Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(American Journal of Botany. 2009;96:545-547.)
doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800399
© 2009 Botanical Society of America, Inc.
 		  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koch, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sillett, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koch, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sillett, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koch, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sillett, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Commentary

A response to: Limitations within "The Limits to Tree Height"1

George W. Koch2,4 and Stephen C. Sillett3

2 Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA 3 Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521 USA

ABSTRACT

Here we respond to the communication in American Journal of Botany (96: 542–544 in this issue) by Netting, who proposes several ways in which our paper "The Limits to Tree Height" (Nature 428: 851–854) may have erred in estimating the biophysical limits to height growth in Sequoia sempervirens. We first explain that because embolism repair requires long time periods and is generally incomplete, xylem vulnerability characteristics offer a sound basis for estimating performance limits in woody plants. We reaffirm our earlier use of vertical gradients of foliar carbon isotope composition with new data for S. sempervirens. We support these arguments with reference to studies in other tree species. We take exception with Netting’s view that the turgor pressure–cell expansion relationship for Zea mays is applicable to S. sempervirens. Finally, we second Netting’s call for more work on carbon allocation vis a vis height growth limits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.