|
|
||||||||
Physiology and Biochemistry |
2 Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257S 1400E, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA; 3 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 4007 Valley Life Sciences, Berkeley, California 94720 USA
ABSTRACT
The wide size range of conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels has important consequences for function. In both conduit types, bigger is better for conducting efficiency. The gain in efficiency with size is maximized by the control of conduit shape, which balances end-wall and lumen resistances. Although vessels are an order of magnitude longer than tracheids of the same diameter, they are not necessarily more efficient because they lack the low end-wall resistance of tracheids with torus-margo pits. Instead, vessels gain conducting efficiency over tracheids by achieving wider maximum diameters. End-walls contributed 5664% to total xylem resistance in both conduit types, indicating that length limits conducting efficiency. Tracheid dimensions may be more limited by unicellularity and the need to supply strength to homoxylous wood than by the need to protect against cavitation. In contrast, the greater size of the multicellular vessel is facilitated by fibers that strengthen heteroxylous wood. Vessel dimensions may be most limited by the need to restrict intervessel pitting and cavitation by air-seeding. Stressful habitats that promote narrow vessels should favor coexistence of conifers and angiosperms. The evolution of vessels in angiosperm wood may have required early angiosperms to survive a phase of mechanic and hydraulic instability.
Key Words: ecological wood anatomy vascular structure and function water transport wood biomechanics xylem cavitation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Wilson, A. H. Knoll, N. M. Holbrook, and C. R. Marshall Modeling fluid flow in Medullosa, an anatomically unusual Carboniferous seed plant Paleobiology, December 1, 2008; 34(4): 472 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Cernusak, K. Winter, J. Aranda, and B. L. Turner Conifers, Angiosperm Trees, and Lianas: Growth, Whole-Plant Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency, and Stable Isotope Composition ({delta}13C and {delta}18O) of Seedlings Grown in a Tropical Environment Plant Physiology, September 1, 2008; 148(1): 642 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Domec, B. Lachenbruch, F. C. Meinzer, D. R. Woodruff, J. M. Warren, and K. A. McCulloh Maximum height in a conifer is associated with conflicting requirements for xylem design PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 12069 - 12074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Motomura, S. Noshiro, and M. Mikage Variable Wood Formation and Adaptation to the Alpine Environment of Ephedra pachyclada (Gnetales: Ephedraceae) in the Mustang District, Western Nepal Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Read and A. Stokes Plant biomechanics in an ecological context Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1546 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |