Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(American Journal of Botany. 2008;95:1191-1198.)
doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800127
© 2008 Botanical Society of America, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meicenheimer, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, E. M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meicenheimer, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, E. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Meicenheimer, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, E. M.

Anatomy and Morphology

Anatomical basis for biophysical differences between Pinus nigra and P. resinosa (Pinaceae) leaves1

Roger D. Meicenheimer2,4, Douglas W. Coffin3 and Eric M. Chapman2

2 Department of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056 USA 3 Department of Paper and Chemical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056 USA

ABSTRACT

Differences in the flexibility of Pinus nigra and P. resinosa leaves can be used to discriminate these two similarly looking pine species from one another. When bent along the longitudinal axis, P. resinosa leaves snap, while P. nigra leaves appear flexible. This useful field test has had no known biophysical or anatomical explanation until now. Analysis of the first order mechanics of bending and buckling of the pine needles was used to elucidate any important anatomical differences between these two species that can account for their different biophysical behaviors when bent. Neither the cross section of the total leaf area nor the inner core area between the two species differed significantly. Differences in the pattern of cell wall thickening and lignification of the endodermal layer of the inner core of the leaves best explain the differences in bending behavior. Thus, subtle variation in anatomy can influence the biophysical properties of naturally occurring structures, which in turn could have important implications for the engineering of manufactured objects.

Key Words: anatomy • biophysics • brittle • flexible • leaves • Pinaceae • Pinus • sandwich composite beams

Received for publication 3 April 2008. Accepted for publication 9 July 2008.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.