|
|
||||||||
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
2The Interdisciplinary Genetics Program and Crop and Soil Environmental Science Department, Clemson University, 276 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0359 USA 3Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Bldg. 006, Room 100, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 USA
Received for publication June 26, 2001. Accepted for publication October 9, 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: development fasciation Glycine max Leguminosae map molecular markers mutant polymorphism soybean
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Domestication of plants seems to favor an increase in apical dominance during the evolution of cultivated species. In the domestication of maize, Zea mays subsp. mays, there is a profound increase in apical dominance relative to its wild ancestor teosinte, Zea mays subsp. parviglumi (Doebley, Stec, and Hubbard, 1997
; Lukens and Doebley, 2001
). The importance of branching may carry evolutionary implications. In this context, contribution of the apical meristem to plant architecture may prove to be informative about the evolution of morphological characters in plants. The strong dominance of the apical meristem is the most characteristic trait of the fasciation mutant in soybean and generates developmental diversity useful for investigation of genetic and hormonal factors important for plant architecture.
The frequent occurrence of the fasciation mutations in many different species (spontaneous fasciation mutations have been reported in more than 100 vascular plant families; Kiesselbach, 1926
; White, 1945
; Zielinski, 1945
) suggests that the regulatory factors, which are fundamental to plant development, must be affected in individual mutants. Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana fasciation mutants implicated several genes including CLAVATA1 (Clark, Running, and Meyerowitz, 1993
; Clark, Williams, and Meyerowitz, 1997
); CLAVATA2 (Kayes and Clark, 1998
); CLAVATA3 (Clark, Running, and Meyerowitz, 1995
); FASCIATA1 and FASCIATA2 (Leyser and Furner, 1992
; Kaya et al., 2001
). Changes in the function of these genes lead to developmental alterations resulting in a similar fasciation phenotype (Wilkinson and Haughn, 1995
; Meyerowitz, 1997
; Laufs et al., 1998
). In our previous studies, two GmCLV1 genes were isolated from soybean (Yamamoto, Karakaya, and Knap, 2000
). Expression and sequencing analysis showed that GmCLV1A and GmCLV1B were not responsible for the fasciation mutation. The GmCLV1A locus maps to linkage group (LG) H of the soybean molecular map (Yamamoto, Karakaya, and Knap, 2000
). Also, sequencing and expression analysis of a soybean ortholog of the Arabidopsis FASCIATA2 gene excluded that gene as a candidate for the fasciation mutation in soybean (Karakaya, 2001
).
The genetic approach can provide a valuable avenue to elucidate factors involved in the establishment of the fasciation phenotype. The f locus was localized on LG 11 of the soybean conventional genetic map (Hedges et al., 1990
). In soybean, several molecular maps have been generated using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers (Apuya et al., 1988
; Lark et al., 1993
; Akkaya, Bhagwat, and Cregan, 1995
; Shoemaker and Specht, 1995
; Keim et al., 1997
; Cregan et al., 1999
). However, none of these molecular maps contains the f locus.
We developed a population segregating for the fasciation phenotype. More than 700 markers (RFLPs with genomic or cDNA clones, AFLPs, and RAPDs) were used in mapping of the fasciation (f) locus. However, efforts to assign the f locus to the public soybean molecular map were not successful until simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used. Simple sequence repeat markers are single locus markers with multiple alleles. The SSR marker density exceeds 600 loci on the soybean molecular map (Cregan et al., 1999
), thus facilitating information on recombination frequencies in the soybean genome.
In this study, we assigned the fasciation locus on LG D1b+W of the soybean molecular map. Positioning of the f locus is the first step toward a detailed genetic map of the region and physical isolation of this important developmental gene in soybean.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA isolation and analysis
DNA was extracted from 4 g of young leaf tissue using the method described by Keim, Olson, and Shoemaker (1988)
. For bulk segregant analysis, 10 µg of DNA from each of ten homozygous FF F2 progeny were pooled together for the FF bulk. Similarly, equal amounts of DNA from F2 recessive genotypes were pooled to make the ff bulk. Restriction enzymes, EcoRI, EcoRV, DraI, HindIII, TaqI, XhoI, and XbaI, were used individually to digest total genomic DNA of mutant and wild type and F2 progeny DNA. Southern analysis with genomic and cDNA clones was performed as described previously (Skorupska et al., 1993
).
Restriction fragment length polymorphism marker analysis
Almost 400 clones were used in RFLP analysis. Two hundred forty-nine soybean genomic clones were obtained from Biogenetic Services (Brookings, South Dakota, USA). The selected RFLP probes spanned the linkage groups of the public soybean molecular map at intervals of approximately 20 centimorgans (cM) (Cregan et al., 1999
). In Southern analysis, the RFLP patterns of genomic clones obtained for Clark 63 and the fasciation mutant were compared with the patterns in SoyBase (http://soybase.agron.iastate.edu) for assignment of loci according to the public soybean molecular map.
One hundred thirty-one clones were isolated from a
ZapII (Stratagene, LaJolla, California, USA) cDNA library constructed from shoot apices of the fasciation mutant at stages V3V4 and differentially screened with cDNA from wild type and mutant epicotyls (Tang, 1999
). For probe synthesis, inserts of
ZapII cDNA clones were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using T3 and T7 primers. The amplification conditions were: 1 min denaturation at 93°C; 30 cycles of 45 s at 93°C, 2 min at 60°C, and 3 min at 72°C; and 5 min at 72°C. The clones were labeled with 15 µCi [
-32P] dCTP by random oligonucleotide-primed synthesis (Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983
).
Two cDNAs, UnP2 and UnP5, were obtained using differential display analysis (GenHunter, Nashville, Tennessee, USA) of cotyledonary tissue of 5-d-old seedlings of mutant and wild type cDNA (Karakaya, 2001
). The cDNA fragments were cloned into pGEM vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and amplified with gene-specific primers: UnP1 with forward primer 5'-GCTAACGCAAGGGCATCAGAGG-3' and reverse primer 5'-TGTCCCTTCAGCGGGATCTTGTT-3'; UnP5 with forward primer 5'-GATGAGGATGAGGACGATGATT-3' and reverse primer 5'-CGAAGTAGCAAGACCATTCTCTCT-3'. A cytokinin oxidase cDNA, GmCKOX, was obtained by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using 5'-GAGCAAGGCCCCATAAATAATTG-3' and 5'-CAGGGATATAGGCTAGTCCTTGGAG-3', forward and reverse primers, respectively (Karakaya, 2001
). The cDNAs were labeled with [
-32P] dCTP by PCR. The PCR labeling mixture contained 40 ng of template, 1 x PCR buffer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA), 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.4 mmol/L dATP, 0.4 mmol/L dGTP, 0.4 mmol dTTP, 2 pmol gene specific primers, 50 µCi [
-32P] dCTP, and 1 unit Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) in a 20-µL volume. The PCR conditions were denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min; annealing at 60°C for UnP1, 55°C for UnP5, or 57°C for GmCKOX for 40 s; 72°C for 1 min; and extension at 72°C for 5 min.
Sequencing
Clones were sequenced using the ABI Prism Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction DNA Sequencing Kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, California, USA). Sequencing was performed using an ABI 373 Automated Sequencer (Model Version 2.1.1. Perkin-Elmer). Sequence analysis was conducted using BLASTX (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Additional sequence searches were conducted using expressed sequence tag sequences generated by The Soybean Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) Project, which is an excellent resource for functional and comparative analyses (R. C. Shoemaker, Project Leader; http://soybase.agron.iastate.edu). A MEGABLASTN program with the Est Others database field http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/ was used for sequence comparisons using default parameters.
Amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism marker analysis
The AFLP analysis was performed as described by Vos et al. (1995)
using an AFLP Analysis System I, AFLP Starter Primer Kit (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA). For DNA digestion, two restriction enzymes, EcoRI and PstI, were used in combination with MseI. A total of 64 EcoRI/MseI primer combinations and 81 PstI/MseI primer combinations were tested in bulk segregant analysis with DNA samples of Clark 63, fasciation mutant, the F2 FF bulk, and the F2 ff bulk. Twenty-five primer combinations that either generated a high number of polymorphic fragments or fragments corresponding to the wild type pattern (Clark 63 and the F2 FF bulk) vs. the mutant pattern (the fasciation mutant and the F2 ff bulk) were tested in the F2 progeny.
Random amplified polymorphic DNA marker analysis
The RAPD analysis was conducted using decamer primers (Operon Technologies, Alameda, California, USA). Amplification conditions used were as described in Skorupska et al. (1994)
. A total of 250 primers were tested on parental and the F2 FF and F2 ff DNA bulks. Forty-eight primers that produced distinct polymorphisms were tested in the F2 population.
Simple sequence repeat marker analysis
LG 11 of the classical soybean map containing the f locus was integrated with LG D1b+W of the soybean molecular map (Cregan et al., 1999
). Twenty-five SSR primer pairs (Satt005, Satt041, Satt069, Satt089, Satt135, Satt141, Satt172, Satt189, Satt198, Satt202, Satt271, Satt274, Satt282, Satt290, Satt350, Satt412, Satt428, Satt459, Satt506, Satt537, Satt546, Satt579, Satt600, Satt604, and Satt703) from LG D1b+W were obtained from the USDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, USA. The amplification of SSR was conducted as described in Cregan and Quigley (1997)
. Amplification products were fractionated on a 3% NuSieve 3 : 1 agarose gel (Bio Whittaker Molecular Applications, Rockland, Maryland, USA) and stained with ethidium bromide for observation of SSR fragments.
Linkage analysis
Linkage analysis was conducted with Mapmaker/Exp 3.0 (Lander et al., 1987
) using a logarithm of odds (LOD) score of 3.0. Recombination frequencies were converted to map distance in centimorgans by the Kosambi function (Kosambi, 1944
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In bulk segregant analysis, 14 AFLP markers had contrasting patterns between the FF genotypes (wild type and the FF F2 bulk) and the ff genotypes (fasciation mutant and the ff F2 bulk). Two of these markers, EaggMacc245 and EaacMcta250, were linked to the f locus based upon analysis of the F2 population (Fig. 1). The association of these two AFLP markers with the f locus was further confirmed by the AFLP pattern of 26 ff F2 segregants isolated from the independent F2 population generated from Clark 63 and fasciation mutant cross (one recombinant occurred for marker EaacMcta250, and three recombinants were observed for marker EaggMacc245; data not shown). None of the polymorphic RAPD markers observed in bulk segregant analysis linked with the fasciation phenotype.
|
2 = 0.26, P > 0.75). When using RFLP, AFLP, and RAPD markers, the fasciation phenotype was not assigned a locus on a linkage map. The successful positioning of the f locus was accomplished using SSR markers that facilitated detection of recombination events on LG D1b+W. Three SSR markers, Satt005, Satt141, and Satt600 linked with the f locus within 15 cM (Figs. 1 and 2). The order and map distances of the SSR loci differed from those reported by Cregan et al. (1999)
Seventeen RFLP markers obtained with cDNA clones mapped to 11 LGs of the public molecular map. Only cDNAs with similarity to known or unknown proteins were given locus assignments (Fig. 1). The GenBank accession numbers are presented in Table 2. We also used the soybean expressed sequence tag database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/index.html) as a Glycine max species reference for clones isolated in our laboratory. The mapped clones encode housekeeping proteins such as: ribosomal protein subunits S8 (Rps8) and L31 (RpsL31) (mapped on LG G and M, respectively); histone protein (H2B) (mapped on LG B1); and several important development related proteins (Table 2). Five clones (UnP1, UnP2, UnP3, UnP4, UnP5) with similarities to A. thaliana unknown proteins mapped on LG A2, C2, K, or L (Table 2). Expressed sequence tag soybean database searches with the UnP1, UnP2, UnP3, UnP4, or UnP5 sequences identified ESTs, confirming that the mapped clones function during vegetative or reproductive stages in soybean.
|
Two cDNA clones, which were mapped on the LG F, encode for a highly conserved ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase, UBPC, which is involved in ATP-dependent protein degradation (Viestra, Langan, and Haas, 1985
) and putative cytokinin oxidase, GmCKOX. In the soybean EST database, which contains more than 189 000 sequences, several CKOX sequences are reported. GmCKOX in this study had sequence homology with GBAN-AW830743 (Table 2). The soybean CKOX EST (GBAN-BG651837) was identified in a cDNA library constructed from mRNA isolated from reproductive shoot apices of the fasciation mutant, which was provided by our laboratory for the Soybean EST sequencing project. Isolation and characterization of the full-length cDNA of this new CKOX gene is in progress.
Two clones were mapped on LG H. These encode a pre-mRNA splicing factor (PrP) associated with the G0/G1 and G1/G2 transitions in the cell cycle and a chloroplast m-type thioredoxin precursor protein (THTM) involved in various redox reactions through the reversible oxidation (Lopez et al., 1994
).
Argonautel (AGO1) belongs to a novel class of proteins controlling leaf, floral organ, and axillary meristem development in Arabidopsis (Bohmert et al., 1998
; Lynn et al., 1999
). In RFLP analysis, the soybean clone GBAN-B1740284 with similarity to Argonautel showed independent assortment from the fasciation locus and mapped on LG Y of the soybean molecular map.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We observed an overall expansion of genetic distances on the Clark 63 x the fasciation mutant map relative to those on the soybean molecular map of Cregan et al. (1999)
. Progeny number or different recombination frequencies in a particular cross might affect overall scores of genetic distances. Genomic similarities between Clark 63 and the fasciation mutant could contribute to higher recombination frequencies and thus map expansion, including LG D1b+W on which the fasciation locus was mapped. Jin et al. (1998)
and Hegstad et al. (2000)
also reported expansion of genetic distances on soybean LG D1b+W in mapping of a male-sterile gene and the wp flower color locus, respectively. Hegstad et al. (2000)
speculate that increased recombination rates in the LG D1b+W region may be caused potentially by rearrangements or insertions generated by a defective wp-m transposable element. Linkage of the f locus and the wp locus with Satt141 and Satt600 on the LG D1b+W suggests that further investigations of the region might elucidate the origin of gene mutation and structural rearrangements of that region of the soybean genome.
An advantage of using cDNA clones for mapping is the identification of actively transcribed regions of the genome. In combination with sequence data, mapping of cDNAs enhances the characterization of gene distribution on each chromosome and within the whole genome. Seventeen cDNAs were mapped to 11 different linkage groups of the public soybean molecular map, adding to previously mapped cDNAs: histone H3 genes (Kanazin, Blake, and Shoemaker, 1996
), disease resistance gene analogs (Kanazin, Fredrick, and Shoemaker, 1996
; Yu, Buss, and Maroof, 1996
), chalcone synthase multigene family (Todd and Vodkin, 1996
), ß-1,3-glucanases genes (Jin et al., 1999
), cDNAs from various studies (Matthews et al., 2001
), and genes associated with cyst nematode infection of soybean (Vaghchhipawala et al., 2001
).
Mapping of cDNA markers may allow identification of genes corresponding to classical loci and association with phenotype. However, mutations caused by single-base changes or frame shifts are difficult to detect by RFLP analysis unless the restriction sites used are altered by the mutation. Several of the mapped clones were differentially expressed between the mutant and Clark 63 (Tang, 1999
; Karakaya, 2001
). None of the tested cDNA markers mapped at the fasciation locus suggesting that several genomic regions might be involved in the establishment of the fasciation mutant phenotype. GmCLV1 and GmFAS2, orthologs of Arabidopsis genes that cause a fasciation phenotype, were excluded as candidate genes for fasciation mutation in soybean based on expression and mapping analyses (Yamamoto, Karakaya, and Knap, 2000
; Karakaya, 2001
). Another important soybean clone with similarity to Argonaute1 (mutation in Argonaute1 pleiotropically affects development of apical shoot meristem, axillary meristems, and leaves) mapped to LG Y. Also, GmCKOX showed independent assortment from the fasciation phenotype and mapped to LG F. Cytokinin oxidase inactivates cytokinins by irreversible degradation (Kaminek, Motyka, and Vankova, 1997
), which could be one of the possible mechanisms for differences in cytokinin levels observed between the mutant and the wild type (Karakaya, 2001
). Characterization of the second GmCKOX identified by the EST sequencing of a cDNA library from reproductive shoot apices of the fasciation mutant might aid information on association of cytokinin oxidase genes with the fasciation mutant phenotype.
Assignment of the f locus to linkage group D1b+W and identification of flanking markers can be used as an initial step for precise mapping of the f gene. It is likely that the f locus product acts upstream of other genes in soybean development and intervenes directly or indirectly in several signal transduction pathways throughout vegetative and reproductive development. Hence, the mutant can be a valuable resource for investigation of genomic organization, regulation of soybean developmental traits, and evolution of key morphological characters.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
4 Author for reprint requests (current address: 272 Poole Agricultural Center, Dept. of Crop & Soil, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0359 USA; mail: hskrpsk{at}clemson.edu
) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Albertsen M. C. T. M. Curry R. G. Palmer C. E. LaMotte 1983 Genetics and comparative growth morphology of fasciation in soybean (Glycine max [L. ] Merr). Botanical Gazette 144: 263-275[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Apuya N. R. B. L. Frazier P. Keim E. J. Roth K. G. Lark 1988 Restriction fragment length polymorphisms as genetic markers in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 75: 889-901[Web of Science]
Bahrami A. R. J. E. Gray 1999 Expression of a proteasome alpha-type subunit gene during tobacco development and senescence. Plant Molecular Biology 39: 325-333[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Banno H. N. H. Chua 2000 Characterization of the Arabidopsis formin-like protein AFH1 and its interacting protein. Plant Cell Physiology 41: 617-626
Bohmert K. I. Camus C. Bellini D. Bouchez M. Caboche C. Benning 1998 AGO1 defines a novel locus of Arabidopsis controlling leaf development. European Molecular Biology Journal 17: 170-180
Clark S. E. M. P. Running E. M. Meyerowitz 1993 CLAVATA1, a regulator of meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Development 119: 397-418[Abstract]
Clark S. E. M. P. Running E. M. Meyerowitz 1995 CLAVATA3 is a specific regulator of shoot and floral meristem development affecting the same processes as CLAVATA1. Development 121: 2057-2067[Abstract]
Clark S. E. R. W. Williams E. M. Meyerowitz 1997 The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89: 575-585[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cregan P. B. T. Jarvik L. A. Bush R. C. Shoemaker K. G. Lark N. Kaya D. G. Johnes J. Chung J. E. Specht 1999 An integrated linkage map of the soybean genome. Crop Science 39: 1464-1490
Cregan P. B. C. V. Quigley 1997 Simple sequence repeat DNA marker analysis. In G. Caetano-Anolles and P. M. Gresshoff [eds.], DNA markers: protocols, applications and overviews, 173185. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA
Doebley J. A. Stec L. Hubbard 1997 The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485-488[CrossRef][Medline]
Feinberg A. P. B. Vogelstein 1983 A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Analytical Biochemistry 137: 266-267[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hedges B. R. J. M. Sellner T. E. Devine R. G. Palmer 1990 Assigning isocitrate dehydrogenase to linkage group 11 in soybean. Crop Science 30: 940-942
Hegstad J. M. J. A. Tarter L. O. Vodkin C. D. Nickell 2000 Positioning the wp flower color locus on the soybean genome map. Crop Science 40: 534-537
Ito N. K. Tomizawa K. Tanaka M. Matsui R. Kendrick T. Sato H. Nakagawa 1997 Characterization of 26S proteasome
- and ß-type and ATPase subunits from spinach and their expression during early stages of seedling development. Plant Molecular Biology 34: 307-316[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jin W. H. T. Horner R. G. Palmer R. C. Shoemaker 1999 Analysis and mapping of gene families encoding beta-1,3-glucanases of soybean. Genetics 153: 445-452
Jin W. R. G. Palmer H. T. Horner R. C. Shoemaker 1998 Molecular mapping of a male-sterile gene in soybean. Crop Science 38: 1681-1685
Kaminek M. V. Motyka R. Vankova 1997 Regulation of cytokinin content in plant cells. Physiologia Plantarum 101: 689-700[CrossRef]
Kanazin V. T. Blake R. C. Shoemaker 1996 Organization of the histone H3 genes in soybean, barley and wheat. Molecular and General Genetics 250: 137-147
Kanazin V. M. Fredrick R. C. Shoemaker 1996 Resistance gene analogs are conserved and clustered in soybean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 11746-11750
Karakaya H. C. 2001 Fasciation mutation in soybean: molecular mapping and isolation of phenotype associated genes. Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
Kaya H. K. Shibahara K. Taoka M. Iwabuchi B. Stillman T. Araki 2001 FASCIATA genes for chromatin assembly factor-1 in Arabidopsis maintain the cellular organization of apical meristems. Cell 104: 131-142[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kayes J. M. S. E. Clark 1998 CLAVATA2, a regulator of meristem and organ development in Arabidopsis. Development 125: 3843-3851[Abstract]
Keim P. T. C. Olson R. C. Shoemaker 1988 A rapid protocol for isolating soybean DNA. Soybean Genetics Newsletter 18: 150-152
Keim P. J. M. Schupp S. E. Travis K. Clayton T. Zhu L. Shi A. Ferreira D. M. Webb 1997 A high density soybean genetic map based on AFLP markers. Crop Science 37: 537-543
Kiesselbach T. A. 1926 Fasciated kernels, reversed kernels, and related abnormalities in maize. American Journal of Botany 13: 35-39[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kosambi D. D. 1944 The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Annals of Eugenetics 12: 172-175
LaMotte C. E. T. M. Curry R. G. Palmer M. C. Albertsen 1988 Developmental anatomy and morphology of fasciation in the soybean (Glycine max). Botanical Gazette 149: 398-407[CrossRef]
Lander E. P. Green J. Abrahamson A. Barlow M. Daley S. Lincoln L. Newburg 1987 Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174-181[CrossRef][Medline]
Lark K. G. J. M. Weisemen B. F. Mathews R. Palmer K. Chase T. Macalma 1993 A genetic map of soybean using an intraspecific cross of two cultivars: Minsoy and Noir.. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 901-906[Web of Science]
Laufs P. J. Dockx J. Kronenberg J. Traas 1998 MGOUN1 and MGOUN2: two genes required for primordium initiation at the shoot apical and floral meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125: 1253-1260[Abstract]
Leyser H. M. O. I. J. Furner 1992 Characterization of three shoot apical meristem mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 116: 397-403[Web of Science]
Lopez J. A. Chueca M. Shahrawy R. Hermoso J. J. Lazaro F. E. Prado G. J. Lopez 1994 Cloning and sequencing of a pea cDNA fragment coding for thioredoxin M. Plant Physiology 105: 1021-1022[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lukens L. J. Doebley 2001 Molecular evolution of the teosinte branched gene among maize and related grasses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 627-638
Lynn K. A. Fernandez M. Aida J. Sedbrook M. Tasaka P. Masson 1999 The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene. Development 126: 469-481[Abstract]
Matthews B. F. et al 2001 Incorporation of sequenced cDNA and genomic markers into the soybean genetic map. Crop Science 41: 516-521
Meyerowitz E. M. 1997 Genetic control of cell division patterns in developing plants. Cell 88: 299-308[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nagai I. 1926 Inheritance in the soybean. Agriculture and Horticulture 14: 107-108
Ozaki-Kuroda K. Y. Yamamoto H. Nohara M. Kinoshita T. Fujiwara K. Irie Y. Takai 2001 Dynamic localization and function of Bni1p at the sites of directed growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Cell Biology 21: 827-839
Shoemaker R. C. J. E. Specht 1995 Integration of the soybean molecular and classical genetic linkage groups. Crop Science 35: 436-446
Skorupska H. T. I. C. Choi A. P. Rao-Arelli W. C. Bridges 1994 Resistance to soybean cyst nematode and molecular polymorphism in various sources of Peking soybean. Euphytica 75: 63-70[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Skorupska H. T. R. C. Shoemaker A. Warner E. R. Shipe W. C. Bridges 1993 Restriction fragment length polymorphism in soybean germplasm of the southern USA. Crop Science 33: 1169-1176
Tang Y. 1999 Developmental and molecular characterization of the fasciation mutation in soybean, Glycine max (L). Merr. Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
Tang Y. H. T. Knap 1998 Fasciation mutation enhances meristematic activity and alters pattern formation in soybean. International Journal of Plant Science 159: 249-260[CrossRef]
Tang Y. H. T. Skorupska 1997 Expression of fasciation mutation in apical meristems of soybean germplasm Glycine max (L.) Merr. American Journal of Botany 84: 328-335[Abstract]
Todd J. J. L. O. Vodkin 1996 Duplications that suppress and deletions that restore expression from a chalcone synthase multigene family. Plant Cell 8: 687-699[Abstract]
Vaghchhipawala Z. R. Bassuner K. Clayton K. Lewers R. C. Shoemaker S. Mackenzie 2001 Modulations in gene expression and mapping of genes associated with cyst nematode infection of soybean. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 14: 42-54
Viestra R. D. S. M. Langan A. L. Haas 1985 Purification and initial characterization of ubiquitin from the higher plant, Avena sativa. Journal of Biological Chemistry 260: 12015-12021
Vos P. R. Hogers M. Bleeker M. Reijans T. van de Lee M. Hornes A. Fritjers J. Pot J. Peleman M. Kuiper M. Zabeau 1995 AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414
White O. E. 1945 The biology of fasciation and its relation to abnormal growth. Journal of Heredity 36: 11-22
Wilkinson M. D. G. W. Haughn 1995 UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS controls meristem identity and organ primordia fate in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 7: 1485-1499[Abstract]
Wongyai W. F. Tadahiko S. Matsumoto 1984 Morphological characteristics and growth habit of fasciated soybean. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 53: 371-378
Yamamoto E. H. C. Karakaya H. T. Knap 2000 Molecular characterization of two soybean homologs of Arabidopsis thaliana CLAVATA1 from the wild type and fasciation mutant. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 25: 333-340
Yu Y. G. G. R. Buss S. Maroof 1996 Isolation of a superfamily of candidate disease-resistance genes in soybean based on a conserved nucleotide-binding site. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 11751-11756
Zielinski Q. 1945 Fasciation in horticultural plants with special reference to the tomato. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 46: 263-268
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Majeran, Y. Cai, Q. Sun, and K. J. van Wijk Functional Differentiation of Bundle Sheath and Mesophyll Maize Chloroplasts Determined by Comparative Proteomics PLANT CELL, November 1, 2005; 17(11): 3111 - 3140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Peltier, A. J. Ytterberg, Q. Sun, and K. J. van Wijk New Functions of the Thylakoid Membrane Proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana Revealed by a Simple, Fast, and Versatile Fractionation Strategy J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49367 - 49383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |