Am. J. Bot. Subscribe to E-TOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, C. M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2006;93:531-538.)
© 2006 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Plasticity of inflorescence traits in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae) in response to soil water availability1

Christina M. Caruso2

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada

ABSTRACT

Many workers have demonstrated a genetic basis for variation in inflorescence traits, but this variation can also have an environmental component. Because flowering can incur significant water costs, I estimated plasticity of inflorescence traits of three populations of Lobelia siphilitica in response to drought. I manipulated soil water availability in the greenhouse and measured seven inflorescence traits. Under drought conditions, plants from one population flowered later and produced fewer flowers with shorter corollas and narrower landing pads. In contrast, the height of the flowering stalk decreased in response to drought in all three populations. Consequently, pollinator-mediated natural selection on these plastic traits may depend on soil water availability. Plastic responses differed between genotypes only for the height of the flowering stalk and the length of the corolla tube and only in one or two populations. This suggests that genotype x environment interactions would not limit the evolution of inflorescence traits in L. siphilitica. The strength and sign of phenotypic correlations among inflorescence traits did not respond plastically to drought, suggesting that indirect selection on inflorescence traits of L. siphilitica will not vary strongly with water availability. My results suggest that plasticity of inflorescence traits may influence their evolution, but the effects are population- and trait-specific.

Key Words: drought • inflorescence • Lobelia siphilitica • phenotypic plasticity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2006
J. Exp. Bot., April 20, 2007; (2007) erm028v2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.