|
|
||||||||
2Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Aptdo. Postal 70-275, Cd. Universitaria, UNAM 04510, México D.F.; and 3Instituto de Ecología A. C., Aptdo. Postal 63, C. P. 91000, Xalapa Veracruz, México
Received for publication September 30, 1997. Accepted for publication December 7, 1998.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
7% higher male function. We discuss three possible scenarios for the evolution of the fixed dimorphism in nectar production, two involving unstable phases (substitution of one morph by the other, and evolution towards dioecy) and one stable scenario (maintenance of the dimorphic system).
Key Words: floral traits Leguminosae mating systems nectar production outcrossing rates pollination polymorphism Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana seed traits
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Populations of honey mesquite, Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana Benson (Mimosoideae), in the Mapimi Biosphere Reserve of Mexico have a fixed intrapopulation dimorphic system of nectar production (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
). Half of the individuals within a mesquite population are nectarful, producing on average 0.51 mg of sucrose equivalents per millilitre of nectar, while the other half produce no nectar at all (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
). Nectarful flowers are visited between 2 and 4 times more often by a larger diversity of pollinators (29 vs. 5, respectively) compared to nectarless individuals. Both nectar morphs have been shown to be self-compatible, but both display a high degree of inbreeding depression (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
). Two observations suggest that nectar production in mesquites has a genetic basis. (1) Nectar production appears to be uncorrelated with environmental factors. During 4 yr (19941997), none of the studied plants has changed nectar morph (Golubov et al., unpublished data), even under varying rainfall regimes. This suggests genetic determination of nectar morph. (2) Nectarful and nectarless trees at various Chihuahuan desert sites are randomly distributed in space; even when found surrounding water supplies, proportions do not differ from 1:1 (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
; López-Portillo, unpublished data). This species, therefore, provides a system in which the relative fitness values of traits associated with nectar production can be assessed under natural conditions.
Our study examines the relative costs and benefits of nectar production by comparing traits of nectarful vs. nectarless plants, specifically addressing the following question: (1) How is nectar production related with plant size, outcrossing rates, and seed traits? (2) What is the relative importance of floral traits and pollinator visitation on the reproductive success of each nectar morph? and (3) Do plants that provide nectar have higher fitness than those that do not?
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study species
The honey mesquite, Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana Benson (Mimosoideae) (hereafter P. glandulosa), is a woody perennial tree widely distributed in northern Mexico and southeastern United States (Rzedowski, 1988
). This species is a dominant element in different communities of the Chihuahuan Desert. At MBR, P. glandulosa is found in the bajadas, playas, and arroyos and is the dominant species that surrounds all water catchments (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
). Flowering at the study site starts in mid-March (before the summer rains) and ends in mid-May. Prosopis glandulosa is mainly pollinated by bees (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
), like other species of Prosopis (e.g., Simpson, Neff, and Moldenke, 1977
; Keys, Buchmann, and Smith, 1995
).
Study population
In 1994, we censused, tagged, measured, and mapped all individuals of P. glandulosa within the 1-ha area of desert scrubland. Tree dimensions were taken as two canopy widths and height. Spatial distribution was analyzed with contingency tables (100 squares, each 10 x 10 m). Within the study site, the density of individuals was 0.13 ind./m2, and of these 0.035 ind./m2 were reproductive. The study site was subdivided into three plots of contrasting plant densities (low density [LD] 0.07 ind./m2, medium density [MD] 0.22 ind./m2, and high density [HD] 0.48 ind./m2).
During the flowering seasons of 1994 and 1995, we measured nectar presence of all reproductive individuals (N = 358). In each plant, we bagged five first-day open inflorescences of two separate branches at dawn. Nectar presenceabsence was determined at dusk after collecting and probing five flowers per inflorescence with graduated 2-µL micropipettes.
The following traits were measured to assess any possible difference between nectar morphs other than the production of nectar. Tree size was calculated as the volume of the tree (using a spherical model of plant size) and cube-root transformed for further analyses (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
). Tree size was ranked into five categories, and possible differences in size between nectar morphs were analyzed by means of a 2 x 5 contingency table (Everitt, 1977
). To assess differences between morphs in flowering phenology, we recorded the presenceabsence of mature inflorescences every 2 d between 14 and 30 March 1994 on nine consecutive observation dates and differences were tested with a 2 x 9 contingency table (Everitt, 1977
). Finally, to characterize water availability between nectar morphs, in each of the three plots with different plant densities, we measured predawn water potentials (Scholander et al., 1965
) for five randomly selected trees from each morph (5 trees x 2 morphs x 3 plots, N = 30). During March 1994, predawn water potentials were measured on two randomly selected shoots per tree using a pressure chamber (PMS model 1000, Corvallis, Oregon).
Mating system
Outcrossing and population geneticsWe estimated heterozygosity and outcrossing rate of each nectar morph using starch-gel electrophoresis of progeny arrays. Fresh cotyledons of 10-d-old emerging seedlings (N = 10 seeds per tree of 30 trees per nectar morph) from the germination experiments (see Seed traits below) were ground on Tris-citrate buffer (pH 8.3) (Keys and Smith, 1994
) and placed on a 10% starch gel Tris-citrate pH 8.3 substrate (Soltis et al., 1983
). Specific staining and interpretation were done on glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (E.C. [Enzyme Commission number] 2.6.1.1.; Saidman, 1986
), leucine aminopeptidase (E.C. 3.4.11.1.; Solbrig and Bawa, 1975
), esterase (E.C. 3.1.1.1.1.; Saidman and Naranjo, 1982
), and the malic enzyme (E.C. 1.1.1.40.; Murphy et al., 1990
). Single (ts) and multiloci (tm) outcrossing rates, maternal genotypes, and maternal and progeny fixation indices were obtained using the multilocus estimation program (MLT; Ritland, 1990
).
Controlled pollination experiments
We tested the importance of selfing and the effectiveness of floral visitors through hand-pollination, using a completely randomized partial hierarchical design (Kirk, 1995
). Hand-pollinations were done on ten randomly selected trees (main plot) per nectar morph in March 1996, during the peak flowering period. On each tree, 15 24 x 12 cm cotton bags (to avoid insect and wind pollination) were used to cover selected branches having immature inflorescences. When inflorescences reached maturity, we randomly assigned five bagged branches to each of the following treatments: (1) automatic self-pollinationbagged inflorescences with no further manipulation, (2) forced self-pollinationinflorescences manually self-pollinated every 2 d, and (3) open-pollination (control)mature inflorescences left open for 5 d and then bagged. As the number of inflorescences varied between samples, each bagged branch assigned to a pollination treatment was considered the subplot experimental unit. Bags were sprayed with insecticide every 2nd d to avoid flower loss from various larvae that consume flower parts.
We assessed fruit set (pods/inflorescence) on 15 May 1996, once pods were almost fully developed. Fruit set was arcsine-transformed (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
), and data were analyzed using nested ANOVA for completely randomized partial hierarchical designs (Kirk, 1995
). The experimental model is nectar morph as the main treatment, trees (nested in nectar morph), and the pollination treatment crossed with nectar morph and tree (nested in morph). Differences between selfing and control pollination treatments were analyzed with orthogonal contrasts (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
).
Floral traits and visitors
To address the possibility of differences in flower traits between nectar morphs, we selected ten nectarful and ten nectarless trees of similar sizes within the study site during the 1996 flowering season. From these, we collected ten first-day inflorescences per tree. Total rachis length was measured, and total number of flowers per inflorescence were counted. Then, one flower per inflorescence was selected randomly, and we measured style and stamen length and counted the number of ovules and pollen grains. Given the symmetry of the two-parted anther, pollen counts were recorded from half an anther (Cruden, 1977
. We stained ovules and pollen grains with methylene blue (0.01 g/mL) and counted them under a stereomicroscope at 80x. Floral measures that did not conform to Shapiro-Wilk normality tests (for N < 1000) were log transformed (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
). All floral measurements were analyzed using nested ANOVA (JMP statistical package, version 3.1.2; SAS, 1995
), considering nectar morph and tree as factors (Kirk, 1995
). Finally, as further indirect evidence of the mating system, we calculated pollen:ovule ratios according to Cruden (1977)
.
We evaluated the abundance and diversity of floral visitors on both nectarful and nectarless individuals during the 1994 flowering peak (21 March6 April). Every 2nd d, on six randomly selected trees per nectar morph, 5-min fixed-capture efforts were made three times a day (0800, 1200, and 1600). Visitors were captured by using plastic bags (10 x 20 cm), as plant architecture and thorns prevent the use of mesh nets and visitors to this species are easily captured. Plants were randomized on a daily basis, to avoid temporal and observer-biased errors. Captured specimens were identified, sexed, and measured (head to tip of abdomen), using four size classes: <2, 23, 34 and >4 cm. Data sets include only bees (Apoidea, Hymenoptera), as they are the main pollinators of Prosopis (Simpson, Neff, and Moldenke, 1977
; López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
; Golubov et al., unpublished data). Differential activity of bees with respect to time of day was analyzed using contingency tables (Everitt, 1977
).
Flowering and fruit set
To determine differences and variability in pod production between nectar morphs, we tagged three widely spaced branches around the canopy of each reproductive tree in 1994. Total numbers of flowers, nodes, and fruits were recorded for each branch during two consecutive years. To avoid losses in counts from dehiscence and predispersal predation, pods were counted before fully mature (May). Fruits set was calculated as the total number of developed pods per total number of inflorescences. To obtain a single estimate of reproductive success per tree, we averaged and arcsine transformed (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
) flower and pod counts of all three branches. Fruit set was analyzed through multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with the 3 yr as repeated measures (von Ende, 1993
), taking nectar morph, site, and tree (nested in morph) as factors (JMP, version 3.1.2; SAS, 1995
). Statistical significance was assessed using exact F contrast tests, and F adjusted with the Greenhouse-Geisser (G-G) method (SAS, 1995
).
Seed traits
To assess differences in seed mass and germination success between nectar morphs, we collected pods from all reproductive individuals from the site in June 1994 (plants having <20 pods were excluded from further manipulations). Ten pods from 30 nectarful and 30 nectarless trees were randomly chosen. To reduce the probability of sampling consanguineous progeny, only one seed (also randomly selected) per pod was used (N = 300 seeds for each morph). Selected seeds were weighed to the nearest 0.001 g, scarified mechanically, sown in soil from the original site, and grown in a greenhouse at the Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, Mexico. Germination was considered successful when the seedlings had a developed radicle and fully expanded cotyledons.
Differences in seed mass were analyzed using nested ANCOVA with three factors: nectar morph, plot, and parent tree (nested in plot) and one covariate (tree size; Kirk, 1995
). Differences in germination success associated with nectar morph and parent tree were analyzed using contingency tables (Everitt, 1977
). The relationship between seed mass and germination was calculated using a logistic regression model (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
; JMP version 3.1.2; SAS, 1995
).
In addition, we related genetic information (see section outcrossing rates and population genetics) to seed mass by means of multiway ANOVAs, considering the number of heterozygous loci (07; pooling loci 0 and 1 as well as 6 and 7), nectar morph, and tree as factors. Contrast t tests were performed to analyze the effect of heterozygous loci on seed mass Sokal and Rohlf, 1981
).
Cumulative effects of nectar production on plant fitness
To obtain an approximate and relative value of female and male function for each nectar morph, we multiplied all characters contributing to each function (Arnold and Wade, 1984
). Among the values measured, we considered number of flowers, number of ovules, fruit set (19941996, see Flowering and fruit set above), and seed set to be components of female function. Numbers of flowers and pollen grains were considered as the components of male function. Numbers of flowers, ovules, and pollen grains were recorded from one flower per inflorescence (N = 100, ten trees per nectar morph). Given the symmetry of the two-parted anther, pollen counts were recorded from half an anther. Fruit sets were taken from tagged branches around the canopy of nectar and nectarless trees during the 3-yr period (19941996). Seed sets were taken as number of viable seeds from 20 pods of five trees per nectar morph. All components are multiplicative and, therefore, the error associated to relative fitness was calculated as: Z = A0 B0 ± (A0
B0 + B0
A0 +
A0
B0), where
's are SE associated to each mean value. This estimate of male fitness is approximate, because pollen flow and the proportion of seeds fathered were not estimated.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 = 2.51; P = 0.113). Neither tree size (P = 0.211; Fig. 1A) nor flowering phenology (P = 0.7; Fig. 1B) differed between morphs.
|
= -0.82 ± 0.08 MPa), as compared to MD (
= -0.58 ± 0.046 MPa) and HD plots (
= -0.55 ± 0.046 MPa). Nectarful and nectarless tress were distributed randomly throughout the whole 1-ha site (
2 = 23.2, df = 99, P > 0.05).
Mating system
Outcrossing and population geneticsSeven polymorphic loci were resolved: LAP 1 (three alleles), EST1 and EST2 (three alleles each), EST3 (two alleles), ME (two alleles), and GOT1 and GOT2 (two alleles), while GOT3 resulted in a monomorphic band. The fixation indices (F), excluding monomorphic loci, were negative in progeny and adults, indicating an excess of heterozygous individuals at both stages. F was lower in parents compared to their progeny, but we found no significant differences in F between morphs at either stage. Heterozygosities were high in both stages, and no difference were found either (Table 1).
|
Controlled pollination experiments
We found differences between pollination treatments with respect to fruit set (P < 0.001; Table 2). The lowest fruit set was for automatic self-pollination (
= 0.0008 ± 0.002), followed by forced self-pollination (
= 0.015 ± 0.012), and finally open pollination (
= 0.058 ± 0.023). Both self-pollination treatments showed a marked decrease in fruit set with respect to the control (P > 0.05). On the other hand, fruit set did not differ between nectar morphs (P = 0.2824, Table 2). The significant treatment x tree interactions indicated the high variability between trees (P = 0.0278, Table 2), but all other interactions were not significant.
|
|
2 = 4.61, df = 2, P = 0.1) or between size classes of bees (
2 = 5.11, df = 3, P = 0.16). Despite these similarities between nectar morphs, the number of visits differed dramatically, as the number of bees on nectarless trees comprised only 4.5% of total captures. Nectarful trees were visited, on average, 21 times more often than were nectarless trees. Taking into account only the eight genera that are shared by both nectar morphs, the visiting ratio is reduced somewhat to 10:1 (nectarful: nectarless). Wasps and files were seen constantly, but only on the nectarful morph. Both sexes of bees visited nectarful individuals, while females alone visited nectarless trees (Table 4).
|
= 0.1977 ± 0.056) followed by plot HD (
= 0.1662 ± 0.053), the plots with the highest water availability; plants in plot LD (
= 0.116 ± 0.038) had significantly lower fruit set (P < 0.0001). Variation in fruit set between plots and nectar morphs among years resulted in the only significant interaction (Table 6).
|
|
= 30.16 ± 0.27 mg, range = 1258 mg). The main influence on seed mass related to maternal effects (P < 0.0001; 40% of total variance, Table 7). Seed mass of both nectar morphs did not vary among plots, but nectarless trees showed a slightly reduced seed mass in plot LD, giving a significant plot x nectar morph interaction (Table 7). The orthogonal contrasts showed seed mass in plot LD to be different from those in plot MD and HD (P < 0.001), but plots MD and HD did not differ from each other (P = 0.66).
|
2 = 6.43, df = 1, P = 0.0112) and parent tree (
2 = 73.944, df = 29, P < 0.001) had significant effects on germination success. The mass of seeds was influenced by both seed heterozygosity (taken as the number of heterozygote loci over the six possible; F = 3.2106, P = 0.0009) and tree-related effects (F = 8.395, P < 0.001), but nectar morph had no significant effect (F = 0.6525, P = 0.32). Contrast t tests after a significant ANOVA divided the sampled population of seeds into two categories (Fig. 2), those having fewer than three heterozygote loci and those having more. There was a slight tendency for heavier seeds to have higher heterozygosities, but little total variation is explained by this factor (r2 = 0.03, df = 598, P < 0.001).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nectar production variability has been shown to affect pollinator foraging bouts and patterns (Waddington, 1983
). In P. glandulosa, nectar production clearly affects the number, species, and sex of bees that visit each nectar morph. Nectar production enhanced visitation frequencies by at least one order of magnitude, as compared to nectarless trees. Similar patterns have been found in dioecious plants in which nectar is associated with female function (Pyke, Day, and Wale, 1988
; Greco, Holland, and Kevan, 1996
). However, the increase in visitation to nectarful individuals was not reflected in a corresponding increase in fruit set. Nectarful trees produced outcrossed progeny, and these did not differ from nectarless ones. Probably, nectar collection is increasing rates of selfing and consequently lowering both fruit and seed set. The possible cost of increased geitonogamy incurred by nectar production (Klinkhamer, de Jong, and Metz, 1994
) seems to be high for nectarful P. glandulosa plants, especially when a single effective pollinator visit is sufficient to pollinate a flower, as has been found for the closely related velvet mesquite, P. velutina (Keys, Buchmann, and Smith, 1995
). Few but effective pollinators (i.e., female bees that collect pollen to feed larvae) were the main visitors of nectarless trees providing a service by dispersing pollen and pollinating during their foraging bouts.
Nectar production does not seen to affect the mating system of the honey mesquite, even considering the differential visitation rates. Prosopis glandulosa, although capable of selfing, is mainly an outcrosser, producing a higher than expected proportion of heterozygote seeds. Previous pollination experiments on P. glandulosa (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
) have also shown higher fruit set for cross- than for self-pollinations. Similar estimates of the mating system were found by Keys and Smith (1994)
for the velvet mesquite, P. velutina. In P. glandulosa, high fruit abortion rates (up to four fruits/inflorescence) could mean selection against homozygote progeny (<1% of seeds sampled were homozygous for all loci) or selection favoring the more heterozygous individuals (Eguiarte, Perez-Nasser, and Piñero, 1992
), although these aspects must be fully explored. We found that fruit set, especially of nectarless morphs, is affected by environmental factors. Felker and Lee (1992)
also found an environmental influence on fruit set of P. glandulosa var. glandulosa, although they did not describe a nectar dimorphism.
Seed mass is an important component of plant fitness, through its effects on time of germination, seedling establishment, competitive ability, survival, and fecundity (Stanton, 1984
; Kalisz, 1989
). In our study, germination and mass of P. glandulosa seeds were unaffected by nectar morph but seemed to be partially influenced by maternal and environmental effects. Maternal effects can be ascribed in part to environmental conditions that determine the amount of resource invested in the seeds by the parent (Roach and Wulff, 1987
), such as those found for nectarless trees in the low water availability areas (plot LD). These maternal and environmental effects on seed traits (e.g., mass) have been found for other species as well (Kalisz, 1989
; Waser, Shaw, and Price, 1995
) and usually affect a large percentage of total variation (40% in this study). We also found negative F estimates (even in seeds) and strong heterosis, correlated with seed mass, similar to those described in several long-lived perennials, mainly conifers (Ledig, 1986
) and tropical palms (Eguiarte, Perez-Nasser, and Piñero, 1992
; Eguiarte et al., 1993
). The advantages of generating outcrossed progeny in relation to selfed progeny have been documented for many plant species (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1987
; Mandujano, Montaña, and Eguiarte, 1996
). This is especially important when heterosis is coupled to seed mass and the latter associated with higher germination rates (A. Martínez, Instituto de Ecología, A. C. unpublished data).
We found higher fruit set and lower pollen counts on nectarful morphs. These two components of fitness are pivotal for understanding total reproductive success in plants (Bell, 1985
; Zimmerman, 1988
). In relation to female function, the nectarful morph had higher success only in fruit set, but overall, female function did not differ between nectar morphs. Higher fruit sets have been found to be associated with higher nectar production (Pyke, Day, and Wale, 1988
). Nonetheless, the nectarless morphs had higher pollen counts, which suggest a slightly (7%) higher male function. This "fitness accounting" is a crude approximation and must be interpreted carefully. Nevertheless, it is still surprising to find differences in male function between nectar morphs. Ongoing research is quantifying pollen flow, in order to estimate a more realistic component of male function (Golubov et al., unpublished data).
The evolutionary forces involved in the origin and maintenance of the nectar dimorphism in P. glandulosa are still unknown. We can rule out a possible relation with resource availability for several reasons. Firstly, if nectar production were associated with water condition, measured water potentials should be different between nectar morphs, and we found that the plots having different water availability still maintained a 1:1 proportion of nectarless to nectarful trees. Secondly, both nectar morphs have a spatially random distribution, and if the morph depended on microsite conditions, we would find different proportions at different sites and in different years. In all studied sites, the proportions of nectar morphs are the same, and individuals have not shifted between nectar morphs during the study period. We consider that there is enough evidence to conclude that the nectar dimorphism has a genetic basis. Three main sets of scenarios could be proposed for the evolution of the nectar dimorphism in P. glandulosa: (1) the population is an unstable phase in the evolution of nectar production. This scenario would result in populations with varying proportions of nectarful to nectarless trees. However, the empirical evidence presented here does not support the hypothesis that nectarful plants have higher fitness, so we would not expect them to displace nectarless tress. We could also consider that nectar production as a relatively cheap expense and this selectively neutral, however, this seems unlikely given the large difference in pollinator behavior. If we consider a case of floral automimicry, we would not expect the morphs to be in equal proportions (López-Portillo, Eguiarte, and Montaña, 1993
). (2) The population is in an early stage of sexual differentiation. In this respect, nectarless plants would be evolving toward males (higher pollen) and nectarful trees towards females (higher fruit set). While we found differences in one component of female function (fruit set), there are no overall differences between morphs. Fruit set was higher for nectarful trees, but the overall female function did not differ between nectar morphs and even though male function did differ, the component we measured (pollen production) only represents a fraction of total male success; the proportion of pollen that reaches receptive stigmas has not been evaluated. In addition, nectar production is generally expected in males when there is sexual dimorphism, as a consequence of Bateman's principle, which states that female fitness is resource limited, while male fitness is limited by access to females (Wilson et al., 1994
). Even though nectar production has been associated with female function in dioecious species as a means of attracting pollinators, it is associated with male fitness in monoecious species. Comparative studies of pollen flow and paternity analysis between nectar morphs will help estimate the relative contributions of male and female function of each nectar morph. (3) The populations are in a stable dimorphic state. This scenario would be the result of a complex balance between the different evolutionary forces mentioned in the above scenarios. This nectar dimorphism could be analogous to other sexual or morphological dimorphisms (dioecism and heteromorphy; Smith, 1963
; Richards, 1986
).
Additional experimental manipulation may help determine whether the differences found between nectarful and nectarless trees are directly associated with the presence of nectar, or are associated with correlated characters such as age (e.g., Zimmerman, 1988
; Mitchell, 1994
). Unfortunately, the heritability of nectar production is difficult to assess through progeny, as age at maturity is probably
20 yr. However, ongoing studies measuring the costs of floral nectar production, monitoring pollinator activities, and quantifying pollen flow should help reveal how this dimorphism is maintained.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
4 Author for correspondence, current address: Department of Biology MSC 3AF, New Mexico State University, P.O. BOX 30001, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003-8001. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bell, G. 1985 On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B 224: 223265.
. 1986 The evolution of empty flowers. Journal of Theoretical Biology 118: 253258.[CrossRef]
Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987 Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237268.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Cruden, R. W. 1977 Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 3246.
Dafni, A. 1992 Pollination ecology: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford.
De Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993 Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 321325.
, M. V. Price, and R. M. Ring. 1992 Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 89: 310315.
Eguiarte, L. E., A. Búrquez, J. Rodríguez, M. Martínez-Ramos., J. Sarukhán, and D. Piñero. 1993 Direct and indirect estimates of neighborhood and effective population size in a tropical palm, Astrocaryum mexicanum. Evolution 47: 7587.
, N. Perez-Nasser, and D. Piñero. 1992 Genetic structure, outcrossing rate and heterosis in Astrocaryum mexicanum (tropical palm): implications for evolution and conservation. Heredity 69: 217228.[Web of Science]
Everitt, B. S. 1977 The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
Felker, P., and S. G. Lee. 1992 Influence of water/heat stress on flowering and fruiting of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa). Journal of Arid Environments 23: 309319.[Web of Science]
Gilbert, F. S., N. Haines, and K. Dickson. 1991 Empty flowers. Functional Ecology 5: 2939.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Greco, C. F., D. Holland, and P. G. Kevan. 1996 Foraging behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) on staghorn sumac [Rhus hirta Sudworth (ex-Typhina L.)]: differences and dioecy. Canadian Entomologist 128: 355366.[Web of Science]
Harder, I. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1992 The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Functional Ecology 6: 226233.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
, and . 1996 Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett [eds.], Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, 140190. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
Hodges, S. A. 1993 Consistent interplant variation in nectar characteristics of Mirabilis multiflora. Ecology 74: 542548.
Kalisz, S. 1989 Fitness consequences of mating system, seed weight, and emergence date in a winter annual, Collinsia verna. Evolution 43: 12631272.
Kevan, P. G., and H. G. Baker. 1983 Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annual Review of Entomology 28: 407453.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Keys, R. N., S. L. Buchmann, and S. E. Smith. 1995 Pollination effectiveness and pollination efficiency of insects foraging Prosopis velutina in south-eastern Arizona. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 519527.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
, and S. E. Smith. 1994 Mating system parameters and population genetic structure in pioneer populations of Prosopis velutina (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 81: 10131020.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kirk, R. E. 1995 Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. International Thompson Publishing Co., New York, NY.
Klinkhamer, P. G., T. J. De Jong, and A. J. Metz. 1994 Why plants can be too attractive: a discussion of measures to estimate male fitness. Journal of Ecology 82: 191194.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Ledig, F. T. 1986 Heterozygosity, heterosis and fitness in outbreeding plants. In M. E. Soulé [ed.], Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity, 77104. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Little, R. J. 1983 A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism. In C. E. Jones and R. J. Little [eds.], Handbook of experimental pollination biology, 294309. Scientific & Academic Editions, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
López-Portillo, J., L. E. Eguiarte, and C. Montaña. 1993 Nectarless honey mesquites. Functional Ecology 7: 452461.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Mandujano, M. C., C. Montaña, and L. E. Eguiarte. 1996 Reproductive ecology and inbreeding depression in Opuntia rastrera (Cactaceae) in the Chihuahuan desert: why are sexually derived recruitments so rare?. American Journal of Botany 83: 6370.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Mitchell, R. J. 1994 Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. American Naturalist 143: 870889.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Murphy, W. R., J. W. Sites, D. G. Buth, and C. H. Haufler. 1990 Proteins I. Isozyme electrophoresis. In D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz [eds.], Molecular systematics, 45126. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Pleasants, J. M., and S. J. Chaplin. 1983 Nectar production rates of Asclepias quadrifolia: causes and consequences of individual variation. Oecologia 59: 232238.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Pyke, G. H. 1991 What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350: 5859.[CrossRef]
, L. P. Day, and K. A. Wale. 1988 Pollination ecology of Christmas bells (Blandfordia nobilis Sm.): effects of adding artificial nectar on pollen removal and seed-set. Australian Journal of Ecology 13: 279284.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Richards, A. J. 1986 Plant breeding systems. Chapman and Hall, London.
Ritland, K. L. 1984 The effective proportion of self-fertilization with consanguineous matings in inbred populations. Genetics 106: 139152.
. 1990 A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. Journal of Heredity 81: 235237.[Web of Science]
Roach, D. A., and R. D. Wulff. 1987 Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 209235.
Rzedowski, J. 1988 Análisis de la distribución geográfíca del complejo Prosopis (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae) en Norte América. Acta Botanica Mexicana 3: 719.
Saidman, B. O. 1986 Isoenzymatic studies of alcohol dehydrogenase and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase in four South American species of Prosopis and their natural hybrids. Silvae Genetica 35: 310.[Web of Science]
, and C. A. Naranjo. 1982 Variaciones de esterasas en poblaciones de Prosopis ruscifolia (Leguminosae). Mendeliana 5: 6170.
SAS. 1995 JMP statistics and graphics guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Scholander, P. F., H. T. Hammel, E. D. Bradstreet, and E. A. Hemmingen. 1965 Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339346.
Simpson, B. B., and J. L. Neff. 1983 Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. In C. E. Jones and R. J. Little [eds.], Handbook of experimental pollination biology, 142159. Scientific and Academic Editions, Van Norstrand, New York, NY.
, , and A. R. Moldenke. 1977 Prosopis flowers as a resource. In B. B. Simpson [ed.], Mesquite: its biology in two desert ecosystems, 86107. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stoudsburg, PA.
Smith, B. W. 1963 The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex hastatulus. Genetics 48: 12651288.
Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981 Biometry, 2d ed., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
Solbrig, O. T., and K. S. Bawa. 1975 Isoenzyme variation in species of Prosopis (Leguminosae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum Harvard University 56: 398412.
Soltis, D. E., C. H. Haufler, D. C. Darrow, and G. J. Gastony. 1983 Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining procedures. American Fern Journal 73: 927.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Southwick, E. E. 1984 Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: a neglected energy investment. Ecology 65: 17751779.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Stanton, M. L. 1984 Seed variation in wild radish: effect of seed size on components of seedling and adult fitness. Ecology 65: 11051112.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
, A. A. Snow, and S. N. Handel. 1986 Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators influences male fitness. Science 232: 16251627.
von Ende, C. N. 1993 Repeated-measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. In S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevich [eds.], Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 113137. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
Waddington, K. D. 1983 Foraging behavior of pollinators. In L. Real [ed.], Pollination biology, 213240. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Waser, N. M., R. G. Shaw, and M. V. Price. 1995 Seed set and seed mass in Ipomopsis aggregata: variance partitioning and inferences about postpollination selection. Evolution 49: 8088.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Wilson, P., J. C. Thomson, M. L. Stanton, and L. P. Rigney. 1994 Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. American Naturalist 143: 283296.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Zimmerman, M. 1983 Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: experimental nectar manipulations in Delphinium nelsonii. Oikos 41: 5763.
. 1988 Nectar production, flowering phenology, and strategies for pollination. In J. Lovett Doust and L. Lovett Doust [eds.], Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies, 157178. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. R Foster and H. Kokko Cheating can stabilize cooperation in mutualisms Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2006; 273(1598): 2233 - 2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. FERRER, L. E. EGUIARTE, and C. MONTANA Genetic structure and outcrossing rates in Flourensia cernua (Asteraceae) growing at different densities in the South-western Chihuahuan Desert Ann. Bot., September 1, 2004; 94(3): 419 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Casiva, J. C. Vilardi, A. M. Cialdella, and B. O. Saidman Mating system and population structure of Acacia aroma and A. macracantha (Fabaceae) Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |