Am. J. Bot. Plant Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barton, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barton, K. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barton, K. E.
(American Journal of Botany. 2007;94:56-66.)
© 2007 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Article

Early ontogenetic patterns in chemical defense in Plantago (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and trade-offs1

Kasey E. Barton2

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 USA

ABSTRACT

Predictions based on the plant age and growth–differentiation balance hypotheses of defense were tested in two congeneric species, Plantago lanceolata and P. major, by quantifying iridoid glycosides, defensive chemicals, in seeds and leaves during the first 6 wk of growth. Concentrations decreased from the seed to 2-wk-old seedling stage in P. lanceolata, but increased during this period in P. major. In both species, levels were similar for 2- and 4-wk-old plants, then significantly increased from 4 to 6 wk. Genetic variation in the ontogeny of iridoid glycoside production was significant in both species at the maternal family level and at the population level. To examine whether allocation costs could explain the low production of iridoid glycosides in seedlings, relationships between growth and defense (iridoid glycosides) were characterized. Growth and defense had a positive or null relationship in all age groups, indicating that there was no trade-off in these plants at any age. This study provides some support for the growth–differentiation balance hypothesis, but offers no support for the plant age hypothesis. Measuring how herbivory affects plant fitness at different ontogenetic stages may shed light on these patterns in Plantago and on the evolution of the ontogeny of defense.

Key Words: allocation constraints • growth defense trade-offs • iridoid glycosides • ontogenetic drift • plant age • Plantaginaceae • secondary chemistry • seedling






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.