HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Caris, P. L. Articles by Smets, E. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Caris, P. L. Articles by Smets, E. F. Agricola Articles by Caris, P. L. Articles by Smets, E. F. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

A floral ontogenetic study on the sister group relationship between the genus Samolus (Primulaceae) and the Theophrastaceae¹

Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Institute of Botany and Microbiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

The former Primulales used to be subdivided into the woody Theophrastaceae and Myrsinaceae, from the tropics and subtropics, and the herbaceous Primulaceae, which are mainly found in the temperate regions of the northern hemisphere. Recent analyses based on morphological as well as molecular data revealed a close relationship between the genus Samolus L. of Primulaceae and the monophyletic family Theophrastaceae. We studied the floral development of six species from four different genera of Theophrastaceae and compared it to floral ontogenetical data of Samolus valerandi L. to find support for a close relationship. Samolus and the members of Theophrastaceae share the presence of staminodes and a similar development of the placenta and the ovules. Apart from the different habit and distribution, however, we also observed some major differences between both lineages, such as the absence of common primordia in Theophrastaceae, the development of a gynoecial cap in Samolus, and the difference in development, shape, and structure of the staminodes. Therefore, we propose to keep Samolus separated from the genera of the Theophrastaceae, and we suggest that it be raised to family level.

Key Words: Ericales • floral ontogeny • morphology • Primulaceae • Samolus • scanning electron microscopy (SEM) • Theophrastaceae

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Viaene, D. Vekemans, V. F. Irish, A. Geeraerts, S. Huysmans, S. Janssens, E. Smets, and K. Geuten Pistillata--Duplications as a Mode for Floral Diversification in (Basal) Asterids Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2009; 26(11): 2627 - 2645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Bello, J. A. Hawkins, P. J. Rudall, M. A. Bello, J. A. Hawkins, and P. J. Rudall Floral Morphology and Development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the Species-poor Relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae Ann. Bot., June 1, 2008; 101(9): 1433 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Bello, J. A. Hawkins, P. J. Rudall, M. A. Bello, J. A. Hawkins, and P. J. Rudall Floral Morphology and Development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the Species-poor Relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 483 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Bello, J. A. Hawkins, and P. J. Rudall Floral Morphology and Development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the Species-poor Relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae Ann. Bot., December 1, 2007; 100(7): 1491 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Prenner and P. J. Rudall Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ flower inflorescence boundary Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1612 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Mayr and A. Weber Calceolariaceae: floral development and systematic implications Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2006; 93(3): 327 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]