Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fumero-Cabán, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fumero-Cabán, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fumero-Cabán, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2007;94:419-424.)
© 2007 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Reproductive Biology

Relative pollination effectiveness of floral visitors of Pitcairnia angustifolia (Bromeliaceae)1

José J. Fumero-Cabán2 and Elvia J. Meléndez-Ackerman

Center for Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation (CATEC), University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-1910 USA; Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3360 USA; Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 21910, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-1910 USA

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of flower visitors as pollinators will determine their potential role as selective agents on flower traits. Pitcairnia angustifolia has floral characters that would fit pollination by long-billed hummingbirds, and they should be the most effective pollinators for this plant. To test this prediction, we characterized the behavior of visitors toward flowers and their pollination effectiveness. Coereba flaveola (bananaquits) was the most frequent flower visitor and acted as a primary nectar robber; however, they pollinated incidentally and deposited pollen on stigmas. The endemic short-billed hummingbird Chlorostilbon maugaeus behaved as a secondary robber and did not pollinate flowers. As expected, the long-billed hummingbird, Anthracothorax viridis, was the most efficient visitor in terms of pollen deposition; however, it was the least frequent flower visitor. Introduced Apis mellifera (honeybees) were second in efficiency at depositing pollen and performed one third of the flower visits. Estimates of the expected rate of pollen deposition by each pollinator did not identify a single most effective pollinator. For P. angustifolia at least three flower visitors including an exotic bee and a nectar robber may be equally important to reproductive success. While these results limit our ability to make predictions on the role of hummingbird-pollination on current flower evolution, they do suggest the potential for pollination redundancy among flower visitors for P. angustifolia populations.

Key Words: bananaquits • honeybees • hummingbirds • nectar robbing • Pitcairnia angustifolia • pollination syndromes • Puerto Rico






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.