Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(American Journal of Botany. 2009;96:1159-1167.)
doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800183
© 2009 Botanical Society of America, Inc.
  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vamosi, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vamosi, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vamosi, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reproductive Biology

Ovule number per flower in a world of unpredictable pollination1

Martin Burd2,12, Tia-Lynn Ashman3, Diane R. Campbell4, Michele R. Dudash5, Mark O. Johnston6, Tiffany M. Knight7, Susan J. Mazer8, Randall J. Mitchell9, Janette A. Steets10 and Jana C. Vamosi11

2 School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 USA 4 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697 USA 5 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 USA 6 Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1 7 Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 USA 8 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA 9 Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325 USA 10 Department of Botany, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3013 USA 11 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4

ABSTRACT

The number of ovules per flower varies over several orders of magnitude among angiosperms. Here we consider evidence that stochastic uncertainty in pollen receipt and ovule fertilization has been a selective factor in the evolution of ovule number per flower. We hypothesize that stochastic variation in floral mating success creates an advantage to producing many ovules per flower because a plant will often gain more fitness from occasional abundant seed production in randomly successful flowers than it loses in resource commitment to less successful flowers. Greater statistical dispersion in pollination and fertilization among flowers increases the frequency of windfall success, which should increase the strength of selection for greater ovule number per flower. We therefore looked for evidence of a positive relationship between ovule number per flower and the statistical dispersion of pollen receipt or seed number per flower in a comparative analysis involving 187 angiosperm species. We found strong evidence of such a relationship. Our results support the hypothesis that unpredictable variation in mating success at the floral level has been a factor in the evolution of ovule packaging in angiosperms.

Key Words: bet hedging • ovule • pollination • reproductive evolution • seed set • stigmatic pollen load

Received for publication 2 June 2008. Accepted for publication 29 January 2009.

FOOTNOTES

1 The authors thank colleagues for providing unpublished information used in this analysis: R. Brookes, C. Goodwillie, A.-L. Jacquemart, S. R. Kephart, F. Lloret, A. C. McCall, C. T. Schick, and H. D. Young. They also thank two anonymous reviewers who raised insightful queries that helped the authors improve the explanation of their analysis. This work was conducted as part of the Pollen Limitation Working Group supported by the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a Center funded by NSF, the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the State of California.

12 Author for correspondence (e-mail: martin.burd{at}sci.monash.edu.au)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. Jurgens, S. R. Bosch, A. C. Webber, T. Witt, D. Frame, and G. Gottsberger
Pollination biology of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae) in Amazonia: effects of pollinator composition on reproductive success in different populations
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2009; 104(5): 897 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.