem aba explain the inhibition of leaf photosynthesis under soil drying?. Photosynthesis Research 51: 149-159[CrossRef]
Lodge D. J. W. H. McDowell C. P. McSwiney 1994 The importance of nutrient pulses in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 384-387[CrossRef]
McGrath D. A. C. K. Smith H. L. Gholz F. D. A. Oliveira 2001 Effects of land-use change on soil nutrient dynamics in Amazonia. Ecosystems 4: 625-645[CrossRef][ISI]
Montagu K. D. K. C. Woo 1999 Recovery of tree photosynthetic capacity from seasonal drought in the wetdry tropics: the role of phyllode and canopy processes in Acacia auriculiformis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26: 135-145
Mulkey S. S. A. P. Smith S. J. Wright 1991 Comparative life history and physiology of 2 understory neotropical herbs. Oecologia 88: 263-273[CrossRef][ISI]
Mulkey S. S. A. P. Smith S. J. Wright J. L. Machado R. Dudley 1992 Contrasting leaf phenotypes control seasonal-variation in water-loss in a tropical forest shrub. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89: 9084-9088
Mulkey S. S. S. J. Wright 1996 Influence of seasonal drought on the carbon balance of tropical forest plants. In S. S. Mulkey, R. Chazdon, and A. P. Smith [eds.], Tropical forest plant ecophysiology, 187216. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA
Mulkey S. S. S. J. Wright A. P. Smith 1993 Comparative physiology and demography of three neotropical forest shrubsalternative shade-adaptive character syndromes. Oecologia 96: 526-536[CrossRef][ISI]
Nepstad D. C. et al. 2002 The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest. Journal of Geophysical Research 107: (D20) 53, 1-18.
Opler P. A. G. W. Frankie H. G. Baker 1976 Rainfall as a factor in the release, timing, and synchronization of anthesis by tropical trees and shrubs. Journal of Biogeography 3: 231-236[CrossRef]
Osmond C. B. O. BjÖrkman D. J. Anderson 1980 Physiological processes in plant ecology: towards a synthesis with Atriplex. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA
Reekie E. G. F. A. Bazzaz 1987 Reproductive effort in plants. 1. Carbon allocation to reproduction. American Naturalist 129: 876-896[CrossRef][ISI]
Reekie E. G. P. Wayne 1992 Leaf canopy display, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis in seedlings of 3 tropical pioneer tree species subjected to drought. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 2334-2338
Reich P. B. R. Borchert 1984 Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 72: 61-74[CrossRef]
Reseman A. K. Raschke 1984 Midday depression in stomatal and photosynthesis activity of leaves of Arbutus unedo are caused by large water vapor pressure differences between leaf and air. Plant Physiology 75: 66.
SAS Institute. 1998 JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
Schulze E.-D. 1993 Soil water deficits and atmospheric humidity as environmental signals. In J. A. C. Smith and H. Griffiths [eds.], Water deficits: plant responses from the cell to the community, 129146. BIOS Scientific, Oxford, UK
Shuttleworth W. J. et al. 1984 Eddy correlation measurements of energy partition for Amazonian forest. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 110: 1143-1162[CrossRef][ISI]
Tenhuen J. D. R. W. Pearcy O. L. Lange 1987 Diurnal variations in leaf conductance and gas exchange in natural environments. In E. Zeiger, G. D. Farquhar, and I. R. Cowan [eds.], Stomatal function, 323352. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA
TenÓrio A. R. D. M. J. J. D. C. Graça J. E. M. Góes J. G. R. Mendez J. R. M. F. Gama P. R. O. da Silva P. S. M. Das Chagas R. N. P. da Silva R. R. Américo W. L. M. Pereira 1999 Mapeamento dos solos da estação de piscicultura de Castanhal, PA. FCAP Informe Técnico 25: 5-26
Tian H. J. M. Mellilo D. W. M. A. D. Kicklighter J. V. Helfrich III B. Moore III C. J. Vörösmarty 1998 Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems. Nature 336: 664-667
Tissue D. T. S. J. Wright 1995 Effect of seasonal water availability on phenology and the annual shoot carbohydrate cycle of tropical forest shrubs. Functional Ecology 9: 518-527[CrossRef][ISI]
Uhl C. J. B. Kauffman 1990 Deforestation, fire susceptibility, and potential tree responses to fire in the eastern Amazon. Ecology 71: 437-449[CrossRef][ISI]
Valladares F. R. W. Pearcy 2002 Drought can be more critical in the shade than in the sun: a field study of carbon gain and photo-inhibition in a Californian shrub during a dry El Niño year. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 749-759[CrossRef]
Vasconcelos L. G. T. R. 2002 Biomassa microbiana de um solo sob vegetação secundária na Amazônia Oriental. Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias do Pará, Belém, Brazil
Watson M. A. B. B. Casper 1984 Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 233-258[CrossRef][ISI]
Williamson G. B. W. F. Laurance A. A. Oliveira P. Delamonica G. Gascon T. E. Lovejoy L. Pohl 2000 Amazônia tree mortality during the 1997 El Niño drought. Conservation Biology 14: 1538-1542[CrossRef][ISI]
Wright S. J. 1991 Seasonal drought and the phenology of understory shrubs in a tropical moist forest. Ecology 72: 1643-1657[CrossRef][ISI]
Wright S. J. 1992 Seasonal drought, soil fertility and the species density of tropical forest plant communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 260-263[CrossRef]
Wright S. J. 1996 Phenological responses to seasonality in tropical forest plants. In S. S. Mulkey, R. Chazdon, and A. P. Smith [eds.], Tropical forest plant ecophysiology, 440460. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA
Wright S. J. J. L. Machado S. S. Mulkey A. P. Smith 1992 Drought acclimation among tropical forest shrubs (Psychotria, Rubiaceae). Oecologia 89: 457-463[ISI]
Yavitt J. B. R. K. Wieder S. J. Wright 1993 Soil nutrient dynamics in response to irrigation of a Panamanian tropical moist forest. Biogeochemistry 19: 1-25
Yavitt J. B. S. J. Wright 1996 Temporal patterns of soil nutrients in a Panamanian moist forest revealed by ion-exchange resin and experimental irrigation. Plant and Soil 183: 117-129[CrossRef][ISI]
Zarin D. J. M. J. Ducey J. M. Tucker W. A. Salas 2001 Potential biomass accumulation in Amazonian regrowth forests. Ecosystems 4: 658-668[CrossRef][ISI]
Zotz G. K. Winter 1994 Annual carbon balance and nitrogen-use efficiency in tropical C-3 and CAM epiphytes. New Phytologist 126: 481-492[CrossRef][ISI]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. V. Aragao, L. B. Fortini, S. S. Mulkey, D. J. Zarin, M. M. Araujo, and C. J. R. de Carvalho Correlation but no causation between leaf nitrogen and maximum assimilation: the role of drought and reproduction in gas exchange in an understory tropical plant Miconia ciliata (Melastomataceae) Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2005; 92(3): 456 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |