HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moulia, B. Articles by Lenne, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Moulia, B. Articles by Lenne, C. Agricola Articles by Moulia, B. Articles by Lenne, C.

Posture control and skeletal mechanical acclimation in terrestrial plants: implications for mechanical modeling of plant architecture¹

Group MECA, UMR 547 Physiologie Intégrée de l'Arbre Fruitier et Forestier, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique -Université Blaise Pascal, 234 Avenue du Brézet, F-63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France

ABSTRACT

Self-supporting plant stems are slender, erect structures that remain standing while growing in highly variable mechanical environments. Such ability is not merely related to an adapted mechanical design in terms of material-specific stiffness and stem tapering. As many terrestrial standing animals do, plant stems regulate posture through active and coordinated control of motor systems and acclimate their skeletal growth to prevailing loads. This analogy probably results from mechanical challenges on standing organisms in an aerial environment with low buoyancy and high turbulence. But the continuous growth of plants submits them to a greater challenge. In response to these challenges, land plants implemented mixed skeletal and motor functions in the same anatomical elements. There are two types of kinematic design: (1) plants with localized active movement (arthrophytes) and (2) plants with continuously distributed active movements (contortionists). The control of these active supporting systems involves gravi- and mechanoperception, but little is known about their coordination at the whole plant level. This more active view of the control of plant growth and form has been insufficiently considered in the modeling of plant architecture. Progress in our understanding of plant posture and mechanical acclimation will require new biomechanical models of plant architectural development.

Key Words: architecture • biomechanics • equilibration • grasses • gravitropism • mechanosensing • modeling • trees

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Sellier and T. Fourcaud Crown structure and wood properties: Influence on tree sway and response to high winds Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 885 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Moulia and M. Fournier The power and control of gravitropic movements in plants: a biomechanical and systems biology view J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2009; 60(2): 461 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Rodriguez, E. d. Langre, and B. Moulia A scaling law for the effects of architecture and allometry on tree vibration modes suggests a biological tuning to modal compartmentalization Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2008; 95(12): 1523 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Lundstrom, T. Jonas, and A. Volkwein Analysing the mechanical performance and growth adaptation of Norway spruce using a non-linear finite-element model and experimental data J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2513 - 2528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fourcaud, X. Zhang, A. Stokes, H. Lambers, and C. Korner Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The Increasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1053 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]