Am. J. Bot. Subscribe to E-TOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Casper, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Casper, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Casper, B. B.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1289-1294.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Lateral root function and root overlap among mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal herbs in a Florida shrubland, measured using rubidium as a nutrient analog1

Christine V. Hawkes2 and Brenda B. Casper

Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6018 USA

Received for publication August 2, 2001. Accepted for publication April 26, 2002.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Lateral root spread is an important indicator of the area over which plants forage belowground and has implications for individual plant fitness, belowground competition, and ultimately both population dynamics and community structure. Because fine lateral roots are difficult to excavate and measure, we used rubidium (Rb), an analog for potassium that occurs at very low levels in soils and plants, as a tracer of root activity. We injected Rb into sandy soils of a xeric Florida shrubland and examined uptake by four small herbaceous species that generally do not overlap aboveground. All four species took up Rb at distances of up to 97 cm (with an average lateral root spread of 51 cm), indicating that belowground neighborhoods are larger than aboveground. The arbuscular mycorrhizal species exhibited greater Rb enrichment without any change in lateral spread. The spatial arrangement of plants with elevated levels of Rb relative to Rb patches was consistent with root and mycorrhizal systems that are radially discontinuous and asymmetric. Furthermore, many individuals acquired Rb from the same patches, suggesting overlap in root function and the potential for belowground competition, although small-scale spatial and/or temporal segregation could have occurred.

Key Words: arbuscular mycorrhizae • belowground competition • belowground neighborhoods • Eryngium cuneifoliumHypericum cumulicolaParonychia chartaceaPolygonella basiramia • Rb • roots


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The area over which a plant forages for nutrients and water is in part determined by the lateral spread and function of its roots and associated mycorrhizae. Lateral root spread directly affects the volume of soil resources available to a plant and the extent that spatial overlap or segregation occurs among neighbors. Lateral root function influences the degree of exploitation when a resource patch is discovered. Spatially overlapping, functioning root systems represent potential belowground competitors and define the size of the belowground neighborhood (Campbell and Grime, 1989 ; Gurevitch et al., 1990 ; Casper and Jackson, 1997 ; Casper, Cahill, and Jackson, 2000 ).

In many models of plant competition, neighborhood sizes are based on overlap in zones of influence, the area over which plants reduce available resources, or are determined by the space available to each plant. Some models determine the zone of influence by considering the distribution of aboveground plant parts and evaluating the numbers and locations of neighbors that impact a particular plant (e.g., Weiner, 1984 ; Silander and Pacala, 1990 ). Another approach divides available space among plants based on the spatial arrangement of the aboveground parts of immediate neighbors (Mead, 1966 ; Mithen, Harper, and Weiner, 1984 ; Daniels, Burkhart, and Clason, 1986 ). These widely used approaches ignore the spatial distribution of belowground plant parts and the possibility that aboveground neighborhoods and belowground neighborhoods may differ in size.

The lateral spread of whole-plant belowground root systems is often studied by excavation of entire root systems (e.g., Cole and Holch, 1941 ; Coupland and Johnson, 1965 ; Brisson and Reynolds, 1994 ; Mou et al., 1995 ). Such studies have revealed little overlap of root systems, although the smallest roots and mycorrhizal hyphae, which are clearly important in resource uptake, are often ignored (Casper and Jackson, 1997 ). Fine roots and mycorrhizal hyphae are difficult to study in situ due to the ease with which they are severed from the plant and the inability to identify individual ownership. Studies that do measure fine roots accurately often use methods that are both difficult and laborious, such as freezing and slicing techniques (e.g., Caldwell, Manwaring, and Durham, 1996 ) or hand sorting of roots visually identifiable to species (e.g., Bauhas, Khanna, and Menden, 2000 ).

To circumvent these problems, stable and radioactive tracers have been used to measure root activity both spatially and temporally (Ferrill and Woods, 1966 ; Brown and Woods, 1968 ; Currie and Hammer, 1979 ; Veresoglou and Fitter, 1984 ; Gibson, 1988 ; Abbott, Fraley, and Reynolds, 1991 ; Casper, Cahill, and Jackson, 2000 ). This technique is effective for describing both the reach and function of roots belowground and can do so even for very fine roots that are missed with other methods. Indeed, Currie and Hammer (1979) found the horizontal spread of lateral root function in a grassland was three times greater when measured with radioactive phosphorus uptake compared to excavation.

In this study, we used the nutrient analog rubidium (Rb), which is taken up along the same pathways as potassium (K) and typically occurs at very low levels in soils and plant tissues (Larcher, 1995 ; Marschner, 1995 ). The Rb tracer was injected into soil in localized patches and subsequently harvested plants that contained the tracer are assumed to have had active roots or mycorrhizae in the tracer patch, allowing us to estimate the extent of lateral root function and spatial overlap of herbaceous root systems in a natural setting. We used this technique to address lateral root activity for the herbaceous component of a Florida rosemary scrub community where light levels are high, soil nutrients scarce, and little aboveground overlap of herbs is observed. Most plant interactions in this system are likely occurring belowground (Tilman, 1982 , 1988 ). Establishing the lateral extension and function of fine roots in rosemary scrub will help determine whether plants are competing for or partitioning resources belowground and to assess differences between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal root systems.


    STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This study was conducted in a rosemary scrub site located at the Archbold Biological Station in Highlands County, Florida, USA (27°11' N, 81°21' W). Rosemary scrub is a xeric, pyrogenic, shrub-dominated upland found along the Florida ridges (Abrahamson et al., 1984 ). The climate is one of hot, wet summers and mild, dry winters. Mean (±1 SE) annual precipitation is 1331.8 ± 28.6 mm with almost half this amount falling between June and August (Archbold Biological Station weather records, 1932–2000). Soils in rosemary scrub are what make the habitat xeric, being sandy and excessively well drained. Soils are also extremely nutrient poor, with low levels of K (3.11 ± 0.93 µg/g soil), P (0.089 ± 0.035 µg/g soil), Mg (5.67 ± 2.87 µg/g soil), Ca (65.33 ± 40.71 µg/g soil), and N (3.59 ± 4.11 µg NH4/g soil and 0.38 ± 0.19 µg NO3/g soil) (C. V. Hawkes, unpublished data).

We chose four herbaceous species for our experiment: the three perennials Eryngium cuneifolium Small (Apiaceae), Hypericum cumulicola (Small) P. Adams (Hypericaceae), and Polygonella basiramia (Small) Nesom & Bates (Polygonaceae), and the annual (occasional short-lived perennial; Anderson, 1991 ) Paronychia chartacea Fern. ssp. chartacea L. C. Anderson (Caryophyllaceae). Much life history information is known for these species (e.g., Johnson and Abrahamson, 1990 ; Hawkes and Menges, 1996 ; Menges and Kimmich, 1996 ; Quintana-Ascencio and Morales-Hernandez, 1997 ). Aboveground plant sizes for all four herbs are small: P. basiramia has a basal leaf spread of 4.09 ± 2.33 cm (C. V. Hawkes, unpublished data); the largest species, E. cuneifolium, has a basal rosette diameter of 8.63 ± 5.92 cm (mean ± 1 SD; E. S. Menges, unpublished data); and Core (1941) described P. chartacea as having a branch length of between 5 and 20 cm. No data are available for H. cumulicola, but we have rarely observed basal leaves spreading >5–10 cm from the center. The four species coexist in open gaps (Quintana-Ascencio and Menges, 2000 ) where they co-occur with soil crusts dominated by cyanobacteria and algae (Hawkes and Flechtner, 2002 ). Distributions range from the rare E. cuneifolium, found only in open, recently burned sites (Menges and Kimmich, 1996 ) to the widespread P. basiramia, found even in small gaps of older sites (Hawkes and Menges, 1995 , 1996 ). Roots from all four species (N = 4 plants per species) were stained (Koske and Gemma, 1989 ) and examined for mycorrhizal colonization; only the roots of E. cuneifolium and H. cumulicola were infected with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We used Rb as a tracer to determine the extent of lateral root spread in four rosemary scrub herbs. Prior to Rb injection, background levels of Rb in plants (N = 4 per species), biological soil crusts (N = 8), and soils (N = 8) were randomly sampled from the site. The background plant samples were used to establish cutoffs for Rb enrichment in the experiment. We separately sampled soil crusts because they fix nitrogen and affect nitrogen uptake by herbaceous plants in rosemary scrub (Hawkes, 2000 ) and may alter other plant nutrients as well (Belnap and Harper, 1995 ), thereby potentially altering root characteristics and activity.

At eight stratified random points in a single rosemary scrub site (ABS west section, mitigation 40 tract) we injected 10 mL of 1 mol/L RbCl to a depth of 10 cm, by injecting 2 mL every 2 cm. We did so without nutrient enrichment and without regard for underlying variation in other soil nutrients. Injections were not made directly into or under plants and were a minimum of 10 m apart to permit assignment of plant uptake to a given Rb patch. Levels of K are low in these acid soils (C. V. Hawkes, unpublished data; Anderson and Menges, 1997 ) and we expected the Rb to be readily taken up (Drobner and Tyler, 1998 ). Because plants in this system grow very slowly, we exposed them to Rb over a 3-mo period (mid-July to mid-October 1998). Injections were repeated after heavy rainfall events (approximately every 2–3 wk) to compensate for leaching losses in the extremely porous, low-organic-matter sand of rosemary scrub.

To determine whether Rb spread horizontally after injection due to diffusion or to release by plants after uptake, we used both ion exchange beads and dye injections near each Rb patch. In each plot, water-soluble, blue vegetable dye was injected to examine lateral and vertical water movement. Negatively charged resin beads (Amberlite 1R-120 Plus [H], Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) were used to capture the positively charged Rb ions moving in the soil solution. Approximately 15 mL of resin beads were placed into nylon mesh bags that had been cut from nylon stockings into pieces 10 cm in length and sealed at the ends with rubber bands. These were positioned at 0.5 and 1.0 m from the point of injection in randomly selected directions. The minimum distance of 0.5 m was used to avoid interference of the bags with roots accessing the Rb patches. At the time of harvest, we also collected additional soil crust and soil samples from random locations within 1 m of the injection point to analyze for horizontal Rb spread through diffusion or microbial movement. To check for Rb movement within 0.5 m of the injection, four additional control plots were established after the harvest. In each plot, resin bags were placed at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 m from the Rb patch. No plants occurred aboveground between the Rb patch and the bags. Injections were otherwise identical to the initial trial.

To quantify Rb uptake and root overlap, we harvested all individuals of the four species occurring within a 2 x 2 m area centered on each of the eight randomly positioned Rb patches and recorded the distance and direction of each plant from the Rb patch. The entire aboveground portions of each plant and as much of the root system as possible were collected. Plant and soil samples were dried for 24 h at 80°C and ground to a fine powder in a Spex 8000 Mixer Mill. All plants with aboveground stems <1 m (N = 53) and a subset of plants with stems >1 m (N = 14) from the injection point were analyzed for Rb content. All bags of resin beads were collected and analyzed for Rb content. The volume of resin beads in each bag was measured to check for loss. Beads were then placed in flasks with 25 mL of 4 mol/L KCl, shaken at 185 rpm for 1 h, and 20 mL of the liquid collected in vials. Plant, soil, and liquid samples were sent to the Pennsylvania State University Materials Characterization Laboratory for analysis of Rb content (on a Perkin Elmer 703 spectrometer in flame-emission mode).

The concentration of Rb that was considered elevated or enriched was calculated as the 99% upper confidence limit of the Rb levels found in background plant samples taken before Rb was injected. Throughout the results, we also present the 99% upper confidence limit of the Rb content of the resin bags. Though their meaning is less clear, they represent an extremely conservative cutoff for enrichment. No plants >1 m from the Rb column took up Rb and were therefore excluded from all analyses.

Whether the Rb content or the distance to the Rb patch of enriched plants varied by injection point (patch) or species was first tested with separate two-way ANOVAs. Post hoc Sidák comparisons were made for species when it was a significant main factor (P < 0.05). Rubidium concentrations and distances were natural log transformed to achieve normality and homogeneity of variance. We then used regression analysis to describe how the Rb content (ln transformed) of enriched plants of each species depended on distance (ln transformed) to the injection point and plant biomass.

We estimated potential root system overlap using the lateral root distances we measured for plants within a 4-m2 plot (2 x 2 m) centered on each point of tracer injection, assuming that root systems were radially symmetric in a horizontal plane. The circular areas occupied by root systems of enriched plants were calculated using their observed distances to the Rb injection point as radii; we estimated the radial area occupied by unenriched plants based on the average lateral root spread found in enriched plants. We then calculated the proportion of each 4-m2 plot that would be occupied by zero through greater than six root systems, given the actual spacing of plants aboveground.

All statistical procedures were completed with SPSS version 10.0.0 (SPSS, 1999 ). Unless stated otherwise, untransformed data are reported as means ±1 SD and backtransformed data are reported as averages ± asymmetric 95% confidence intervals.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Background levels of Rb in plants were low, ranging from 4 to 15 ppm across all four species, with an average of 7.25 ± 2.91 (Fig. 1). The 99% upper confidence limit for plant background levels was 10.99, and we used this as the cutoff for enrichment. Soils had undetectable levels of Rb (<1 ppm) both before and after the injections. Soil crusts also did not accumulate Rb (<1 ppm), implying that, unlike the vascular herbs, microbes cannot capture Rb, actively discriminate against Rb, or preferentially release Rb after uptake.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Mean (±1 SE) distance to the Rb patch and (B) mean (±95% CI) Rb concentration of the four focal species. Closed circles in (A) represent the maximum distance of plants enriched with Rb. Different letters indicate significant differences. Note the lack of correspondence between plant distance to Rb patch and Rb enrichment of plants. Figure abbreviations: Ec = Eryngium cuneifolium, Hc = Hypericum cumulicola, Pb = Polygonella basiramia, Pc = Paronychia chartacea

 
Unlike soil crusts and soils, the resin beads did capture and hold Rb ions. No differences were observed across distances in the Rb content of resin beads placed at 0.5 and 1 m from the Rb patch (F1, 14 = 1.559, error MS = 1.854, P = 0.232) or those placed at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 m from the Rb patch (F4, 14 = 0.916, error MS = 3.638, P = 0.480), but the concentration of Rb was higher overall in the latter (34.0 ± 2.0) than the former (3.5 ± 1.4). Because distance had no effect on Rb content of resin beads in either batch, these values likely represent background levels of Rb in soils. Different concentrations of Rb between the batches of resin beads are likely a result of the different seasons (rainy in the first, dry in the second), different sample batches, or any number of other factors. No plants were sampled at the time the second batch of resin beads was collected, and it is not possible to confirm the relationship of the overall Rb concentration in the beads to that in plant tissues, but the lack of a distance effect supports these being background levels. Injections of blue dye were not observed to spread laterally from the point of injection.

Elevated Rb concentrations (>10.99 ppm) occurred in all four species at distances of up to 97 cm from the point of injection, with an average distance of 51.4 ± 24.9 cm for enriched plants. The concentration of Rb differed significantly among species, but not patches (Table 1). More concentrated and variable amounts of Rb were found in E. cuneifolium compared to P. basiramia or P. chartacea; intermediate Rb concentrations occurred in H. cumulicola (Fig. 1). The distance of enriched plants to the Rb injection point did not differ among species or Rb patches (Table 1, Fig. 1), indicating that plants of all four species were capable of lateral root activity at comparable distances and that this was not altered by local microsite conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Univariate ANOVAs for the Rb content (ln transformed) and distance (ln transformed) of enriched plants as a function of Rb patch (injection point) and species identity. Mean squares, degrees of freedom, and P-values are reported

 
Distance to the Rb patch had no significant effect on the concentration of Rb in enriched plants of any species, though it explained 44% of the variation in Rb enrichment of H. cumulicola (Fig. 2B) and 31% in P. chartacea (Fig. 2D). Polygonella basiramia was equally enriched at all distances observed in this study (Fig. 2C), and only 10% of the variation in Rb concentration of E. cuneifolium could be accounted for by distance (Fig. 2A). All plants <40 cm from the Rb patch were enriched with Rb (N = 12), whereas only 63% of plants between 40 and 100 cm from the Rb patch were enriched (N = 41). No plants in our subsample of those greater than 100 cm from the Rb patch accumulated Rb (N = 14).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Rb concentration (ln) as a function of distance to the Rb patch for each species. The dashed horizontal line indicates the 99% upper confidence of background Rb levels in plant tissue; only plants above this line are considered enriched in Rb and included in the regression analysis. The dotted horizontal line represents the 99% upper confidence limit for Rb found in the resin bags

 
Plant biomass also was not a significant predictor of the concentration of Rb in enriched plants (Fig. 3). Biomass explained 29% of the variation in Rb concentration of E. cuneifolium plants, though this relationship was somewhat driven by two large plants that also had high levels of Rb (Fig. 3A). Only 18% of the variation in Rb concentration of P. basiramia and <2% of that in H. cumulicola and P. chartacea could be accounted for by biomass (Fig. 3B–D).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Rubidium concentration (ln) of each species as a function of plant biomass for plants with elevated Rb levels. Symbols and lines as in Fig. 2

 
In six out of eight Rb patches, more than one individual and more than one species obtained Rb, indicating overlap of root systems in the Rb column. Based on our measurements, the number of root systems overlapping in the Rb column ranged from 2/7 to 8/13 plants within 1 m of the Rb patches. Based on our calculations when assuming a radial root structure, on average 31% of the area within 1 m of the Rb patch was unoccupied by roots, 35% contained only a single root system, and 44% was occupied by more than one root system.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The lateral spread of root activity in this system is substantial relative to aboveground plant sizes. Individuals of all four species foraged over radial distances greater than 83 cm, yet aboveground plant rosettes are typically <5 cm in diameter for H. cumulicola, P. basiramia, and P. chartacea, and 10–12 cm for E. cuneifolium. Aboveground plant size also had little effect on Rb uptake and would not be an accurate indicator of belowground neighborhood size or root function for these rosemary scrub herbs.

Compared to other studies using nutrient analogs as tracers, the maximum distances over which plants took up Rb in this experiment were far greater than those found in fertilized monocultures of Abutilon theophrasti (32 cm; Casper, Cahill, and Jackson, 2000 ). Field studies using tracers have found roots functioning over more comparable maximum lateral distances: 90 cm for the grass Leymus cinereus in a natural, cold-desert system (Abbott, Fraley, and Reynolds, 1991 ), 60 cm for three grasses, Festuca arizonica, Muhlenbergia montana, and Bouteloua gracilis, and one shrub, Artemisia frigida, in a grassland habitat (Currie and Hammer, 1979 ), and 45 cm for two grasses, Arrenatherum elatius and Poa pratensis, in a dune grassland (Gibson, 1988 ). Though patterns of lateral root growth are undoubtedly species specific and habitat dependent, roots may be more likely to forage over greater distances in sandy, nutrient-poor, or dry soils (Grime, 1994 ; Hutchings and de Kroon, 1994 ; Schenk, Callaway, and Mahall, 1999 ). Indeed, Coupland and Johnson (1965) found that of 56 grassland species, most had more extensive root systems when growing in sandy soils than when growing in fine textured loam.

Either there is no direct relationship between aboveground plant sizes and rooting area or the root systems of these species are not radially symmetric. In some cases, plants that took up Rb were immediately adjacent to neighbors that did not access Rb patches; in five instances, plants closer to the Rb patch did not take up Rb while neighboring plants at greater distances did. Casper, Cahill, and Jackson (2000) found irregularly shaped, discontinuous root systems in a study using two tracers. Such root geometry would result in a decreasing probability of a root hitting a tracer patch with increasing distance of the plant from the point of injection and could contribute to the observed lack of enrichment for plants >1 m from the point of Rb injection. Regardless of the shape of their root systems, plants in rosemary scrub are clearly capable of interacting with more than just their nearest neighbors.

Arbuscular mycorrhizae appear to increase uptake without extending effective root length beyond that observed in the nonmycorrhizal species. Of the mycorrhizal species, E. cuneifolium had significantly higher and H. cumulicola had higher, though not statistically significant, levels of Rb, but both had similar mean and maximum distances from Rb patches compared to the nonmycorrhizal species. Because in many respects mycorrhizae are extensions of the root system, the degree of physical overlap of roots is not a sufficient indicator of the potential degree of belowground interactions. In another sand dune system, the presence of AM fungal mycelia >8 cm from their associated plant root was demonstrated using fatty acid analyses (Olsson and Wilhelmsson, 2000 ). Mycorrhizae can influence the outcome of competition between two species (e.g., Allen and Allen, 1990 ; Hartnett et al., 1993 ; Marler, Zabinski, and Callaway, 1999 ) as well as the diversity and aboveground productivity of the plant community (van der Heijden et al., 1998 ; Klironomos et al., 2000 ). No doubt belowground interactions are one important mechanism behind these phenomena. By differentiating between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal species, our study offers insight into the potential role of mycorrhizal fungi in defining belowground neighborhood sizes and the extent of belowground competition and suggests lines of further study in an area that has been little explored.

If individual root and mycorrhizal systems are extending almost 1 m, then herbs up to nearly 2 m apart aboveground could potentially interact belowground. Many plants did take up Rb from the same patch, indicating overlap of root or mycorrhizal function and potential competition both within and among species. Between 20 and 78% of the plants within 1 m of an Rb patch were enriched, with up to eight individual root systems obtaining Rb from the same point of tracer injection.

It is possible, however, that the overlap of roots we observed is not functional overlap in that roots or mycorrhizae may be segregated vertically within the column of tracer or may be accessing the patch at different times (Parrish and Bazzaz, 1976 ). Temporal segregation of Rb uptake is less likely than spatial segregation because of the seasonal growth and nutrient limitation of the plants (Chapin, 1980 ; Eissenstat and Yanai, 1996 ). Root turnover would have to be much faster than aboveground tissue growth in this system for roots of different individuals to inhabit the same soil space at different times during the course of this study. Rates of root turnover for native plants in Florida scrub are unknown; roots of citrus trees in sandy Florida soils have a median lifespan of 300 d and exhibit little decline in uptake capacity during that time (Bouma et al., 2001 ). Spatial segregation of roots may have occurred along the 10 cm deep column of injected Rb. Even so, indirect competition may occur as roots near the surface remove some nutrients that would otherwise filter downward through the sandy soil to deeper roots. Direct interactions are also possible as competition for water and for mobile nutrients such as nitrate can occur at proximities on the order of centimeters (Schenk, Callaway, and Mahall, 1999 ).

Subsequent excavation of the herbs revealed differences among species in the shape and size of root systems and provided evidence that direct root system overlap occurs. Although following the fine roots to their ends was nearly impossible, some gross trends were observed. Most roots were found in the top 10–15 cm of soil, consistent with other studies of root depth in scrub (Hunter and Menges, in press). The nonmycorrhizal species P. basiramia and P. chartacea that had lower tissue concentrations of Rb also had smaller taproots. Several P. chartacea lateral roots were >70 cm in length. We found the roots of P. basiramia, P. chartacea, and H. cumulicola in close proximity at distances on the order of centimeters and occasionally entangled. Roots of E. cuneifolium may be spatially segregated, having few fine and lateral roots, and a deeper taproot. The ability of E. cuneifolium to take up larger quantities of Rb than the other herbs could be explained by a combination of the depth of its root system, which could place deep roots in a position to capture any tracer leaching down from the Rb columns, and its mycorrhizal association, which may cause morphological increases in surface area available for uptake or physiological increases in uptake rates. Consistent with this explanation, H. cumulicola had lower concentrations of Rb in its tissues, a shallower root system, and greater level of mycorrhizal infection than E. cuneifolium (C. V. Hawkes, unpublished data). The possibility that mycorrhizae, rather than plant biomass or distance to a resource patch, are primarily responsible for patterns of uptake activity is intriguing, though clearly more study is required to confirm the role of the mycorrhizal association in this process.

This study and others point to a balance of belowground competition and niche partitioning in the rosemary scrub ecosystem where herbaceous plant interactions aboveground are not apparent. Hawkes (2000) , for example, suggests that changes in the supply of nitrogen from increased deposition can alter the relative abundance of the mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal herbs through effects on the spatial location of nitrogen sources and belowground competition. Yet no belowground models to date are sufficient to describe accurately this relationship or its ramifications for plant population or community dynamics. To address these issues, we reiterate calls for (1) inclusion of belowground interactions when studying plant competition (Cahill, 1999 ; Cahill and Casper, 2000 ), (2) incorporation of mycorrhizae in the study of belowground interactions, and (3) changes to neighborhood models in order to account for root and mycorrhizal belowground neighborhoods that are larger and more irregularly shaped than their aboveground counterparts (Casper and Jackson, 1997 ; Casper, Cahill, and Jackson, 2000 ).


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank Eric Menges, Jennifer Doherty, Abigail McCarthy, and Philip Higuera for field and lab assistance and James Cahill, Arthur Dunham, David Evans, Eric Menges, Rebecca Ostertag, Peter Petraitis, Jon Sullivan, Jochen Schenk, Aaron Ellison, and one anonymous reviewer for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by The Nature Conservancy-Mellon Foundation Ecosystem Research Grant Program, the Florida Department of Forestry, Archbold Biological Station, and The University of Pennsylvania. Back

2 Author for reprint requests, current address: 151 Hilgard Hall, Ecosystem Sciences, Department of Environmental Studies, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3110 USA (chawkes{at}nature.berkeley.edu ) Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 STUDY SITE AND SPECIES
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Abbott M. L. L. Fraley T. D. Reynolds 1991 Root profiles of selected cold desert shrubs and grasses in disturbed and undisturbed soils. Environmental and Experimental Botany 31: 165-178[CrossRef][ISI]

Abrahamson W. G. A. F. Johnson J. N. Layne P. A. Peroni 1984 Vegetation of the Archbold Biological Station, Florida: an example of the southern Lake Wales Ridge. Florida Scientist 47: 209-250

Allen E. B. M. F. Allen 1990 The mediation of competition by mycorrhizae in successional and patchy environments. In J. B. Grace and D. Tilman [eds.], Perspectives on plant competition, 367–389. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA

Anderson L. C. 1991 Paronychia chartacea ssp. minima (Caryophyllaceae): a new subspecies of a rare Florida endemic. Sida 14: 435-441

Anderson R. C. E. S. Menges 1997 Effects of fire on sandhill herbs: nutrients, mycorrhizae, and biomass allocation. American Journal of Botany 84: 938-948[Abstract]

Bauhus J. P. K. Khanna N. Menden 2000 Aboveground and belowground interactions in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1886-1894[CrossRef]

Belnap J. K. T. Harper 1995 Influence of cryptobiotic soil crusts on elemental content of tissue of two desert seed plants. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 9: 107-115

Bouma T. J. R. D. Yanai A. D. Elkin U. Hartmond D. E. Flores-Alva D. M. Eissenstat 2001 Estimating age-dependent costs and benefits of roots with contrasting life span: comparing apples and oranges. New Phytologist 150: 685-695[CrossRef][ISI]

Brisson J. J. F. Reynolds 1994 The effect of neighbors on root distribution in a creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) population. Ecology 75: 1693-1702[CrossRef][ISI]

Brown J. H., Jr. F. W. Woods 1968 Root extension of trees in surface soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. Botanical Gazette 129: 126-132[CrossRef][ISI]

Cahill J. F. 1999 Fertilization effects on interactions between above- and belowground competition in an old field. Ecology 80: 466-480[CrossRef][ISI]

Cahill J. F. B. B. Casper 2000 Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. Oikos 90: 311-320[CrossRef][ISI]

Caldwell M. M. J. H. Manwaring S. L. Durham 1996 Species interactions at the level of fine roots in the field: influence of soil nutrient heterogeneity and plant size. Oecologia 106: 440-447[CrossRef][ISI]

Campbell B. D. J. P. Grime 1989 A new method for exposing developing root systems to controlled patchiness in mineral nutrient supply. Annals of Botany 63: 395-400[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Casper B. B. J. F. Cahill Jr. R. B. Jackson 2000 Plant competition in heterogeneous habitats. In M. Hutchings, E. John, and A. Stewart [eds.], Ecological consequences of habitat heterogeneity, 111–130. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England, UK

Casper B. B. R. B. Jackson 1997 Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 545-570

Chapin F. S. 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 233-260

Cole H. E. A. E. Holch 1941 The root habits of certain weeds of southeastern Nebraska. Ecology 22: 141-147[CrossRef][ISI]

Core E. L. 1941 The North American species of Paronychia. American Midland Naturalist 26: 369-397[CrossRef]

Coupland R. T. R. E. Johnson 1965 Rooting characteristics of native species in Saskatchewan. Journal of Ecology 53: 475-507[CrossRef]

Currie P. O. F. L. Hammer 1979 Detecting depth and lateral spread of roots of native range plants using radioactive phosphorus. Journal of Range Management 32: 101-103[CrossRef][ISI]

Daniels R. F. H. E. Burkhart T. R. Clason 1986 A comparison of competition measures for predicting growth of loblolly pine trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 1230-1237[CrossRef]

Drobner U. G. Tyler 1998 Conditions controlling relative uptake of potassium and rubidium by plants from soils. Plant and Soil 201: 285-293[CrossRef][ISI]

Eissenstat D. M. R. D. Yanai 1996 The ecology of root lifespan. Advances in Ecological Research 27: 1-60

Ferrill M. D. F. W. Woods 1966 Root extension in a longleaf pine plantation. Ecology 47: 97-102[CrossRef][ISI]

Gibson D. J. 1988 The maintenance of plant and soil heterogeneity in dune grassland. Journal of Ecology 76: 497-508[CrossRef]

Grime J. P. 1994 The role of plasticity in exloiting environmental heterogeneity. In M. M. Caldwell and R. W. Pearcy [eds.], Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: ecophysiological processes above- and belowground, 1–19. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA

Gurevitch J. P. Wilson J. L. Stone P. Teese R. J. Stoutenburgh 1990 Competition among old-field perennials at different levels of soil fertility and available space. Journal of Ecology 78: 727-744[CrossRef][ISI]

Hartnett D. C. B. A. D. Hetrick G. W. T. Wilson D. J. Gibson 1993 Mycorrhizal influence of intra- and inter-specific neighbor interactions among co-occurring prairie grasses. Journal of Ecology 81: 787-795[CrossRef][ISI]

Hawkes C. V. 2000 Soil crusts in a xeric Florida shrubland and their interactions with four herbaceous plants. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Hawkes C. V. V. R. Flechtner In press Biological soil crusts in a xeric Florida shrubland: composition, abundance, and spatial heterogeneity of crusts with different disturbance histories. Microbial Ecology.

Hawkes C. V. E. S. Menges 1995 Density and seed production of a Florida endemic, Polygonella basiramia, in relation to time since fire and open sand. American Midland Naturalist 133: 138-148[CrossRef][ISI]

Hawkes C. V. E. S. Menges 1996 The relationship between open space and fire for species in a xeric Florida shrubland. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123: 81-92[CrossRef][ISI]

Hunter M. E. E. S. Menges In press Allelopathic effects and root distribution ofCeratiola ericoides on seven rosemary scrub species. American Journal of Botany.

Hutchings M. J. H. de Kroon 1994 Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 159-238[ISI]

Johnson A. F. W. G. Abrahamson 1990 A note on the fire responses of species in rosemary scrubs on the southern Lake Wales Ridge. Florida Scientist 53: 138-143

Klironomos J. N. J. McCune M. Hart J. Neville 2000 The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity. Ecology Letters 3: 137-141

Koske R. E. J. N. Gemma 1989 A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycological Research 94: 486-488

Larcher W. 1995 Physiological plant ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

Marler M. J. C. A. Zabinski R. M. Callaway 1999 Mycorrhizae indirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb on a native bunchgrass. Ecology 80: 1180-1186[ISI]

Marschner H. 1995 Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA

Mead R. 1966 A relationship between individual plant-spacing and yield. Annals of Botany 30: 301-309[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Menges E. S. J. Kimmich 1996 Microhabitat and time since fire: effects on demography of Eryngium cuneifolium (Apiaceae), a Florida scrub endemic plant. American Journal of Botany 83: 185-191[CrossRef][ISI]

Mithen R. J. L. Harper J. Weiner 1984 Growth and mortality of individual plants as a function of ‘available area.’. Oecologia 62: 57-60[CrossRef][ISI]

Mou P. R. H. Jones R. J. Mitchell B. Zutter 1995 Spatial distribution of roots in sweetgum and loblolly pine monocultures and relations with aboveground biomass and soil nutrients. Functional Ecology 9: 689-699[CrossRef][ISI]

Olsson P. A. P. Wilhelmsson 2000 The growth of external AM fungal mycelium in sand dunes and experimental systems. Plant and Soil 226: 161-169[CrossRef][ISI]

Parrish J. A. D. F. A. Bazzaz 1976 Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57: 1281-1288[CrossRef][ISI]

Quintana-Ascencio P. E. S. Menges 2000 Competitive abilities of three narrowly endemic plant species in experimental neighborhoods along a fire gradient. American Journal of Botany 87: 690-699[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Quintana-Ascencio P. M. Morales-Hernandez 1997 Fire-mediated effects of shrubs, lichens, and herbs on the demography of Hypericum cumulicola in patchy Florida scrub. Oecologia 112: 263-271[CrossRef][ISI]

Schenk H. J. R. M. Callaway B. E. Mahall 1999 Spatial root segregation: are plants territorial?. Advances in Ecological Research 28: 145-180

Silander J. A., Jr. S. W. Pacala 1990 The application of plant population dynamics models to understanding plant competition. In J. B. Grace and D. Tilman [eds.], Perspectives on plant competition, 67–92. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA

SPSS. 1999 SPSS for Windows, rel. 10.0.0. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Tilman D. 1982 Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

Tilman D. 1988 Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

van der Heijden M. G. A. J. N. Klironomos M. Ursic P. Moutoglis R. Streitwolf-Engel T. Boller A. Wiemken I. R. Sanders 1998 Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396: 69-72[CrossRef]

Veresoglou D. S. A. H. Fitter 1984 Spatial and temporal patterns of growth and nutrient uptake of five co-existing grasses. Journal of Ecology 72: 259-272[CrossRef]

Weiner J. 1984 Neighborhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals. Journal of Ecology 72: 183-195[CrossRef]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Casper, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Casper, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Casper, B. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS