Am. J. Bot. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, R. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, R. N.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:602-612.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Population Biology

Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): differentiation in the eastern United States1

Elizabeth Bartlett2, Stephen J. Novak3 and Richard N. Mack2,4

2School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-4238 USA; 3Department of Biology, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive B, Boise, Idaho 83725 USA

Received for publication April 3, 2001. Accepted for publication November 6, 2001.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Bromus tectorum, a devastating plant invader in western North America, had entered Pennsylvania by 1790. Although rare, or extirpated, in the east until the 1850s, it was collected with increasing frequency after 1859 from Vermont to Virginia. Using enzyme electrophoresis, we analyzed 38 populations of this grass in the eastern U.S. to determine their genetic variation and structure as well as assess their relatedness to populations in the west. Genetic variation among eastern U.S. populations is low: mean number of alleles per locus (A), percent polymorphic loci per population (%P), and expected heterozygosity (Hexp) are 1.01, 1.05%, and 0.002, respectively. No heterozygotes were detected. The eastern populations are genetically similar: mean genetic identity for all populations was 0.990 with values among population pairs ranged from 0.913 to 1.000. Thirteen populations in eastern and western North America shared Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a, while eight populations shared Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b. Other alleles detected in western North America (Got-4c, Got-4d, and Pgi-2b) were not, however, found in eastern U.S. populations. The invasion of North America by B. tectorum occurred through multiple introductions on both coasts; results from historical and genetic evidence suggest that eastern populations stem from a minimum of two introductions. The 19th century westward spread of B. tectorum from the East appears to be plausible.

Key Words: allozyme variation • biotic invasion • Bromus tectorum • cheatgrass • genetic bottleneck • multiple introductions • Poaceae


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Unraveling the history of a biotic invasion in terms of its genetic consequences for the invader often forces researchers to follow a circuitous path (Stirton, 1977 ; Garcia et al., 1989 ). In its simplest and least likely scenario, an invasion stems from the genetic sampling (sensu Lindroth, 1957 ) of emigrants in a species' native range that encompasses all the species' genetic variation (Taylor and Walker, 1984 ; Williams, Mack, and Black, 1995 ). The organisms are then transported directly to a new range environmentally similar to their native range. These immigrants readily produce descendants that retain the genetic structure of native ancestral populations (Arthington and Mitchell, 1986 ; Barrett, 1989 ). Their proliferation is the direct result of preadaptation for the new range and the selection forces this preadaptation produces (Grant, 1963 ).

Each step in the scenario outlined above can vary substantially. Emigrants usually stem from genetic sampling in a highly restricted area within the native range and thus may reflect only a portion of the species' genetic variation (Barrett and Richardson [1986 ] and references therein). Additionally, any invasion may be the product of comingled descendants of separate introductions of immigrants; these founder populations likely differ in date of arrival, size, source area, and genetic structure (Burdon, Marshall, and Groves, 1980 ; Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ). Furthermore, the route to a new range may be a multistep odyssey in which the immigrants are not derived directly from the native range but from one or more other new ranges, i.e., spread occurs in a "stepping-stone" process (e.g., the spread of Lantana camara across Oceania; Thaman, 1974 ). Finally, the invader's genetic variation and structure would likely reflect the permutations of genetic sampling and dispersal as well as the natural selection, genetic drift, and even mutation that have occurred along this circuitous journey as well as in the new range (Waddington, 1965 ; Mayr, 1982 ). As a result, any attempt to reconstruct the evolutionary history of an invader must identify and evaluate the potential for these confounding forces to have acted on the species in question.

Identifying and quantifying these confounding forces is facilitated by incorporating knowledge of the areal extent of an invader's native and introduced ranges and its introduction history (e.g., dates, locations, circumstances) and by comparing the genetic structure of populations from native and introduced ranges (Mascie-Taylor and Lasker, 1988 ; Garcia et al., 1989 ; Malacrida et al., 1998 ). By identifying the same alleles in native and introduced ranges and correlating the geographical distribution of these alleles with introduction history, plausible scenarios can be constructed that explain the genetic consequences of the invader's introduction and subsequent spread. We have employed this approach in our ongoing reconstruction of the introduction and spread of Bromus tectorum L. in North America (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991, 1993 ; Novak and Mack, 1993 ).

Bromus tectorum, a predominantly cleistogamous, diploid (2n = 14), annual grass, was introduced from its Eurasian native range into North America (Mack, 1981 ; Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1993 ). The grass has had an exceptionally long association with humans in general and with nonirrigated crops, in particular (Hegi, 1931 ). The grass's specific epiphet, tectorum, recognizes its common habitat in 18th century Europe, which was the thatched roofs of dwellings (Leopold, 1949 ); it likely entered and spread through its new range as a seed contaminant (Mack, 1981 ). In an era in which contamination or adulteration of crop seeds with weeds seeds was rampant (Mack, 1986 ), its early arrival with pre-1800 European settlement along the North American coastline seems plausible. Yet its early collection history in eastern North America is puzzling. Wood (1863) , whose study includes northeastern United States flora, lists B. tectoram L. (sic). But the most authoritative regional flora for the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, Gray's Manual of Botany, does not list the grass until the sixth edition in 1889, although half a dozen other alien bromes were reported in its consecutive editions, which began in 1848. Little more heretofore had apparently been assembled about B. tectorum in pre-20th century eastern North America (Klemmedson and Smith, 1964 ) that could be compared with the much more comprehensive knowledge of its entry and spread into western North America (Mack, 1981 ; Yensen, 1981 ).

Based on the 111 populations examined previously, genetic variation in B. tectorum appears low in both native and introduced ranges compared to other diploid seed plants (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ; Novak and Mack, 1993 ). Across all introduced populations, only 28% of the loci are polymorphic compared to 52% in the native range (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ; Novak and Mack, 1993 ). The level of diversity within populations is, however, higher in the introduced range on average, while genetic differentiation among both populations and regions is greater in the native range (Novak and Mack, 1993 ). Significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium are apparent in both ranges. Novak and Mack (1993) considered that the higher within-population component of genetic diversity in the introduced range could be the result of multiple introductions: a minimum of five separate founder events have been detected in western North America (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1993 ).

These conclusions were drawn with little genetic information about the now widespread populations of B. tectorum east of the Mississippi River in the U.S. (Hitchcock and Chase, 1971 ). Thus, the paucity of allozyme data from eastern populations has been a handicap in forming a comprehensive view of the species' genetic variation and structure in North America. Furthermore, lack of comprehensive collections from the easternmost USA hampers any resolution of whether (and to what extent) the enormous populations of B. tectorum in western North America are descended from populations that first became established along the Atlantic seaboard.

By employing both historical records and enzyme electrophoresis for populations of B. tectorum in eastern U.S., we attempted to answer the following questions: (1) Can the historical record, based on early floras, contemporaneous accounts, and most reliably, herbarium specimens, shed further light on a minimum date by when the grass had entered the eastern USA? (2) How does the level of variation compare between eastern U.S. populations and populations previously reported from elsewhere in North America and Eurasia? (3) What is the genetic structure among eastern U.S. populations compared with native Eurasian and other North American populations? (4) What genetic contribution (if any) did populations in the eastern USA make to what became the more abundant populations in the West? (5) Can source populations in Eurasia be identified for these eastern U.S. populations? With these data we attempt to establish the minimum number of introductions and infer the significance of founder effects for eastern U.S. populations of B. tectorum.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Plant material
Thirty-four populations of Bromus tectorum were sampled in the eastern United States in spring 1995 and June 1996. Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1991) earlier assigned populations in North America to four geographical regions: the USA east of the Rocky Mountains, Nevada-California, Intermountain West, and British Columbia. This initial analysis of B. tectorum east of the Rocky Mountains was based on only 14 widely separated populations, with only 4 of these populations (Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA; S. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Tinicum, Pennsylvania, USA; and Kentucky, USA) actually located east of the Mississippi River (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991, 1993 ). Populations in the native range were assigned to two regions: Europe and Southwest Asia (Novak and Mack, 1993 ). Geographical partitioning was designed to consider European settlement by humans in introduced ranges, to detect multiple introductions, and to compare variation within and among native compared with introduced ranges.

Populations of B. tectorum included in this analysis were found in disturbed habitats near roadsides, railroad tracks, abandoned fields, and construction sites. The populations were located by either revisiting sites based on herbarium records or by new searches. Collecting along interstate highways was avoided because it is less likely that these populations accurately represent genotypes originally introduced in these locales. We made a deliberate attempt to collect in coastal areas because the grass may have entered at 18th- and 19th-century ports. Bromus tectorum was frequently found along or near the eastern coast, north from Virginia to southern Maine. However, the grass was not found along the coast of North Carolina, South Carolina, or Georgia; only inland populations were sampled from these states (Fig. 1).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Locations of the 38 populations of Bromus tectorum analyzed in this study. Numbers in the figure correspond to the population designation and locations listed in Table 2

 
Each collection consisted of mature panicles collected throughout the whole population, where populations occupied areas from 100 to 1000 m2. An attempt was made to collect only from populations occupying >500 m2. To ensure accurate estimations of genetic diversity, individuals were collected at least 1 m apart to minimize the likelihood of sampling closely related individuals. Approximately 30 individuals were collected from each population, and the panicle of each individual was placed in a separate envelope.

Enzyme electrophoresis
In the laboratory, one seed from each individual in a population was germinated on moistened filter paper in a petri dish and harvested approximately 5–7 d after germination. Starch gel electrophoresis was performed following Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1991) . The following 15 enzymes were assayed: alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldolase (ALD), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), glutamate oxalacetate transaminase (GOT), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), malic enzyme (ME), phosphoglucoisomerase (PGI), phosphoglucomutase (PGM), 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD), shikimate dehydrogenase (SKDH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and triosephosphate isomerase (TPI). Nomenclature for loci and alleles follows Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1991) and Novak and Mack (1993) .

Data analysis
Electrophoresis data were analyzed using BIOSYS-1 (Swofford and Selander, 1987 ) to obtain the same parameters reported in Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1991) and Novak and Mack (1993) . Computed estimates of the genetic variability for B. tectorum were the mean number of alleles per locus (A), the percent polymorphic loci per population (%P at the 99% criterion), and observed and expected mean heterozygosity (Hobs and Hexp, respectively). Observed heterozygosity was determined by the direct count method; expected heterozygosity was determined by the unbiased estimate method of Nei (1978) , which adjusts for small sample sizes. The parameter, expected mean heterozygosity, is equivalent to expected genetic diversity.

Values for Wright's fixation index (F) at each polymorphic locus were analyzed using a chi-square test (Wright, 1965 ). We calculated Nei's (1973, 1977) gene diversity statistics from the variance components provided in the output of the Wright-78 analysis of BIOSYS-1. Total gene (allelic) diversity (HT) was partitioned into within- (HS) and among-population (DST) components, with the proportion of the total genetic diversity partitioned among populations calculated as GST = DST/HT. Nei's (1978) unbiased genetic identity coefficients (I) were calculated for all population pairs. Values of I can range from 0.000 to 1.000, where a value of 1.000 indicates that a population pair is genetically identical. Two phenograms based on Nei's genetic identity values were generated using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averaging (UPGMA) algorithm (Swofford and Selander, 1987 ). The first phenogram was generated for 38 populations of B. tectorum from eastern USA and the second phenogram was generated for all 94 North American populations of B. tectorum analyzed to date.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Genetic variability
Results for the 34 populations of Bromus tectorum described above are combined with the results for the four easternmost populations analyzed previously (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ). Thus, our estimate of genetic variability in eastern U.S. populations of B. tectorum was based on the combined analysis of 1248 individuals from 38 populations (Fig. 1). Genetic variability of all 1248 individuals was assessed using results for the same 25 loci, as previously described for B. tectorum (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ). The mean number of individuals sampled per population was 32.8, a slightly smaller mean population size than that reported by Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1991) .

Four loci (16%) were polymorphic across all 38 eastern populations: Mdh-2, Mdh-3, Pgm-1, and Pgm-2 (Table 1). For each polymorphic population, both Mdh-2 and Mdh-3 displayed the same allele frequencies; this result was also observed for Pgm-1 and Pgm-2 (Table 1). One individual from Bryson City, North Carolina, USA, and 11 from Holland, Virginia, USA, expressed Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b (allele frequencies equal 0.033 and 0.275, respectively). Mdh-2a and Mdh-3a are fixed in all other populations. One individual from Bryson City, North Carolina, USA; four from Burnsville, North Carolina, USA; 20 from Kiptopeke, Virginia, USA; and all 35 individuals from Lexington, Kentucky, USA, displayed Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a (0.033, 0.211, 0.909, and 1.000, respectively). Pgm-1b and Pgm-2b are fixed in all other populations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Allelic frequencies at polymorphic loci for populations of Bromus tectorum from eastern USA that exhibit variability relative to the most common genotype. The most common genotype was detected in 33 of 38 eastern U.S. populations. Sample size for each variable population is given in parentheses

 
We detected 29 alleles at the 25 loci scored for these 38 populations (a mean of 1.16 alleles per locus). Only four of 38 populations analyzed in this study are polymorphic; these four populations are located in either Virginia or North Carolina. Within populations, on average A was 1.01, %P was 1.05%, and Hexp was 0.002 (Tables 2 and 3). The population at Bryson City displayed the highest value of A (1.16) and %P (16%) (Table 2). This Bryson City population is unique in that it expresses variability at four loci (Table 1): one individual displayed Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b, while another individual possessed Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a. Because only two individuals in this population were variable, it also possessed the lowest value for Hexp (0.010) among populations that were polymorphic (Table 2). For all other polymorphic populations (Burnsville, Holland, and Kiptopeke), A (1.08) and %P (8.00%) were the same, and values of Hexp were 0.027, 0.032, and 0.013, respectively. For all 94 North American populations analyzed, A was 1.03, %P was 3.36%, Hobs was 0.0000, and Hexp was 0.009. Averaged across all 145 populations of B. tectorum that we have analyzed, A was 1.03, %P was 2.92%, Hobs was 0.0000, and Hexp was 0.007 (Table 3). For all variable loci in each population, Wright's fixation index (F) is +1.0, indicating complete deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Chi-square analysis reveals that all ten polymorphic loci differed significantly (P < 0.001) from Hardy-Weinberg expectation (data not shown). Indeed, no heterozygous individuals occur in any of the populations included in this study (Hobs = 0.000, data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Measure of genetic variability for 38 eastern United States populations of Bromus tectorum: N is the number of individuals sampled in each population, A is the mean number of alleles per locus, %P is the percent polymorphic loci, and Hexp is the expected mean heterozygosity. The observed mean heterozygosity (Hobs) for all 38 eastern populations is 0.000

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Measures of genetic variability for Bromus tectorum summarized by regions in the native and introduced ranges and for North American, Eurasian, and all populations. All abbreviations are as given in Table 2

 
Population differentiation
For the 38 eastern U.S. populations analyzed here, the mean total allelic diversity (HT) is 0.075 (Table 4). The highest HT value occurs at the Pgm-1 and Pgm-2 (0.133 for both loci), and the lowest HT value occurs at Mdh-2 and Mdh-3 (0.016 for both loci). Most of the allelic diversity for Pgm-1 and Pgm-2 is partitioned among populations (DST for both loci is 0.118), while most of the allelic diversity at Mdh-2 and Mdh-3 is partitioned within populations (HS for both loci is 0.012). Therefore, GST values range from 0.233 for Mdh-2 and Mdh-3 to 0.886 for Pgm-1 and Pgm-2, and the mean value for all polymorphic loci is 0.560 (Table 4). A comparison of Nei's genetic diversity statistics for populations of B. tectorum by regions in North America is also provided (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Nei's gene diversity statistics for 38 eastern United States populations of Bromus tectorum. HT is the total gene diversity, HS is the within-population component, DST is the among-population component, and GST is the proportion of the total genetic diversity partitioned among populations

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Nei's gene diversity statistics summarized for Bromus tectorum by regions in North America. Abbreviations are as described in Table 4

 
Nei's (1978) unbiased genetic identity (I) coefficients are a measure of genetic similarity among populations. The mean value of I for 38 eastern U.S. populations of B. tectorum is 0.990, with values for individual population pairs ranging from 0.913 to 1.000 (data not shown). The lowest value of I for any pair-wise comparison (0.913) was observed for the populations from Holland, Virginia, USA, and Lexington, Kentucky, USA. Overall, these results indicate that eastern populations are very similar genetically. In fact, 33 of 38 populations (86.8%) are genetically identical (Table 1).

The two UPGMA phenograms provide graphic representations of the overall genetic similarity among populations from the eastern USA and all North American populations of B. tectorum (Figs. 2 and 3). Clustering of populations from eastern USA was determined by differences in the frequency of alleles at Mdh-2, Mdh-3, Pgm-1, and Pgm-2 (Fig. 2). The three populations in the most genetically distinct cluster (Kiptopeke, Lexington, and Burnsville) all possess a high frequency of Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a (Table 1). The population from Holland, Virginia, USA, forms a separate cluster because it possesses moderately high frequencies of Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b (0.275 for both loci). The variation exhibited within the Bryson City population is so low that this population is considered genetically equivalent to the monomorphic populations (Fig. 2). Population clustering in the phenogram of all 94 North American populations of B. tectorum was determined by variation in the occurrence and frequency of alleles at several loci (Got-4, Mdh-2, Mdh-3, Pgi-2, Pgm-1, and Pgm-2) (Fig. 3). Population clusters in the phenogram exhibiting this variation are indicated by capital letters (for further explanation see the Population differentiation section of the Discussion).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averaging (UPGMA) phenogram based on Nei's genetic identity values of all eastern U.S. populations of Bromus tectorum analyzed in this study. Postal code abbreviations are used for each population's state location

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averaging (UPGMA) phenogram based on Nei's genetic identity values for 98 North American populations of Bromus tectorum. The phenogram identified distinct clusters of populations: A, B, C, and D. Postal code abbreviations are used for each population's U.S. state or Canadian province location

 
Shared alleles
Each of the alleleic variants detected in eastern U.S. populations is also found among groups of populations in the native range (Table 6). For example, Mdh-2 and Mdh-3 occur in the Holland, Virginia, USA, and Bryson City, North Carolina, USA, populations, and these alleles were previously reported by Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1993) to occur in only two populations in the native range, Afghanistan-2 and Afghanistan-3. The same PGM alleles detected in Bryson City, Burnsville, Kiptopeke, and Lexington also occur in Vac, Hungary, Bratislava, Slovakia, Afghanistan-1 and Iran-1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Introduced populations of Bromus tectorum sampled in this study and native range populations of B. tectorum that share the same alleles. Data for native range populations from Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1993)

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Historical accounts, including floras, and herbarium specimens provide a clearer, if still imperfect, picture of the early history of Bromus tectorum in the eastern USA. The species' earliest record in North America of which we are aware is from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA. The grass was collected no later than November 1790 (Muhlenberg, 1793) . Although we cannot verify Muhlenberg's identification, he probably had the means to correctly identify the grass. A correctly labeled specimen of B. tectorum from Europe remains from his own herbarium, No. 241 (PH), the product of his receiving specimens from J. C. D. von Schreber, a German colleague (E. E. Spamer, Academy of Natural Sciences, personal communication). Presence of B. tectorum in the eastern USA for the next 70 yr is problematical. In Wood's (1863) report of "B. tectoram L." (sic) he also contends that Torrey's (1843) listing of B. sterilis for New York is the same species. But we are not aware whether the specimen(s) Torrey reputedly misidentified still exist(s). At least two hypotheses account for this lack of records of B. tectorum from the early 19th century. The first is that the species was present all along but simply overlooked. This hypothesis cannot be rejected, but eastern Pennsylvania, where Muhlenberg collected, was a center for plant collectors in the early 19th century. Yet neither Pursh (1814) , a regional flora, nor Torrey (1819) , a flora for New York City area (approximately 200 km away from Lancaster), nor Barton (1818) , a Philadelphia flora, report the grass. Alternatively, the population(s) Muhlenberg saw were later extirpated and the species' detection later in the 19th century stems from reintroductions.

Remarkable in this regard is the handwritten letter to an unknown recipient that accompanies the oldest specimen of B. tectorum in eastern North America that we have examined. The specimen was collected by Halliday Jackson in West Chester, Pennsylvania in 1859 (NY). We quote his letter.

West Chester June 13, 1859Respected Friend,The enclosed is a species of Bromus which I have found growing in this place. It seems to agree very much with B. ciliatus of Gray but not with B. purgans which I perceive is much synonymous with ciliatus and pubescens in thy work. My plant is not the B. ciliatus of Darlington's Flora (sic) Cestrica (?). The plant which he has described under this name appears to be the true B. pubescens. Dr. Darlington informs me that my plant differs from the B. ciliatus preserved in his herbarium.—If thou hast duplicate specimens of B. purgans. I should be much obliged for a specimen. The plant in question is very rare here—It appears to be a stranger and is confined to a single locality. It resembles very closely the B. tectorum of Europe, a dried specimen of which I have in my own herbarium...

Jackson was correct; the specimen is B. tectorum. Furthermore, his explicit reference to its rarity suggests (but of course does not demonstrate) that he had come across a recent introduction or even reintroduction of the grass into eastern Pennsylvania, approximately 60 km from the site of Muhlenberg's collection more than 70 yr earlier. Indirect support for the recent arrival of the grass is that Darlington's (1826) flora for West Chester (Chester County, Pennsylvania), as referred to above by Jackson, contains no mention of B. tectorum. Whatever its pre-1859 history, B. tectorum was uncommon in the eastern U.S. Miller and Young reportedly claimed that their finding of B. tectorum at the eastern end of Long Island was for a species, "never before reported in this country" (Anonymous, 1874) . Despite having already collected 871 species in their plant searches on Long Island, they had not detected B. tectorum until 1874 (Anonymous, 1874) . Their contention that B. tectorum was new to the USA was in error, but their collecting diligence argues that B. tectorum had not long been established. Its rarity, if not absence, through much of the 19th century is further suggested by the aforementioned absence of any mention of the grass until 1889 within Gray's comprehensive Manual of Botany, despite the fact that half a dozen other alien bromes were reported in consecutive editions beginning in 1848. Whether the pre-1880 specimens of B. tectorum now housed at the Gray Herbarium (GH) (Table 7) were deposited long after their collection dates is not known.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Earliest herbarium records (1859–1897) of B. tectorum for Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., USA. Repository abbreviations for specimens follow Stafleu (1974)

 
The frequency of its collection in the eastern U.S. apparently increased after 1860; at least there are many more records from this period. Records of the earliest herbarium specimens of B. tectorum from Vermont to Virginia of which we are aware reveal that the grass was being collected, perhaps for the first time, along much of the eastern seaboard post-1859 (Table 7). These records suggest, but once again cannot demonstrate, that multiple introductions had taken place. For example, B. tectorum was collected in Massachusetts in 1861, only 2 yr after Jackson found it in eastern Pennsylvania. It seems unlikely that these populations were descendants of the same immigrants.

Genetic variability
Allozyme variation within the 38 eastern U.S. populations of Bromus tectorum we examined is extremely low: only four of 38 populations exhibit any variation (i.e., are polymorphic). Low levels of genetic variability have often been observed for introduced plants, especially those that possess a self-pollinating mating systems (Brown and Marshall, 1981 ; Barrett and Richardson, 1986 ; Barrett and Shore, 1989 ; Barrett and Husband, 1990 ). However, the level of genetic variation reported here is very low even when compared to other introduced self-pollinating plants (Marshall and Weiss, 1982 ; Glover and Barrett, 1987 ; Garcia et al., 1989 ; Warwick, 1990 ; Perez, Garcia, and Allard, 1991 ; Neuffer, 1996 ). Based on a summary of electrophoretic studies compiled by Hamrick and Godt (1990) , the within-population variability of these 38 populations (A = 1.01, %P = 1.05%, and Hexp = 0.002) is low when compared to the mean value for all other plant species (A = 1.53, %P = 34.2%, and Hexp = 0.113); it is also low in comparison to other selfing plant species (A = 1.31, %P = 20.0%, and Hexp = 0.074).

Results from our analysis of additional eastern U.S. populations of B. tectorum are consistent with the estimate of genetic variation previously reported for eastern populations (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ). Equally low levels of genetic variation were detected within the 14 populations from east of the Rocky Mountains that were analyzed earlier (A = 1.01, %P = 1.14%, and Hexp = 0.003) and the 38 populations reported here (A = 1.01, %P = 1.05%, and Hexp = 0.002). The populations that were analyzed earlier were arrayed across the eastern two-thirds of the continent, as far west as Wyoming. In this study we sampled more populations, but across a much smaller geographical area. Yet, despite differences in the population sampling strategies employed, similar genetic variability estimates were obtained in each of these studies. For all 48 populations of B. tectorum from east of Rocky Mountains that have been analyzed to date (results of four populations are shared in the two data sets described above), A is 1.01, %P is 1.17%, and Hexp is 0.003 (data not shown).

Genetic variation within North American populations of B. tectorum exhibits strong regional differentiation. Among regions, eastern populations possess the lowest levels of genetic variation, populations from Nevada-California and the Intermountain West have intermediate values, and populations from British Columbia exhibit the highest levels (Table 3). In fact, the mean of genetic variation detected in eastern populations is the lowest of any region in either the native or introduced range of B. tectorum and most closely resembles the level of genetic variation observed in European populations (Novak and Mack, 1993 ).

We did not detect any heterozygous individuals among the 1248 plants analyzed from the introduced range of B. tectorum in eastern USA (data not shown). This finding is consistent with our previous results: in an analysis of 2141 individuals collected throughout North America, we did not detect a single heterozygous individual (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ). Even in the native range of B. tectorum, heterozygous individuals have been rarely detected (Novak and Mack, 1993 ). Thus, in comparison with other vascular plants, B. tectorum has an exceptionally high level of self-pollination (Schemske and Lande, 1985 ). These results for B. tectorum provide empirical support for the theory suggesting that a selfing mating system is selected for in plants that experience population bottlenecks through repeated colonization of new habitats by few individuals (Stebbins, 1957 ; Jain, 1976 ; Lande and Schemske, 1985 ; Holsinger, 1988 ).

Population differentiation
The mean value of HT for the 38 eastern U.S. populations of B. tectorum (0.075) is much lower than the value reported for populations from the other three geographic regions (Table 5). However, the diversity that does occur in eastern populations is, on average, mostly partitioned among populations. The mean value of GST for all polymorphic loci is 0.560 and indicates that 56.0% of the total allelic diversity in eastern U.S. populations is distributed among populations, whereas 44.0% is distributed within populations. The distribution of allelic diversity in these 38 eastern U.S. populations is exactly the same (GST = 0.560) as the distribution previously reported by Novak, Mack, and Soltis (1991) for 14 populations east of the Rocky Mountains (data not shown). In contrast to the populations from eastern USA, most of the genetic diversity of B. tectorum from the three western regions is partitioned within populations. In fact, the GST values for populations in the Intermountain West (0.241) and British Columbia (0.329) are one-half or almost one-half of that of eastern U.S. populations (0.560) (Table 4).

The mean genetic identity value for the 38 populations of B. tectorum analyzed in this study (I = 0.990) is consistent with the mean value previously reported for 60 North American populations (I = 0.980) (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ). These values indicate that the level of genetic similarity among all North American populations of B. tectorum is quite high. This similarity occurs because 43 of 94 (45.7%) North American populations from widely separated locations are fixed for the most common genotype (S. J. Novak and R. N. Mack, unpublished data). Moreover, the UPGMA phenogram of all North American populations of B. tectorum indicates that population clustering is not region specific. For instance, populations from Burnsville, North Carolina, USA; Kiptopeke, Virginia, USA; and Lexington, Kentucky, USA form cluster A with populations from Gunnison, Colorado, USA; Monte Creek, British Columbia, Canada; and Cache Creek, British Columbia, Canada. The population from Monte Creek, the most genetically distinct population in cluster A, was polymorphic at Pgm-1, Pgm-2, and Got-4 (Novak, 1990 ), while the other populations in this cluster were monomorphic for Got-4b.

Source populations
By identifying the same geographically restricted alleles in both native and introduced populations of B. tectorum (shared alleles), we previously identified potential source populations in Eurasia and inferred the introduction dynamics of the grass into North America (Novak and Mack, 1993 ; Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1993 ). Using this method, we identified several distinct populations or localities in the western Mediterranean, in central Europe, and in southwest (SW) Asia as potential sources of B. tectorum in North America. Results from the current study are generally consistent with our earlier findings. The alleles Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a are found in four populations from the native range in central Europe and SW Asia and four populations from eastern USA (Table 6). Additionally, these same alleles are also displayed in nine other North American populations: Norman, Oklahoma, USA; Gunnison, Colorado, USA; Tonasket, Washington, USA, and six populations in British Columbia (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1993 ). Within the introduced range of B. tectorum, Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b were both detected in two populations from eastern USA (Table 6) and six populations from western North America (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1993 ). These alleles were found in only two native range populations from SW Asia (Afghanistan-2 and Afghanistan-3), but not in Europe. Based on single-locus gene distributions, marker alleles introduced into the eastern USA appear to have been drawn either from central Europe, SW Asia, or both.

Introduction and spread of Bromus tectorum: allozyme evidence
Our initial analysis of B. tectorum from east of the Rocky Mountains (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991, 1993 ) was based on too few populations to assess accurately the grass' introduction and spread into the eastern USA. Results reported here now allow us to draw more reliable conclusions about the grass' regional introduction and spread. The Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a marker alleles occur in four eastern U.S. populations included in this analysis: Kiptopeke, Virginia, USA; Burnsville, North Carolina, USA; Bryson City, North Carolina, USA; and Lexington, Kentucky, USA. Also, we detected Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b in populations at Holland, Virginia, USA, and Bryson City, North Carolina, USA (Table 5). Consequently, eastern USA populations of B. tectorum appear to have arisen from a minimum of two separate introductions. Additional introductions may have taken place in the eastern USA but remain undetected because the immigrants and their descendants possess the same genotype. Marker alleles were detected in only 5 of 38 eastern U.S. populations; all other populations, including 25 populations found at localities extending from Maine to Delaware, are fixed for the most common genotype (S. J. Novak and R. N. Mack, unpublished data).

The repeated collection of B. tectorum in eastern North America after 1859 coupled with its subsequent collection almost four decades later in western North America (Mack, 1981 ) suggests that the grass could have spread westward with European settlers. This collection chronology also provides no support for a west to east invasion history. Occurrence of this species in eastern and western North America may stem instead from separate introductions. Our data suggest that the introduction and spread of B. tectorum probably occurred via both routes. For instance, populations with the Pgm-1a and Pgm-2a marker alleles have been detected in 13 localities that span North America; these results suggest that this genotype may first have been introduced in the east and then spread westward. Alternatively, eastern and western North American populations with this genotype may be derived from separate introductions. Similar alternative scenarios may hold for the introduction and spread of Mdh-2b and Mdh-3b, although no populations with these alleles have been detected in the central USA (Table 3).

Other marker alleles have been found only in western North American populations and indicate that the introductions with these genotypes stemmed directly from the native range. For instance, all 38 eastern populations of B. tectorum included in this study are fixed for the allele Got-4b, whereas Got-4c occurs widely among populations of western North America. In western North America, 36 of 46 populations are polymorphic at Got-4; they possess both the b and c alleles. Six of 46 western populations are fixed for Got-4c. Similarly, populations with Got-4d and Pgi-2b alleles were detected only in western North America (Novak and Mack, 1993 ; Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1993 ). Based on the allelic diversity among North American populations of B. tectorum, we conclude that eastern and western populations most probably stem in part from multiple separate introductions.

The introduction history of B. tectorum in North America emerges as a series of events and includes the possibility of its early extirpation, re-entry, and subsequent establishment in the eastern USA. Allozyme evidence reveals that there were multiple introductions, not only in western North America (Novak, Mack, and Soltis, 1991 ) but also along the eastern coastline. Unlike the pattern in the west however, these immigrants in eastern North America gave rise eventually to a widely naturalized species but not an invasion (sensu Mack et al., 2000) . Although commonly found throughout the eastern USA, cheatgrass is largely restricted to sites of frequent human disturbance (e.g., footpaths, rubble heaps, railroad beds) and coarse textured soil. Unlike its role in the arid west (Mack, 1981 ), it has been unable to occupy pastoral areas, nor is it a major weed of crop fields (Muenscher, 1955 ). Whether an invasion of this grass in eastern North America was averted simply through chance genetic sampling could be resolved through comparison of the performance in eastern North America of B. tectorum populations assembled from its high-latitude European range. This example with B. tectorum exemplifies an important issue in predicting the fate of introduced species in new ranges: the role of chance genetic sampling in predetermining the outcome. We need a much more comprehensive experimental resolution of this issue; it relates directly not only to our understanding of the limits of evolution (Antonovics, 1976 ) but also to the efficacy of quarantine measures based on the plant species as the taxonomic level for scrutiny and control.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank R. Dirig, J. Cavender-Bares, J. Kallunki, C. L. Kinter, L. McWeeney, D. Raynal, G. F. Russell, C. Sheviak, and E. Spamer for invaluable assistance in locating many of the herbarium specimens and other sources of information on the early introduction of Bromus tectorum; J. Anderson, L. H. Mack, N. L. Mack, and D. Donati for collecting some of the populations of B. tectorum analyzed here; P. S. Soltis and D. E. Soltis for use of laboratory facilities; and C. Hunt for excellent graphics. CSIRO-Entomology at its European Laboratory (Montpellier, France) and Canberra (Australia) provided facilities for SJN and RNM, respectively, to complete this work, for which we are very grateful. Back

4 Author for reprint request (rmack{at}mail.wsu.edu ) Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Anonymous. 1874 Catalogue of Suffolk Co. plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 5: 4.

Antonovics J. 1976 The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63: 224-247[CrossRef][ISI]

Arthington A. H. D. S. Mitchell 1986 Aquatic invading species. In R. H. Groves and J. J. Burdon [eds.], Ecology of biological invasions, 34–53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Barrett S. C. H. 1989 Waterweed invasions. Scientific American 260: 90-97[ISI][Medline]

Barrett S. C. H. B. C. Husband 1990 The genetics of plant migration and colonization. In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding and germplasm resources, 254–277. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA

Barrett S. C. H. B. J. Richardson 1986 Genetic attributes of invading species. In R. H. Groves and J. J. Burdon [eds.], Ecology of biological invasions: an Australian perspective, 21–33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Barrett S. C. H. J. S. Shore 1989 Isozyme variation in colonizing plants. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 106–126. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA

Barton W. P. C. 1818 Compendium Florae Philadelphicae: containing a description of the indigenous and naturalized plants found within a circuit of ten miles around Philadelphia, vols. 1–2. M. Carey & Sons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Brown A. H. D. D. R. Marshall 1981 Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants. In G. C. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal [eds.], Evolution today, 351–363. Hunt Institute of Botanical Documents, Carnegie-Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Burdon J. J. D. R. Marshall R. H. Groves 1980 Isozyme variation in Chondrilla juncea L. in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 28: 193-198

Darlington W. 1826 Florula cestrica; an essay towards a catalogue of the phaenogamous plants, native and naturalized, growing in the vicinity of the borough of West-Chester, in Chester County, Pennsylvania. S. Siegfried, West-Chester, Pennsylvania, USA

Garcia P. F. J. Vences M. Perez de la Vega R. W. Allard 1989 Allelic and genetic composition of ancestral Spanish and colonial Californian gene pools of Avena barbata. Genetics 122: 687-694[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glover D. E. S. C. H. Barrett 1987 Genetic variation in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Heredity 59: 7-17[ISI]

Grant V. 1963 The origin of adaptations. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Gray A. 1889 Manual of the botany of the Northern United States, 6th ed. American Book, New York, New York, USA

Hamrick J. L. M. J. W. Godt 1990 Allozyme diversity in plant species. In A. D. H. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding and germplasm resources, 43–63. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA

Hegi G. 1931 Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa, Band 1. J. F. Lehmann, Munich, Germany

Hitchcock A. S. A. Chase 1971 Manual of the grasses of the United States, 2nd ed. Dover, New York, New York, USA

Holsinger K. E. 1988 Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating-system evolution. Evolution 42: 1235-1244[CrossRef][ISI]

Jain S. K. 1976 The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 469-495

Klemmedson J. P. J. G. Smith 1964 Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L). Botanical Review 30: 226-262

Lande R. D. W. Schemske 1985 The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40[CrossRef][ISI]

Leopold A. 1949 A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA

Lindroth C. H. 1957 The faunal connections between Europe and North America. Wiley, New York, New York, USA

Mack R. N. 1981 Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 145-165

Mack R. N. 1986 Alien plant invasion into the Intermountain West: a case history. In H. A. Mooney and J. Drake [eds.], Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii, 192–213. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA

Mack R. N. D. Simberloff W. M. Lonsdale H. Evans M. Clout F. A. Bazzaz 2000 Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689-710[CrossRef][ISI]

Malacrida A. R. F. Marinoni C. Torti L. M. Gomulski F. Sebastiani C. Bonvicini G. Gasperi C. R. Guglielmino 1998 Genetic aspects of the worldwide colonization process of Ceratitis capitata. Journal of Heredity 89: 501-507[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marshall D. R. P. W. Weiss 1982 Isozyme variation within and among Australian populations of Emex spinosa (L.) Campd. Australian Journal of Biology 35: 327-332

Mascie-Taylor C. G. N. G. W. Lasker [eds.] 1988 Biological aspects of human migration. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA

Mayr E. 1982 Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Muenscher W. C. L. 1955 Weeds, 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA

Muhlenberg H. 1793 Index florae Lancastriensis. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society of Philadelphia 3: 157-184

Nei M. 1973 Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 70: 3321-3323[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nei M. 1977 F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided population. Annals of Human Genetics 41: 225-233[ISI][Medline]

Nei M. 1978 Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neuffer B. 1996 Rapid analyses in colonial and ancestral populations of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Med. (Brassicaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 393-403[CrossRef][ISI]

Novak S. J. 1990 Multiple introduction and founder effects in Bromus tectorum L.: an analysis of Eurasian and North American populations. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA

Novak S. J. R. N. Mack 1993 Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): comparison between native and introduced populations. Heredity 71: 167-176[ISI]

Novak S. J. R. N. Mack D. E. Soltis 1991 Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum L.: population differentiation in its North American range. American Journal of Botany 78: 1150-1161[CrossRef][ISI]

Novak S. J. R. N. Mack P. S. Soltis 1993 Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): introduction dynamics in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 1441-1448

Perez de la Vega M. P. Garcia R. W. Allard 1991 Multilocus genetic structure of ancestral Spanish and colonial Californian populations of Avena barbata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 88: 1202-1206[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pursh F. 1814 Flora Americae Septentrionalis. White, Cochrane, London, UK

Schemske D. W. R. Lande 1985 The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52[CrossRef][ISI]

Stafleu F. A. [ed.] 1974 Index herbariorum: a guide to the location and content of the world's public herbaria: pt. 1. The herbaria of the world, 6th ed. Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Stebbins G. L. 1957 Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. American Naturalist 91: 337-354[CrossRef][ISI]

Stirton C. H. 1977 Some thoughts on the polyploid complex Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae). In D. P. Annecke [ed.], Proceedings of the Second National Weeds Conference of South Africa, 321–340. Balkema, Cape Town, South Africa

Swofford D. L. R. K. Selander 1987 BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity 72: 281-283

Taylor S. E. B. H. Walker 1984 Autecology of an invading population of the cactus Cereus peruvianus (Queen of the night) in the central Transvaal. South African Journal of Botany 3: 387-396[ISI]

Thaman R. R. 1974 Lantana camara: its introduction, dispersal and impact on islands of the tropical Pacific Ocean. Micronesica 10: 17-39

Torrey J. 1819 A catalogue of plants, growing spontaneously within thirty miles of the City of New-York. Lyceum of Natural History of New York, Albany, New York, USA

Torrey J. 1843 A flora of the state of New York, vol. II, Natural history of New York. Carroll and Cook, Albany, New York, USA

Waddington C. H. 1965 Introduction to the symposium. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins [eds.], The genetics of colonizing species, 1–6. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA

Warwick S. I. 1990 Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 169: 41-54[CrossRef][ISI]

Williams D. G. R. N. Mack R. A. Black 1995 Ecophysiology and growth of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology 76: 1569-1580[CrossRef][ISI]

Wright S. 1965 The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420[CrossRef][ISI]

Wood A. 1863 Class-book of botany: being outlines of the structure, physiology, and classification of plants; with a flora of the United States and Canada. A. S. Barnes, New York, New York, USA

Yensen D. L. 1981 The 1900 invasion of alien plants into southern Idaho. Great Basin Naturalist 41: 176-183




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. T. Valliant, R. N. Mack, and S. J. Novak
Introduction history and population genetics of the invasive grass Bromus tectorum (Poaceae) in Canada
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1156 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. J. DeWalt and J. L. Hamrick
Genetic variation of introduced Hawaiian and native Costa Rican populations of an invasive tropical shrub, Clidemia hirta (Melastomataceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2004; 91(8): 1155 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions