HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (29) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Knight, T. M Articles by Ashman, T.-L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Knight, T. M Articles by Ashman, T.-L. Agricola Articles by Knight, T. M Articles by Ashman, T.-L. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation¹

²National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California 93101 USA; and ³Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 USA

ABSTRACT

Our understanding of pollen limitation depends on a realistic view of its magnitude. Previous reviews of pollen supplementation experiments concluded that a majority of plant species suffers from pollen limitation and that its magnitude is high. Here, we perform a meta-analysis and find evidence that publication bias, experimental design, and the response variable chosen all influence the magnitude of pollen limitation. Fail-safe numbers indicate that publication bias exists for some measures of pollen limitation; significant results are more likely to be published and therefore available for review. Moreover, experiments conducted on only a fraction of a plant's flowers and reproductive episodes report ~8-fold higher effect sizes than those on all flowers produced over the entire lifetime, likely because resource reallocation among flowers and across years contributes to estimates of pollen limitation. Studies measuring percentage fruit set report higher values of pollen limitation than those measuring other response variables, such as seeds per fruit, perhaps because many plant species will not produce fruits unless adequate pollen receipt occurs to fertilize most ovules. We offer suggestions for reducing the bias introduced by methodology in pollen supplementation experiments and discuss our results in the context of optimality theory.

Key Words: life history trade-off • meta-analysis • pollen limitation • pollination • plant reproduction

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. D. Harder and M. A. Aizen Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2010; 365(1539): 529 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Vaughton and M. Ramsey Floral emasculation reveals pollen quality limitation of seed output in Bulbine bulbosa (Asphodelaceae)1 Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2010; 97(1): 174 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Munguia-Rosas, V. J. Sosa, M. M. Ojeda, and J. A. De-Nova Specialization clines in the pollination systems of agaves (Agavaceae) and columnar cacti (Cactaceae): A phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2009; 96(10): 1887 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Harmon-Threatt, J. H. Burns, L. A. Shemyakina, and T. M. Knight Breeding system and pollination ecology of introduced plants compared to their native relatives Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1544 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Elliott and R. E. Irwin Effects of flowering plant density on pollinator visitation, pollen receipt, and seed production in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae) Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 912 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-M. Klein, B. E Vaissiere, J. H Cane, I. Steffan-Dewenter, S. A Cunningham, C. Kremen, and T. Tscharntke Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2007; 274(1608): 303 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Brys, H. Jacquemyn, and M. Hermy Impact of mate availability, population size, and spatial aggregation of morphs on sexual reproduction in a distylous, aquatic plant Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2007; 94(1): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]