Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, T. M
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, T.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Knight, T. M
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, T.-L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Knight, T. M
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, T.-L.
(American Journal of Botany. 2006;93:271-277.)
© 2006 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation1

Tiffany M Knight4, Janette A Steets5 and Tia-Lynn Ashman

2National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California 93101 USA; and 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 USA

ABSTRACT

Our understanding of pollen limitation depends on a realistic view of its magnitude. Previous reviews of pollen supplementation experiments concluded that a majority of plant species suffers from pollen limitation and that its magnitude is high. Here, we perform a meta-analysis and find evidence that publication bias, experimental design, and the response variable chosen all influence the magnitude of pollen limitation. Fail-safe numbers indicate that publication bias exists for some measures of pollen limitation; significant results are more likely to be published and therefore available for review. Moreover, experiments conducted on only a fraction of a plant's flowers and reproductive episodes report ~8-fold higher effect sizes than those on all flowers produced over the entire lifetime, likely because resource reallocation among flowers and across years contributes to estimates of pollen limitation. Studies measuring percentage fruit set report higher values of pollen limitation than those measuring other response variables, such as seeds per fruit, perhaps because many plant species will not produce fruits unless adequate pollen receipt occurs to fertilize most ovules. We offer suggestions for reducing the bias introduced by methodology in pollen supplementation experiments and discuss our results in the context of optimality theory.

Key Words: life history trade-off • meta-analysis • pollen limitation • pollination • plant reproduction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Brys, H. Jacquemyn, and M. Hermy
Impact of mate availability, population size, and spatial aggregation of morphs on sexual reproduction in a distylous, aquatic plant
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2007; 94(1): 119 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.