|
|
||||||||
|
First published online April 13, 2009; doi:10.3732/ajb.0800039 American Journal of Botany 96: 968-978 (2009) © 2009 Botanical Society of America, Inc. |
What's this? |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reproductive Biology |
2 Department of Biology, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325 USA 3 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA
ABSTRACT
Multiple field populations of two pairs of diploid sister taxa with contrasting mating systems in the genus Clarkia (Onagraceae) were surveyed to test predictions concerning the effects of resource status, estimated as plant size, on pollen and ovule production and on the pollen:ovule (P:O) ratio of flowers. Most theoretical models of size-dependent sex allocation predict that, in outcrossing populations, larger plants should allocate more resources to female function. Lower P:O ratios in larger plants compared to smaller plants have been interpreted as supporting this prediction. In contrast, we predicted that P:O ratio should not vary with plant size in predominantly selfing plants, in which each flower contributes to reproductive success equally through male and female function. We found that, in all four taxa, both ovule and pollen production per flower usually increased significantly with plant size and that the shape of this relationship was decelerating. However, ovule production either decelerated more rapidly than or at the same rate as pollen production with plant size. Consequently,the P:O ratio increased or had no relationship with plant size. This relationship was population-specific (not taxon-specific) and independent of the mating system. Possible explanations for the increasing maleness with plant size are discussed.
Key Words: Clarkia gametophyte production mating system Onagraceae pollen to ovule ratio size-dependent sex allocation
Received for publication 31 January 2008. Accepted for publication 16 January 2009.
FOOTNOTES
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (DEB 9816256 to V.A.D. and 9815300 to S.J.M.) and from Gettysburg College. A number of Gettysburg undergraduates (J. Knies, N. Alden, D. Campion, T. Kearins, J. Hoffman, J. LaPaglia) and M. Camara helped with data collection. V.A.D. also thanks M. Dudash and C. Fenster for hosting her in their laboratory during preparation of this manuscript. The authors also thank the reviewers and associate editor for comments that greatly improved this manuscript.
4 Author for correspondence (e-mail: delesall{at}gettysburg.edu)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |