|
|
||||||||
Systematics |
2Department of Botany, Box 351330, Johnson 412, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA; 3Departments of Botany and Genetics, Box 355325, Hitchcock 543, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA
Received for publication June 26, 2001. Accepted for publication November 9, 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Agaricales Inocybe molecular phylogeny nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA RNA polymerase II RPB1
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
exon sequences, among other nonprotein coding sequences, in their reconstruction of mucoralean (Zygomycota) phylogeny. Here we intend to demonstrate that partial sequence data of the single-copy RNA polymerase II largest subunit (RPB1) provide suitable alternatives to other markers to reconstruct lower level phylogeny among mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Additionally, an RPB1 phylogeny can serve to assess evolutionary relationships inferred by sources such as rDNA. We present a nLSU phylogeny that is confounded in part by two long terminal branch lengths, a reconstruction in disagreement with those based on RPB1 sequences. In contrast, trees derived from RPB1 sequences exhibit increased resolution, greater confidence for several relationships, and relatively uniform terminal branch lengths.
RNA polymerase II is the enzyme responsible for transcription of protein-coding genes into pre-mRNA transcripts. The largest subunit of this protein, RPB1, is also of interest, ironically, since it possesses the active binding site for
-amanitin, a toxin produced by several agaric genera such as Amanita, Pholiotina, Galerina, and Lepiota (Horgen, Vaisius, and Ammirati, 1978
; Wieland, 1986
; Benjamin, 1995
). Unlike previous studies that used RNA polymerase II sequence data to investigate higher level relationships among a broad array of eukaryotes (Nawrath, Schell, and Koncz, 1990
; Iwabe et al., 1991
; Sidow and Thomas, 1994
; Klenk et al., 1995
; Stiller and Hall, 1997
; Denton, McConaughy, and Hall, 1998
; Liu, Whelen, and Hall, 1999
), this study evaluates taxonomically lower level relationships in a genus of mushroom-forming fungi, Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. (Cortinariaceae, Agaricales).
Inocybe is a species-rich group of higher basidiomycetes that is recognized morphologically by the fleshy fruit bodies (basidiomata) with a dry and often fibrillose, rimose, or squamulose pileus and often spermatic odor. The basidiospores are dull brown pigmented with a smooth spore wall, although in some species portions of the wall are projected outwards and resemble nodules to a varying degree, including spinose protuberances, or may be angular in outline. The genus is considered ectomycorrhizal and exhibits poor mycelial growth on standard agar plates (Kuyper, 1986
; Singer, 1986
). Basidiospores of Inocybe fail to germinate under laboratory settings, and current techniques fail to establish successful cultures (Boidin, 1986
). Additionally, many species possess muscarine, a toxin that stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system in humans (Bresinsky and Besl, 1990
; Benjamin, 1995
), and a few species even contain hallucinogenic compounds (Besl and Mack, 1985
; Gartz and Drewitz, 1985
; Stijve, Klan, and Kuyper, 1985
). The genus is fairly large with a conservative estimate of between 250 and 350 species that occur worldwide in an ectomycorrhizal status with a wide range of angiosperms and gymnosperms (Kuyper, 1986
), making it one of the most diverse genera in the Agaricales. Furthermore, new Inocybe species are still being described throughout the globe (e.g., Vauras, 1997
; Buyck and Eyssartier, 1999
; Kobayashi and Courtecuisse, 2000
; Seok et al., 2000
; Watling, 2001
; P. B. Matheny, M. C. Aime, and T. W. Henkel, unpublished data; P. B. Matheny and Bougher, unpublished data; P. B. Matheny and N. L. Trappe, unpublished data).
Taxonomically, Inocybe has primarily been classified in the family Cortinariaceae where it occupies its own tribe, Inocybeae Fayod ex Singer (Kühner, 1980
; Singer, 1986
). Additionally, most systematists (Kühner, 1980
; Moser, 1983; Kuyper, 1986
; Singer, 1986
) recognize one genus of inocyboid species in contrast to Horak (1968)
and Jülich (1981)
, who prefer to treat the nodulose-spored species of Inocybe in the genus Astrosporina. Zerova (1974)
even accomodated the spinose-spored (with spine-like protuberances) I. calospora in its own genus, Inocybella. Considerable debate exists as to the evolutionary importance of the topology of the basidiospore in Inocybe. Kuyper (1986)
, however, demonstrated that the nodulose-spored condition arose more than once using parsimony and character compatibility analyses of morphological characters. Furthermore, questions still surround the familial placement of Inocybe and just which taxa are sister to it. Jülich (1981)
, for example, elevated Inocybe to familial rank, and Kuyper (1986)
, in his morphological cladistic analyses, chose Phaeomarasmius (Strophariaceae), a saprobic smooth-spored genus, as the outgroup instead of a more traditional choice, Hebeloma (Cortinariaceae), an ectomycorrhizal warty-spored genus, long considered by many, beginning with Fries (18211832), to be closely related to Inocybe.
To assess the phylogenetic utility of RPB1, partial exon sequences are compared with partial nLSU sequences for the same set of 21 taxa18 species of Inocybe and three outgroup representatives, Hebeloma olympianum, Galerina semilanceata, and Phaeomarasmius curcuma. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, which are phylogenetically useful for assessment of recently diverged fungal groups (Bruns, White, and Taylor, 1991
; Hibbett, 1992
; Kohn, 1992
; Vilgalys, Hopple, and Hibbett, 1994
) were not explored in our study due to an ambiguous alignment that resulted during a trial survey of several Inocybe species (B. Kropp, Utah State University, personal communication). The nLSU marker has been used to assess phylogenetic relationships at the generic and/or infrageneric taxonomic level for a few mushroom groups, for example, Amanita, Coprinus sensu lato, and Craterellus (Weiss, Yang, and Oberwinkler, 1998
; Drehmel, Vilgalys, and Moncalvo, 1999
; Hopple and Vilgalys, 1999
; Dahlman, Danell, and Spatafora, 2000
; Moncalvo, Drehmel, and Vilgalys, 2000
). The nLSU sequence data also have proven useful to address relationships at the family or ordinal level among mushroom-forming fungi (e.g., Binder, Besl, and Bresinsky, 1997
; Hughey et al., 2000
; Miller et al., 2000
; Moncalvo et al., 2000
; Thorn et al., 2000
; Grubisha et al., 2001
). Additional studies among mushroom families and genera that rely on nLSU sequences are anticipated because this locus is easily amplified and phylogenetically useful. However, aside from comparisons with morphological or mitochondrial ribosomal RNA sequences, very few studies offer comparisons with protein-coding sequences and at times are marked by interior nodes with short branches that lack high (>70%) bootstrap support.
The goals of the present study are twofold: (1) to compare the utility of partial nLSU sequences to those of partial RPB1 sequences in agaric phylogeny and (2) to reconstruct the evolutionary history of Inocybe. RPB1 provides flexibility in addressing multiple-level systematic questions given its amino acid or exon content. Moreover, the 5' proximal sequences of the RPB1 coding region (conserved domains AC) contain a large intron often >500 base pairs (bp) in length and guanine-cytosine rich. With these goals in mind, we ask the following questions: (1) Is RPB1 useful to determine agaric phylogeny, and how does this data set compare to trees derived from nLSU sequences? (2) Do combined data sets offer greater resolution and/or bootstrap support? (3) Is Inocybe monophyletic, and what are monophyletic groups within Inocybe?
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Taxon sampling
A number of infrageneric classifications have been proposed for Inocybe (Massee, 1904
; Lange, 1917
; Heim, 1931
; Kühner and Romagnesi, 1953
; Horak, 1968
; Kühner, 1980
; Kuyper, 1986
; Singer, 1986
; Bon, 1997a, b, 1998
) and some modifications suggested by others (e.g., Jülich, 1981
; Kobayashi, 1993
). Our data set contains a sample from each of the three subgenera and "supersections" proposed by Kuyper (1986)
in addition to samples from all but three of Singer's 14 sections that he recognized in the genus (Singer, 1986
). One of the unsampled sections of Singer is monospecific (section Rubellae Kühner & Romagnesi) and another contains only two species (section Hystrices Stangl & Veselsky); the last unsampled section is Petiginosae R. Heim. However, we included two noteworthy species associated with unique hosts, one smooth-spored cortinate species associated with Nothofagus from Argentina, South America (Inocybe sp. BK 8-Feb-99-1), and one mallocyboid species with necropigmented basidia associated with Eucalyptus from southeast Australia (I. "serpitocystis," a provisional name for an undescribed species). The taxon sampling scheme is presented in Table 1, which presents two major competing classifications (Kuyper, 1986
; Singer, 1986
). To gauge the phylogenetic breadth of RPB1, we deliberately sampled among putatively closely related species as well, such as I. lanuginosa, I. leptophylla, and I. stellatospora (Matheny and Kropp, 2001)
and I. pudica and I. agglutinata.
|
|
RNA extraction, RNA amplification, and sequencing
RNA was extracted from two fresh basidiomes, Inocybe sindonia (Fr.) P. Karsten (PBM 2048, WTU) and I. geophylla var. lilacina (Peck) Gillet (PBM 2039, WTU), using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit, catalogue number 74904 (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) to confirm RPB1 spliceosomal intron boundaries. The cDNA was synthesized using RNA template and reverse transcription PCR following "Protocol 2" of the displayTHERMO-RT Kit Version 1.4, catalogue number 570-100 (Display Systems Biotech, Vista, California, USA). The cNDA was then amplified using the degenerate RPB1 primers discussed above. The resulting PCR product was sequenced as discussed above. Exon (DNA) sequences of both samples are available from GenBank (GBAN-AF390019 and GBAN-AF390020).
Phylogenetic analyses
Sequence data were aligned using CLUSTAL W (Thompson, Higgins, and Gibson, 1994
), adjusted by eye, if necessary, and analyzed with PAUP 4.0b4 (PAUP*) (Swofford, 2000
). Alignments are available from the authors by request or on TreeBASE (study accession number S686). Hebeloma olympianum was designated as outgroup in PAUP* for rooting purposes based on a more inclusive study of agaric phylogeny (Moncalvo et al., 2000
).
Sequences were examined using both equally weighted maximum parsimony (MP) and differentially weighted maximum parsimony (WP). In weighted analyses of the nLSU data sets, transitions and transversions were estimated using maximum likelihood. Simulation studies indicate that only a slight weighting of transversions is needed to reach accuracy (Hillis, Huelsenbeck, and Swofford, 1994
), so these estimates served to generate a symmetric step matrix for the nLSU data in which we weighted transversions three steps, AG transitions two steps, and CT transitions one step. This step matrix is also similar to that employed by Moncalvo, Drehmel, and Vilgalys (2000)
in their weighted parsimony analyses of Amanita. For a brief consideration of transversion weighting of fungal rDNA data, see Hibbett (1992)
. In weighted analyses of the RPB1 data set, first codon positions were weighted four steps, second positions five steps, and third positions one step to reflect the relative costs of transformations at these three positions. In the nLSU and exon data, gaps were rescored as separate presence/absence characters, a method coined as "simple indel coding" (Simmons and Ochoterena, 2000)
. The rescored indels were appended to the data matrix and partitioned for optional inclusion in parsimony analyses.
We employed heuristic tree searches under the maximum parsimony criterion using 30 random addition sequence replicates with one tree held at each step during stepwise addition with the tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping algorithm and "MulTrees" option in effect. Bootstrapping (Felsenstein, 1985
) was performed on each parsimony data set using a simple addition sequence but was otherwise the same as in the heuristic tree searches, and 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed for each maximum parsimony analysis.
We chose to analyze each data set individually, examine combined data sets for incongruence, and then combine the data. Data sets were assessed for their topological congruence using the partition homogeneity test (ILD test; Farris et al., 1994
). Results with a P value <0.05 indicate an incongruence between topologies derived from two different sources of data. However, whether to combine the data despite a significant incongruence remains debatable (Hibbett and Donoghue, 2001
).
RPB1 intron sequences were analyzed using maximum parsimony separately and in combination with exon sequences. A large number of indels, many overlapping, occurred in the intron 2 alignment that include distantly related taxa. These indels were scored as missing.
Maximum likelihood analyses relied on models determined as best-fits to each data set by comparing different nested models of DNA substitution in a hierarchical hypothesis-testing framework following the likelihood ratio test as implemented by MODELTEST version 3.04 (Posada and Crandall, 1998
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Phylogenetic inference from nLSU sequences
Our MP (maximum parsimony) data set resulted in six equally parsimonious trees produced from 1292 total sites, of which 132 are parsimony informative. One of the six trees is shown in Fig. 3a. Although the deeper topology is resolved in a strict consensus of the six most parsimonious trees, only four clades receive >70% boostrap support. Support for the monophyly of the genus Inocybe (99%) and the sister position of the genus Phaeomarasmius (93%) is high, but confidence elsewhere is restricted to the two sets of closely related species pairs, pudica-agglutinata and lanuginosa-leptophylla. However, the two longest branches on the tree, I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis" form a moderately supported clade with 63% bootstrap support. This result is surprising because I. "serpitocystis" shares a morphological synapomorphy, necropigmented basidia, with dulcamara-Inocybe sp. PBM 1615, two members of subgenus Mallocybe. Clade I, composed of five smooth-spored species with hymenial metuloid cystidia, is more clearly resolved by WP and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses (Fig. 3ac). Additionally, weak monophyletic relationships are suggested for stirps Lanuginosa sensu R. Heim (lanuginosa-leptophylla-stellatospora) (Heim, 1931
; Matheny and Kropp, 2001
) and section 5 or the "Geophyllinae" (agglutinata-pudica-godeyi) of Singer (1986)
, neither of which is monophyletic in a strict consensus of the most parsimonious trees nor by any other data set, whether using MP, WP, or ML. A separate analysis included 37 gaps, which contributed 14 additional parsimony informative sites and reduced the number of MP optimal trees to four without significantly affecting bootstrap support (data not shown).
|
A Tamura-Nei model with unequal base frequencies, an estimated proportion of invariable sites, and an estimated gamma distribution shape parameter was determined as the best-fit model to the data by MODELTEST (Table 4). The ML tree (Fig. 3c) is largely congruent with the WP tree shown except for a few rearrangements within subgenus Inocybe that receive poor bootstrap support in both the MP and WP treatments. Unlike the MP analysis, the ML and WP results do not support a clade of I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis" (with 63% bootstrap support under MP). Furthermore, both WP and ML support a basal position for lanuginosa-leptophylla within subgenus Inocybe. Overall, WP records six clades with >70% bootstrap support, and WP plus gaps recovers a single most parsimonious tree. The inclusion of gaps, however, reduces the number of clades with >70% bootstrap support to four (data not shown).
Phylogenetic inference from RPB1 exon sequences
A total of 642 sites, 233 of them parsimony informative, were obtained from RPB1 exon sequence data. Thirty-four (15%) informative sites occur at first-codon positions, 14 (6%) at second-codon positions, and 185 (79%) at third-codon positions. Eight equally most parsimonious trees were recovered, one of which is presented (Fig. 3d). The outer backbone of this tree is resolved with moderate to strong bootstrap support unlike the nLSU trees. Inocybe "serpitocystis" joins a resolved and moderately supported clade with dulcamara-Inocybe sp. PBM 1615, two northern hemispheric members of subgenus Mallocybe. In fact, this relationship is supported by a high bootstrap value (75%) and anatomical similarities (P. B. Matheny, unpublished data) and conflicts with the MP nLSU tree. Inocybe hirsuta var. maxima is basal in our sample with moderate bootstrap support (69%). Additionally, I. maculata is supported as sister to subgenus Inocybe with moderate confidence (bootstrap = 71%). In contrast, none of the nLSU analyses provided any confidence for this sister relationship. Subgenus Inocybe, indicated by an arrow, receives strong boostrap support compared to the nLSU-MP results (63%
100%). Inocybe lacera is indicated as basal in subgenus Inocybe, but this branch collapses in the strict consensus of the eight most parsimonious trees. Inocybe praetervisa and I. calospora, which form a poorly resolved and weakly supported clade in nLSU-MP, receive moderate boostrap support (59%) and do not collapse in the RPB1-MP strict consensus tree. Overall, eight clades receive >70% bootstrap support compared to four for the nLSU-MP data.
Differentially weighting the RPB1 data set results in a single most parsimonious tree (Fig. 3e). The higher level branching order outside subgenus Inocybe remains the same in the RPB1-MP data set except for the placement of I. hirsuta var. maxima, which now occupies a weakly supported branch basal to I. maculata. Resolution and high confidence are maintained for a clade of the three samples with necropigmented basidia, I. "serpitocystis" and dulcamara-Inocybe sp. PBM 1615, again in contrast to the poor resolution and moderate to weak bootstrap support from the nLSU data. Within subgenus Inocybe, two principal clades, one of five smooth-spored species (clade I), the other of four nodulose-spored species (clade II), are resolved but lack bootstrap support. Inocybe relicina is supported weakly as basal in this subgenus. The positions of I. lacera, I. stellatospora, and Inocybe sp. BK 8-Feb-99-1 are resolved but poorly supported by bootstrapping. These three taxa stem from very short internodes and their positions in other trees are just as poorly supported or not resolved in consensus trees. The bootstrap support for agglutinata-pudica increases in the WP analysis (75
90%).
The model bestfit to the RPB1 data is a Tamura-Nei model with equal base frequencies, an estimated proportion of invariable sites, and an estimated gamma distribution shape parameter (Table 3). The CT transitions occur at a slightly higher rate than the AG transitions. The ML tree agrees with the MP tree in the branching order of those taxa basal to I. relicina. However, as in the WP tree, I. relicina is basal within subgenus Inocybe. Clades I and II in subgenus Inocybe are maintained by the ML tree. The positions of I. stellatospora, I. lacera, and Inocybe sp. BK 8-Feb-99-1 are not in agreement with any other analysis.
Phylogenetic inference based upon intron 2 sequences
Sequences of intron 2 across the RPB1 data set contributed 116 parsimony-informative sites out of 462 sites that could be aligned. The 5' half of this intron, approximately the first 260 bp, is remarkably invariant while the latter half of the intron is highly variable. Over 50 indels were recorded, many of which overlap and thus would contribute missing data to the matrix if rescored under simple indel coding (Simmons and Ochoterena, 2000)
. Thus, the indels in this region were scored as missing. The complete intron sequence of I. dulcamara was not obtained, so it was omitted from the parsimony analysis. An MP analysis of this data set produced 27 equally most parsimonious trees with a resolved backbone but little resolution within subgenus Inocybe (trees not shown). Only two highly supported relationships within subgenus Inocybe are recovered by the intronic sequence, relationships equally well recovered by previous analyses (lanuginosa-leptophylla and agglutinata-pudica). The deeper topology is similar to other trees with the exception that Inocybe sp. PBM 1615, I. "serpitocystis," I. hirusuta var. maxima, and I. maculata form a paraphyletic grade. The intron 2 data, like the RPB1 exon sequences, do not support a clade of I. "serpitocystis" and I. hirsuta var. maxima.
Partition homogeneity tests between RPB1 exon sequences and intron 2, on the one hand, and nLSU and intron 2, on the other, yielded nonsignificant results (P = 0.320 and P = 0.410, respectively). However, the addition of intron 2 sequences to the RPB1 and nLSU data failed to improve resolution. One of the four MP trees produced the exact same topology without the intron sequences and with similar bootstrap values (trees not shown). An analysis including weighted nLSU and exon sequences plus equally weighted intron 2 sequences produced four equally parsimonious trees, all of which supported the basal position of I. relicina in subgenus Inocybe in contrast to the WP analysis without the intron, which places I. stellataspora basal to I. relicina. Again, bootstrap support values were very similar to the WP analysis without the intron.
Given the higher level of our taxonomic questions, the accelerated rate of change in intron 3 prohibited its employment in our phylogenetic analyses. However, this small intron might be useful in addition to exon sequences and intron 2 sequences to infer relationships of closely related species or populations within a species.
