|
|
||||||||
Physiology and Development |
2Weed Biology Laboratory, Agronomy Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA; 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA
Received for publication May 8, 2001. Accepted for publication August 23, 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: carbon monoxide Graminae oxygen respiration seed dormancy seed germination Setaria faberii soil atmosphere soil seedbanks
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies in this series have documented the global genotypic population structure of the weedy foxtails (Wang, Wendel, and Dekker, 1995a, b
) and some of the agriculturally important phenotypic traits responsible for its extensive biogeographic distribution (Wang and Dekker, 1995
; Dekker et al., 1996
). Weedy adaptation in this species-group also depends on the ability to time germination and seedling emergence such that it results in maximum subsequent reproductive efforts.
Individual panicles on a single parent plant produce a diverse array of seeds, each with potentially different after-ripening requirements for germination. The production of seeds with different levels of dormancy (experimentally revealed by the after-ripening dose [e.g., time at 4°C, moist, dark] required for germination) is a function of plant architecture. Earlier-fertilized seeds (both intra- and interpanicle) are relatively more dormant than later-developing seeds. The first seeds on an individual panicle were shown to possess relatively greater dormancy (greater after-ripening requirement) than the last seeds maturing on the same panicle (Haar, 1998
). Additionally, primary (1°) panicles produce seeds with relatively greater dormancy than those produced on secondary (2°), and again on tertiary (3°), panicles of the same parent plant. Significant heterogeneity in dormancy states among seeds shed by a single plant allow these species to emerge at appropriate times within a cropping season and in different years (Dekker et al., 1996
; Forcella et al., 1997
). Soil seed banks consisting of diverse foxtail species and genotypes, each contributing a heterogeneous collection of dormancy phenotypes, reveal a hedge-betting strategy for adaptation to changing conditions within agroecosystems (e.g., Cohen, 1966
; Philippi and Seger, 1989
).
The wide geographic range of adaptation, heterogeneity in dormancy phenotypes, and genotypic diversity raise the question of what mechanisms in foxtail seeds drive seed behaviors (e.g., seed dormancy, germination, or seedling emergence). A recent review of foxtail seed behavior argued for the possible unifying role that soil water and oxygen may play describing both biogeographic distribution and responses by individual seeds in a soil microsite (Dekker, 2000
).
The morphology of foxtail seeds also provides important clues about what environmental factors limit germination and maintain dormancy. Morphologically, the foxtail seed symplast (embryo, endosperm, and aleurone layer) is surrounded by several enveloping layers which control its behavior (Dekker et al., 1996
). The symplast is surrounded by the caryopsis coat composed of several crushed cell layers (Rost, 1971, 1973, 1975
; Rost and Lersten, 1973
). It is filmy, oily to the touch, water- and gastight, and continuous except at the placental pore opening on the basal end of the seed. Although the mature foxtail seed is capable of freely imbibing water and dissolved gases, entry is restricted and regulated by the placental pore tissues, where there is membrane control by the transfer aleurone cell layer (TACL; Rost and Lersten, 1970
). Gases entering the moist seed symplast must be dissolved in the imbibed water passing through the narrow placental pore and TACL. The importance of gases entering dry seed is unknown. The morphology of foxtail seeds strongly suggests that seed germination is restricted by water availability in the soil and by the amount of oxygen dissolved in water reaching the inside of the seed symplast to fuel metabolism. Oxygen solubility in the water entering the symplast is an inverse function of the diurnally, seasonally, and annually changing soil temperature. The control by this oxygen-limited, gastight morphology is supported by observations of increased germination when foxtail seed envelopes, including the caryopsis coat, are punctured (Stanway, 1971
; Dekker et al., 1996
). A graphical representation of the restricting morphology on H2O-O2-time signal is presented in Fig. 1.
|
In agricultural soils the gaseous components, including oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and volatile metabolites such as carbon monoxide and ethylene, also influence seed behavior (Siegel, Renwick, and Rosen, 1962
; Siegel and Siegel, 1987
; Corbineau and Côme, 1995
). The gaseous environment of the surface soil layers within which seeds germinate is influenced by the structural characteristics of the soil (texture, drainage, aggregation, crusting, and cracking), chemical qualities of the gases, and biological activity within the soil (Pareja and Staniforth, 1985
; Pareja, Staniforth, and Pareja, 1985
).
Diatomic oxygen is required for germination by almost all plant seeds (Bewley and Black, 1994
), including dormant grasses (Simpson, 1990
), but exceptions have been observed (Corbineau and Côme, 1995
). Oxygen concentrations do not usually limit seed germination, but soil structure can inhibit O2 availability (Pareja and Staniforth, 1985a). Oxygen concentrations in agricultural soils range from 18 to 21% depending on soil depth, drainage, time of year, cropping, and tillage system (James, 1968
). The stimulatory effect of oxygen on many plant species has been observed (Atwood, 1914
; Côme and Tissaoui, 1972
), but not previously in foxtails. High concentrations of oxygen can relieve seed dormancy (Roberts, 1962
; Corbineau and Côme, 1995
). Nondormant seeds of many species have been shown to be less sensitive to oxygen deprivation than dormant seeds (Gay, Corbineau, and Côme, 1991
).
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a naturally occurring diatomic gas present in water at the soil surfaceair interface (Siegel and Siegel, 1987
), but its role in seedbank dynamics is not understood. Soil fungi, seeds, and seedlings of a wide variety of species produce significant amounts of CO in the upper soil layers in the dark. This CO production is of significant magnitude to contribute to the overall CO flux, especially at night (Siegel, Renwick, and Rosen, 1962; Siegel and Siegel, 1987
).
Carbon monoxide has many inhibitory effects on processes important during seed germination. Its toxic effect was recognized in the 17th century (Moray, 1665
). Carbon monoxide is an inhibitor of plant respiration and seed germination, acting on the coupled reactions of the mitochondria (Einarsdottir et al., 1988
; Sowa, Roos, and Caughey, 1993
). Specifically, it is an inhibitor of cytochrome c oxidase (Enzyme Commission 1.9.3.1), the terminal oxidase in the mitochondrial electron transfer chain. Often its inhibition of respiration is incomplete because of the alternate (cyanide resistant) respiratory pathway. Carbon monoxide has other roles, including environmental pollutant and inhibitor of terpene and terpenoid biosyntheis and other cytochrome P450-catalyzed reactions (e.g., Goodwin and Mercer, 1983
; Klaasen, Amdur, and Doull, 1986; Voet and Voet, 1995
).
Several studies have demonstrated the stimulatory effects of CO on germination of dormant seed, although no studies showing the effects of O2, N2, and CO over a wide concentration range have been reported previously (Fischnich, Thielbein, and Grahl, 1962
; Roberts, 1964
; Majors and Roberts, 1968
; Esashi et al., 1991
). Roberts demonstrated germination stimulation of rice (Roberts, 1964
) and of barley (Major and Roberts, 1968
). He observed "the paradox that dormancy could be broken by either increased oxygen tensions or (CO, respiratory inhibitors)" (Roberts, 1969
, p. 173).
Considering foxtail biogeography, genotypic and phenotypic diversity, the restraints imposed by seed morphology, and previous studies on the influence of gaseous atmosphere on seed germination, the objectives of this paper are to determine the effects of the gaseous atmosphere (oxygen [O2], nitrogen [N2], and carbon monoxide [CO]) on the germination of dormant giant foxtail (Setaria faberii) seed under favorable temperature and moisture conditions.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
35% germination in the conditions described below. Our lot #3731 was derived from seed in soil collected early in 1997 from an agricultural field (historically a cornsoybean rotation) 32 km southwest of Ames, Boone County, Iowa, USA. After seed germination, plants were grown in an unheated glass greenhouse on the Iowa State University campus (Ames, Iowa, USA) during the summer of 1997, and seeds at abscission were harvested on 16 September 1997. Immediately after harvest, the seeds were air-dried overnight on screens at 19°C. None of the seed germinated when it was evaluated at harvest under the conditions described below. On 17 September 1997 the majority of the dried seed was placed in paper envelopes (200 seeds each) and stored at a constant temperature of 20°C. Seeds were removed from these conditions immediately prior to being used in each of the experiments reported here (November 1999 through March 2000).
Germination
Several types of apparatus have been used to evaluate the effect of gases on germination, the primary difference between them is whether the gas continuously flows through the germination chamber (e.g., Gay, Corbineau, and Côme, 1991
; Sowa, Roos, and Caughey, 1993
) or whether a sealed system is used (e.g., Major and Roberts, 1968
; Esashi et al., 1991
). Each presents its own set of experimental artifacts, but it was felt that a sealed system was more appropriate because it mimicked the soil seed bank environment in which atmosphere exchange is limited by diffusion processes within the soil matrix and because it ensured that moisture was at no time either limiting or excessive. In other studies, the atmospheric content was changed during the course of the assay, confounding the interpretation of any changes in germination (e.g., Major and Roberts, 1968
; Esashi et al., 1991
). A sealed system also provided us with a known, constant quantity of water that never limited germination. The amount of water in our assay system was ample for germination and seedling growth up to several leaves. The seeds were covered at all times with an ample film of water wicked from the blotter paper on which they rested, but were not submerged. Seed germination in air (control) in 30-, 50-, and 100-mL sealed vials was similar (data not reported), additional evidence that gas and moisture were not limiting.
Germination was evaluated in 30-mL gas-tight vials, with 20 mm outside diameter mouths (Wheaton Science Products, Millville, New Jersey, USA). Two disks of Anchor Blue germination blotter paper (Anchor Paper, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA), 32 mm in diameter, were placed in, and completely covered, the bottom of the vials. Immediately prior to sealing and gassing, 1.5 mL of distilled, deionized water was placed in the vials along with ten dry giant foxtail seeds. After placing seed and water in the vials they were immediately sealed (Wheaton hand crimper, model 22430; Wheaton Science Products, Millville, New Jersey, USA) with neoprene stoppers and an aluminum seal was crimped around the vial neck to ensure a gas- and watertight seal.
Gas atmosphere
Combinations of O2, CO, and N2 were used to test our hypothesis. Only combinations of these gases that have physiological relevance were included (e.g., not N2CO combinations). The single gas, two-gas, and three-gas combinations that were evaluated are summarized in the Table 1.
|
Germination conditions
The sealed vials with appropriate gas atmospheres, germination paper, water, and seed were then placed in a Hoffman (model SG-30; Hoffman Manufacturing, Albany, Oregon, USA) controlled environment seed germination cabinet for 8 d. The daily conditions in the chamber alternated between 16 h light 30°C periods and 8 h dark 20°C periods. Past experience indicates these are ideal conditions for germination of seeds at or near the germination threshold (seeds almost or fully after-ripened).
Data collection and analysis
The number of seeds germinated in each vial was recorded each day for 8 d. Germination was evidenced by coleorhiza and/or coleoptile protrusion outside the seed hull. Treatments (Table 1) were arranged in a completely randomized experimental design. Each experiment was replicated 34 times; and each experiment was repeated 36 times. Each treatment mean is the pooled mean response of 9 replicates, whereas the O2, N2 and CO controls were the pooled mean of 24 replicates. Analysis of variance and appropriate t tests were conducted on mean final germination (in percentages) and mean time (in days) to germination. Data are reported as means ± 1 SE.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
37% ± 17% (Fig. 2). This heterogeneity in germination is typical of a population of partially after-ripened, dormant foxtail seed (Dekker et al., 1996
|
87 ± 15% (Figs. 2 and 3). The time to germination was shorter (
1 d) at all O2 concentrations greater than that of air (20%). Seed germination and time to germination did not decrease as O2 decreased from 20 to 10%.
Oxygencarbon monoxide effects
An atmosphere consisting of only carbon monoxide completely inhibited seed germination, as did N2, probably due to a lack of O2 (Figs. 2 and 3). Carbon monoxide did not inhibit O2-stimulated seed germination, but it did delay the time it took those seeds to germinate and stunted the size of the embryo axes that emerged (Figs. 2 and 3; Table 2).
|
When N2 and CO at the same concentration were compared separately in mixtures of N2O2 or COO2 (Figs. 2 and 3) final germination percentage did not differ, but time to germination did (Table 2). Carbon monoxide in these mixtures resulted in a longer time to germination than the same amount of N2 (i.e., 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90% CO or N2) in mixtures with O2. No effects due to CO (and lowered O2 concentration) were observed in the 10% CO90% O2 mixture, which resulted in a mean seed germination percentage similar to pure O2.
Oxygennitrogencarbon monoxide effects
In three gas mixtures with O2 at 20% concentration (air), and N2 completing the atmosphere, CO had a stimulatory effect on final germination at low concentrations (0.1 and 1% CO), a neutral effect at intermediate concentrations (5, 10, 25, and 50% CO), and an inhibitory effect at the highest (75%) concentration, when all were compared to responses in air alone (Fig. 4). The lower concentrations of CO (0.1, 1, 5, and 10%) in these three-gas mixtures resulted in a time to germination similar to that in air. But the higher concentrations of CO (25, 50, and 75%) inhibited the time to germination. The foxtail seedlings from seeds that germinated in 75% CO (20% O2 5% N2) were stunted: both coleoptile and coleorhiza axes were atypically short and blunt but typically white in color.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Partially after-ripened, dormant giant foxtail seeds were very sensitive to enriched O2 atmospheres, especially at concentrations immediately greater than ambient air (20% O2). The greatest stimulation of germination (and time to germination) occurred with the first 5% increase in O2 above that of air (from 20 to 25%). Surprisingly, no concurrent decrease in germination (and time to germination) occurred with a decrease in O2 of 10% (from 20% to 10%).
These observations reveal not only the stimulatory effects of O2 on germination or relief of dormancy but a dynamic, asymmetrical response to incremental changes in O2 above and below that typically found in agricultural soils. Foxtails rarely encounter O2 conditions above 20% in natural conditions but may have frequently encountered conditions <20%. Foxtails have evolved a robust, short-term response to low O2 concentrations, but germination remains similar at 20 and 10% O2. Seeds are poised to germinate rapidly once the normal atmospheric level of 20% O2 is exceeded. At abnormal O2 concentrations above that of air, many more seeds germinate with small incremental increases in O2 above 20%. The germination response was saturated at O2 concentrations of 75100%, conditions probably rarely or never encountered in the evolution of this species.
Several modes of action of carbon monoxide during giant foxtail seed germination
Carbon monoxide had three different effects on giant foxtail germination depending on the gas atmosphere composition to which the seed was exposed: it resulted in stimulation, no effect, or inhibition (Figs. 3 and 4).
|
More difficult to interpret were the results of Roberts (1964)
, who observed germination stimulation of rice (Oryza sativa L., ssp. indica, cv. Toma 112) in an atmosphere of 90% CO9.6% O20.4% N2 compared germination in an atmosphere of 9.6% O290.4% N2. In the gaseous mixture in our studies that were comparable to those in Roberts (90% CO10% O2), 90% CO had no effect on germination percentage (but it did increase the time to germination and stunted the emerged embryo axes) relative to germination in our gas mixture of 90% N210% O2 (Fig. 3; Table 2). Differences in species, dormancy, physiological system affected, adaptation to aquatic conditions during germination, or experimental technique and equipment may provide an explanation for the differences in observations.
Neutral effect
Carbon monoxide had no effect on germination percentage in many of the oxygen-containing gas atmosphere mixtures evaluated in this study (Fig. 3; Table 2). With a given O2 concentration, CO and N2 at the same concentration did not inhibit germination percentage in most mixtures. No effects on either germination percentage or time to germination were observed in the 10% CO90% O2 mixture. These observations on neutral effects of CO on germination percentage are consistent with results on the effects of CO on germination of Phaseolus vulgaris (Sowa, Roos, and Caughey, 1993
).
Inhibition
Without oxygen to support mitochondrial respiration, pure CO or N2 gas atmospheres completely inhibited germination. The inhibitory effect of CO on the germination process was most apparent in the delay in time it took seeds to germinate and their stunted appearance (Figs. 3 and 4; Table 2) rather than in the final germination percentage. The embryo axes (coleoptile, colerhiza) of those seeds that did germinate in the presence of high CO concentrations were stunted, yet otherwise appeared white and healthy. These reductions in axis growth are consistent with results on the effects of CO on germination of Phaseolus vulgaris (Sowa, Roos, and Caughey, 1993
). All CO concentrations delayed time to germination when compared to germination in the same N2 concentration, in mixtures with O2 (except 20% O2).
There appear to be two separate effects of CO on foxtail germination, each occurring in different physiological systems of dormant seeds at the same time. These results are consistent with what is known of the inhibitory effects of CO on mitochondrial respiration of the terminal oxidase, but it is unknown whether the alternative (cyanide resistant) respiratory pathway in germinating S. faberii seeds allows normal germination in the presence of CO (Goodwin and Mercer, 1983
; Einarsdottir et al., 1988
; Sowa, Roos, and Caughey, 1993
). What remains unknown from these observations is which physiological system(s) are being affected by CO when hydrated foxtail seed germination is stimulated.
The observation that two physiologically active diatomic chemical gases, O2 and CO, both stimulate giant foxtail seed germination provides clues about the nature of the mechanism of seed dormancy regulation. When sufficient oxygen is present in the hydrated seed symplast it stimulates the first events of foxtail germination. The first events in seed germination of domesticated (nondormant) plant species occur when they become hydrated, but the literature is unclear in separating the physiology of seed hydration and the initial processes of germination per se (Fincher, 1989
; Bewley and Black, 1994
). Foxtail seeds spend considerable time in the soil fully hydrated yet dormant. The exact nature of the first events in hydrated, after-ripened, foxtail seed germination is unknown. But what is the nature of CO stimulation? It is not apparent that it is a consequence of low CO concentrations on the respiratory apparatus, as no reports of CO-stimulated plant respiration exist. If CO-stimulated germination does not arise from respiratory stimulation, then it may be a consequence of CO interactions with an unknown factor in the seed. At low CO concentrations another factor in foxtail seeds may be inhibited, a factor that normally scavenges O2 and prevents it from initiating the first events, thereby delaying the germination process. At low concentrations, CO may poison this O2 scavenging system and thus speed the time until the critical, germination threshold amount of O2 is present in the symplast. The data presented herein are consistent with this alternative explanation.
An improved model of foxtail seed dormancy
An inherent problem with seed germination only being regulated by a restriction of O2H2O entry (TACL regulation) (Dekker, 2000
) is the observation that foxtail seed germination in natural soil habitats occurs several weeks after both favorable temperatures and O2H2O are available in the spring (Fig. 1; Forcella et al., 1992, 1997
). What is the basis of delayed weed seed germination timing in the soil after adequate temperature and resource conditions are obtained? Hiltner (1910)
suggested that inside dormant grass seeds was an oxygen-absorbing substance that would prevent O2 from reaching the embryo. It has since been suggested that polyphenoloxidase-mediated oxidation of phenolic compounds in external seed coat tissues may reduce the oxygen supply to the symplast (Roberts, 1969
; Bewley and Black, 1994
; Corbineau and Côme, 1995
). It is not apparent how these seed hull compounds could influence oxygen uptake into the foxtail seed symplast via the placental pore. Also not apparent is how these phenolic compounds can continue to absorb O2 for the time seeds remain dormant in the soil (110 or more years) and how this system could allow dormancy to be reversible allowing reinduction of dormancy in the hot months of summer (Forcella et al., 1992, 1997
; Honek and Martinkova, 1992
).
A robust seed regulatory system could result from the interaction of the TACL that restricts O2H2O entry into the seed and an oxygen scavenging system that delays the transduction of O2 in the symplast. These restrictions in uptake and O2 scavenging could act together to prolong the time before O2 stimulates the first metabolic events of seed germination. Heterogeneous foxtail seeds with differing levels and combinations of placental pore (TACL) size and O2 absorption could also provide the means by which the seedling emergence of different individuals from the same parent plant would occur over the course of an individual growing season and also over many years (Forcella et al., 1992, 1997
). Heterogeneous collections of foxtail seeds in the soil would provide a hedge-betting strategy well suited to the disturbances typical of agroecosystems, habitats to which the weedy foxtails are very well adapted (Cohen, 1966
; Phillippi and Seger, 1989
). This model of foxtail seed behavior is schematically represented in Fig. 5.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
4 Author for reprint requests (jdekker{at}iastate.edu
) ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bewley J. D. M. Black 1994 Seeds physiology and germination, 2nd ed. Plenum, New York, New York, USA
Cohen D. 1966 Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology 12: 119-129[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Côme D. T. Tissaoui 1972 Interrelated effects of imbibition, temperature and oxygen on seed germination. In W. Heydecker [ed.], Seed ecology, Proceedings of the 19th Easter School of Agriculture and Science, University of Nottingham, 157168. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Corbineau F. D. Côme 1995 Control of seed germination and dormancy by the gaseous environment. In J. Kigel and G. Galili [eds.], Seed development and germination, 397424. Marcel Dekker, New York, New York, USA
Dekker J. 1997 Weed diversity and weed management. Weed Science 45: 357-363[ISI]
Dekker J. 1999 Soil weed seed seed banks and weed management. Journal of Crop Production 2: 139-166[CrossRef]
Dekker J. 2000 Emergent weedy foxtail (Setaria spp.) seed germinability behavior. In M. Black, K. J. Bradford, and J. Vasquez-Ramos, [eds.], Seed biology: advances and applications, 411423. CAB International, Wallingford, UK
Dekker J. B. I. Dekker H. Hilhorst C. Karssen 1996 Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp.: IV. Changes in the germinative capacity of S. faberii embryos with development from anthesis to after abscission. American Journal of Botany 83: 979-991[CrossRef][ISI]
Einarsdottir O. M. G. Choc S. Weldon W. S. Caughey 1988 The site and mechanism of dioxygen reduction in bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263: 13641-13654
Esashi Y. S. Matsuyama H. Ashino M. Ogasawara R. Hasegawa 1991 ß-Glucosidase activities and HCN liberation in unimbibed and imbibed seeds, and the induction of cocklebur seed germination by cyanogenic glycosides. Physiologia Plantarum 83: 34-40[CrossRef]
Fincher G. B. 1989 Molecular and cellular biology associated with endosperm mobilization in germinating cereal grains. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 305-346[CrossRef][ISI]
Fischnich O. M. Thielbein A. Grahl 1962 Die Beeinnflussung des Saatgutwetes von Getreide duch aussere Faktoren unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der Keimruh. Saatgut-Wirtschaft 14: 12-14,39-42. Field Crop Abstract 1962, 15, Abstract No. 1231
Forcella F. R. G. Wilson J. Dekker R. J. Kremer J. Cardina R. L. Anderson D. Alm K. A. Renner R. G. Harvey S. Clay D. D. Buhler 1997 Weed seed bank emergence across the corn belt. Weed Science 45: 67-76[ISI]
Forcella F. R. G. Wilson K. A. Renner J. Dekker R. G. Harvey D. A. Alm D. D. Buhler J. A. Cardina 1992 Weed seedbanks of the U.S. corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Science 40: 636-644[ISI]
Gay C. F. Corbineau D. Côme 1991 Effects of temperature and oxygen on seed germination and seedling growth in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 31: 193-200[CrossRef][ISI]
Goodwin T. W. E. I. Mercer 1983 Introduction to plant biochemistry, 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, New York, New York, USA
Haar J. M. 1998 Characterization of foxtail (Setaria spp. ) seed production and giant foxtail (Setaria faberii) seed dormancy at abscission. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Hiltner L. 1910 Die Prufung des Saatgutes auf Frische und Gesundheit. Jahresbericht der Vereinigung fur Angewandte Botanik 8: 219.
Holm L. J. Doll E. Holm J. Pancho J. Herberger 1997 World weeds: natural histories and distribution. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA
Holm L. J. V. Pancho J. P. Herberger D. L. Plucknett 1979 A geographic atlas of world weeds. Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York, USA
Honek A. Z. Martinkova 1992 The induction of secondary seed dormancy by oxygen deficiency in a barnyard grass Echinochloa crus-galli. Experimentia 48: 904-906[CrossRef][ISI]
James A. L. 1968 Some influences of soil atmosphere on germination of annual weeds. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Klaassen C. D. M. O. Amdur J. Doull [eds.] 1986 Casarett and Doull's toxicology: the basic science of poisons, 3rd ed. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA
Major W. E. H. Roberts 1968 Dormancy in cereal seeds. I. The effects of oxygen and respiratory inhibitors. Journal of Experimental Botany 19: 77-89
Moray R. 1665 A relation of persons killed with subterranean damps. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London 1: 44-45
Pareja M. R. D. W. Staniforth 1985 Seed-soil microsite characteristics in relation to weed seed germination. Weed Science 33: 190-195[ISI]
Pareja M. R. D. W. Staniforth G. P. Pareja 1985 Distribution of weed seed among soil structural units. Weed Science 33: 182-189[ISI]
Philippi T. J. Seger 1989 Hedging one's bets, revisited. Trends Ecology and Evolution 4: 41-44
Roberts E. H. 1962 Dormancy in rice seed. III. The influence of temperature, moisture, and gaseous environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 13: 75-94
Roberts E. H. 1964 The distribution of oxidation-reduction enzymes and the effects of respiratory inhibitors and oxidizing agents on dormancy in rice seed. Physiologia Plantarum 17: 14-29[CrossRef]
Roberts E. H. 1969 Seed dormancy and oxidation processes. Symposia Society of Experimental Biology 23: 161-192
Rominger J. M. 1962 Taxonomy of Setaria (Gramineae) in North America. Illinois Biological Monographs No. 29, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA
Rost T. L. 1971 Structural and histochemical investigations of dormant and non-dormant caryopses of Setaria lutescens (Gramineae). Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Rost T. L. 1973 The anatomy of the caryopsis coat in mature caryopses of the yellow foxtail grass (Setaria lutescens). Botanical Gazette 134: 32-39[CrossRef]
Rost T. L. 1975 The morphology of germination in Setaria lutescens (Gramineae): the effects of covering structures and chemical inhibitors on dormant and non-dormant florets. Annals of Botany 39: 21-30
Rost T. L. N. R. Lersten 1970 Transfer aleurone cells in Setaria lutescens (Gramineae). Protoplasma 71: 403-408[CrossRef][ISI]
Rost T. L. N. R. Lersten 1973 A synopsis and selected bibliography of grass caryopsis anatomy and fine structure. Iowa State Journal of Research 48: 47-87
Siegel S. M. G. Renwick L. A. Rosen 1962 Formation of carbon monoxide during seed germination and seedling growth. Science 137: 683-684
Siegel S. M. B. Z. Siegel 1987 Biogenesis of carbon monoxide: production by fungi and seed plants in the dark. Phytochemistry 26: 3117-3119[CrossRef][ISI]
Simpson G. M. 1990 Seed dormancy in grasses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Sowa S. E. E. Roos W. S. Caughey 1993 Effector molecules to probe cytochrome c oxidase activity in germinating Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. Plant Physiology 141: 647-653
Stanway V. 1971 Laboratory germination of giant foxtail, Setaria faberii Herrm., at different stages of germination. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts 61: 85-90
Voet D. J. G. Voet 1995 Biochemistry, 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA
Wang R. L. J. Dekker 1995 Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp.: III. Variation in herbicide resistance in Setaria spp. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 51: 99-116[CrossRef][ISI]
Wang R. L. J. Wendel J. Dekker 1995a Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp.: I. Isozyme analysis of the genetic diversity and population genetic structure in S. viridis. American Journal of Botany 82: 308-317[CrossRef][ISI]
Wang R. L. J. Wendel J. Dekker 1995b Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp.: II. Genetic diversity and population genetic structure in S. glauca, S. geniculata and S. faberii. American Journal of Botany 82: 1031-1039[CrossRef][ISI]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |