Am. J. Bot. Subscribe to E-TOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. W.
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1929-1932.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Brief Communication

Problems in measuring among-family variation in inbreeding depression1

Charles W. Fox2

Department of Entomology, S-225 Ag Science Center North, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091 USA

Understanding the sources of variation in inbreeding depression within populations is important for understanding the evolution of selfing rates. At the population level, inbreeding depression is due to decreased heterozygosity caused by inbreeding, which decreases overdominance and increases the frequency of expression of recessive deleterious alleles. However, within individual families inbreeding has two distinct consequences: it reduces heterozygosity and it restricts the alleles present in offspring to those present in the parent. Outcrossing both increases heterozygosity and brings new alleles into a family (compared to the alleles present if the plant is self-pollinated). Both consequences of inbreeding affect offspring fitness, but the most common experimental design used to measure among-family variation in inbreeding depression cannot distinguish them. The result is that variance in inbreeding depression among families is confounded by genetic variation in the traits being measured. Also, correlations (among families) between measures of inbreeding depression or between inbreeding depression and mean trait values are confounded by genetic variation in the traits being measured. I conclude that more complex crossing designs that allow estimation of breeding values for individual families are required to accurately detect and measure among-family variation in inbreeding depression.

Key Words: genetic variation • inbreeding depression • mating systems • outcrossing • selfing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S.-M. Chang
Gender-specific inbreeding depression in a gynodioecious plant, Geranium maculatum (Geraniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1193 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. W. Fox, K. L. Scheibly, W. G. Wallin, L. J. Hitchcock, R. C. Stillwell, and B. P. Smith
The Genetic Architecture of Life Span and Mortality Rates: Gender and Species Differences in Inbreeding Load of Two Seed-Feeding Beetles
Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 763 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.