HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Telewski, F. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Telewski, F. W. Agricola Articles by Telewski, F. W.

A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants¹

W. J. Beal Botanical Garden, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA

ABSTRACT

The perception of mechanical stimuli in the environment is crucial to the survival of all living organisms. Recent advances have led to the proposal of a plant-specific mechanosensory network within plant cells that is similar to the previously described network in animal systems. This sensory network is the basis for a unifying hypothesis, which may account for the perception of numerous mechanical signals including gravitropic, thigmomorphic, thigmotropic, self-loading, growth strains, turgor pressure, xylem pressure potential, and sound. The current state of our knowledge of a mechanosensory network in plants is reviewed, and two mechanoreceptor models are considered: a plasmodesmata-based cytoskeleton–plasma membrane–cell wall (CPMCW) network vs. stretch-activated ion channels. Post-mechanosensory physiological responses to mechanical stresses are also reviewed, and future research directions in the area of mechanoperception and response are recommended.

Key Words: gravitropism • gravity • mechanoperception • sound • thigmomorphogenesis • thigmotropism • turgor pressure • wind

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. C. Nicoll, B. A. Gardiner, and A. J. Peace Improvements in anchorage provided by the acclimation of forest trees to wind stress Forestry, June 30, 2008; (2008) cpn021v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Lundstrom, T. Jonas, and A. Volkwein Analysing the mechanical performance and growth adaptation of Norway spruce using a non-linear finite-element model and experimental data J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2513 - 2528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Coutand, C. Dupraz, G. Jaouen, S. Ploquin, and B. Adam Mechanical Stimuli Regulate the Allocation of Biomass in Trees: Demonstration with Young Prunus avium Trees Ann. Bot., June 1, 2008; 101(9): 1421 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Moulia, C. Coutand, and C. Lenne Posture control and skeletal mechanical acclimation in terrestrial plants: implications for mechanical modeling of plant architecture Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1477 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]