Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1102-1113.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Mechanisms for tolerating freeze–thaw stress of two evergreen chaparral species: Rhus ovata and Malosma laurina (Anacardiaceae)1

R. B. Pratt2,4, F. W. Ewers3, M. C. Lawson2, A. L. Jacobsen3, M. M. Brediger2 and S. D. Davis2

2Natural Science Division, Pepperdine University, Malibu, California 90263 USA; 3Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA

ABSTRACT

The response to freeze–thaw stress was examined for two co-occurring evergreen species, Malosma laurina and Rhus ovata. Laboratory and field experiments on adults and seedlings were made in the spring and winter in 1996 and again on adults in 2003 and 2004. Laboratory and field results indicated that the stem xylem for adults of M. laurina and R. ovata were similarly susceptible to freezing-induced cavitation (percentage loss of conductivity = 92 ± 2.6% for R. ovata and 90 ± 4.2% for M. laurina at ≤ –6°C). In contrast, leaves of M. laurina were more susceptible to freezing injury than leaves of R. ovata. Among seedlings in the field, leaves of M. laurina exhibited freezing injury at –4°C and total shoot mortality at –7.2°C, whereas co-occurring seedlings of R. ovata were uninjured. Surprisingly, R. ovata tolerates high levels of freezing-induced xylem embolism in the field, an apparently rare condition among evergreen plants. Rhus ovata avoids desiccation when xylem embolism is high by exhibiting low minimum leaf conductance compared to M. laurina. These results suggest a link between minimum leaf conductance and stem hydraulics as a mechanism permitting the persistence of an evergreen leaf habit in freezing environments.

Key Words: Anacardiaceae • California • cavitation • chaparral • embolism • Malosma laurinaRhus ovata • xylem


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. Valladares, J. Zaragoza-Castells, D. Sanchez-Gomez, S. Matesanz, B. Alonso, A. Portsmuth, A. Delgado, and O. K. Atkin
Is Shade Beneficial for Mediterranean Shrubs Experiencing Periods of Extreme Drought and Late-winter Frosts?
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2008; 102(6): 923 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. L. Jacobsen, F. W. Ewers, R. B. Pratt, W. A. Paddock III, and S. D. Davis
Do Xylem Fibers Affect Vessel Cavitation Resistance?
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2005; 139(1): 546 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.