Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harder, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harder, L. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harder, L. D.
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1862-1870.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Functional associations of floret and inflorescence traits among grass species1

Jannice Friedman2 and Lawrence D. Harder

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

ABSTRACT

The aerodynamics of wind pollination selects for an intimate relation between form and function in anemophilous plants. Inflorescence architecture and floral morphology vary extensively within the Poaceae, but the functional implication of this variation remains largely unknown. Here we quantify associations between floret, culm, and inflorescence characteristics for 25 grass species in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, and consider whether different architectures may implement unique mechanisms to aid pollination. The species cluster into four categories defined by all combinations of floret size (small vs. large) and inflorescence architecture (compact vs. diffuse). Species differed significantly for all 18 traits that we measured, with 12 traits differing only between floret-size classes, three differing only between inflorescence types, and three differing among both (independently or by an interaction). Based on these morphological associations, we discuss the aerodynamic and functional consequences of each category for wind pollination. The independence of inflorescence and floral traits has probably allowed exploration of all possible combinations of inflorescence architecture and floret size during the evolution of the Poaceae.

Key Words: aerodynamics • floret size • inflorescence architecture • Poaceae • pollen dispersal • wind pollination




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. G. Weller, A. K. Sakai, T. M. Culley, D. R. Campbell, P. Ngo, and A. K. Dunbar-Wallis
Sexually dimorphic inflorescence traits in a wind-pollinated species: heritabilities and genetic correlations in Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1716 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. Barthelemy and Y. Caraglio
Plant Architecture: A Dynamic, Multilevel and Comprehensive Approach to Plant Form, Structure and Ontogeny
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 375 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.