|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 19, 2008; doi:10.3732/ajb.0800202 American Journal of Botany 96: 237-251 (2009) © 2009 Botanical Society of America, Inc. |
What's this? |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Invited Papers |
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7534 USA
ABSTRACT
Five orders of late Paleozoic–Mesozoic seed ferns have, at one time or another, figured in discussions on the origin of angiosperms, even before the application of phylogenetic systematics. These are the Glossopteridales, Peltaspermales, Corystospermales, Caytoniales, and Petriellales. Although vegetative features have been used to suggest homologies, most discussion has focused on ovulate structures, which are generally interpreted as megasporophylls bearing seeds, with the seeds partially to almost completely enclosed by the megasporophyll (or cupule). Here we discuss current information about the reproductive parts of these plants. Since most specimens are impression-compression remains, homologizing the ovulate organs, deriving angiospermous homologues, and defining synapomorphies remain somewhat speculative. Although new specimens have increased the known diversity in these groups, a reconstruction of an entire plant is available only for the corystosperms, and thus hypotheses about phylogenetic position are of limited value. We conclude that, in the case of these seed plants, phylogenetic analysis techniques have surpassed the hard data needed to formulate meaningful phylogenetic hypotheses. Speculation on angiosperm origins and transitional stages in these fossils provides for interesting discussion, but currently it is still speculation, as the role of these groups in the origin of angiospermy continues to be cloaked in Darwins mystery.
Key Words: angiosperm ancestors caytonialeans corystosperms fossil plants glossopterids Mesozoic peltasperms Permian seed plant phylogeny
Received for publication 19 June 2008. Accepted for publication 27 October 2008.
FOOTNOTES
1 The authors thank the following colleagues for kindly supplying figures: J. M. Anderson, C. P. Daghlian, H. Kerp, S. McLoughlin, H. Nishida, P. Ryberg, and M. Zavada, as well as students and postdoctoral scholars in our laboratory who contributed to this work. This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (OPP-0229877, ANT-0635477).
2 E-mail: etaylor{at}ku.edu; tntaylor{at}ku.edu
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mathews, M. D. Clements, and M. A. Beilstein A duplicate gene rooting of seed plants and the phylogenetic position of flowering plants Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2010; 365(1539): 383 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang and H. W. Pfefferkorn Nystroemiaceae, a new family of Permian gymnosperms from China with an unusual combination of features Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2010; 277(1679): 301 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Stockey, S. W. Graham, and P. R. Crane Introduction to the Darwin special issue: The abominable mystery1 Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Stockey and G. W. Rothwell Distinguishing angiophytes from the earliest angiosperms: A Lower Cretaceous (Valanginian-Hauterivian) fruit-like reproductive structure Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 323 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |