|
|
||||||||
Ecology |
Geobotanical Institute ETH, Zurichbergstrasse 38, 8044 Zurich, Switzerland
Received for publication August 15, 2002. Accepted for publication November 26, 2002.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: half-viability period Populus Salicaceae Salix seed longevity seed mass sizenumber trade-off
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Salicaceae from flood plains offer a good opportunity to study reproductive trade-offs within one family, because they frequently occur in mixed populations and have similar life histories. Apart from vegetative reproduction, these species produce large numbers of wind-dispersed, nondormant, and short-lived seeds, and seed mass varies by at least two orders of magnitude within the family (Karrenberg et al., 2002a
). Because of their limited longevity, Salix seeds were thought to be recalcitrant, i.e., not tolerant to desiccation; however, recent evidence shows that they exhibit orthodox storage behavior and their longevity is greatly enhanced under dry and cold storage conditions (Maroder et al., 2000
). In the natural habitat, differences in seed longevity between species of Salicaceae are of particular importance, because sexual regeneration takes place only during a short period of time when seed release coincides with the availability of bare moist substrates (Niiyama, 1990
; van Splunder et al., 1995
; Mahoney and Rood, 1998
). Pilot studies investigating methods for seed propagation in Salix species suggested that larger seeds might be longer-lived than small seeds (S. Karrenberg, unpublished data). Therefore, we hypothesize that, in this group, enhanced longevity may be one of the benefits conveyed by an increase in seed size. The production of larger seeds may, on the other hand, be associated with a lower seed number; i.e., a sizenumber trade-off may be present. Specifically, we investigated the following hypotheses in six species of Salicaceae: (1) seed size is positively correlated with seed longevity, and (2) there is a seed sizenumber trade-off.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seed collection and storage
Seeds were collected in spring 2000 in large mixed populations of the study species in the gravel-bed of the river Tagliamento near Pinzano, northeast Italy (46°12' N, 12°58' E). The Tagliamento is an unconstrained river with exceptionally low human impact (Ward et al., 1999
). The study area (2 km long, 800 m wide) was characterized by multiple channels and gravel bars with pioneer stands composed of the five species of Salix, Populus nigra, and Alnus incana (Kollmann et al., 1999
). To ensure sufficient spread of the collection plants, the study area was divided into five sections in which six female plants of each of the study species were marked and monitored for seed release every 13 d and seeds were collected until a sufficient number of individuals was sampled. As a result of changing weather conditions, seeds were collected from 1522 of 30 marked individuals per species. Catkins were stored in paper bags and left protected from rain under outdoor conditions until all capsules were fully open. Bags were then transferred to insulated boxes that were open to air circulation. The aim of these storage conditions was to produce conditions close to the natural environment and at the same time to prevent a seasonal increase in storage temperature in order to compare results across species. At hourly intervals, temperature and humidity were monitored within these boxes and ambient temperature was measured in the shade (temperature/humidity logger HOBO Pro, Onset Computer, Pocasset, Massachusetts, USA; Fig. 1B). Mean storage conditions were 20.5° ± 0.03°C and 63.2 ± 0.16% humidity.
|
Seed number
Ten catkins per study plant were harvested for counts of mature and undeveloped fruits. Catkin number per plant was counted directly in most individuals and estimated if exceeding 1000. On a random selection of 12 individuals per species, ovules were counted in one fruit. Seed numbers per catkin and per plant were estimated for each plant using the ovule number per fruit and the average number of mature fruits per catkin (Table 3). These numbers represent maximum seed numbers because usually not all ovules develop into seeds.
|
Statistical analysis
Seed germination in relation to storage time was modelled as a binary response variate with binomial error distribution and logit link function (Collett, 1991
). With these models, the percentage of initially viable seeds and the half-viability period (i.e., the time after which 50% of the initially viable seeds no longer germinated) were estimated for each individual. Because a slight overdispersion of the data (1.23.6) was detected for most individuals, heterogeneity factors were retrospectively applied to standard errors of predicted values (Collett, 1991
). For each species, viability curves were calculated in an identical fashion to estimate initial viability and half-viability periods directly, rather than calculating these measures from the estimates per plant. Model fit was assessed by analysis of deviance. Diagnostic graphs of deviance residuals against storage time and normal plots of deviance residuals indicated a good fit of the models and a normal distribution of deviance residuals (Venables and Ripley, 1999
).
Using a data set containing one record per plant and linear models, we investigated the effect of seed mass, genus identity, and species identity on half-viability periods and seed numbers. Half-viability periods and seed mass were log transformed prior to analysis. Model fit was assessed by analysis of variance (Venables and Ripley, 1999
). The residuals of these models exhibited no major deviations from the normal distribution. To assess whether differences in prediction accuracy of the half-viability periods affected these results, standard errors of the predicted half-viability periods were plotted against the residuals of the linear models. There was no obvious relationship, and we concluded that the linear models used were a good reflection of trends in the data.
We compared seed mass, seed number, and germination traits between the species using multiple t tests with Bonferroni correction. To account for similarity by common descent (cf. Silvertown and Dodd, 1996
), Populus nigra was first contrasted to the Salix species (genus identity) and, as a second step, multiple comparisons between the Salix species were made. Because phylogenic relationships within the genus Salix are at present unresolved (cf. Azuma et al., 2000
) and all Salix species studied fall into separate sections as defined by Skvortsov (1999)
, no further subgroups were used in the formal comparisons. Significance levels were
= 0.05 and all analyses were conducted using the program R.1.3.1 (Ihaka and Gentleman, 1996
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Generally, the half-viability period increased exponentially with seed mass, yielding a linear relationship when seed mass is log transformed (Fig. 4). Salix triandra, however, had a longer half-viability period, despite its very small seed mass. In a linear model of half-viability periods, genus identity and species identity explained 75% of the variation in half-viability periods, whereas seed mass within genus explained only 46% of the variation in half-viability period (Table 4). When both factors were incorporated into one model, the percentage of explained variation of half-viability periods increased only slightly, but significantly, to 78%. On average, among Salix species, half-viability periods increased 9.6 ± 4.6 d per increase of each order of magnitude in seed mass. Within species, no relationship between seed mass and half-viability periods was found, as the addition of the factor seed mass nested within species was not significant (Table 4, model 5).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seed longevity under field conditions may be even shorter than in our study because fluctuations in temperature and humidity that result in a decrease in seed longevity (Junttila, 1976
; Siegel and Brock, 1990
) are more prominent in the field than under our storage conditions (cf. Fig. 1). According to Hung et al. (2001)
, this effect is not from the fluctuations per se, but from a semi-logarithmic relationship between storage temperature and seed longevity (e.g., Ellis, 1988
). The actual longevity of seeds in the field thus depends on the precise microclimatic conditions encountered. However, general differences between species are likely to be preserved under field conditions, although the differences between early- and late-seeding species may be reduced because of the seasonal increase in temperature (Fig. 1).
Because seeds germinate as soon as they contact a moist surface, our estimates of seed longevity are only relevant for dry weather. Such conditions often persist for several weeks during the seed release period (Francesco Baruffi, Autorita di Bacino dei Fiume Isonzo, Tagliamento, Livenza, Italy, personal communication), and Salicaceae seeds may remain in the air or in bulks entangled on obstacles such as woody debris or vegetation until washed down by rain (S. Karrenberg, personal observation). Such a situation would lead to an advantage of P. nigra over the Salix species, and S. elaeagnos and S. daphnoides would have a better chance for regeneration than S. triandra, S. purpurea, or S. alba. However, the seed release period was longer in S. triandra than in the other species during the study (Fig. 1) and in 1999 (Karrenberg et al., 2002b
) and was also observed by van Splunder et al. (1995)
in the Netherlands. A prolonged dispersal period or increased variability in dispersal time between individuals could enhance regeneration chances in S. triandra.
Seed longevity was positively related to seed mass in accordance with our hypothesis and in contrast to the general contention that small seeds are longer lived than large seeds (Rees, 1996
; Hodkinson et al., 1998
). However, this relation is based on dormancy characteristics rather than on seed longevity in the absence of dormancy. A decrease of seed longevity with seed mass was also found in small-seeded Fabaceae by Gáspár et al. (1981)
and is generally supported by Priestley (1986)
. Conversely, seed mass was not related to seed longevity in six species of Salix from flood plains in Japan (Niiyama, 1990
) but how seeds were collected, i.e., how many individuals they represented, was not mentioned. As our results show, differences between individuals in seed mass and seed longevity can be considerable. Both in our study and in the study of Niiyama (1990)
there was no distinction between the two proposed subgenera of Salix, Salix and Vetrix (Skvortsov, 1999
), in either seed longevity or seed mass, nor was there any relationship to flowering time. Reasons for differences between species could lie in the nature or amount of biochemical components that prevent damage to the embryo in the dry state (e.g., Walters, 1998
). In addition, Salicaceae seeds are already green at dispersal, and Densmore and Zasada (1983)
suggested that the rapid loss of viability in nondormant Salix seeds could be related to chlorophyll degeneration. Salix triandra might differ from the other species in our study biochemically, resulting in comparatively high seed longevity despite low seed mass.
Seed mass was negatively related to seed number, demonstrating a phenotypic seed sizenumber trade-off in the Salicaceae. The closest relationship was observed within the genus Salix at the smallest morphological levelindividual fruitsas also found in Plantago (Primack, 1979
) and Epilobium (Stöcklin, 1999
). Seed number per catkin was less closely related to seed mass but it was species-specific, suggesting that selection pressures other than the sizenumber trade-off may have acted on seed number per catkin, such as the balance between insect and wind pollination (Karrenberg et al., 2002b
). Within species, we found no relationship between seed mass and seed number. Here we must take into account that the maximum seed numbers were estimated from ovule numbers and the percentage of matured fruits, but differences in the number of matured seeds per fruit were not detected.
Generally, a sizenumber trade-off can be treated as an optimization problem, suggesting one optimal seed size per habitat (e.g., Smith and Fretwell, 1974
). On the other hand, game theoretical models, which also include the seed sizes of competitors, predict coexistence of several seed sizes in the same habitat as an evolutionary stable strategy (Rees and Westoby, 1997
; Geritz et al., 1999
). While phenological spread is an important factor in the coexistence of flood plain Salicaceae (Fagerström and Ågren, 1980
; van Splunder et al., 1995
), these species may also be an example of the multiple optima of seed mass in one habitat that are mediated by a sizenumber trade-off (Geritz et al., 1999
). This phenotypic trade-off is emphasized by an increase of seed longevity with increasing seed size.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author for reprint requests, present address: Indiana University, Department of Biology, Jordan Hall, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA (tel.: 812 855 9018; fax: 812 855 6705; karrenberg{at}bio.indiana.edu
) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baskin C. C. J. M. Baskin 1998 Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA
Bill H. C. P. Spahn M. Reich H. Plachter 1997 Bestandsveränderungen und Besiedlungdynamik der Deutschen Tamariske, Myricaria germanica (L.) Desv., an der Oberen Isar (Bayern). Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 6: 137-150
Collett D. 1991 Modelling binary data. Chapman and Hall, London, UK
Densmore R. J. Zasada 1983 Seed dispersal and dormancy patterns in northern willows: ecological and evolutionary significance. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 3207-3216[ISI]
Ellis R. H. 1988 The viability equation, seed viability nomographs, and practical advice on seed storage. Seed Science and Technology 16: 29-50[ISI]
Fagerström T. G. I. Ågren 1980 Phenological spread in plants: a result of adaptations to environmental stochasticity?. Vegetatio 43: 83-86[CrossRef][ISI]
Gáspár S. A. Bus J. Banyái 1981 Relationship between 1000-seed weight and germination capacity and seed longevity in small seeded Fabaceae. Seed Science and Technology 9: 457-468[ISI]
Geritz S. A. H. E. van der Meijden J. A. J. Metz 1999 Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. Theoretical Population Biology 55: 324-343[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Grime J. P. G. Mason A. V. Curtis J. Rodman S. R. Band M. A. G. Mowferth A. M. Neal S. Shaw 1981 A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 69: 1017-1059[CrossRef][ISI]
Harper J. L. P. H. Lovell K. G. Moore 1970 The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 327-356
Hendry G. A. F. J. P. Grime 1993 Methods in comparative plant ecology: a laboratory manual. Chapman and Hall, London, UK
Hewitt N. 1998 Seed size and shade-tolerance: a comparative analysis of North American temperate trees. Oecologia 114: 432-440[CrossRef][ISI]
Hodkinson D. J. A. P. Askew K. Thompson J. G. Hodgson J. P. Bakker R. M. Bekker 1998 Ecological correlates of seed size in the British flora. Functional Ecology 12: 762-766[CrossRef][ISI]
Hung L. Q. T. D. Hong R. H. Ellis 2001 Constant, fluctuating and effective temperature and seed longevity: a tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) exemplar. Annals of Botany 88: 465-470
Ihaka R. R. Gentleman 1996 R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5: 299-314[CrossRef]
Jakobsson A. O. Eriksson 2000 A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88: 494-502[CrossRef][ISI]
Junttila O. 1976 Seed germination and viability in five Salix species. Astarte 9: 19-24
Karrenberg S. P. J. Edwards J. Kollmann 2002a The life history of Salicaceae living in the active zone of flood plains. Freshwater Biology 47: 733-747[CrossRef][ISI]
Karrenberg S. J. Kollmann P. J. Edwards 2002b Pollen vectors and inflorescence morphology in four species of Salix. Plant Systematics and Evolution 235: 181-188[CrossRef][ISI]
Kollmann J. M. Vieli P. J. Edwards K. Tockner J. V. Ward 1999 Interactions between vegetation development and island formation in the Alpine river Tagliamento. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 25-36
Leishman M. R. 2001 Does the seed size/number trade-off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality. Oikos 93: 294-302[CrossRef][ISI]
Mahoney J. M. S. B. Rood 1998 Streamflow, requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitmentan interactive model. Wetlands 18: 634-645[ISI]
Maroder H. L. I. A. Prego G. R. Faciutto S. B. Maldonado 2000 Storage behaviour of Salix alba and Salix matsudana seeds. Annals of Botany 86: 1017-1021
Niiyama K. 1990 The role of seed dispersal and seedling traits in colonization and coexistence of Salix spp. in a seasonally flooded habitat. Ecological Research 5: 317-332[CrossRef]
Priestley D. A. 1986 Seed aging. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA
Primack R. B. 1979 Reproductive effort in annual and perennial species of Plantago (Plantaginaceae). American Naturalist 114: 51-61[CrossRef][ISI]
Rees M. 1995 Community structure in sand dune annuals: is seed weight a key quantity?. Journal of Ecology 83: 857-863[CrossRef]
Rees M. 1996 Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B 351: 1299-1308[CrossRef]
Rees M. M. Westoby 1997 Game-theoretical evolution of seed mass in multi-species ecological models. Oikos 78: 116-126[CrossRef][ISI]
Schütt P. H. J. Schuck U. M. Lang G. Roloff 1999 Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse. ecomed, Landsberg am Lech, Germany
Siegel R. S. J. H. Brock 1990 Germination requirements of key Southwestern woody riparian species. Desert Plants 10: 3-8
Silvertown J. M. Dodd 1996 Comparing plants and connecting traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351: 1233-1239[CrossRef]
Skvortsov A. K. 1999 Willows of Russia and adjacent countries: taxonomical and geographical revision. Joensuu University, Joensuu, Finland
Smith C. C. S. D. Fretwell 1974 The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. American Naturalist 108: 499-506[CrossRef][ISI]
Stöcklin J. 1999 Differences in life history traits of related Epilobium species. Folia Geobotanica 34: 7-18[CrossRef][ISI]
Turnbull L. A. M. Rees M. J. Crawley 1999 Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. Journal of Ecology 87: 899-912[CrossRef]
van Splunder I. H. Coops L. A. C. J. Voesenek C. W. P. M. Blom 1995 Establishment of alluvial forest species in floodplains: the role of dispersal timing, germination characteristics and water level fluctuations. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 44: 269-278
Venables W. N. B. D. Ripley 1999 Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. Springer, New York, New York, USA
Walters C. 1998 Understanding the mechanisms and kinetics of seed aging. Seed Science Research 8: 223-244[ISI]
Ward J. V. K. Tockner P. J. Edwards J. Kollmann G. Bretschko A. M. Gurnell G. E. Petts B. Rossaro 1999 A reference river system for the Alps: the Fiume Tagliamento. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15: 63-75[CrossRef]
Westoby M. M. Leishman J. Lord 1996 Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B 351: 1309-1318[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. L. Halpern Sources and consequences of seed size variation in Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae): adaptive and non-adaptive hypotheses Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2005; 92(2): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |