HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sperry, J. S. Articles by Pittermann, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sperry, J. S. Articles by Pittermann, J. Agricola Articles by Sperry, J. S. Articles by Pittermann, J.

Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels¹

² Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257S 1400E, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA; ³ Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 4007 Valley Life Sciences, Berkeley, California 94720 USA

ABSTRACT

The wide size range of conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels has important consequences for function. In both conduit types, bigger is better for conducting efficiency. The gain in efficiency with size is maximized by the control of conduit shape, which balances end-wall and lumen resistances. Although vessels are an order of magnitude longer than tracheids of the same diameter, they are not necessarily more efficient because they lack the low end-wall resistance of tracheids with torus-margo pits. Instead, vessels gain conducting efficiency over tracheids by achieving wider maximum diameters. End-walls contributed 56–64% to total xylem resistance in both conduit types, indicating that length limits conducting efficiency. Tracheid dimensions may be more limited by unicellularity and the need to supply strength to homoxylous wood than by the need to protect against cavitation. In contrast, the greater size of the multicellular vessel is facilitated by fibers that strengthen heteroxylous wood. Vessel dimensions may be most limited by the need to restrict intervessel pitting and cavitation by air-seeding. Stressful habitats that promote narrow vessels should favor coexistence of conifers and angiosperms. The evolution of vessels in angiosperm wood may have required early angiosperms to survive a phase of mechanic and hydraulic instability.

Key Words: ecological wood anatomy • vascular structure and function • water transport • wood biomechanics • xylem cavitation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Motomura, S. Noshiro, and M. Mikage Variable Wood Formation and Adaptation to the Alpine Environment of Ephedra pachyclada (Gnetales: Ephedraceae) in the Mustang District, Western Nepal Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Read and A. Stokes Plant biomechanics in an ecological context Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1546 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]