Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asikainen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mutikainen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Asikainen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mutikainen, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Asikainen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mutikainen, P.
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:487-494.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Pollen and resource limitation in a gynodioecious species1

Eija Asikainen2,4 and Pia Mutikainen3

2Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland; 3Department of Biology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland

Differences between plant sex morphs in pollen or resource availability may affect their relative fitness and thereby the sex ratio of dimorphic species. In gynodioecious species, in which hermaphroditic and female plants coexist, a variety of factors (e.g., hermaphrodite self-fertility or rarity or pollinator discrimination against females) might be expected to lead to stronger pollen limitation in females than in hermaphrodites. On the other hand, females have been found to be superior compared to hermaphrodites in low-nutrient conditions. The effects of supplemental hand-pollination and resource addition on the reproductive output of the self-fertile gynodioecious perennial Geranium sylvaticum (Geraniaceae) were tested for several populations that differ in their female frequency (4.4–23.0%). Both pollen and resource availability limited fruit set and the number of seeds produced per plant; however, seed set (i.e., the number of seeds produced per fruit) was limited only by resources. Because pollen limitation in females did not correlate with female frequency, our results suggest that pollen limitation in females does not depend on the frequency of the pollen-producing hermaphrodites. Furthermore, because pollen and resource availability limited reproductive output of both sex morphs, these factors may not contribute significantly to maintenance and evolution of gynodioecy in G. sylvaticum.

Key Words: Geraniaceae • Geranium sylvaticum • gynodioecy • pollen limitation • resource limitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S.-M. Chang
Gender-specific inbreeding depression in a gynodioecious plant, Geranium maculatum (Geraniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1193 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. Ne'eman, R. Ne'eman, and A. M. Ellison
Limits to reproductive success of Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1660 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S.-M. Chang
Female compensation through the quantity and quality of progeny in a gynodioecious plant, Geranium maculatum (Geraniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2006; 93(2): 263 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Lopez-Villavicencio, B. J. Genton, E. Porcher, and J. A. Shykoff
The role of pollination level on the reproduction of females and hermaphrodites in the gynodioecious plant Gypsophila repens (Caryophyllaceae)
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2005; 92(12): 1995 - 2002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.