HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

First published online October 23, 2009; doi:10.3732/ajb.0800417 American Journal of Botany 96: 2062-2073 (2009) © 2009 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajb.0800417v1 96/11/2062    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Ortiz, P. L. Articles by Arista, M. PubMed Articles by Ortiz, P. L. Articles by Arista, M. Agricola Articles by Ortiz, P. L. Articles by Arista, M. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

The role of resources and architecture in modeling floral variability for the monoecious amphicarpic Emex spinosa (Polygonaceae)¹

Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1095, 41080 Sevilla, Spain

ABSTRACT

Determining the sources of floral variation is crucial to the understanding of floral evolution. Architectural effects and phenotypic plasticity in development can play an important role in intraplant floral variation, giving rise to gender dimorphism or sexual specialization. Amphicarpic plants have another source of floral variation that could also be influenced by positional effects. We studied the effects of resource availability and architecture in intraplant floral variability in two ecotypes of the amphicarpic Emex spinosa. Male flowers were smaller than females, irrespective of position or resource availability. Emex spinosa shows gender dimorphism not influenced by positional effects. Flower size differences among positions were mainly due to architecture, because the effects of resources on flower size were minimal. Architectural effects caused a decrease in female flower size from ground to apical positions but an increase in most male traits that resulted in sexual specialization at the end of flowering. In general, the ecotypes were similarly affected by resources or architecture. Differences between subterranean and aerial female flowers seem also to be a consequence of architecture. Our results contribute to the evidence that resource limitation is an overestimated effect and that architectural effects must be considered in studies of floral or fruit variation.

Key Words: amphicarpy • architecture • Emex spinosa • flower morphology • monoecy • Polygonaceae • positional effects • sexual dimorphism • wind-pollinated species

Received for publication 9 December 2008. Accepted for publication 11 August 2009.

FOOTNOTES

¹ The authors thank Dr. Richards and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was financed with FEDER funds and grants from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia to P.L.O. (CGL2005-03731, CGL2008-02533-E) and to M.A. (CGL2005-01951) and a grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia to M.T. The authors thank M. J. Ariza for technical support.

² Author for correspondence (e-mail: plortiz{at}us.es)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?