|
|
||||||||
Ecology |
2Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, 600 Lincoln Avenue, Charleston, Illinois 61920-3099 USA; 3Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, New York 12545-0129 USA; 4Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University, 1 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-1582 USA
Received for publication May 15, 2001. Accepted for publication September 4, 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Acer rubrum Acer saccharum edge effects establishment probabilities Quercus palustris root : shoot ratio
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At boundaries between deciduous forests and abandoned agricultural land, edge environments have higher light, wind speed, and soil temperature and lower relative humidity relative to the adjacent forested patch (Matlack, 1993
; Forman, 1995
; Cadenasso, Traynor, and Pickett, 1997
). However, the spatial position and abruptness of the transition from field to forest conditions differs greatly depending on the environmental variable examined (Cadenasso, Traynor, and Pickett, 1997
) and with edge orientation (Wales, 1972
; Fraver, 1994
). While the largest changes in microclimate may occur on the field side of the edge (Cadenasso, Traynor, and Pickett, 1997
), detectable changes in microclimate may extend 50 m into deciduous forest stands (Matlack, 1993
). Edges may locally influence nutrient cycling through enhanced atmospheric deposition rates (Beier and Gundersen, 1989
; Lindberg and Owens, 1993
) and increased litter inputs (Facelli and Carson, 1991
).
The complex environmental changes associated with edges may influence the spatial pattern of tree seedlings in forest remnants (Wales, 1972
; Whitney and Runkle, 1981
; Chen, Franklin, and Spies, 1992
; Young and Mitchell, 1994
) and in clear-cuts (Lepage et al., 2000
). However, the direct response of tree seedlings to this complex environmental gradient is largely untested (but see Williams-Linera, 1990
; Meiners, Handel, and Pickett, 2000
). The presence of edges also affects habitat use by animals (Sork, 1983
; Linzey, 1989
; Cadenasso and Pickett, 2000
; McCormick and Meiners, 2000
) that may interact with the plant community (e.g., as herbivores, seed dispersers, or seed predators). Consequently, there is the potential for indirect edge effects on the plant community through altered spatial patterns of herbivory or predation (Murcia, 1995
; Meiners, Handel, and Pickett, 2000
). Furthermore, changes in plant community composition across edges (Fraver, 1994
; Matlack, 1994
; Meiners and Pickett, 1999
) may result in patches of differing invasibility (Hill, Canham, and Wood, 1995
), leading to changes in tree establishment. These direct and indirect edge effects may regulate the spatial pattern of tree invasion into successional sites.
Despite the biological and environmental impacts of edges, the role of the forest edge in determining tree regeneration in old fields and clear-cuts has largely been studied as a dispersal phenomenon. In these studies, the forest remnant serves as a source of propagules for the adjacent disturbed site (Johnson, 1988
; Hill, Canham, and Wood, 1995
; Hughes and Bechtel, 1997
). Some investigators have proposed that the spatial pattern of seed dispersal determines the pattern of tree seedlings in successional habitats (Hughes and Fahey, 1988
; Johnson, 1988
; Hughes and Bechtel, 1997
). This idea assumes that establishment does not vary across the edge gradient (Johnson, 1988
). However, the spatial pattern of seed dispersal often does not determine the spatial pattern of established seedlings in plant communities (Houle, 1992
; Herrera et al., 1994
; Hughes and Bechtel, 1997
; LePage et al., 2000
). Because dramatic changes in environmental conditions and in plantanimal interactions are associated with edges, we expect the probability of tree establishment to vary across the edge gradient. The final pattern of seedling establishment would therefore be a combination of differential seed input and differential establishment across the edge.
Johnson (1988)
acknowledged that modeling spatial patterns of tree seedlings as a function of seed dispersal was based on the untested assumption that postdispersal establishment rates did not vary. To solve this problem, he proposed that "[u]niformity in seedling environment could be checked by sowing known number and quality of tree seeds in plots leading away from seed trees and monitoring predation, recruitment and seedling survival" (p. 185). The goal of our research was to test for changes in the establishment probability of tree seedlings across an edge gradient, evaluating the assumption of constant establishment. We studied a spatial gradient that should encompass the majority of tree seeds dispersed within the site.
Previous work at this site (Meiners, Handel, and Pickett, 2000
), has found that tree seedlings respond to edges at small spatial scales (within 10 m of the edge) and that these effects may be quite strong. The present study expands this research, experimentally determining postdispersal tree-seedling edge responses across the potential dispersal range for three tree species common in eastern deciduous forests. We hypothesized that a species' shade tolerance would determine seedling responses to the edge gradient. We predicted that relatively shade-intolerant species (Acer rubrum and Quercus palustris) would respond to the edge with higher establishment in the field portion of the gradient. Conversely, we predicted that more shade-tolerant species (Acer saccharum) would have a higher rate of establishment in the forested portion of the site. Understanding the role of edges in determining tree establishment is critical to predicting forest regeneration at regional scales and to understanding the development of spatial patterning within regenerating stands.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental design
We established a 90 x 90 m grid beginning 30 m inside the forest and extending 60 m into the old field. Within this grid, we placed 100 1-m2 plots at regular 10-m intervals (Fig. 1). The boundary of the young forest with the old growth forest occurred at
60 m from the study edge, limiting the depth of the grid. Plot position was shifted slightly when necessary to avoid other experimental projects or human-made trails. Wherever possible, we held distance from the forest edge constant within each distance interval, shifting plot position parallel to the edge. For this study, we defined the forest edge as a straight line that approximated the most recent plow line. Several of the plots at 20 m from the edge were adjacent to a mown path 1.5 m wide. Vegetation at this distance did not reflect the presence of the path, falling within the gradient of vegetation change observed across the edge (Meiners and Pickett, 1999
). The spatial range studied should encompass the majority of the seed shadow for seeds produced within the forested portion of the site (Hughes and Fahey, 1988
; Greene and Johnson, 1996
; Hughes and Bechtel, 1997
) and as such, should have illustrated the influences of the forest edge on the vast majority of tree seeds.
|
20 cm between species. Seeds of both Acer species were planted even with the soil surface and re-covered with any leaf litter. Quercus palustris seed were planted so that the top of the acorn was
1 cm beneath the soil surface. The hole was then refilled with soil and covered with litter. Care was taken to minimize disturbance to the plot vegetation. Planting occurred on 30 April1 May 1997 for A. saccharum, 58 May 1997 for Q. palustris, and 26 May3 June 1997 for A. rubrum after stratification of A. saccharum and Q. palustris (Young and Young, 1992
We monitored plots every 2 wk for emergence and mortality until 11 August 1997. Upon emergence, each seedling's location was marked with a plastic toothpick to separate from new germinants. We did not observe any seedlings of any of the experimental species germinating outside of the planted area within the plots, so emergence measures should reflect emergence of planted seed only. On 2026 August, we harvested both above- and belowground biomass for all surviving seedlings. Seedlings were dried at 70°C for 3 d and weighed. We defined establishment as survival to the end of the first growing season (i.e., to harvest). Establishment defined this way is the product of emergence and survival.
Data analysis
The influence of distance from the forest edge on tree seedling emergence, first-year survivorship, and establishment was tested with logistic regression (Proc LOGISTIC; SAS, 1989
). Logistic regression is analogous to traditional regression analysis with the exception that it uses the logit function to analyze binary data such as survival. Logistic regressions included both distance and squared distance from the edge as independent variables and seedling counts as the dependent. Where the squared distance from the edge was nonsignificant, it was dropped from the model and we report only distance effects. Regression coefficients presented refer to changes per meter distance from the edge. Spatial effects perpendicular to the forest edge gradient were found to be nonsignificant and were dropped from all analyses.
The effects of distance from the forest edge on seedling growth and allocation patterns were analyzed with regression (Proc GLM, SAS Institute, 1989
). Growth and root : shoot ratio data were log transformed to conform to normality assumptions of regression analyses. Because allocation patterns vary with seedling development (Gedroc, McConnaughay, and Coleman, 1996
), a regression between root : shoot ratio and total seedling biomass was first calculated to remove the influence of seedling size on allocation patterns. The residuals from these analyses were then studied to determine changes in root : shoot ratio across the edge gradient independent from seedling developmental stage. Regression analyses of growth and allocation patterns included both distance and squared distance from the edge as independent variables. Regression coefficients presented from the analyses refer to changes per meter distance from the edge.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 m into the field. In A. saccharum, emergence was lowest inside the forest and gradually increased across the forest edge and into the old field (Fig. 2B).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Emergence responses
Emergence in the old field portion of the site ranged from 5 to 25%, which is typical of studies of trees in old fields (Burton and Bazzaz, 1991
; DeSteven, 1991
; Gill and Marks, 1991
; Meiners and Gorchov, 1998
; Meiners, Handel, and Pickett, 2000
). Shading by woody species can reduce tree seedling emergence (Callaway, 1992
; Meiners and Gorchov, 1998
) and may explain decreases in emergence close to the edge and inside the forest. The variation among species in emergence response shows the individualistic nature of species' edge responses and the potential of edges to greatly affect spatial patterns of forest regeneration.
Survivorship responses
While overall survivorship of A. saccharum was low, interesting spatial variation was present in the species. Whitney and Runkle (1981)
found that this species was more abundant in forest interiors than at edges, attributing this to the shade tolerance of A. saccharum. In the current study, Acer saccharum seedlings clearly had higher survival in the old field portion of the edge gradient rather than in the forest, as was initially predicted. However, the mortality of A. saccharum in the forest may not have been due to physiological limitations, but to slug herbivory. Both Acer species were found to have some damage indicative of slug herbivory in the forest. We frequently observed slugs in the forest plots, but they were never feeding on seedlings. Unfortunately, the direct cause of mortality could not be determined for most seedlings.
Survivorship of Quercus palustris was unaffected by the edge. However, growth of Q. palustris continued to increase with distance into the field. Because growth rate often determines the survivorship of seedlings (Kobe et al., 1995
), we would have expected that survivorship also would have increased with distance into the field.
Growth and allocation responses
The lack of a growth response of Acer saccharum to the edge gradient may be explained by its shade tolerance. While able to grow at low light levels, this species may be physiologically unable to take advantage of higher light levels in the field (Bazzaz and Carlson, 1982
). For example, growth of this species was unaffected by shading from Juniperus virginiana in an Ohio old field (Meiners and Gorchov, 1998
). With little change in potential net photosynthetic assimilation across the gradient, A. saccharum growth would remain constant. Although not measured in this study, changes in light intensity (e.g., Cadenasso, Traynor, and Pickett, 1997
) across the edge gradient probably explain the growth response of Quercus palustris. This species is highly shade intolerant as a seedling and can grow quickly with sufficient light (USDA, 1990
). The growth response of Q. palustris follows the predictions based on its shade tolerance.
After removing the influence of overall plant size, allocation patterns did not change across the edge gradient for Q. palustris. This analysis suggests that the seedling-scale environment did not change sufficiently across the site to cause changes in the allocation patterns of first year seedlings or that Q. palustris seedlings were not able to change allocation patterns. The hump-shaped response of A. saccharum was unexpected. This response may be caused by changes in a combination of factors across the edge gradient such as light availability, soil moisture, and background vegetation. Regardless of the mechanism, this change in seedling allocation patterns represents a very subtle, long-distance effect of forest edges.
Establishment probability and the edge gradient
While the emergence and mortality patterns differed greatly among species, their establishment responses to the edge were similar. Both A. saccharum and Q. palustris show responses consistent with that predicted for shade-intolerant species. While we predicted this response for Q. palustris, our initial prediction was that A. saccharum would have higher establishment near the forest because of its shade tolerance. The emergence response drives the pattern of establishment in Q. palustris, while establishment for A. saccharum is a combination of emergence and mortality.
Most studies of forest fragments have found changes in the numbers of tree seedlings near edges. Several studies have identified species that are less abundant at forest edges than forest interiors (Whitney and Runkle, 1981
; Chen, Franklin, and Spies, 1992
; Young and Mitchell, 1994
). These species tend to be shade-tolerant species characteristic of old-growth forests (Whitney and Runkle, 1981
). The majority of species studied to date show increased seedling abundances at the edge of forest fragments (Wales, 1972
; Whitney and Runkle, 1981
; Williams-Linera, 1990
; Chen, Franklin, and Spies, 1992
; Young and Mitchell, 1994
; this study). These species are often shade-intolerant species that depend on gaps for regeneration (Wales, 1972
). These studies show the potential for varied tree responses to edge gradients.
In regional models of forest regeneration, it may be necessary to account for species responses to edges. If increasing rates of establishment with increasing distance from the forest edge are a general edge response in eastern forests, modeling the distribution of these trees by seed dispersal alone would result in the underestimation of seedling abundance at greater distances from the edge. For example, Hughes and Bechtel (1997)
studied Picea rubens regeneration in a clear-cut, quantifying both seed dispersal and seedling abundance. Seedling abundance did not vary with distance from the edge, while seed dispersal declined exponentially. This response suggests that seeds at greater distances from the edge had a greater probability of establishment, resulting in constant numbers of seedlings regenerating across the site. For this reason, seedling establishment in fragmented systems cannot be modeled purely as a function of seed dispersal (Johnson, 1988
; Lepage et al., 2000
), but as a combination of dispersal and establishment. While we know little of establishment responses for most species, establishment rates can clearly change dramatically in association with edge gradients.
Conclusions
In order to understand changes in plant community composition and dynamics across edge gradients, both the spatial pattern of dispersal and the edge response of the species will need to be determined. This study highlights the need to examine the more subtle effects of habitat fragmentation on plant community dynamics. By altering the spatial pattern and species composition of tree invasions, edges may generate long-term patterns in regenerating forests. This spatial legacy may continue long after canopy closure in the disturbed site. We also suggest testing many more tree species to determine the range of edge responses in natural systems.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
5 Author for reprint requests (cfsjm2{at}eiu.edu
; FAX: 217-581-7141) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beier C. P. Gundersen 1989 Atmospheric deposition to the edge of a spruce forest in Denmark. Environmental Pollution 60: 257-271[CrossRef][Medline]
Burton P. J. F. A. Bazzaz 1991 Tree seedling emergence on interactive temperature and moisture gradients and in patches of old-field vegetation. American Journal of Botany 78: 131-149[CrossRef][ISI]
Cadenasso M. L. S. T. A. Pickett 2000 Linking forest edge structure to edge function: mediation of herbivore damage. Journal of Ecology 88: 31-44
Cadenasso M. L. S. T. A. Pickett 2001 Effect of edge structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conservation Biology 15: 91-97
Cadenasso M. L. M. M. Traynor S. T. A. Pickett 1997 Functional location of forest edges: gradients of multiple physical factors. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 774-782[CrossRef]
Callaway R. M. 1992 Effects of shrubs on recruitment of Quercus douglasii and Quercus lobata in California. Ecology 73: 2118-2128[CrossRef][ISI]
Chen J. J. F. Franklin T. A. Spies 1992 Vegetation responses to edge environments in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecological Applications 2: 387-396[CrossRef][ISI]
Darley-Hill S. W. C. Johnson 1981 Acorn dispersal by the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata). Oecologia 50: 231-232[CrossRef][ISI]
DeSteven D. 1991 Experiments on mechanisms of tree establishment in old-field succession: seedling emergence. Ecology 72: 1066-1075[CrossRef][ISI]
Facelli J. M. W. P. Carson 1991 Heterogeneity of plant litter accumulation in successional communities. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118: 62-66[CrossRef][ISI]
Forman R. T. T. 1995 Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Fraver S. 1994 Vegetation responses along edge-to-interior gradients in the mixed hardwood forests of the Roanoke River basin, North Carolina. Conservation Biology 8: 822-832[CrossRef][ISI]
Gedroc J. J. K. D. M. McConnaughay J. S. Coleman 1996 Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both?. Functional Ecology 10: 44-50[CrossRef][ISI]
Gill D. S. P. L. Marks 1991 Tree and shrub seedling colonization of old fields in central New York. Ecological Monographs 61: 183-205
Greene D. F. E. A. Johnson 1996 Wind dispersal of seeds from a forest into a clearing. Ecology 77: 595-609[CrossRef][ISI]
Herrera C. M. P. Jordano L. Lopez-Soria J. A. Amat 1994 Recruitment of a mast-fruiting, bird-dispersed tree: bridging frugivore activity and seedling establishment. Ecological Monographs 64: 315-344
Hill J. D. C. D. Canham D. M. Wood 1995 Patterns and causes of resistance to tree invasion in rights-of-way. Ecological Applications 5: 459-470[CrossRef][ISI]
Houle G. 1992 Spatial relationship between seed and seedling abundance and mortality in a deciduous forest of north-eastern North America. Journal of Ecology 80: 99-108[CrossRef][ISI]
Hughes J. W. D. A. Bechtel 1997 Effect of distance from forest edge on regeneration of red spruce and balsam fir in clearcuts. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 2088-2096[CrossRef]
Hughes J. W. T. J. Fahey 1988 Seed dispersal and colonization in a disturbed northern hardwood forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 115: 89-99
Johnson W. C. 1988 Estimating dispersibility of Acer, Fraxinus and Tilia in fragmented landscapes from patterns of seedling establishment. Landscape Ecology 1: 175-187
Kobe R. K. S. W. Pacala J. A. Silander C. D. Canham 1995 Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance. Ecological Applications 5: 517-532
LePage P. T. C. D. Canham K. D. Coates P. Bartemucci 2000 Seed abundance versus substrate limitation of seedling recruitment in northern temperature forests of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 415-427[CrossRef]
Lindberg S. E. J. G. Owens 1993 Throughfall studies of deposition to forest edges and gaps in montane ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 19: 173-194
Linzey A. V. 1989 Response of the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) to the transition between disturbed and undisturbed habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 505-512
Matlack G. R. 1993 Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biological Conservation 66: 185-194[CrossRef][ISI]
Matlack G. R. 1994 Vegetation dynamics of the forest edgetrends in space and successional time. Journal of Ecology 82: 113-123
McCormick J. T. S. J. Meiners 2000 Season and distance from forest-old field edge affect seed predation by white-footed mice. Northeastern Naturalist 7: 7-16
Meiners S. J. D. L. Gorchov 1998 Effects of distance to Juniperus virginiana on the establishment of Fraxinus and Acer seedlings in old fields. American Midland Naturalist 139: 353-364[CrossRef][ISI]
Meiners S. J. S. N. Handel S. T. A. Pickett 2000 Tree seedling establishment under insect herbivory: edge effects and inter-annual variation. Plant Ecology 151: 161-170[CrossRef][ISI]
Meiners S. J. S. T. A. Pickett 1999 Changes in community and population responses across a forest-field gradient. Ecography 22: 261-267[CrossRef][ISI]
Murcia C. 1995 Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 58-62
Pickett S. T. A. M. L. Cadenasso 1995 Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269: 331-334
SAS. 1989 SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6, 4th ed., vols. 1 and 2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
Sork V. L. 1983 Distribution of pignut hickory (Carya glabra) along a forest to edge transect, and factors affecting seedling recruitment. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 110: 494-506[CrossRef][ISI]
USDA. 1990 Silvics of North America, vol. 2. Hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USA
Wales B. A. 1972 Vegetation analysis of north and south edges in a mature oak-hickory forest. Ecological Monographs 42: 451-471[CrossRef]
Whitney G. G. J. R. Runkle 1981 Edge versus age effects in the development of a beech-maple forest. Oikos 37: 377-381[CrossRef][ISI]
Williams-Linera G. 1990 Origin and early development of forest edge vegetation in Panama. Biotropica 22: 235-241[CrossRef][ISI]
Young A. N. Mitchell 1994 Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a fragmented podocarp-broadleaf forest in New Zealand. Biological Conservation 67: 63-72
Young J. A. C. G. Young 1992 Seeds of woody plants in North America. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |