Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapotin, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chapotin, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chapotin, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, N. M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2006;93:1251-1264.)
© 2006 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Anatomy and Morphology

A biomechanical perspective on the role of large stem volume and high water content in baobab trees (Adansonia spp.; Bombacaceae)1

Saharah Moon Chapotin4, Juvet H. Razanameharizaka and N. Michele Holbrook

2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA; 3Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, Forêts et Biodiversité, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo (101), Madagascar

ABSTRACT

The stems of large trees serve in transport, storage, and support; however, the degree to which these roles are reflected in their morphology is not always apparent. The large, water-filled stems of baobab trees (Adansonia spp.) are generally assumed to serve a water storage function, yet recent studies indicate limited use of stored water. Through an analysis of wood structure and composition, we examined whether baobab morphology reflects biomechanical constraints rather than water storage capacity in the six Madagascar baobab species. Baobab wood has a high water content (up to 79%), low wood density (0.09–0.17 g · cm–3), high parenchyma content (69–88%), and living cells beyond 35 cm into the xylem from the cambium. Volumetric construction cost of the wood is several times lower than in more typical trees, and the elastic modulus approaches that of parenchyma tissue. Safety factors calculated from estimated elastic buckling heights were low, indicating that baobabs are not more overbuilt than other temperate and tropical trees, yet the energy investment in stem material is comparable to that in temperate deciduous trees. Furthermore, the elastic modulus of the wood decreases with water content, such that excessive water withdrawal from the stem could affect mechanical stability.

Key Words: anatomy • biomechanics • Bombacaceae • construction cost • Madagascar • parenchyma • safety factor • water storage




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Vernescu and P. Ryser
Constraints on leaf structural traits in wetland plants
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1068 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.