Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrera, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Herrera, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herrera, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
(American Journal of Botany. 2006;93:575-581.)
© 2006 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb1

Carlos M. Herrera4, Ricardo Pérez and Conchita Alonso

2 Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Avenida de María Luisa s/n, E-41013 Sevilla, Spain; 3 Instituto de Investigaciones Químicas, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas Isla de La Cartuja, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Avenida Américo Vespucio s/n, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain

ABSTRACT

Variation in nectar chemistry among plants, flowers, or individual nectaries of a given species has been only rarely explored, yet it is an essential aspect to our understanding of how pollinator-mediated selection might act on nectar traits. This paper describes variation in nectar sugar composition in a population of the perennial herb Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae) and dissects it into components due to variation among plants, flowers of the same plant, and nectaries of the same flower. The proportions of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in single-nectary nectar samples collected at two times in the flowering season were determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Sugar composition varied extensively among nectaries, and nearly all combinations of individual sugars were recorded. Population-wide variance was mainly accounted for by variation among flowers of the same plant (56% of total), nectaries of the same flower (30%), and only minimally by differences among plants (14%). In absolute terms, intraplant variation was similar to or greater than that ordinarily reported in interspecific comparisons. Results suggest that the prevailing notion of intraspecific constancy in nectar sugar composition may be unwarranted for some species and that more elaborate nectar sampling designs are required to detect and appropriately account for extensive within-plant variance. Within-plant variation in nectar sugar composition will limit the ability of pollinators to exert selection on nectar chemistry in H. foetidus and may be advantageous to plants by reducing the number of flowers visited per foraging bout by variance-sensitive, risk-averse pollinators.

Key Words: Helleborus foetidus • hexoses • individual variation • nectar sugar composition • sucrose • variance components • within-plant variation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. L. Ortiz, R. Berjano, M. Talavera, and M. Arista
The role of resources and architecture in modeling floral variability for the monoecious amphicarpic Emex spinosa (Polygonaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2009; 96(11): 2062 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
G. A. Wright, A. F. Choudhary, and M. A. Bentley
Reward quality influences the development of learned olfactory biases in honeybees
Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2009; 276(1667): 2597 - 2604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. M. Herrera, C. de Vega, A. Canto, and M. I. Pozo
Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(9): 1415 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Garcia, A. M. Siepielski, and C. W. Benkman
Cone and seed trait variation in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis; Pinaceae) and the potential for phenotypic selection
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 1050 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. S. Morrant, R. Schumann, and S. Petit
Field methods for sampling and storing nectar from flowers with low nectar volumes
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2009; 103(3): 533 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Canto, C. M. Herrera, M. Medrano, R. Perez, and I. M. Garcia
Pollinator foraging modifies nectar sugar composition in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae):An experimental test
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. Canto, R. Perez, M. Medrano, M. C. Castellanos, and C. M. Herrera
Intra-plant Variation in Nectar Sugar Composition in Two Aquilegia Species (Ranunculaceae): Contrasting Patterns under Field and Glasshouse Conditions
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2007; 99(4): 653 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.