HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ashman, T.-L. Articles by King, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ashman, T.-L. Articles by King, E. A. Agricola Articles by Ashman, T.-L. Articles by King, E. A.

Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry¹

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 USA; and Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, Linesville, Pennsylvania 16424 USA

ABSTRACT

Ants are common flower visitors, but their effects on plant reproductive fitness have not often been assessed. Flower-visiting ants were studied to determine whether they are antagonists or mutualists and whether they could influence floral or breeding system evolution in gynodioecious wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana). Ant and flying pollinator (bees/flies) access to plants was manipulated, and visitation, fruit, and seed set were assessed. Ants visited flowers of hermaphrodites more often than those of females when bees and flies were excluded, but visited the sex morphs equally when they were present. Insect class did not influence fruit or seed set of hermaphrodites. In contrast, ants had both positive and negative effects on seed set in females. Females visited only by ants had 90% of the seed set of those visited only by bees/flies, and their seed set increased with ant visitation. The spatial pattern of seed set, however, suggests that ants may also damage pistils. Lastly, in contrast to bees and flies, ants failed to increase visitation with floral display size, suggesting that ant presence at flowers could reduce selection on this attractive trait. Findings suggest that when in high abundance, flower-visiting ants could affect breeding system and floral evolution in this gynodioecious plant.

Key Words: ant–plant interaction • ant pollination • floral evolution • Fragaria virginiana • gynodioecy • pollination • Rosaceae • sexual dimorphism

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Alonso, P. Mutikainen, and C. M. Herrera Ecological Context of Breeding System Variation: Sex, Size and Pollination in a (Predominantly) Gynodioecious Shrub Ann. Bot., December 1, 2007; 100(7): 1547 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]