Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Small, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Small, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Small, R. L.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:985-996.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics

Addressing the "hardest puzzle in American pomology:" Phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions1

Joey Shaw2 and Randall L. Small

Department of Botany, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USA

Prunus subg. Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) is a North American taxon with 17 commonly recognized taxa. To test the hypothesis of monophyly for the section we sequenced the trnG and rpL16 introns and the trnH-psbA and trnS-trnG intergenic spacers for at least two representatives of each of the five subgenera in Prunus. Additionally we sampled heavily among Prunus subg. Prunus sections Prunus and Armeniaca and Prunus subg. Amygdalus because these groups are putatively most closely related to Prunocerasus. Once monophyly of sect. Prunocerasus was shown we added the sequences of trnL and rpS16 introns and the trnL-trnF spacer in an attempt to increase resolution within the section. The species of sect. Prunocerasus showed an initial split with P. subcordata, the only species from western North America, sister to the rest of the group. The remaining species fell into three primary clades. Within each of the three primary clades there was little phylogenetic resolution. Lastly, we present evidence that P. texana, previously classified in subg. Amygdalus, may be a plum or at least contain a Prunocerasus chloroplast. This is the first phylogenetic hypothesis presented for sect. Prunocerasus, and the clades recovered contrast sharply with previously defined groups based on morphological characters.

Key Words: Amygdaloideae • Amygdalus • chloroplast DNA • Euprunus • Plum • PrunocerasusPrunus • Rosaceae




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
L. Depypere, P. Chaerle, K. V. Mijnsbrugge, and P. Goetghebeur
Stony Endocarp Dimension and Shape Variation in Prunus Section Prunus
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2007; 100(7): 1585 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
Q. Liu, P. M. Peterson, J. T. Columbus, N. Zhao, G. Hao, and D. Zhang
Inflorescence diversification in the "finger millet clade" (Chloridoideae, Poaceae): a comparison of molecular phylogeny and developmental morphology
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1230 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Shaw and R. L. Small
Chloroplast DNA phylogeny and phylogeography of the North American plums (Prunus subgenus Prunus section Prunocerasus, Rosaceae)
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2005; 92(12): 2011 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small
The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.