|
|
||||||||
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
2Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA; 3Department of Biology, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, The Republic of Korea; 4W. J. Beal Botanical Garden, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA
Received for publication May 7, 2002. Accepted for publication July 19, 2002.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: allozymes contact zone genetic differentiation geography mutation drift Pinus arizonica Pinus ponderosa spatial genetic structure
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A detailed study of one such transitional population, on Mt. Lemmon in the Santa Catalina Mountains, near Tucson, Arizona, revealed a striking spatial distribution of needle-number types (Epperson et al., 2001
). Nearly all trees are pure three-needle types near the summit, and pure five-needle types
1000 m downslope, while toward the middle of the transect many trees have characteristics of hybrids, containing a mix of three, four, and five needles. The spatial differentiation of needle numbers indicated that there is very strong selection acting, at either the intra- or interspecific level. The data also suggested the occurrence of low levels of hybridization. In the Mt. Lemmon population the amount of spatial autocorrelation for needle numbers is extremely high (Epperson et al., 2001
), indeed possibly the highest reported for any genetic trait within a plant population (Epperson, 2003
). It is completely inconsistent with the much weaker amounts of autocorrelation expected for neutral genes in a freely interbreeding population having the seed and pollen dispersal characteristics of Pinus species (Epperson, Huang, and Li, 1999
).
In this study we investigated the spatial distribution of nuclear allozyme variants in the Mt. Lemmon contact zone, in order to determine the amount of spatial differentiation for nuclear genomic variation for genes that mutate at normal rates. This can be compared to the spatial differentiation of the ecotypic trait, needle number. If there is spatial structuring similar to that found for needle number, it would strongly indicate that the two types had been reproductively isolated (and probably geographically separated) for a very long time and that since recontact introgression has been insubstantial. No or little spatial structuring, beyond that expected for a freely interbreeding population, together with little differentiation, could be consistent with either low or high rates of hybridization, because the two taxa may not have been separated long enough for mutation drift to have created much differentiation since separation. Little spatial structure in the transect population, but high differentiation (in populations away from the transect), would indicate that the taxa had been reproductively isolated for a long period and that hybridization has been common since recontact.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In total, 105 sampled Ponderosae trees are located along an elevational gradient, beginning at
2758 m (9080 feet [ft]) on the south-facing slope of Mt. Lemmon, Santa Catalina Mountains, Pima County, Arizona, and extending down to an elevation of
2402 m (7880 ft). This gradient zone is dominated by Ponderosae but contains a transition from a primarily three-needle-leaved population of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. scopularum) at the summit of Mt. Lemmon to a primarily five-needle-leaved population (Pinus ponderosa var. arizonica or Pinus arizonica) at the bottom of the transect. The belt transect has approximate dimensions, measured in horizontal distances, of 1.25 km by 100 m and an area of
12.5 ha. The average slope is
30%.
In 1996, the criteria for selecting the 81 trees included the availabilities of collectable cones with mature seed. Of these, needle numbers for 71 were used in the previous study, and the other 10 were resampled in 1999. Sample trees added in 1999 were intended to achieve three objectives: (1) add samples (six trees) representing the top end of the transect; (2) add samples (ten) extending the bottom end of transect; and (3) fill in (eight) two gap areas where few trees were sampled originally. Attempts were made to spread the added samples equally over each relevant area, but otherwise they were randomly chosen (availability of cones was not a criterion), subject to the constraint that they were at least 20 cm diameter at breast height (dbh) (i.e., at height
147 cm or 4'10'').
A high-resolution Trimble GeoExplorer Model 17319-32 unit, together with a calibration base station (U.S. Forest Service, Santa Catalina Ranger District, Coronado National Forest, Arizona, USA) was used to obtain Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) coordinates for each sampled tree. Field coordinates were recorded in Universal Trans-Mercatur (UTM) units, calibrated, and plotted using ArcView Geographic Information System (GIS) software.
In addition, in an effort to assay possible outgroups for the five-needle types, samples were collected from 15 trees (>15 cm dbh) in Bear Canyon, located about 10.75 km southeast from the transect, at an elevation of 1829 m (6000 ft). The 15 trees were on the north side of a stream, close to a 1-ha study plot described by Schreve (1917)
, in a stand consisting mostly of Ponderosae. As a possible outgroup for the three-needle pines, 15 three-needle trees (>20 cm dbh) were sampled from just over the summit (and on the opposite side of the Mt. Lemmon Observatory), on the north-facing slope of Mt. Lemmon. Three groups of five trees were sampled at distances of
0.60, 0.85, and 1.03 km, respectively, north from the top of the transect. Approximate elevations of the three groups were determined as, respectively, 2713 m (8890 ft), 2682 m (8800 ft), and 2658 m (8720 ft). In this zone on the north slope, common tree species included Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and white fir (Abies concolor) at higher elevations and southwestern white pine (Pinus strobiformis) downslope. Collected needles were kept on ice and then shipped to the laboratory of M. G. Chung and stored at 4°C until protein extraction.
Needle number counts
The numbers of needles per fascicle were counted for several hundred fascicles from three branches from each tree. The number of needles per fascicle was determined, carefully accounting for broken, missing, malformed, or aborted needle leaf formation within each fascicle (Epperson et al., 2001
).
Allozyme analysis
Needles were cut into fine pieces and crushed with a mortar and pestle. A potassium phosphate extraction buffer (Mitton et al., 1979
) was added to the needles to facilitate crushing and to aid enzyme stabilization. The crushed extract was absorbed onto 4 x 6 mm wicks cut from Whatman 3MM chromatography paper, and the wicks were stored at 70°C until needed for allozyme analysis. Electrophoresis was performed using 11.5% starch gels. Out of 13 enzyme systems that were clearly resolved using three gel/electrode buffer combinations, we focused on nine polymorphic loci that produced very clear banding patterns. Stain recipes were taken from Soltis et al. (1983)
, except for diaphorase (Cheliak and Pitel, 1984
). The genetic basis of allozyme banding patterns was inferred from segregation patterns with reference to typical subunit structure (Weeden and Wendel, 1989
; Wendel and Weeden, 1989
) and conceptual methods described in Gillet (1998)
. Putative loci were designated sequentially, with the most anodally migrating allozyme designated 1, the next 2, and so on. Similarly, alleles were designated sequentially with the most anodally migrating alleles designated by a. A Poulik buffer system, a modification (Haufler, 1985
) of Soltis et al.'s (1983)
system 6 was used to resolve alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh-2), flourescent esterase (Fe-2), phosphoglucomutase (Pgm-1), and triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi-2). A histidine citrate buffer system, a modification (Chung and Kang, 1994
) of Soltis et al.'s (1983)
system 11 was used to resolve isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idh), malate dehydrogenase (Mdh-3), 6phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6pgd-1, 6pgd-2). Soltis et al.'s (1983)
system 7 was used to resolve diaphorase (Dia-3).
Statistical analysis
The mean number of needles per fascicle and its standard error (SE) were calculated for each tree using SAS procedure Means (SAS, 1982
). For spatial autocorrelation analysis of allozyme genotypes, each allele "A" was characterized separately. If tree i was homozygous for allele A, it was assigned the value Xi = 1.0. If it were heterozygous for or had no copies of that allele, it was assigned values 0.5 or 0, respectively. Spatial structure was quantified using unweighted Moran's I statistics (Sokal and Oden, 1978
; Cliff and Ord, 1981
). Each pair of trees was assigned to one of a number of mutually exclusive distance classes. Distance classes were formed, generally for 100-m intervals, as in Epperson et al. (2001)
. Allele a of Dia-3 occurred as only one copy in the entire sample of 105 trees, and it was excluded from spatial analysis as being noninformative. For each allele and distance class, Moran's I statistic was calculated using the standard formula

Several statistical analyses were conducted to determine the degree of allozyme differentiation between the three-needle and five-needle forms. Twelve trees at the bottom of the transect (BH) were chosen with the criteria that they have mean needle numbers closest to 5.0. Similarly, 12 trees at or near the top of the transect (TH) with needle numbers closest to 3.0 were grouped. The pattern of allelic differentiation among these two groups and the two other population samples, Bear Canyon (BC) and north slope of Mt. Lemmon (OH), was assessed using the Genetic Data Analysis program of Lewis and Zaykin (2001)
to calculate Weir and Cockerham's (1984)
estimator of the theoretical measure FST of population genetic differentiation, and Nei's (1978)
measures of genetic identity and distance (which correct for sample sizes), and to conduct the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
calculated by treating combined samples BH + BC (the "fives") vs. OH + TH ("threes") range from 0.02 to 0.25 (Table 3). Similar results were obtained treating the four samples separately (Table 3). In addition, the "threes" had six "private" alleles (Adh-2b, Fe-2c, Idhb, 6pgd-1a, 6pgd-2a, and Pgm-1c) not found in the sample of "fives," although it should be noted that five of these (Adh-2b, Fe-2c, Idhb, 6pgd-2a, and Pgm-1c) occurred only in the OH group, not in TH. In comparison, there were three private alleles for the "fives" (Adh-2c, Mdh-3d, and Tpi-2b), and two of these (Adh-2c and Mdh-3d) were found only in the BC group. Tables 1 and 3 indicate that large I statistics occur only for loci that are differentiated among the needle types. Tpi-2 is unusual in that it was the most differentiated but did not show autocorrelation in the transect.
|
The mean needle numbers for the 15 trees in the sample from the north slope of Mt. Lemmon was 3.12, with values ranging from 3.00 to 3.70. The median was 3.03, and the one tree with 3.70 accounted for much of the standard deviation, 0.21. Overall, this indicates that the sample from the north slope is indeed nearly pure three-needle pines. The mean value for the 15 trees from Bear Canyon was 4.22. Values ranged from 3.02 to 4.94, with a much larger standard deviation of 0.62, indicating that Bear Canyon is a mixed population, not the pure five we expected. Most of the variation is caused by three trees with numbers near 3.0 (3.02, 3.21, and 3.29), although there were also several trees with values near 4.0, as well as the numerous individuals near 5.0.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.01 or less for Moran's I statistic for distance class 1 (Epperson, Huang, and Li, 1999
The average levels of autocorrelation are also far smaller than that observed for the characteristic trait of needle number. The latter values are among the highest ever reported for genetic traits in any species (Epperson, 2003
), and they are even slightly higher than we observed based on a subset of the present needle data set (Epperson et al., 2001
). They show that the population is structured near the theoretical maximum. Moreover, a very strong cline is clearly indicated, as is its orientation.
Loci are generally subject to more or less the same mating system, so why do allozyme genotypes have less spatial structure than does the needle trait? If both were selectively neutral, then they should have similar spatial structures under genetic isolation by distance models for freely interbreeding populations at equilibrium (Epperson, 1995
). The strength of the cline for needle number made it clear that selection is operating either on genetic variation for needle number (heritability
60%: Rehfeldt, 1999
) itself, or on other genes of the taxa it represents, with which it may be in strong linkage disequilibrium (Epperson et al., 2001
). However, it is unknown whether selection for the taxa is interspecific (i.e., the two types are completely nonhybridizing "biological species") or intraspecific (i.e., the two hybridize at substantial levels). In contrast, allozyme variation is generally believed to be selectively neutral. Difference in selection is an important part of the explanation of the difference in spatial structure for allozymes compared to needle number.
We can further examine the role of selection in determining spatial structure in the transect by considering two opposite scenarios about how much hybridization-mediated gene flow has been occurring. First consider the scenario where there has been little or no recent hybridization. It follows that one possibility is that the difference in spatial structure for allozymes and needle number is simply due to there never having been much differentiation for the allozymes between the two taxa. Our analysis using pure three- and pure five-needle pines from the ends of the transect as well as the two other populations clearly shows that the allozymes are much less differentiated. Moreover, those loci that show very low differentiation also show little or no spatial autocorrelation along the transect. For the two loci that were somewhat more differentiated, one, 6pgd-1, showed much greater autocorrelation than the other seven loci, but the other, Tpi-2, did not. However, we should note that the sample sizes used to establish differentiation are small and that the high estimated level of differentiation for Tpi-2 is due to the five needle-types having a "private allele" at moderate frequency. Loci that are not differentiated between the two types should show only a background level of spatial autocorrelation that fits a freely interbreeding population, even if there really are two distinct noninterbreeding populations. Each would have the same type of structure within it, and combining the two over the transect area would result in an overall spatial distribution like that of its two parts. In contrast, if the two were completely differentiated for allozymes, then the spatial distribution of allozyme genotypes should reflect that of the needle types. Difference in rates of mutation between the genes controlling allozyme variation vs. those controlling the needle trait could explain the difference in spatial structures for allozymes vs. needle number. It would have caused differences in the amount of newly generated genetic differentiation that has occurred between the two taxa since they initially became reproductively isolated. However, there appears to be no reason to expect that the mutation rate for needle number genes is much greater than that for allozyme alleles (e.g., Hedrick, 2000
). Selection for needle number during isolation would be the most likely cause for the difference in differentiation. Moreover, apparently the needle genes differentiated in direct response to selection, because it seems somewhat unlikely that hitchhiking would cause such differentiation for needle traits but not allozymes.
In the second scenario where hybridization is common, it could be reducing spatial structure and differentiation for allozymes, while very strong (intraspecific) selection maintains the cline in needle number. As pointed out in our earlier paper (Epperson et al., 2001
), the pattern of trees with intermediate numbers of needles in the center of the transect and the preponderance of pure three-needle types at the top and pure five-needle types at the bottom strongly suggest that some hybridization is occurring. Moreover, some reproductive compatibility between the taxa has been demonstrated (Conkle and Critchfield, 1988
). But the required amount of gene flow would have to be quite high in order to equalize any substantial differences in allele frequencies for allozymes that might have existed before contact. It is also worth noting that this again would suggest that needle number per se is under direct selection, rather than genetic hitchhiking. It seems unlikely (but not impossible) that genes controlling needle number would maintain strong disequilibrium with other, selected genes while the allozymes would not. It is still possible under the scenario of recent high levels of hybridization that rates of mutation were not high enough to have created much differentiation for allozymes during any period of isolation before the present contact.
Finally, as in our previous paper, we further tested Rehfeldt's (1999)
idea that there exists a "taxon X," a primarily three- and four-needle taxon, by conducting an additional spatial autocorrelation analysis of the needle number data, after excluding all individuals having mean needle values
4.6 (following the Peloquin's [1984
] definition of a "five-needle type"). The following values of Moran's I statistics were obtained: 0.04, 0.02, 0.04, 0.03, 0.04, 0.01, 0.04, for the first seven of the distance classes in Fig. 1, and 0.29 for the largest distance class, from 700 to 902 m (exclusion of "five-needle types" shortened the transect by
400 m). The values are very similar to, only somewhat stronger than, those for the analogous statistics calculated in our earlier paper (Epperson et al., 2001
). In that paper we argued that although the values for short distances are much smaller than those for the full data set and indicate that the various (non-five-needle) types are indeed highly mixed over short distances, the very large negative value for the longest distance class (700902 m) indicates strong spatial differentiation over the upper two-thirds of the transect. Inspection of the spatial distribution clearly indicates the orientation of this differentiation: trees with needle numbers nearer to 3.0 occur on the top, whereas (non-five-needle) trees with larger values are concentrated 600800 m down the mountainside. The fact that the putative hybrid types are concentrated in the transition zone is consistent with their truly being hybrids or advanced introgressed types and suggests that there is no taxon X on Mt. Lemmon.
It would be useful to investigate the transect with molecular markers having very high mutation rates, and we are in the process of identifying polymorphic loci for microsatellites, simple sequence repeats (SSRs). If there is marked differentiation along the transect and for the two other populations, it would suggest that the two taxa have not experienced advanced introgression and that the role of hybridization has been minor. Consequently, this would mean that there has been sufficient time for mutation drift to have differentiated SSRs but not enough for allozyme differentiation, between the two taxa.
In summary, allozyme genotypes show more spatial autocorrelation than expected for a freely interbreeding population, but relatively little differentiation compared to needle number. The contrast suggests that the initial differentiation of needle types was caused by direct selection on the genes controlling needle number. It appears that P. ponderosa and P. arizonica have not been separated long enough or completely enough for mutation drift to have caused much allozyme differentiation. Thus, those parts of the nuclear genome (apart from the genes controlling ecotypic traits) that have similar or lower mutation rates also should not have differentiated much. The needle data suggests that hybridization does occur on Mt. Lemmon.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
5 Author for reprint requests (FAX: 517-432-1143; epperson{at}msu.edu
) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chung M. G. S. S. Kang 1994 Genetic variation and population structure in Korean populations of Eurya japonica (Theaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1077-1082[CrossRef][ISI]
Cliff A. D. J. K. Ord 1981 Spatial processes. Pion, London, UK
Conkle M. T. W. B. Critchfield 1988 Genetic variation and hybridization in ponderosa pine. In D. M. Baumgartner and J. E. Lotan [eds.], Ponderosa pine: the species and its management, 2743. Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA
Epperson B. K. 1995 Spatial structure of two-locus genotypes under isolation by distance. Genetics 140: 365-375[Abstract]
Epperson B. K. 2003 Geographical genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, in press
Epperson B. K. Z. Huang T.-Q. Li 1999 Spatial genetic structure of multiallelic loci. Genetical Research Cambridge 73: 251-261
Epperson B. K. F. W. Telewski A. Plovanich-Jones J. E. Grimes 2001 Clinal differentiation and putative hybridization in a contact zone of Pinus ponderosa and P. arizonica (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1052-1057
Farjon A. B. T. Styles 1997 Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. New York Botanical Garden, New York, New York, USA
Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 1993 Flora of North America, vol. 2, Pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA
Gillet E. 1998 DIPLOGEN: qualitative inheritance analysis of zymograms and DNA electropherograms in diploid individuals. Computer program and user's manual available at
http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/fg/software.htm
Haufler C. H. 1985 Enzyme variability and modes of evolution in Bommeria (Pteridaceae). Systematic Botany 10: 92-104
Hedrick P. W. 2000 Genetics of populations, 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, USA
Kearney T. H. R. H. Peebles 1964 Arizona flora. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA
Lewis P. O. D. Zaykin 2001 Genetic data analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data, version 1.0 (d16c). Free program distributed by the authors at
http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html
Martin P. S. D. Yetman M. Fishbein P. Jenkins T. R. Van Devender R. K. Wilson 1998 Gentry's Rio Mayo plants. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Mitton J. B. Y. B. Linhart K. B. Sturgeon J. L. Hamrick 1979 Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. Journal of Heredity 70: 86-89
Nei M. 1978 Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590
Niebling C. R. M. T. Conkle 1990 Diversity of Washoe pine and comparisons with allozymes of ponderosa pine races. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 20: 298-308
Peloquin R. L. 1984 The identification of three-species hybrids in the ponderosa pine complex. Southwestern Naturalist 29: 115-122[CrossRef][ISI]
Perry J. P. 1991 The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA
Rehfeldt G. E. 1999 Systematics and genetic structure of Ponderosae taxa (Pinaceae) inhabiting the mountain islands of the southwest. American Journal of Botany 86: 741-752
Rehfeldt G. E. B. C. Wilson S. P. Wells R. M. Jeffers 1996 Phytogeographic, taxonomic, and genetic implications of phenotypic variation in the Ponderosae of the southwest. Southwestern Naturalist 41: 409-418
SAS. 1982 SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
Schreve F. 1917 The density of stand and rate of growth of Arizona yellow pine as influenced by climatic conditions. Journal of Forestry 15: 695-707
Sokal R. R. N. L. Oden 1978 Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10: 199-228[CrossRef]
Soltis D. E. C. R. Haufler D. C. Darrow G. J. Gastony 1983 Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9-27[CrossRef][ISI]
Wartenberg D. E. 1989 SAAP. A spatial autocorrelation analysis program, version 4.3. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York, USA
Weeden N. F. J. F. Wendel 1989 Genetics of plant isozymes. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 4672. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA
Weir B. S. C. C. Cockerham 1984 Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370[CrossRef][ISI]
Wendel J. F. N. F. Weeden 1989 Genetics of plant isozymes. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 545. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA
Wright S. 1943 Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |