HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cooley, A. M. Articles by Rundel, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cooley, A. M. Articles by Rundel, P. Agricola Articles by Cooley, A. M. Articles by Rundel, P. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Leaf support biomechanics of neotropical understory herbs¹

²Organization for Tropical Studies, La Selva Biological Station, Interlink 341, P.O. Box 02-5635, Miami, Florida 33102-5635 USA; ³Department of Organismal Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 USA

Plants in light-limited tropical rainforest understories face an important carbon allocation trade-off: investment of available carbon into photosynthetic tissue should be advantageous, while risk of damage and mortality from falling debris favors investment into nonphotosynthetic structural tissue. We examined the modulus of rupture (_max), Young's modulus of elasticity (E), and flexural stiffness (F) of stems and petioles in 14 monocot species from six families. These biomechanical properties were evaluated with respect to habitat, rates of leaf production, clonality, and growth form. Species with higher E and _max, indicating greater resistance per unit area to bending and breaking, respectively, tended to be shade-tolerant, slow growing, and nonclonal. This result is consistent with an increase in carbon allocation to structural tissue in shade-tolerant species at the expense of photosynthetic tissue and growth. Forest- edge species were weaker per unit area (had a lower E), but had higher flexural stiffness due to increases in stem and petiole diameter. While this is inefficient in requiring more carbon per unit of structural support, it may enable forest-edge species to support larger and heavier leaves. Our results emphasize the degree to which biomechanical traits vary with ecological niche and illustrate suites of characteristics associated with different carbon allocation strategies.

Key Words: biomechanics • herb • modulus of elasticity • modulus of rupture • monocot • petiole • stem • understory

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Vernescu and P. Ryser Constraints on leaf structural traits in wetland plants Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1068 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Matlaga and C. C. Horvitz Growth and survival across a gap-understory gradient: Contrast in performance of sexually vs. clonally produced offspring Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2009; 96(2): 439 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Etnier and P. J. Villani Differences in mechanical and structural properties of surface and aerial petioles of the aquatic plant Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa (Nymphaeaceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1067 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Bruna and M. B. N. Ribeiro The compensatory responses of an understory herb to experimental damage are habitat-dependent Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2005; 92(12): 2101 - 2106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]