|
|
||||||||
Physiology and Biochemistry |
2School of Resource Management, Faculty of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 3001; 3School of Forest and Ecosystem Science, Faculty of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Australia, 3001; 4Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia, 3001
ABSTRACT
Tree stability in windstorms and tree failure are important issues in urban areas where there can be risks of damage to people and property and in forests where wind damage causes economic loss. Current methods of managing trees, including pruning and assessment of mechanical strength, are mainly based on visual assessment or the experience of people such as trained arborists. Only limited data are available to assess tree strength and stability in winds, and most recent methods have used a static approach to estimate loads. Recent research on the measurement of dynamic wind loads and the effect on tree stability is giving a better understanding of how different trees cope with winds. Dynamic loads have been measured on trees with different canopy shapes and branch structures including a palm (Washingtonia robusta), a slender Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens) and trees with many branches and broad canopies including hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii) and two species of eucalypt (Eucalyptus grandis, E. teretecornus). Results indicate that sway is not a harmonic, but is very complex due to the dynamic interaction of branches. A new dynamic model of a tree is described, incorporating the dynamic structural properties of the trunk and branches. The branch mass contributes a dynamic damping, termed mass damping, which acts to reduce dangerous harmonic sway motion of the trunk and so minimizes loads and increases the mechanical stability of the tree. The results from 12 months of monitoring sway motion and wind loading forces are presented and discussed.
Key Words: damping dynamics loads model spectrum stability tree wind
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Moulia, C. Coutand, and C. Lenne Posture control and skeletal mechanical acclimation in terrestrial plants: implications for mechanical modeling of plant architecture Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1477 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |