HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fumero-Cabán, J. J. Articles by Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Fumero-Cabán, J. J. Articles by Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J. Agricola Articles by Fumero-Cabán, J. J. Articles by Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J.

Relative pollination effectiveness of floral visitors of Pitcairnia angustifolia (Bromeliaceae)¹

Center for Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation (CATEC), University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-1910 USA; Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3360 USA; Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 21910, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-1910 USA

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of flower visitors as pollinators will determine their potential role as selective agents on flower traits. Pitcairnia angustifolia has floral characters that would fit pollination by long-billed hummingbirds, and they should be the most effective pollinators for this plant. To test this prediction, we characterized the behavior of visitors toward flowers and their pollination effectiveness. Coereba flaveola (bananaquits) was the most frequent flower visitor and acted as a primary nectar robber; however, they pollinated incidentally and deposited pollen on stigmas. The endemic short-billed hummingbird Chlorostilbon maugaeus behaved as a secondary robber and did not pollinate flowers. As expected, the long-billed hummingbird, Anthracothorax viridis, was the most efficient visitor in terms of pollen deposition; however, it was the least frequent flower visitor. Introduced Apis mellifera (honeybees) were second in efficiency at depositing pollen and performed one third of the flower visits. Estimates of the expected rate of pollen deposition by each pollinator did not identify a single most effective pollinator. For P. angustifolia at least three flower visitors including an exotic bee and a nectar robber may be equally important to reproductive success. While these results limit our ability to make predictions on the role of hummingbird-pollination on current flower evolution, they do suggest the potential for pollination redundancy among flower visitors for P. angustifolia populations.

Key Words: bananaquits • honeybees • hummingbirds • nectar robbing • Pitcairnia angustifolia • pollination syndromes • Puerto Rico

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. de Vega, M. Arista, P. L. Ortiz, C. M. Herrera, and S. Talavera The ant-pollination system of Cytinus hypocistis (Cytinaceae), a Mediterranean root holoparasite Ann. Bot., May 1, 2009; 103(7): 1065 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]