Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ganders, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ganders, F. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ganders, F. R.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1437-1443.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Sex-biased seed predation and the maintenance of females in a gynodioecious plant1

Melanie Marshall2 and Fred R. Ganders

Botany Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada

Received for publication July 5, 2000. Accepted for publication February 8, 2001.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We investigated genetic and ecological factors contributing to the maintenance of females in populations of the gynodioecious plant, Sidalcea hendersonii (Malvaceae). Our crossing experiments indicated that male sterility is controlled by a dominant nuclear allele. Nuclear determination of sex theoretically requires much higher female fitness to account for the high frequency of female plants often observed during surveys of S. hendersonii populations. Females were, in fact, shown to have higher fitness in an experimental population, producing more viable seed and surviving offspring than hermaphrodite plants. In natural populations, however, differences in viable seed production were not evident unless seed predation was considered. Sex-biased seed predation appears to play an important role in the maintenance of gynodioecy in S. hendersonii. In populations with high female frequencies, weevil larvae destroyed significantly more seeds from hermaphrodite plants than females, substantially reducing their seed production. To our knowledge, this study provides the first evidence that sex-biased predation may be responsible for high female frequencies in natural populations of a gynodioecious species.

Key Words: Anthonomus melancholicus • breeding system • Curculionidae • gynodioecy • Malvaceae • predispersal seed predator • Sidalcea hendersonii


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Gynodioecious plant populations consist of separate hermaphrodite and male sterile (female) individuals. Female plants appear to have a reproductive disadvantage relative to hermaphrodites since they do not contribute genes through pollen (Lewis, 1941 ); however, this loss of male function may be compensated either by producing more seeds or higher quality seeds than hermaphrodites (Ashman, 1992 ). The level of compensation required for females depends on the genetic control of male sterility. Because cytoplasmic factors are usually maternally inherited, cytoplasmic and cytoplasmic nuclear control of male sterility may result in a higher frequency of male sterile progeny and permit the maintenance of gynodioecy where nuclear control may not (Maurice et al., 1994 ). Theoretical models predict that when the inheritance of male sterility is nuclear, females must produce more than twice as much seed as hermaphrodites for male sterility genes to persist, but if maternally inherited cytoplasmic factors are involved, females may require smaller advantages in seed production (Lewis, 1941 ; Lloyd, 1974a ; Charlesworth, 1981 ; Delannay, Gouyon, and Valdeyron, 1981 ; Schultz, 1993 ).

Two principal hypotheses have been proposed to explain the maintenance of females in gynodioecious populations. The outcrossing hypothesis proposes that the progeny of females experience higher fitness because female flowers are obligately outcrossed, while the seeds of hermaphrodite flowers may result from self-fertilization and could exhibit inbreeding depression (Lewis, 1941 ; Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1978 ; Ganders, 1978 ). The outcrossing hypothesis has been extensively tested with population genetics models (e.g., Lewis, 1941 ; Ross and Shaw, 1971 ; Lloyd, 1974b ; Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1978 ; Charlesworth and Ganders, 1979 ; Delannay, Gouyon, and Valdeyron, 1981 ; Webb, 1981 ; Schultz and Ganders, 1996 ). The frequency of females at equilibrium, p, can be estimated by

{abot-88-08-17-e1}

where s is the selfing rate of hermaphrodites, {delta} is the inbreeding depression in the progeny from selfing, and f is the seed production of hermaphrodites relative to females (modified from Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1978 ). From this equation, the frequency of females increases as s and {delta} increase or f decreases. Even in the absence of differences in seed production, females may be maintained at equilibrium when selfing and inbreeding are high, i.e., s{delta} > 0.5 (Lloyd, 1974b ; Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1978 ; Ganders, 1978 ; Schultz and Ganders, 1996 ).

The second hypothesis, the resource allocation hypothesis, proposes that maternal genotype and/or maternal environment may be an important source of female advantage (Van Damme and Van Delden, 1984 ; Ashman, 1992 ). Female plants may allocate more resources to ovules and seed development than hermaphrodites because females do not expend resources on male function. Developmental advantages associated with maternal parentage have been reported for a number of species including Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Ashman, 1992 ), Cucurbita foetidissima (Kohn, 1989 ), Phacelia linearis (Eckhart, 1992 ), and Eritrichum aretioides (Puterbaugh, Wied, and Galen, 1997 ). Outcrossing advantages and maternal-sex effects can operate simultaneously or at different stages of the life cycle (Shykoff, 1988 ; Ashman, 1992 ; Sakai et al., 1997 ).

Although many genetic models of the maintenance of male sterility may incorporate ecological parameters (Ross, 1982 ), ecological effects are infrequently identified or examined in isolation, perhaps because they are difficult to quantify or separate from genetic factors. Ecological factors can play a significant role in mating system evolution, and in some cases, may even overshadow an initial genetic disposition (Stebbins, 1957 ; Jain, 1976 ; Barrett and Harder, 1996 ). We report here an ecological condition where hermaphrodite plants may experience higher levels of seed predation than female plants and suggest that pest pressure affects the frequency of females in populations of Sidalcea hendersonii.

A few examples of sex-related predation preferences have been reported. Sex-specific leaf-feeding by insects has been observed in the dioecious species Hippohoa rhamnoides and Cannabis sativa (Gatima and Giklova cited in Bawa and Opler, 1978 ). Cox (1982) describes the incidental destruction of male flowers by bats, birds, and rodents seeking pollen, and staminate inflorescences of dioecious Simarouba glauca are considerably more likely than females to sustain feeding damage from moth larvae (Bawa and Opler, 1978 ). Also, hermaphrodite plants in a gynodioecious population of Iris douglasiana were shown to experience higher levels of seed predation by moth larvae than females (Uno, 1982 ). Anecdotal evidence suggests that pollen/flower eating beetles preferentially attack the hermaphroditic flowers in a gynodioecious population of Tellima grandiflora (Wagner and Miller, 1984 ).

The objective of this research was to determine the relative importance of several factors that could contribute to the maintenance of females in populations of Sidalcea hendersonii, specifically: (1) What is the genetic basis of male sterility? (2) What are the effects of inbreeding and maternal parentage on fitness? (3) Do seed predators prey selectively on the seeds of one sex? (4) Is there a positive relationship between the degree of seed destruction in hermaphrodites and the frequency of females in a population?


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Study plant
Sidalcea hendersonii Wats. (Malvaceae) is a perennial herb inhabiting low-elevation wet meadows and tidal marshes from southwestern British Columbia, Canada, to Oregon, USA. The populations of S. hendersonii examined in this study are gynodioecious. Hermaphroditic flowers contain both functional anthers and ovaries and are self-compatible but protandrous. Female flowers have functional ovaries but nonfunctional anthers and have significantly smaller petals than hermaphrodite flowers (Marshall, 1998 ). Pollinator observations during this study indicate that these plants are pollinated primarily by species of Bombus.

Seed predators
Two species of weevils, Macrorhoptus sidalcea Sleeper and Anthonomus melancholicus Dietz (Curculionidae), parasitize the flowers of S. hendersonii in British Columbia and often coexist in host populations. Our collections revealed the presence of Macrorhoptus sidalcea (Fig. 1) in populations of S. hendersonii along the east coast of Vancouver Island and at Delta, British Columbia on the mainland. Mating pairs of M. sidalcea were observed in blossoms of S. hendersonii in June. Female weevils deposit their eggs in immature carpels, and the larvae complete their development in the fruit (a 5–9 seeded schizocarp) prior to seed dispersal. When a seed has been consumed, the larva may tunnel through the lateral carpel wall to feed on an adjacent seed. Pupation occurs in the cavity being formed by the larva, and the adult exits through a hole chewed in the carpel wall (Burke, 1973 ).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 1–2. Weevil seed predators. Dorsal view drawings by L. Lucas (1995). Magnified 33.3x 1. Macrorhoptus sidalcea. 2. Anthonomus melancholicus

 
Anthonomus melancholicus (Fig. 2) weevil larvae may also use S. hendersonii carpels or buds for their development. While M. sidalcea larvae feed only on the interior of the seed, creating small tunnels through carpel walls, A. melancholicus larvae appear to destroy entire fruits. Diets of adult weevils were not investigated in this study, but adult weevils in the genus Anthonomus are known to forage on pollen (H. Burke, Texas A & M University, personal communication).

Experimental study: growth conditions, fitness measures, and breeding design
In September 1994, seed of S. hendersonii was collected at random from female and hermaphrodite individuals from populations at Delta and Comox, British Columbia. Seeds (mericarps) were scarified and placed in a mixture of peat and fungicide (oxine benzoate 2.5%) at 9°C for 14 d. Germinated seeds were planted into pots at the University of British Columbia greenhouse and then transferred to insect-free growth chambers just prior to flowering. The growth chamber was maintained at 20°C with an 8-h photoperiod.

To identify the mode of inheritance for male sterility and the presence of fitness differences between the sexes, crosses (891 total) were performed between 17 female and 13 hermaphrodite plants and between separate hermaphrodite individuals. All hermaphrodite plants were also self-pollinated to test for inbreeding depression. Each maternal plant received pollen from several different pollen donors, although single flowers received pollen from one donor only. Each pollen donor was crossed to several different seed parents. Eight hermaphroditic individuals were used as pollen donors for crosses with females. These same eight individuals, as well as three additional pollen donors, were used for crosses between hermaphrodites.

Stamens at anthesis were removed from hermaphrodite flowers and used in hand pollinations. Both outcrossed and self-pollinated hermaphrodite seed parents were emasculated prior to receiving pollen. Protandry minimized the chances of contamination from self-pollen as the style typically emerged from the androecium 2–3 d following emasculation at anthesis.

The seeds produced from these crosses were harvested during the fall of 1995 and the number of viable seeds and unfertilized ovules was determined. The progeny from all crosses between any pair of parents were considered a family, while all progeny of any one seed parent were considered a maternal family. Thirty families with sufficient seed stock for genetic interpretation and statistical comparisons were selected. Female mothers were grouped into three maternal families (of 5, 4, and 2 families, respectively), and hermaphrodite mothers were grouped into five maternal families (of 3, 3, 4, 4, and 5 families, respectively).

In January 1996, the seeds from the selected families (660 seeds from female families, 361 seeds from outcrossed hermaphrodite families, and 82 seeds from selfed hermaphrodites) were planted. The seedlings were exposed to the same environmental conditions as the parent plants except that the growth chamber temperature and daylight hours were increased to accelerate germination and flowering (23°C, 12-h photoperiod). Germination was monitored every 1–2 d for 3 mo, and germinating seeds were marked for later detection of seedling mortality. To reduce position effects, individual pots were randomized and rotated every 2 wk for 4 mo, at which time the plants were too large and fragile to rotate. Survival was determined after 5 mo. The sex of each individual and the proportion of plants that flowered within 13 mo were scored. The results for sex determination were based on offspring from several different parent combinations; however, some parents produced more flowering offspring than others. Due to space limitations at the time of flowering, 250 female offspring (randomly selected within each family) were moved to a second growth chamber and used only for sex determination.

Field study: female frequency, seed set, and seed predation
Six populations of S. hendersonii were included in this study, one located at Delta, British Columbia (Ladner Marsh, LA) in the Lower Fraser Valley, and the other five from Vancouver Island (Campbell River, CR; Comox, CX; Duncan, DU; Port Alberni, PA; Sayward, SY). The relative frequency of females in each population was determined by scoring the sex of plants as encountered during surveys.

In June of 1995 and 1996, single racemes from female and hermaphrodite individuals were randomly selected and marked for subsequent measures of seed set and seed predation. At each population, 28–40 racemes per sex were collected both years in August. For estimates of seed set and seed predation by Anthonomus weevils, we counted the number of intact and completely consumed fruits. For fruits infested by tunneling Macrorhoptus weevils, we counted the number of damaged and undamaged seeds.

The average number of seeds per fruit was determined from a sample of the first ten intact fruits from the base of the stem upward. Every seed from this sample was dissected and classified as viable, unfilled (including unfertilized ovules and aborted seeds), or tunneled (containing larvae, weevil tunnels, or exit holes). Tunneled seeds will be referred to as "Macrorhoptus predation."

The number of completely eaten seeds was estimated (since no seeds remained to be counted) by multiplying the number of completely eaten fruit by the average seed production/fruit for the corresponding raceme. Completely eaten seeds will be referred to as "Anthonomus predation." Total seed predation per sex per population was calculated as the sum of tunneled and completely eaten seeds (Macrorhoptus predation + Anthonomus predation).

Analyses
Observed progeny sex ratios in the experimental population were compared to expected Mendelian ratios for a nuclear model, and differences were analyzed using a chi-square test. Differences in seed production among female, outcrossed hermaphrodite, and self-pollinated hermaphrodite parents were evaluated with a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks. Nonparametric analyses were performed when the data were not normally distributed and/or variances were unequal and when values could not be transformed. Differences in progeny performance were evaluated with a chi-square test. Multiplicative fitness (after Sakai, Karoly, and Weller, 1989 ) was estimated for each maternal parent group as the product of seed production and progeny performance at all stages (overall fitness = proportion of viable seed produced x proportion of germinated seeds x proportion of seedlings that survived x proportion of progeny that flowered). Inbreeding depression was estimated as {delta} = 1 – ws/wo where wo is the overall fitness estimate of outcrossed progeny and ws is the overall fitness estimate of selfed progeny.

A nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum test was applied to compare mean values of females and hermaphrodites in natural populations for seed set and seed predation. All statistical analyses were performed with SigmaStat® v. 2.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Genetic control of male sterility
Crosses to female mothers yielded a ratio of hermaphrodite to female offspring not significantly different from a 1 : 1 ratio (41 : 40; {chi}2 = 0.0123; P > 0.5), while hermaphrodite mothers gave rise to hermaphrodite offspring only (44 progeny).

Female frequency
The mean frequency of females in natural populations of S. hendersonii was 39%, though values ranged from 14 to 54% (CR: 44%, N = 100; CX: 54%, N = 129; DU: 49%, N = 175; LA: 21%, N = 300; PA: 52%, N = 66; SY: 14%, N = 337).

Fitness measures
Experimental population
From hand pollinations, female parents had the highest overall fitness followed by outcrossed hermaphrodite parents, and selfed hermaphrodites had the lowest value. Outcrossed females produced 22% more viable seeds/fruit, had 31% greater germination, 7% higher survival, and 22% greater flowering success than outcrossed hermaphrodites (Table 1). Fitness measures for progeny of outcrossed hermaphrodite plants were three times higher than for progeny of self-pollinated hermaphrodites. Inbreeding depression is estimated at 0.67 ({delta} = 1 – 0.01/0.03). This may be an underestimate, since estimates of inbreeding depression under greenhouse or growth chamber conditions are often lower than estimates under field conditions (Dudash, 1990 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Performance comparisons and multiplicative fitness for females (F), outcrossed hermaphrodites (Hox), and self-pollinated hermaphrodites (Hs) in the experimental population of Sidalcea hendersonii. N = number of fruit sampled. Overall fitness is the product of the proportion of viable seeds/total seeds per fruit, proportion of germinated seeds, proportion of seedlings to survive after 5 mo, and proportion of plants to flower in the first year. Chi-square tests the hypothesis F = Hox = Hs for proportion of seedlings to germinate, survive, and flower. Proportion values are listed in parentheses

 
Natural populations
No consistent pattern of sex-related differences in fecundity alone was evident in natural populations. The number of fruit on a raceme was not significantly different between female and hermaphrodite plants in any of the populations. Females did produce significantly more seeds per uneaten fruit than hermaphrodites for most populations (Table 2), but frequently many of the seeds were inviable. In Campbell River and Duncan populations, female fruit contained more viable seeds than hermaphrodite fruit, but hermaphrodite fruit contained more viable seeds at Port Alberni (Table 2). In general, both hermaphrodite and female plants had extraordinarily low fruit set and seed number at the Port Alberni population (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean values for fruit and seed production in natural populations of Sidalcea hendersonii. Data reported for PA and SA are from 1996 (data not available for 1995), and data reported for the remainder of populations are from 1995 (results similar in 1996). Total fruits/raceme includes eaten fruit (calyx persistent), while only uneaten fruit could be sampled to determine total seeds/fruit and viable seeds/fruit. N = number of individuals sampled; F = females and H = hermaphrodites. Standard deviations are reported in parentheses. Significant differences are between sexes of the same species. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

 
Sex-biased seed predation
Weevils were the most abundant insects on S. hendersonii, and other insects identified were not seed predators. Anthonomus melancholicus was present in all of the Vancouver Island populations, but was not found at Ladner Marsh in Delta, British Columbia. Macrorhoptus sidalcea was present in all of the populations surveyed except for Duncan. Not surprisingly, plants at Ladner Marsh had the highest number of seeds exhibiting Macrorhoptus tunneling for both females and hermaphrodites, and the lowest number of seeds exhibiting the Anthonomus form of predation (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Seed predation and seed survival over 2 yr in natural populations of Sidalcea hendersonii. Macrorhoptus and Anthonmus predation refers to: mean number of seeds eaten/raceme. F = females and H = hermaphrodites. Standard deviations are reported in parentheses. Significant differences are between sexes of the same species. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

 
The number of predated seeds was variable among individuals within each sex. Some hermaphrodite individuals had all of their fruit (and seeds) destroyed, while other individuals were untouched. Female plants (F) generally had low levels of seed predation, but a few individuals were severely attacked in some populations. With the exception of Ladner Marsh, hermaphrodite plants (H) had significantly higher total seed predation than female plants (mean seed predation H = 39%, F = 5.6%; P < 0.05) (Table 3, Fig. 3). Consequently, seed survival was at least 1.6 times higher on average for females in all of the populations except Ladner, where seed survival was the same for females and hermaphrodites (Table 3). Furthermore, there was a trend for the frequency of females in S. hendersonii populations to be positively correlated with relative seed survival (r = 0.70; N = 6; P = 0.124) (Fig. 4).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mean total percentage seed predation for female and hermaphrodite plants of Sidalcea hendersonii in natural populations. For populations in which predation was measured in 1995 and 1996, the average value of the two years is reported. CR, Campbell River; CX, Comox; DU, Duncan; LA, Ladner Marsh; PA, Port Alberni; SA, Sayward

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relative seed survival and female frequency in natural populations of Sidalcea hendersonii. Each point represents a different population. CR, Campbell River; CX, Comox; DU, Duncan; PA, Port Alberni; SY, Sayward; LA, Ladner Marsh;. F = females, H = hermaphrodites

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Genetic control of male sterility
The inheritance of male sterility in S. hendersonii conforms to Mendelian ratios, suggesting that sterility is controlled by a nuclear gene, which is not influenced by cytoplasmic factors. Male sterility is most likely controlled by a single dominant allele. Although most gynodioecious species are alleged to have cytoplasmic-nuclear inheritance of sex, nuclear dominant systems have been reported for at least 14 other gynodioecious species (citations in Ganders, 1978 ; Kaul, 1988 ; Kohn, 1989 ).

This relatively uncomplicated result is surprising since a cytoplasmic–nuclear interaction was reported to control male sterility in the closely related gynodioecious congener S. oregana ssp. spicata (Ashman, 1992 ). At least nine other gynodioecious Sidalcea species are known, suggesting that gynodioecy is not a recent development in the genus. The genetic control of an apparently well-established male sterility system in Sidalcea might be expected to be relatively complex. Alternatively, the frequency of gynodioecy in Sidalcea could also indicate that Sidalcea species are simply more susceptible to male sterility mutations, and the independent appearance of nuclear controlled gynodioecy is certainly possible. Another explanation for this inconsistency is that male-sterile cytoplasm may have been fixed in these populations of S. hendersonii. Some models suggest that cytoplasmic-nuclear gynodioecy is a nonequilibrium state inclined to evolve towards nuclear male sterility (Charlesworth and Ganders, 1979 ; Delannay, Gouyon, and Valdeyron, 1981 ). If male-sterile cytoplasm becomes fixed in a population, male sterility would appear to be controlled by nuclear genes (Charlesworth and Ganders, 1979 ).

Theoretical models predict that for nuclear-controlled male sterility genes to persist, female Sidalcea hendersonii plants should be more than twice as fit as hermaphrodites. The requirements for female maintenance are the same if a fixed sterile cytoplasm interacts with nuclear, recessive, fertility-restoring alleles.

Fitness measures
Experimental population
If female advantage is the result of a difference in outcrossing rates and inbreeding depression, outcrossed hermaphrodites should have higher fitness than self-pollinated hermaphrodites. If differences in performance are a function of maternal sex-allocation effects, then females should have higher fitness than both outcrossed and selfed hermaphrodites. In the experimental population, outcrossed hermaphrodites did have higher fitness values than self-pollinated hermaphrodites, supporting the outcrossing hypothesis. However, females had higher fitness than outcrossed hermaphrodites, suggesting that maternal sex effects occur as well. Relative to females, outcrossed hermaphrodite fitness was estimated to be 0.18, indicating that 82% of the female advantage is most likely due to a maternal effect such as resource allocation differences between the sexes (i.e., females do not expend resources on pollen production). Compared to females, hermaphrodite fitness is reduced an additional 12% when inbreeding occurs.

Inbreeding depression was estimated at 0.67, suggesting that many of the progeny from selfing do not reproduce. An estimate of 0.67 for inbreeding depression is considered to be high, although inbreeding depression values were reported to range from 0.62 to 0.94 in gynodioecious Schiedea salicaria (Sakai, Karoly, and Weller, 1989 ) and from 0.96 to 0.98 in gynodioecious Bidens sandvicensis (Schultz and Ganders, 1996 ). Though inbreeding depression does appear to be high in S. hendersonii and differences in performance traits for outcrossed and selfed hermaphrodites are statistically significant, the values for overall fitness are so minute (<0.04) that perceived performance differences between the two may not be meaningful.

Natural populations
Averaged for all study populations, the proportion of viable seed to total ovules for females is 0.44 and for hermaphrodites is 0.44, i.e., f = 1 in Eq. 1. Overall, no maternal effect or outcrossing advantage is evident from seed viability data gathered in the field. These results do not eliminate the possibility of inbreeding effects because measures of fitness in natural populations can be complicated by ecological factors. For instance, developing seeds may also abort due to insufficient pollination, limited nutrients, or disease. In addition, most of the advantages associated with outcrossing and maternal effect reported for the experimental population may be detected in later life history stages that were not measured for natural populations.

The similarity in levels of seed production for females and hermaphrodites may also be affected by mating patterns in natural populations. For instance, the protandrous flowers of hermaphrodites could favor outcrossing in hermaphrodites and increase hermaphrodite fitness. Furthermore, females can also experience inbreeding depression if crossed with relatives. Biparental inbreeding in females of gynodioecious Hawaiian Bidens has been estimated to be as high as 25% (Sun and Ganders, 1988 ).

Female frequency
The selfing rate of hermaphrodites was not measured, but it could not be high enough to explain observed female frequencies using Eq. 1. If {delta} = 0.67 and f = 1, for the female frequency to be P > 0.01, hermaphrodites of S. hendersonii must have a high selfing rate of >0.75. Even if the selfing rate were 1.0, the female frequency would only be 0.25. Despite a liberal estimate of selfing in natural populations, these values for selfing, inbreeding depression, and relative seed production are not great enough to explain the high frequency of females in populations of S. hendersonii (often exceeding 50%). When gynodioecy is determined by nuclear genes, a female frequency of 50% or higher implies that the populations are either not in equilibrium for their outcrossing rates or are functionally dioecious, i.e., hermaphrodite plants essentially function as males (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1978 ; Ganders, 1978 ). If S. hendersonii populations are functionally dioecious, selection may favor hermaphrodites that allocate additional resources to male function that could facilitate the evolution of dioecy. However, there was no indication of female sterility in hermaphrodites, as every flower examined for this study contained ovules, and hermaphrodites did produce viable seed in nature and in the experimental population. Furthermore, despite the high frequency of females, gynodioecy appears to persist in Sidalcea species with no known occurrence of obligate dioecy.

Sex-biased seed predation
In all cases of sex-biased predation in S. hendersonii, hermaphrodite plants experienced more damage than females. Sex-biased predation was evident only in populations where A. melancholicus occurred and was always correlated with completely eaten seeds. At Ladner Marsh, where M. sidalcea occurred exclusively, females and hermaphrodites experienced the same levels of seed predation. Macrorhoptus sidalcea was not a selective predator. Macrorhoptus sidalcea also occurs on S. nelsoniana in Oregon and has not demonstrated selective behavior on these plants either (Gisler and Meinke, 1997 ).

The basis for discrimination between flower types by weevils was not investigated in this study. It seems highly likely that adult females of A. melancholicus, whose preferred food is pollen, may select hermaphrodite flowers rather than female flowers because they are attracted to pollen and improve their reproductive efficiency by using the same plant to brood their young. Weevils may further be attracted to the larger flowers of hermaphrodites, which form larger floral displays. Bruchid seed beetles were found to be attracted to larger flowers in Hibiscus moscheutos (Kudoh and Whigham, 1998 ); however, no effect of petal size on rates of seed predation was evident. Also in Ipomopsis aggregata, predispersal seed predation by the dipteran Hylemya sp. increased with increasing inflorescence size (Brody and Mitchell, 1997 ).

In gynodioecious and dioecious species that experience differential predation (e.g., Bawa and Opler, 1978 ; Cox, 1982 ; Uno, 1982 ; Wagner and Miller, 1984 ), the hermaphroditic or male flowers were attacked more frequently than the female flowers. Female Iris plants were thought to escape high levels of predation since they complete flowering and their capsules mature before the onset of the predator's developmental cycle (Uno, 1982 ). Bawa and Opler (1978) suggested a similar synchrony of male flowering and predator cycle in dioecious Simarouba.

Although many other species of Sidalcea are host to weevil predators (Dimling, 1992 ; S. Gisler, Oregon Department of Agriculture, personal communication; T.-L. Ashman, University of Pittsburgh, personal communication), this is the first reported case of sex-biased seed predation in a Sidalcea species. It is possible that selective predation has not been reported for other species of Sidalcea because they do not share the same seed predators. Anthonomus melancholicus is not reported to be a predator of S. malvaeflora (Dimling, 1992 ), S. campestris, S. virgata, or S. nelsoniana (S. Gisler, Oregon Department of Agriculture, personal communication). Anthonomus melancholicus or its ancestors may have accompanied S. hendersonii in its postglacial migration, and predator and host plant differentiated together.

Mating system and sex-biased seed predation
Females must produce significantly more seeds than hermaphrodites for male sterility mutations to be maintained in gynodioecious populations. The high frequency of females could not be completely explained by the mechanism of sex determination, inbreeding depression, or, in natural populations, maternal effects. Founder effects or genetic drift could possibly be responsible for these high frequencies. If, however, predation is included in the fecundity parameter, the average value for A. melancholicus infested populations is f = 0.64. With a value of s = 0.75 and {delta} = 0.67, the equilibrium frequency of females is now 27%, a high value that is much closer to observed frequencies of females in natural populations (Eq. 1 does not strictly apply when there are maternal effects on fitness other than seed set, but the results should be approximately correct). A model for Eq. 1 demonstrates the high selfing rates required for females to exist without seed predation, compared to much lower requirements when seed predation is considered (Fig. 5).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Frequency model using Eq. 1 compares selfing rates required for the maintenance of females in natural populations of Sidalcea hendersonii applying different values for f (seed production of hermaphrodites relative to females): f = 0.64 with seed predation present and f = 1 without seed predation

 
The presence of female plants at the Ladner population, where sex-biased seed predators did not occur, suggests that females may be maintained in some S. hendersonii populations in the absence of differential predation. In the majority of populations examined, sex-biased seed predation appears to contribute significantly to the maintenance of gynodioecy and may even enable females to achieve a high frequency. Cox (1982) proposed a model for the evolution of dioecy resulting from sex-related flower destruction by vertebrate pollinators. Perhaps a model for the evolution or maintenance of gynodioecy due to sex-biased seed predation could be similarly devised.

The answers to the questions posed in the introduction follow. (1) Male sterility in S. hendersonii appears to be controlled by nuclear gene(s). (2) Despite experimental evidence of maternal effect and inbreeding depression, differences in viable seed production in nature were not evident unless seed predation was considered. (3) Sex-biased seed predation does occur in Sidalcea hendersonii. The seed predator Anthonomus melancholicus selectively consumed hermaphrodite seed resulting in significantly greater seed production for females. (4) The high degree of seed destruction in hermaphrodite plants appears to sustain high frequencies of females in populations of S. hendersonii. Sex-biased seed predation may provide the necessary advantage to females in this gynodioecious species.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank Steven Gisler, Matthew Carlson, Leslie Goertzen, and Susan Kephart for critically reviewing the manuscript; Horace Burke and Robert Anderson for identifying and discussing the weevil species; Helen Kennedy, Mark Pidkowich, Rick Ree, Monique Trepaniér, Christel Shaughnessy, Samantha Hicks, Kristin Milligan, and, in particular, Lesley Esford for field assistance. This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant to F. R. Ganders. Back

2 Author for reprint requests, current address: Bureau of Land Management, West Eugene Wetlands Field Office, 751 South Danebo, Eugene, Oregon USA 97402 (melanie{at}peak.org ). Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Ashman T.-L. 1992 The relative importance of inbreeding and maternal sex in determining progeny fitness in Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata, a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 46: 1862-1874[CrossRef][ISI]

Barrett S. C. H. L. D. Harder 1996 Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 73-79

Bawa K. S. P. A. Opler 1978 Why are pistillate inflorescences of Simarouba glauca eaten less than staminate inflorescences?. Evolution 32: 673-676

Brody A. K. R. J. Mitchell 1997 Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 110: 86-93[CrossRef][ISI]

Burke H. R. 1973 Taxonomic relationships and biology of Macrorhoptus (Curculionidae). Coleopterists Bulletin 27: 175-181

Charlesworth B. D. Charlesworth 1978 A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997[CrossRef][ISI]

Charlesworth D. 1981 A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in gynodioecious species. Heredity 46: 27-39

———, andF. R. Ganders 1979 The population genetics of gynodioecy with cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility. Heredity 43: 213-218[ISI]

Cox P. A. 1982 Vertebrate pollination and the maintenance of dioecism in Freycinetia. American Naturalist 120: 65-80[CrossRef][ISI]

Delannay X. P. H. Gouyon G. Valdeyron 1981 Mathematical study of the evolution of gynodioecy with cytoplasmic inheritance under the effect of a nuclear restorer gene. Genetics 99: 169-181[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dimling J. F. 1992 Analysis of the biotic factors affecting the seed set of a rare pacific northwest endemic: Sidalcea malvaeflora (D. C.) Gray ex Benth. elegans (Greene) C. L. Hitchc. Northwest Science 66: 35-39[ISI]

Dudash M. R. 1990 Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139[CrossRef][ISI]

Eckhart V. M. 1992 Resource compensation and the evolution of gynodioecy in Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolution 46: 1313-1328[CrossRef][ISI]

Ganders F. R. 1978 The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 1400-1408

Gisler S. D. R. J. Meinke 1997 Reproductive attrition by pre-dispersal seed predation in Sidalcea nelsoniana (Malvaceae): implications for the recovery of a threatened species. In T. N. Kaye, A. Liston, R. M. Love, D. L. Luoma, R. J. Meinke, and M.V. Wilson [eds.], Conservation and management of native plants and fungi, 56–61. Native Plant Society of Oregon, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

Jain S. K. 1976 The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 469-495

Kaul M. L. H. 1988 Male sterility in higher plants. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 10

Kohn J. R. 1989 Sex ratio, seed production, biomass allocation, and the cost of male function in Cucurbita foetidissima HBK (Cucurbitaceae). Evolution 43: 1424-1434[CrossRef][ISI]

Kudoh H. D. F. Whigham 1998 The effect of petal size manipulation on pollinator/seed-predator mediated female reproductive success of Hibiscus moscheutos. Oecologia 117: 70-79[CrossRef][ISI]

Lewis D. 1941 Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytologist 40: 56-63[CrossRef]

Lloyd D. G. 1974a The genetic contributions of individual males and females in dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32: 45-51[ISI]

———. 1974b Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32: 11-34[ISI]

Marshall M. 1998 The maintenance of gynodioecy in Sidalcea hendersonii. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Maurice S. E. Belhassen D. Couvet P.-H. Gouyon 1994 Evolution of dioecy: can nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions select for maleness?. Heredity 73: 346-354

Puterbaugh M. N. A. Wied C. Galen 1997 The functional ecology of gynodioecy in Eritrichum aretioides (Boraginaceae), the alpine forget-me-not. American Journal of Botany 84: 393-400[Abstract]

Ross M. D. 1982 Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. American Naturalist 119: 297-318[CrossRef][ISI]

———, andR. F. Shaw 1971 Maintenance of male sterility in plant populations. Heredity 26: 1-8[ISI]

Sakai A. K. K. Karoly S. G. Weller 1989 Inbreeding depression in Schiedea globosa and S. salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), subdioecious and gynodioecious Hawaiian species. American Journal of Botany 76: 437-444[CrossRef][ISI]

Sakai A. K. S. G. Weller M.-L. Chen S.-Y. Chou C. Tasanont 1997 Evolution of gynodioecy and maintenance of females: the role of inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates, and resource allocation in Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 51: 724-736[CrossRef][ISI]

Schultz S. T. 1993 Evolution of gynodioecy and dioecy: theoretical issues and the case of Bidens sandvicensis and B. cervicata. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

———, andF. R. Ganders 1996 Evolution of unisexuality in the Hawaiian Islands: a test of microevolutionary theory. Evolution 50: 1842-1855[CrossRef][ISI]

Shykoff J. A. 1988 Maintenance of gynodioecy in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae): stage-specific fecundity and viability selection. American Journal of Botany 75: 844-850[CrossRef][ISI]

Stebbins G. L. 1957 Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. American Naturalist 41: 337-354[CrossRef]

Sun M. F. R. Ganders 1988 Mixed mating systems in Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae). Evolution 42: 516-527[CrossRef][ISI]

Uno G. E. 1982 Comparative reproductive biology of hermaphroditic and male-sterile Iris douglasiana Herb (Iridaceae). American Journal of Botany 69: 818-823[CrossRef][ISI]

Van Damme J. M. M. W. Van Delden 1984 Gynodioecy in Plantago lanceolata L. IV. Fitness components of sex types in different life cycle stages. Evolution 38: 1326-1336[CrossRef][ISI]

Wagner D. H. J. W. Miller 1984 Gynodioecy in Tellima grandiflora (Pursh) Dougl. (Saxifragaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 93

Webb C. J. 1981 Test of a model predicting equilibrium frequencies of females in populations of gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 46: 397-405[ISI]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. C. McCall
Leaf damage and gender but not flower damage affect female fitness in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 445 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S.-M. Chang
Female compensation through the quantity and quality of progeny in a gynodioecious plant, Geranium maculatum (Geraniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2006; 93(2): 263 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Lopez-Villavicencio, A. Branca, T. Giraud, and J. A. Shykoff
Sex-specific effect of Microbotryum violaceum (Uredinales) spores on healthy plants of the gynodioecious Gypsophila repens (Caryophyllaceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2005; 92(5): 896 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. ASIKAINEN and P. MUTIKAINEN
Preferences of Pollinators and Herbivores in Gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2005; 95(5): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. F. Rosas, J. Perez-Alquicira, and C. A. Dominguez
Environmentally induced variation in fecundity compensation in the morph-biased male-sterile distylous shrub Erythroxylum havanense (Erythroxylaceae)
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 116 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. Andreasen and B. G. Baldwin
Reexamination of relationships, habital evolution, and phylogeography of checker mallows (Sidalcea; Malvaceae) based on molecular phylogenetic data
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 436 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ganders, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ganders, F. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ganders, F. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS