HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data A correction has been published Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (39) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Soltis, D. E. Articles by Soltis, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Soltis, D. E. Articles by Soltis, P. S. Agricola Articles by Soltis, D. E. Articles by Soltis, P. S.

Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast¹

²Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; ³Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA

The sequence of the plastid genome of Amborella trichopoda, the putative sister to all other extant angiosperms, was recently reported (Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1499–1505). Goremykin et al. used sequence data for 61 plastid genes from Amborella and 12 other embryophytes in phylogenetic analyses and concluded that Amborella is not the sister to the remaining flowering plants; the monocots instead occupy this position. The authors attributed their results, which differ substantially from all recent phylogenetic analyses of angiosperms, to the increased character sampling (30 017 nucleotides in their aligned matrix) in their analysis relative to published studies that included fewer genes but more taxa. We hypothesized that the difference in topology is not due to limited character sampling in previous studies but to limited taxon sampling in the analysis by Goremykin et al. To test this, we conducted a series of phylogenetic analyses using a three-gene, 12 (or more)-taxon data set to evaluate the topological effects of (i) including three vs. 61 genes for (nearly) the same set of taxa, (ii) analyzing different codon positions, (iii) substituting representatives of other basal lineages for Amborella, (iv) replacing the grasses used to represent the monocots with other monocots, selected either for their phylogenetic position or randomly, and (v) adding other basal taxa—Nymphaea, Austrobaileya, magnoliids, and monocots—to the 12-taxon data set. Our results demonstrate that the "monocots basal" topology obtained by Goremykin et al. is not due to increased character sampling of the plastid genome; their topology was obtained using only two plastid genes or two plastid genes and one nuclear gene. This topology was also retained when either Nymphaea or Austrobaileya was substituted for Amborella, demonstrating that any of the three basal lineages will attach to Calycanthus for lack of any other close branch. Furthermore, the "monocots basal" topology is not robust to changes in sampling of monocots. Simply adding Oncidium, for example, places Amborella sister to the other angiosperms. Thus, limited taxon sampling, focusing on organisms with complete genome sequences, can lead to artifactual results.

Key Words: Amborella • angiosperm phylogeny • basal angiosperms • taxon sampling • plastid DNA

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. K. Jansen, Z. Cai, L. A. Raubeson, H. Daniell, C. W. dePamphilis, J. Leebens-Mack, K. F. Muller, M. Guisinger-Bellian, R. C. Haberle, A. K. Hansen, et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19369 - 19374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Theissen and R. Melzer Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Origin and Diversification of the Angiosperm Flower Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 603 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Barthet and K. W. Hilu Expression of matK: functional and evolutionary implications Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1402 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-C. Chang, H.-C. Lin, I-P. Lin, T.-Y. Chow, H.-H. Chen, W.-H. Chen, C.-H. Cheng, C.-Y. Lin, S.-M. Liu, C.-C. Chang, et al. The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with that of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 279 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Leebens-Mack, L. A. Raubeson, L. Cui, J. V. Kuehl, M. H. Fourcade, T. W. Chumley, J. L. Boore, R. K. Jansen, and C. W. dePamphilis Identifying the Basal Angiosperm Node in Chloroplast Genome Phylogenies: Sampling One's Way Out of the Felsenstein Zone Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 1948 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Edwards, R. Nyffeler, and M. J. Donoghue Basal cactus phylogeny: implications of Pereskia (Cactaceae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life form Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2005; 92(7): 1177 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Zahn, J. Leebens-Mack, C. W. dePamphilis, H. Ma, and G. Theissen To B or Not to B a Flower: The Role of DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA Orthologs in the Evolution of the Angiosperms J. Hered., May 1, 2005; 96(3): 225 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rokas and S. B. Carroll More Genes or More Taxa? The Relative Contribution of Gene Number and Taxon Number to Phylogenetic Accuracy Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1337 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ane, J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, and M. J. Sanderson Covarion Structure in Plastid Genome Evolution: A New Statistical Test Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 914 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]