Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgert, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burgert, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burgert, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
(American Journal of Botany. 2006;93:1391-1401.)
© 2006 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Physiology and Biochemistry

Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls1

Ingo Burgert2

Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, Research Campus Golm, 14424 Potsdam, Germany

ABSTRACT

Plants are hierarchically organized in a way that their macroscopic properties emerge from their micro- and nanostructural level. Hence, micromechanical investigations, which focus on the mechanical design of plant cell walls, are well suited for elucidating the details of the relationship between plant form and function. However, due to the complex nature of primary and secondary cell walls, micromechanical tests on the entire structure cannot provide exact values for polymer properties but must be targeted at the general mechanisms of cell wall deformation and polymer interaction. The success of micromechanical examinations depends on well-considered specimen selection and/or sample pretreatment as well as appropriate experimental setups. Making use of structural differences by taking advantage of the natural variability in plant tissue and cell structure, adaptation strategies can be analyzed at the micro- and nanoscale. Targeted genetic and enzymatic treatments can be utilized to specifically modify individual polymers without degrading the structural integrity of the cell wall. The mechanical properties of such artificial systems reveal the functional roles of individual polymers for a better understanding of the mechanical interactions within the cell wall assembly. In terms of testing methodology, in situ methods that combine micromechanical testing with structural and chemical analyses are particularly well suited for the study of the basic structure–property relationships in plant design. The micromechanical approaches reviewed here are not exhaustive, but they do provide a reasonably comprehensive overview of the methodology with which the general mechanisms underlying the functionality of plant micro- and nanostructure can be explored without destroying the entire cell wall.

Key Words: genetic modification • in situ methods • micromechanics • microtensile tests • natural variability • primary cell wall • secondary cell wall • structure–function relationships


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
I. Burgert and P. Fratzl
Plants control the properties and actuation of their organs through the orientation of cellulose fibrils in their cell walls
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 49(1): 69 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
I. Burgert and P. Fratzl
Actuation systems in plants as prototypes for bioinspired devices
Phil Trans R Soc A, April 28, 2009; 367(1893): 1541 - 1557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. J. Mellerowicz, P. Immerzeel, and T. Hayashi
Xyloglucan: The Molecular Muscle of Trees
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2008; 102(5): 659 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Ruggeberg, T. Speck, O. Paris, C. Lapierre, B. Pollet, G. Koch, and I. Burgert
Stiffness gradients in vascular bundles of the palm Washingtonia robusta
Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2008; 275(1648): 2221 - 2229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. M. Cavalier, O. Lerouxel, L. Neumetzler, K. Yamauchi, A. Reinecke, G. Freshour, O. A. Zabotina, M. G. Hahn, I. Burgert, M. Pauly, et al.
Disrupting Two Arabidopsis thaliana Xylosyltransferase Genes Results in Plants Deficient in Xyloglucan, a Major Primary Cell Wall Component
PLANT CELL, June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1519 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent
Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.