Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ickert-Bond, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ickert-Bond, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ickert-Bond, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1234-1255.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Anatomy and Morphology

Comparative infructescence morphology in Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) and its evolutionary significance1

Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond2,3,5, Kathleen B. Pigg3 and Jun Wen2,4

2Department of Botany, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496 USA; 3School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501 USA; 4Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany and Herbarium, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093 People's Republic of China

ABSTRACT

The sweet gum genus Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) has two species in eastern Asia, one in eastern North America, and one in western Asia. Mature infructescences are studied to provide anatomical, morphological, and micromorphological details, some of which are newly recognized. Homology is suggested between extrafloral spinose processes of L. formosana and L. acalycina, braid-like ornamentation of L. styraciflua, and broad intercarpellate areas of L. orientalis. Morphology, position, number, and the presence of similar structures in the closely related Hamamelidaceae s.s. support their derivation from sterile flowers. Morphological cladistic analysis using 43 characters supports the monophyly of Liquidambar with Altingia as its sister. The matK analysis contrastingly places Altingia sister to the L. acalycinaL. formosana clade, rendering Liquidambar paraphyletic. Discordance between morphological and matK data sets may result from both different rates of morphological evolution and convergence. Several similarities between Altingia and L. acalycina are symplesiomorphic in the morphological cladistic analysis. Microaltingia apocarpela, from the Cretaceous of eastern North America, documents the earliest known fossil divergence within Altingiaceae. The Miocene Liquidambar changii of western North America is sister to a clade of extant Liquidambar species. Consideration of this fossil evidence reveals complex intercontinental biogeographic disjunctions in Altingiaceae.

Key Words: Altingiaceae • biogeography • infructescence • Liquidambar • phylogeny




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. M. Ickert-Bond, K. B. Pigg, and J. Wen
Comparative infructescence morphology in Altingia (Altingiaceae) and discordance between morphological and molecular phylogenies
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1094 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.