The nLSU and RPB1 exon data combined
Because moderately supported conflict exists over the placement of I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis," we partitioned the two data sets and performed a test of congruence using the partition homogeneity test in PAUP*. The result of this test (P = 0.080) suggests that the conflict between the two data sets does not statistically merit incongruence. As suggested by Wiens (1998)
, we chose to combine the two data sets since major portions of the trees indicate a shared evolutionary history for the two genes. The combined data set results in 365 parsimony informative sites from a total of 1934 sites and two equally most parsimonious trees under the MP criterion. One of these trees is shown as Fig. 4a. Nine clades with >70% bootstrap support are recovered compared to eight for the RPB1 data and four for the nLSU data alone. The combined data indicate for the first time moderate bootstrap support (71%) for clade I, composed of five smooth-spored species. Clade II, however, is weakly supported and not well resolved because subtending branches collapse in the strict consensus of the two most parsimonious trees. However, within clade II I. praetervisa and I. calospora form a strong monophyletic group (90% bootstrap support), which at best is weakly supported by the RPB1 or nLSU data alone. Basal to clade II, a nodulose-spored clade, are the poorly resolved I. lacera and Inocybe sp. BK 8-Feb-99-1. The basal position of I. stellatospora in subgenus Inocybe is not entirely resolved across MP, WP, and ML analyses; and although I. hirsuta var. maxima is inserted into a clade with I. dulcamara, Inocybe sp. PBM 1615, and I. "serpitocystis" under MP and ML criteria, this relationship is not supported by the WP analysis.
|
The ML tree (Fig. 4c), generated by a Tamura-Nei model (Table 4), supports clades I and II but places I. relicina in the basal position in subgenus Inocybe. Unlike the WP analysis, I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis" do form a clade.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RPB1 contributes more parsimony-informative sites than the nLSU data set (Table 2). Furthermore, only one single amino acid indel occurs in the set of RNA polymerase II exon sequences, including the outgroups. Thus, alignment ambiguities are not encountered at our taxonomic level. Spliceosomal intron boundaries were confirmed by cDNA sequences, which enable the intronic regions to be identified easily.
Intron 2 sequences were alignable across all taxa, including three outgroup representatives. The first 260 bp and a downstream 50-bp region are remarkably conserved across our samples. Intervening regions, however, are highly variable and difficult to align except among closely related taxa. Inocybe stellatatospora and I. relicina, for example, are characterized by two nonhomologous and partially overlapping large deletions. Additionally, both I. corydalina and I. stellatospora share a 6-bp deletion, but this gap must be viewed as a homoplasious event because these two taxa do not share an immediate common ancestor. In contrast to the extraordinarily conserved 5' proximal region of intron 2, the last 200 bp would appear promising for resolving very closely related species. The large number of gaps and distantly related taxa complicate alignments of this region in our data set. Unexpected patterns of intron conservation have been reported previously (Mattick, 1994
), but we are unaware of the function of this intronic sequence.
Several topological distinctions are noted between the trees inferred for RPB1 and those for nLSU. RPB1, for example, demonstrates fairly uniform terminal branch lengths across taxa and exhibits a highly resolved outer backbone with moderate to strong support among higher level taxa (Fig. 3de). These results stand in contrast to the nLSU data sets that are characterized by heterogeneous terminal branch lengths, viz., I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis," and poor resolution along the outer backbone portion of the trees (Fig. 3ab). The positions of I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis" are tenuous because the long branches of these two species shuffle within the lower part of the tree with varying resolution and moderate to weak bootstrap support depending on the phylogenetic inference method. An RPB1 analysis of the same taxa produces a highly resolved and well-supported relationship that suggests I. "serpitocystis" is sister to a clade of north temperate members of subgenus Mallocybe, with which the sample shares a number of anatomical similarities (Fig. 3df). Moreover, the branch lengths of I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocystis" are consistent with those of other RPB1 samples and are not plagued by long-branch attraction. Additionally, the well-resolved but poorly supported clade II, discussed in detail below, is recovered by RPB1 sequences under WP and ML but not by our nLSU data.
Combined data sets increase resolution and confidence: clades I and II
Protein-coding sequences not only achieve independent assessments of ribosomal RNA phylogeny but also can be used in combination to raise the number of informative sites and amplify signal from either data set that otherwise is weak. For example, two clades are discussed below that are characterized by improved resolution, bootstrap support, or both when the data are combined.
Clade I: smooth-spored Inocybes with metuloid hymenial cystidia
A clade of five species (pudica-abietis) with smooth basidiospores and presence of metuloid hymenial cystidia was recovered across all data sets, whether examined individually or combined using either maximum parsimony or maximum likelihood (Figs. 3af, 4ac). Boostrap support among individual data sets is weak for clade I (<50%). However, when combined it receives 6671% bootstrap support. The nLSU-MP data set (Fig. 3a) suggests that section 5 or "Geophyllinae" (Singer, 1986
)including our I. pudica, I. agglutinata, and I. godeyiis monophyletic, however, the position of I. godeyi collapses in a strict consensus of this tree. Other analyses point to a nonmonophyletic result for this section. The interior clade of I. abietis and I. corydalina is recovered across all analyses with the exception of RPB1-MP and combined-ML. Only combined-WP suggests any bootstrap support for the clade (76%), which is composed of two different sections in Singer (1986)
(Fig. 4b). Smooth-spored species with metuloid hymenial cystidia excluded from clade I include I. lacera, a species with a boletoid to minimally angular spore outline, and the unidentified Nothofagus-associate from Argentina.
Clade II: nodulose-spored Inocybes of stirps Lanuginosa, section Marginatae, and section Calosporae
Clade II, composed of four species with nodulose basidiospores, is recovered by RPB1 data but not by the individual nLSU analyses. Combined data maintain the clade but with weak support (Fig. 4ab). Moreover, within clade II a confident relationship (7490% bootstrap support) is inferred by combined-MP and WP analyses for praetervisa-calospora, support for which is marginal based on the RPB1 data alone and weakly contradicted by nLSU-WP. This relationships is interesting because I. calospora was placed by Zerova (1974)
in a monotypic genus due to the unusual basidiospores that feature radial spinose nodules; additionally, I. praetervisa is the lectotype of the genus Astrosporina (Horak, 1968
). Both species, however, share entirely pruinose stipes and lack a cortina. Our results suggest praetervisa-calospora form a strongly supported clade inclusive within a larger clade that we have identified as subgenus Inocybe. Two nodulose-spored species are not members of clade II: I. stellatospora and I. relicina, the latter the type of Inocybe.
Current assessment of Inocybe phylogeny
Inocybe, as currently circumscribed by most taxonomists, is a large genus of agarics. Between 250 and 350 species, a conservative estimate, are represented throughout the world among a wide array of ectomycorrhizal hosts (Kuyper, 1986
). This number is likely an underestimate given that ectotrophic regions such as Australia (P. B. Matheny and N. L. Bougher, unpublished data) contain incompletely documented agaric floras. Our findings indicate that Inocybe is a monophyletic group although our sampling among outgroups is rather limited based on the data sets presented here. A higher-level study by Moncalvo et al. (2000)
also indicates the monophyly of Inocybe. Phylogenetic analyis of expanded nLSU data sets (P. B. Matheny, unpublished data) suggest that none of the following genera, Conocybe, Simocybe, Tubaria, Crepidotus, Agrocybe, Naucoria, Hypholoma, Flammulaster, Gymnopilus, Cortinarius, nor an Australian sample of Hymenogaster (in addition to Hebeloma, Phaeomarasmius, and Galerina) are derived within Inocybe.
Several monophyletic groups are recovered within Inocybe, some of which are clearly distinguished by their nLSU nucleotide sequences and RPB1 exon sequences. Combined sequences of RPB1 and nLSU regions suggest Inocybe is at least composed of four principal monophyletic groups: subgenus Inocybe (clade A), section Rimosae (clade B), subgenus Mallocybe (clade C), and section Cervicolores (clade D) (Fig. 4ac). These findings support a cladistic study of European representatives of the genus based on morphological characters (Kuyper, 1986
). Indeed, Kuyper suspected that subgenus Inosperma, containing sections Rimosae and Cervicolores (clades B and D, respectively), might not be monophyletic. However, the two loci sampled here support conflicting placement of the mallocyboid Australian sample I. "serpitocystis," and the Cervicolores sample, I. hirsuta var. maxima, which raises questions regarding their phylogeny. Their relationships must be interpreted as dubious in the nLSU analyses given the long branches they exhibit (Felsenstein, 1978
) (Fig. 3ac). RPB1 data suggest I. "serpitocystis" is sister to dulcamara-Inocybe sp. PBM 1615 with high bootstrap support (7583%), a relationship also supported by several morphological characters (P. B. Matheny, unpublished data). Combined data, however, suggest a unique result (Fig. 4ac) that itself is not consistent depending on the inference method used. Based on this evidence it is likely that a clade of I. hirsuta var. maxima and I. "serpitocytsis" is an artifact. Additional sources of data and continued sampling among similar taxa could alleviate their equivocal status. Nucleotide compositional bias appears not to be the source of the nLSU long-branch attraction.
Within subgenus Inocybe, which in combined analyses receives 100% bootstrap support, nodulose-spored species do not form a monophyletic group. Therefore, recognition of the genus Astrosporina, circumscribed by nodulose-spored taxa and typified by I. praetervisa, is not warranted. The name, however, could be applied to clade II, which contains I. praetervisa, but at a lower rank. Basal to clade II are I. lacera and Inocybe sp. BK 8-Feb-99-1, the latter a Nothofagus associate from Argentina with a cortina and amydaliform spore outline. Although this branching order lacks strong bootstrap support, it might suggest the derivation of the nodulose-spored condition from a minimally angular or an amydaliform-shaped state. Clade I in subgenus Inocybe consists entirely of species with amygdaliform to elliptic spore outlines. This clade receives moderate boostrap support (6671%) in combined parsimony analyses and represents three different sections in Singer (1986)
. One of these, section 5 or "Geophyllinae" is likely not monophyletic unless I. godeyi is excluded. Clade I also contains a species, I. corydalina, which is remarkable for its lack of muscarine and possession of psilocybin, an hallucinogenic compound (Besl and Mack, 1985
; Stijve, Klan, and Kuyper, 1985
). Distributed among these two clades are members of "supersection" Marginatae sensu Kuyper (1986)
, a monophyletic group inferred by morphological characters, viz. lack of a cortina. The monophyly of the "supersection" is not supported here because I. praetervisa, I. abietis, and I. godeyi never form a clade in any analysis.
Resolution of the sister group to subgenus Inocybe is improved when combining data sets or treating RPB1 data alone. Section Rimosae (clade B) is supported as sister to subgenus Inocybe (clade A) no matter the method and with moderate to high bootstrap support (71% MP; 83% WP) in these analyses (Fig. 4ac).
Although this study does not rigorously evaluate a large number of outgroups to determine a sister-level relationship to Inocybe, it suggests that the genus Phaeomarasmius (Strophariaceae) is more closely related to Inocybe (Cortinariaceae) than is Galerina (Cortinariaceae) in contrast to a morphological numerical analysis of these relationships (Machol and Singer, 1971
). Moreover, Moncalvo et al. (2000)
have shown that the Cortinariaceae are likely not a monophyletic group. However, their analyses fail to indicate any well-supported sister group to Inocybe. Compounding this lack of resolution is the problem that neighboring genera such as Phaeomarasmius, Flammulaster, Tubaria, and Simocybe are incompletely known (Horak, 1979
). Furthermore, future research should consider the systematic placement of Fissolimbus and Asproinocybe, two genera with various inocyboid features (Singer, 1986
).
Concluding remarks
Taxon sampling has been demonstrated to be problematic in our nLSU data set due to the presence of two long branches and lack of resolution and support in the remainder of the topology when independently evaluated by protein-coding sequences. Other sources of data are needed not only to assess the nLSU estimate, but to infer the phylogeny where nLSU data suggest doubt. In contrast, most regions of our RPB1 phylogeny are stable despite the inclusion of the taxa that are problematic in our nLSU estimates. Moreover, when assessed by different methods of phylogenetic inference, the RPB1 data tend to yield more consistent results.
Classification is an additional problematic issue since the four (or five) principal lineages within Inocybe are almost as distinct from each other as from the outgroup representatives. Yet, these lineages are classified at different ranks. Alternatives include recognition of the lineages as sections, subgenera, or genera. Due to the high amount of pairwise distance dissimilarities among the inocyboid lineages and outgroups, it would appear justified to relegate the lineages to generic rank and accept Jülich's intuitive proposal for the family Inocybeaceae. Additional sampling from multiple genes across sections Rimosae, Cervicolores, subgenus Mallocybe, southern hemispheric relatives, and additional outgroups are envisioned prior to any reclassification.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
4 Author for reprint requests (matheny{at}u.washington.edu
) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Benjamin D. R. 1995 Mushrooms: poisons and panaceas. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA
Besl H. P. Mack 1985 Halluzinogene Rißpilze. Zeitschrift für Mykologie 51: 183-184
Binder M. H. Besl A. Bresinsky 1997 Agaricales odor Boletales? Molekularbiologische Befunde zur Zuordnung einiger umstrittener Taxa. Zeitschrift für Mykologie 63: 189-196
Boidin J. 1986 Intercompatibility and the species concept in the saprobic basidiomycotina. Mycotaxon 26: 319-336[ISI]
Bon M. 1991 Les noms qui changent (suite... sans fin!). Documents mycologiques 20: (82)51-59
Bon M. 1997a Cle monographique du genre Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. (1ère partie: généralités et espèces acystidiées = Ss.-g. Inosperma Kühner). Documents mycologiques 27: (105)1-51
Bon M. 1997b Cle monographique du genre Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. (2 partie: sous-genre Inocybe = Inocybium (Earle) Sing). Documents mycologiques 27: (108)1-77
Bon M. 1998 Cle monographique du genre Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. (3ème partie: espèces gibbosporées, = Ss.-g. Clypeus Britz. = genre Astrosporina Schroet). Documents mycologiques 28: (111)1-45
Bresinsky A. H. Besl 1990 A colour atlas of poisonous fungi. Wolfe Publishing, London, UK
Bruns T. D. T. J. White J. W. Taylor 1991 Fungal molecular systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 525-564
Buyck B. G. Eyssartier 1999 Two new species of Inocybe (Cortinariaceae) from African woodland. Kew Bulletin 54: 675-681[CrossRef]
Dahlman M. E. Danell J. W. Spatafora 2000 Molecular systematics of Craterellus: cladistic analysis of nuclear nLSU rDNA sequence data. Mycological Research 104: 388-394[CrossRef][ISI]
Denton A. L. B. L. McConaughy B. D. Hall 1998 Usefulness of RNA polymerase II coding sequences for estimation of green plant phylogeny. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1082-1085[ISI][Medline]
Drehmel D. R. Vilgalys J. Moncalvo 1999 Molecular phylogeny of Amanita based on large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences: implications for taxonomy and character evolution. Mycologia 91: 610-618[CrossRef][ISI]
Farris J. S. M. Källersjö A. G. Kulge C. Bult 1994 Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319[CrossRef][ISI]
Felsenstein J. 1978 Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410[CrossRef][ISI]
Felsenstein J. 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791[CrossRef][ISI]
Foster P. G. D. A. Hickey 1999 Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. Journal of Molecular Evolution 48: 284-290[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fries E. 18211832 Systema mycologicum, sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species hucusque cognitas. Gryphiswaldiae
Gartz J. G. Drewitz 1985 Der erste Nachweis des Vorkommens von Psilocybin in Rißpilen. Zeitschrift für Mykologie 51: 199-203
Grubisha L. C. J. M. Trappe R. Molina J. W. Spatafora 2001 Biology of the ectomycorrhizal genus Rhizopogon. V. Phylogenetic relationships in the Boletales inferred from nLSU rDNA sequences. Mycologia 93: 82-89[CrossRef][ISI]
Gurr S. J. S. E. Unkles J. R. Kinghorn 1988 The structure and organisation of nuclear genes in filamentous fungi. In J. R. Kinghorn [ed.], Gene structure in eukaryotic microbes, 93139. IRL Press, Oxford, UK
Heim R. 1931 Le genre Inocybe, encyclopedie mycologique 1. Paul Lechevalier & Fils, Paris, France
Hibbett D. S. 1992 Ribosomal RNA and fungal systematics. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 33: 533-556
Hibbett D. S. M. J. Donoghue 2001 Analysis of character correlations among wood decay mechanisms, mating systems, and substrate ranges in Homobasidiomycetes. Systematic Biology 50: 215-242[ISI][Medline]
Hillis D. M. J. P. Huelsenbeck D. L. Swofford 1994 Hobgoblin of phylogenetics?. Nature 369: 363-364[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirt R. P. J. M. Logsdon Jr. B. Healy M. W. Dorey W. F. Doolittle T. M. Embley 1999 Microsporidia are related to fungi: evidence from the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and other proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 580-585
Holmgren P. K. N. H. Holmgren L. C. Barnett 1990 Index herbariorum. 8th ed. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA
Hopple J. S., Jr. R. Vilgalys 1999 Phylogenetic relationships in the mushroom genus Coprinus and dark-spored allies based on sequence data from the nuclear gene coding for large ribosomal subunit RNA: divergent domains, outgroups, and monophyly. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 1-19[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Horak E. 1977 Fungi agaricini Novaezelandiae VI. Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. and Astrosporina Schroeter. New Zealand Journal of Botany 15: 713-747[ISI]
Horak E. 1979 New and interesting species of Phaeomarasmius (Agaricales) from Papua New Guinea and adjacent regions. Sydowia 32: 167-180
Horgen P. A. A. C. Vaisius J. F. Ammirati 1978 The insensitivity of mushroom nuclear RNA polymerase activity to inhibition by amatoxins. Archives of Microbiology 118: 317-319[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hughey B. D. G. C. Adams T. D. Bruns D. S. Hibbett 2000 Phylogeny of Calostoma, the gelatinous-stalked puffball, based on nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 92: 94-104
Iwabe N. K. Kuma H. Kishino M. Hasegawa T. Miyata 1991 Evolution of RNA polymerases and branching patterns of the three major groups of archaebacteria. Journal of Molecular Evolution 32: 70-78[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jülich W. 1981 Higher taxa of Basidiomycetes. Bibliotheca Mycologica 85. Cramer, Vaduz
Klenk H. P. W. Zillig M. Lanzendörfer B. Grampp P. Palm 1995 Location of protist lineages in a phylogenetic tree inferred from sequences of DNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Archiv für Protistenkunde 145: 221-230
Kobayashi T. 1993 A new subgenus of Inocybe, Leptocybe from Japan. Mycotaxon 48: 459-469[ISI]
Kobayashi T. R. Courtecuisse 2000 Two new species of Inocybe, section Marginatae (Agaricales, Cortinariaceae). Mycoscience 41: 161-166[CrossRef]
Kohn L. M. 1992 Developing new characters for fungal systematics: an experimental approach for determining the rank of resolution. Mycologia 94: 139-153
Kretzer A. M. T. D. Bruns 1999 Use of atp6 in fungal phylogenetics: an example from the Boletales. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 483-492[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kühner R. 1980 Les Hyménomycètes agaricoïdes. Numéro spécial du Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, Lyon, France
Kühner R. H. Romagnesi 1953 Flore analytique des champignons supérieurs. Masson et Cie, Paris, France
Kuyper T. W. 1986 A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe. I. Subgenus Inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe. Persoonia Supplement 3: V-247
Lange J. 1917 The genus Inocybe. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 2: 23-50
Liu Y. J. S. Whelen B. D. Hall 1999 Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1799-1808[Abstract]
Machol R. E. R. Singer 1971 Bayesian analysis of generic relations in Agaricales. Nova Hedwigia 21: 753-787
Massee G. 1904 A monograph of the genus Inocybe, Karsten. Annals of Botany 18: 459-504
Matheny P. B. B. R. Kropp 2001 A revision of the Inocybe lanuginosa group and allied species in North America. Sydowia 53: 93-139