|
|
||||||||
2 Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800 USA; and 3 Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53606 USA
Received for publication September 3, 1999. Accepted for publication March 10, 2000.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 carpels sharing a single style. The fruits are globose to oblate, loculicidally dehiscent capsules, with a persistent calyx, and contain flat, elliptical seeds that are surrounded by a small wing. Pollen removed from the anthers is tricolpate with finely striate sculpture. Although clearly dicotyledonous, the combination of characters found in Landeenia is not known in any modern genus. The familial affinities of the plant, though certainly not with the Araliaceae as previously thought, remain uncertain. However, the combination of characters is consistent with treatment as a member of the Sapindales. The fossil material is thus assigned to the rank of Sapindales-Incertae sedis.
Key Words: Bridger Formation Eocene extinct flower Landeenia pollen Sapindales Wyoming
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the more intriguing fruits of the Blue Rim assemblage is Carpites aralioides MacGinitie. This species was originally described on the basis of a few fruits from the middle Eocene Absaroka volcanic province of northwestern Wyoming (MacGinitie, 1974
). The larger and more diverse array of specimens now available from Blue Rim and other localities, including fruits, seeds, infructescences, and flowers with in situ pollen, provides an opportunity to further describe and investigate the affinities of this plant. Although MacGinitie (1974)
assigned the species to the Araliaceae, our investigation shows that this species is incompatible with that or any other extant plant family.
In this article, we present the new extinct genus, Landeenia, and describe its morphology as known from specimens of fruits, seeds, flowers, and pollen. We then compare Landeenia with extant families and genera to assess its probable systematic position.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Observations of the fossils were made with the naked eye and under the dissecting microscope. Macrophotographs were taken with the Wild M400 microscope. Masses of pollen were retrieved from the anthers of flowers using a probe, cleaned with HCl and HF, and macerated for microscopy. The maceration included treatment in HNO3 followed by washing in water and a brief treatment with ammonia. After washing again in water, some of the pollen was mounted on glass slides with Canada Balsam for light microscopy. Some of the remaining macerated pollen was transferred to aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with
150 Å of gold and examined with a Hitachi S-4000 scanning electron microscope. Pollen grain measurements were made from Canada Balsam preparations with an ocular micrometer at 400x under a compound light microscope.
To assess the systematic relationships of Landeenia with respect to extant angiosperm families, the fossil was keyed on the basis of floral, fruit, seed, and pollen characteristics using two different computer databases, MEKA (version 1.3 for MS-DOS; Duncan and Meacham, 1987) and INTKEY (version 4.05, automatic setting; Watson and Dallwitz, 1997
). The following characters were entered into MEKA: plants woody; flowers bisexual; actinomorphic; receptacle enlarged, completely united with the ovary, totally or partially covering it; perianth segments five; sepals five; anthers opening by longitudinal slits; stamens free from corolla; style one, or styles more or less connate (carpels free or connate); carpels more than five (free or united); fruit a capsule; fruit with more than two seeds; and seeds winged. The following characters were entered into INTKEY: habit of trees, shrubs, lianas; fertile flowers hermaphroditic; unisexual flowers absent; flowers aggregated in inflorescences; flower size small (2 mm to 2 cm); flowers actinomorphic; calyx pentamerous; calyx persistent; anthers dehiscing via longitudinal slits; pollen grains triaperturate; pollen grains colpate; gynoecium superior to partly inferior; gynoecium stylate; fruit nonfleshy; fruit a capsule; fruit without fleshy investment; capsule dehiscence type loculicidal; and seeds winged.
The MEKA and INTKEY analyses were used to limit the field of possible families to which Landeenia might belong; however, because Landeenia is an extinct plant and the computer databases are not fully complete in linking rarely represented characters (such as winged seeds in the Rosaceae) to family, we did not adhere strictly to the list of families keyed by the programs, but expanded our search to include related families using the literature. Further, because palynological characteristics were poorly represented in both programs, we also used literature to compare the fossil grains of Landeenia with those of extant genera to identify any other possible familial affiliations not brought to light by MEKA, INTKEY, or the systematic literature.
| SYSTEMATICS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
10, anthers dehiscing by longitudinal slits. Pollen tricolpate with finely striate sculpture. Gynoecium superior,
18 carpels, sharing a single style. Fruits pedicellate, borne in cymes, capsular, dehiscing loculicidally, globose to oblate, often with persistent calyx and sometimes style. Seeds elliptical, flattened, surrounded by a small wing.
Type species
Landeenia aralioides (MacGinitie) comb. nov.
Basionym
Carpites aralioides MacGinitie 1974 Univ. Calif. Pub. Geol. Sci.
Etymology
This genus is named in honor of Jane Landeen, who discovered the Blue Rim Paleobotanical locality and contributed many of the specimens upon which this study is based.
Nomenclature
The type species was previously placed in the fossil genus Carpites Schimper. This nonconmiittal generic name has been used by paleobotanists to accommodate fossil fruits that lack sufficient detail to make more informative generic assignments. The new data now available facilitate recognition of this taxon as a new and distinct genus for which we establish the name Landeenia.
Landeenia aralioides
(MacGinitie) comb. nov. Figs. 126.
Emended species diagnosis
Flowers pedicellate, actinomorphic, bisexual. Calyx pentamerous, 79 mm in maximum diameter, individual sepals 34 mm long and 23 mm wide, contiguous with a thickened circular rim. This rim is 34 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick. Corolla unknown, possibly fallen away before fossilization. Stamens free from the corolla,
10, anthers dehiscing by longitudinal slits. Pollen subprolate to spheroidal, tricolpate, sculpture finely striate, striations separated in places by perforations, grains average 17 µm diameter. Gynoecium superior, carpels many (
18), sharing a single style (2 mm long); stigma unknown. Infructescence a cyme with woody axis and pedicels; fruits capsular, borne on a short pedicel (34 mm long), dehiscing loculicidally, globose to oblate, 10 mm in width and 78 mm in height, often with persistent calyx and sometimes style. Seed flattened, elliptical, 56 mm long and 45 mm wide, including an encircling wing, 0.61.2 mm thick.
Holotype
UCMP PA5659 (fig. 1; MacGinitie, 1974
) from Kisinger Lakes (locality UCMP PA 108).
Other specimens
UF 22571 (fruit showing calyx, oblique view); 22591 (flower showing disc); 22592 (flower with stamens), 22618 (cross-section of fruit); 22619 (two longitudinal sections of fruit); 22620 (fruit with persistent calyx, oblique and lateral views); 22622 (fruit with persistent calyx, oblique view; two seeds); 22626 (longitudinally fractured fruit with sepals and pedicel); 22630 (fruit showing carpels); 22644, 22646 (fruits showing carpels); 22648 (fruit with persistent calyx, oblique view); 22650 (longitudinal section of fruit showing sepals, pedicel, and style); UF 22652, 22737, 26703 (transversely compressed flowers); 22774 (two seeds); UCMP 168318 (five seeds); UCMP 168316 (flower in lateral view).
Discussion
MacGinitie's original diagnosis of this species was based only on specimens of mature fruits. The larger collections now available allow us to expand the original description to include characters of the infructescences, flowers, pollen, and seeds. The fruits are globose to oblate capsules (Figs. 110),
1 cm wide, and 78 mm high. Carpels are many, in the most distinct specimen numbering
18 (Fig. 9), united, and sharing a single style (Figs. 1, 6). The gynoecium is superior, as seen by the underlying position of sepals both in flowers (Fig. 18) and fruits (Figs. 7, 8). Mature carpels appear D-shaped to nearly circular in lateral view (Fig. 12), their flat shape suggesting that each probably bore no more than one or two seeds. Although a longitudinal surface groove is present in the plane of the septa separating each of the carpels (Figs. 1, 9), dehiscence of the fruit was strictly loculicidal (Fig. 11). Many of the fruiting specimens show remnants of a persistent calyx (Figs. 48) and style (Figs. 1, 6). The style, when present, is
2 mm long, but it is uncertain whether this is the full length, as a structure representing the stigma has yet to be identified.
|
0.61.2 mm wide (Figs. 13, 14). Wing included, the seeds measure 56 mm in length and 45 mm in width, slightly smaller than many of the carpels (47 x 45 mm). Flowers that have not matured to fruiting stage are associated with fruits of Landeenia both at the Blue Rim (Figs. 1517) and Kisinger Lakes (Fig. 18) floras. We consider these flowers conspecific with the fruits based on the correspondence between the hypogynous pentamerous calyces, circular central thickened, radially ridged rim (probable nectary), and single style.
The flowers are small (79 mm in diameter) and actinomorphic with five sepals. A corolla is not preserved, possibly lost during fossilization or absent altogether in live plants. The sepals are attached to a thickened circular rim, interpreted as a nectary, that surrounds the base of the gynoecium. The nectariferous rim measures about 1 mm thick and is marked by 1012 radiating ridges (Figs. 16, 18) that may be points of attachment for the stamens, petals, or impressions of carpels. Relatively thick bits of carbonaceous matter are preserved on this rim.
Although inflorescences have not been recovered, partial infructescences are preserved, which demonstrate a determinate type of inflorescence. Only two specimens clearly show the infructescence organization. One of them shows an axis terminating in three pedicellate fruits, the middle slightly larger than the laterals (Fig. 5). The other is an axis terminating in a pair of opposite fruits, with a swelling at the top of the peduncle where a terminal flower was probably situated (Fig. 6). Both of these fruiting specimens appear to derive from a determinate, apparently cymose, inflorescence. Both flowers and fruits had robust pedicels (Figs. 1, 18). The robustness of the pedicels and peduncles suggests that the flowers and fruits were borne by a woody plant.
Stamens preserved in some of the flowers have basifixed anthers about 2.53 times longer than wide, attached to short filaments (Figs. 1517). Although the full complement of stamens is not preserved in any single specimen, at least five can be observed in a radial span of 180° in one flower (Fig. 15). Although stamens are not preserved on the other side of the flower, symmetry indicates that there were probably about ten in the complete flower. Anthers dehisce via longitudinal slits (Fig. 15).
Pollen removed directly from the anthers of two specimens (Figs. 15, 17) is tricolpate (or perhaps tricolporate with poorly defined porae) (Figs. 1922), subprolate to spheroidal, with finely striate exine (Figs. 2326). The grains are minute, average 17 µm in both polar and equatorial diameter (N = 9). Exine sculpture is not distinct under the light microscope, and grains appear psilate (Figs. 2022). Scanning electron microscopy reveals an intricate sculpture of fine striations (0.230.38 µm in width) oriented roughly parallel to the colpi (Figs. 24, 25); the striations both dichotomize and anastomose, with circular to oblong perforations separating them at irregular intervals (Fig. 26).
|
| SYSTEMATIC AFFINITIES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two diagnostic programs were applied to evaluate possible familial affinities of Landeenia using the traits listed under Materials and Methods. The programs produced incongruous results but are helpful as a starting point in considering possible systematic relationships. The MEKA program matched Landeenia to four possible plant families while the INTKEY program matched the fossil to 12, with only one family overlapping. The disagreement is possibly due to differences in the character descriptions entered and in the number of genera represented in the two programs. MEKA indicated Lythraceae, Myrtaceae, Flacourtiaceae, and Rosaceae, while INTKEY indicated Asclepiadaceae, Celastraceae, Cunoniaceae, Hamamelidaceae, Hydrangeaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Loganiaceae, Meliaceae, Myrtaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae, Styracaceae, and Violaceae as families to which Landeenia might belong. Comparison of the literature on these families with specimens of Landeenia, however, leads to no reasonably satisfactory character matches. Among the reasons for the mismatch include epigyny (Rubiaceae and Myrtaceae), unilocular gynoecia (Violaceae and Flacourtiaceae), pollen in pollinia (Asclepiadaceae), adnation of stamens to the corolla tube (Styracaceae), lack of members with striate pollen ornamentation (Myrtaceae and Lythraceae), lack of members with winged seeds (Flacourtiaceae), syncarpous members possessing multiple styles (Rosaceae), and tendency toward low carpel number (Celastraceae, Cunoniaceae, Hamamelidaceae, Hydrangeaceae, Ixonanthaceae, and Rosaceae). The Meliaceae and Rutaceae compare the most favorably with Landeenia as they may possess multiple carpels (although usually limited to five) and a common style (Judd et al., 1999
).
The tricolpate, striate pollen of Landeenia is helpful in considering the systematic affinities. Because neither the MEKA nor INTKEY databases includes detailed pollen characters, palynological literature was consulted to compare the pollen of Landeenia to that of extant plants in another approach to finding familial matches. Since the fossil pollen grains appear psilate using light microscopy, SEM images were used to match the sculpture of the fossil grains with that of other plants. Families that matched most favorably in grain size, number of apertures, and type of ornamentation include the Rosaceae (Adams and Morton, 1974
; Eide, 1981
), Aceraceae and Anacardiaceae (Adams and Morton, 1976
), and Sapindaceae (Erwin and Stockey, 1990
).
Landeenia bears a suite of characters that are consistent with Sapindales, the monophyletic order containing, for example, Meliaceae, Rutaceae, Anacardiaceae, Sapindaceae, and Simaroubaceae (Soltis et al., 1998
; Judd et al., 1999
). These families share a distinct nectar disk, superior ovary, four- or five-merous calyx, typically 410 stamens, multiple carpels sharing a single style, and tricolpate (to tricolporate) pollen, sometimes with finely striate ornamentation. However, dissimilarity between the characteristics of Landeenia and the defining traits of the extant plant families studied precludes placement of Landeenia directly within one of these families based upon currently available information.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author for reprint requests. ![]()
3 Current address: Division of Biological Sciences, LH Bailey Hortorium, 462 Mann Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4301 USA. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Crane, P. R., S. R. Manchester, and D. L. Dilcher. 1991 Reproductive and vegetative structure of Nordenskioldia (Trochodendraceae), a vesseless dicotyledon from the early Tertiary of the Northern Hemisphere. American Journal of Botany 78: 13111334[CrossRef][ISI]
Duncan, T., and C. A. Meacham. 1987 MEKA: version 1.3 for MS-DOS. University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
Eide, F. 1981 Key for Northwest European Rosaceae pollen. Grana 20: 101118
Erwin, D. M., and R. A. Stockey. 1990 Sapindaceous flowers from the Middle Eocene Princeton Chert (Allenby Formation) of British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 20252034
Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, and P. F. Stevens. 1999 Plant Systematics, a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA
Kistner, F. B. 1973 Stratigraphy of the Bridger Formation in the Big Island-Blue Rim area, Sweetwater County, Wyoming. Master's thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA
MacGinitie, H. D. 1974 An early Middle Eocene flora from the Yellowstone-Absaroka Volcanic Province, northwestern Wind River Basin, Wyoming. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 108: 1103, 45 pl
Manchester, S. R., P. R. Crane, and D. L. Dilcher. 1991 Nordenskioldia and Trochodendron (Trochodendraceae) from the Miocene of northwestern North America. Botanical Gazette 152: 357368[CrossRef]
Manchester, S. R., and M. S. Zavada. 1987 Lygodium foliage with intact sorophores from the Eocene of Wyoming. Botanical Gazette 148: 392399[CrossRef]
Newberry, J. S. 1898 The later extinct floras of North America. United States Geological Survey Monograph 35: 1295
Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. E. Mort, M. W. Chase, V. Sarolainen, S. B. Hoot, and C. M. Morton. 1998 Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Systematic Biology 47: 3242[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Watson, L., and M. J. Dallwitz. 1997 The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. INTKEY version 4.05, 24-Mar-97. http://www.keil.ukans.edu/delta/
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. B. Bachelier and P. K. Endress Floral Structure of Kirkia (Kirkiaceae) and its Position in Sapindales Ann. Bot., August 7, 2008; (2008) mcn139v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Castaneda-Posadas and S. R. S. Cevallos-Ferriz Swietenia (Meliaceae) flower in Late Oligocene Early Miocene amber from Simojovel de Allende, Chiapas, Mexico Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1821 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |