Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


  Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter
What's this?
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow HTML Page - index.htslp
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gobeille Rogers, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gobeille Rogers, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gobeille Rogers, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:1939-1943.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Brief Communication

Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding?1

W. Scott Armbruster2,3,4,5 and Denise Gobeille Rogers2,6

2Institute of Arctic Biology and Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA; 3Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 4School of Biological Sciences, King Henry Building, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK

We hypothesize that floral features promoting pollen competition in angiosperms may have evolved, in some cases, in response to selection generated by the negative effects of inbreeding, at least in plants with mixed-mating systems. Screening of haploid genotypes through pollen competition may purge recessive (or additive) deleterious alleles that are expressed in haploid pollen and hence may reduce the fitness cost of self-pollination, geitonogamy, or biparental inbreeding. We tested one prediction of this hypothesis, that offspring produced by more intense competition among self-pollen have higher fitness than offspring produced by less intense competition. Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae) flowers were pollinated with pollen from other flowers on the same plant (geitonogamous self-fertilization). Those flowers experiencing more intense pollen competition as a result of low pollen dispersion (positional variance) on the stigma produced heavier seeds and seedlings with faster-growing radicles than flowers experiencing less intense pollen competition (high pollen dispersion), as predicted by our hypothesis.

Key Words: Dalechampia scandens • Euphorbiaceae • genetic load • inbreeding depression • male gametophyte • mating-system evolution • pollen competition


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. L. Collin, L. Penet, and J. A. Shykoff
Early inbreeding depression in the sexually polymorphic plant Dianthus sylvestris (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of selfing and biparental inbreeding among sex morphs
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2009; 96(12): 2279 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. Lankinen, J. Maad, and W. S. Armbruster
Pollen-tube growth rates in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): one-donor crosses reveal heritability but no effect on sporophytic-offspring fitness
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2009; 103(6): 941 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Lankinen, W. S. Armbruster, and L. Antonsen
Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination, and mating-system evolution
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1183 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Alonso
Pollination success across an elevation and sex ratio gradient in gynodioecious Daphne laureola
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2005; 92(8): 1264 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Pelabon, M. L. Carlson, T. F. Hansen, and W. S. Armbruster
Effects of crossing distance on offspring fitness and developmental stability in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2005; 92(5): 842 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.